Potential Vorticity Inversion on a Hemisphere

Michael E. McIntyre Centre for Atmospheric Science, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Michael E. McIntyre in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Warwick A. Norton Centre for Atmospheric Science, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Warwick A. Norton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Several different kinds of accurate potential vorticity (PV) inversion operators, and the associated balanced models, are tested for the shallow water equations on a hemisphere in an attempt to approach the ultimate limitations of the balance, inversion, and slow-manifold concepts. The accuracies achieved are far higher than for standard balanced models accurate to one or two orders in Rossby number R or Froude number F (where F = |u|/c; |u| = flow speed; and c = gravity wave speed). Numerical inversions, and corresponding balanced-model integrations testing cumulative accuracy, are carried out for cases that include substantial PV anomalies in the Tropics. The balanced models in question are constructed so as to be exactly PV conserving and to have unique velocity fields (implying, incidentally, that they cannot be Hamiltonian). Mean layer depths of 1 and 2 km are tested.

The results show that, in the cases studied, the dynamical information contained in PV distributions is remarkably close to being complete even though R = ∞ at the equator and even though local maximum Froude numbers, Fmax, approach unity in some cases. For example, in a 10-day integration of the balanced model corresponding to one of the most accurate inversion operators, “third-order normal mode inversion,” the mean depth was 1 km, the minimum depth less than 0.5 km, and Fmax ≃ 0.7, hardly small in comparison with unity. At the end of 10 days of integration, the cumulative rms error in the layer depth was less than 15 m, that is, less than 5% of the typical rms spatial variation of 310 m. At the end of the first day of integration the rms error was 5 m, that is, less than 2%. Here “error” refers to a comparison between the results of a balanced integration and those of a corresponding primitive equation integration initialized to have low gravity wave activity on day 0. Contour maps of the PV distributions remained almost indistinguishable by eye over the 10-day period. This remarkable cumulative accuracy, far beyond anything that could have been expected from standard scale analysis, is probably related to the weakness of the spontaneous-adjustment emission or “Lighthill radiation” studied in the companion paper by

* Current affiliation: Department of Atmospheric Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Corresponding author address: Dr. M. E. McIntyre, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, United Kingdom.

Email: mem@damtp.cam.ac.uk

Abstract

Several different kinds of accurate potential vorticity (PV) inversion operators, and the associated balanced models, are tested for the shallow water equations on a hemisphere in an attempt to approach the ultimate limitations of the balance, inversion, and slow-manifold concepts. The accuracies achieved are far higher than for standard balanced models accurate to one or two orders in Rossby number R or Froude number F (where F = |u|/c; |u| = flow speed; and c = gravity wave speed). Numerical inversions, and corresponding balanced-model integrations testing cumulative accuracy, are carried out for cases that include substantial PV anomalies in the Tropics. The balanced models in question are constructed so as to be exactly PV conserving and to have unique velocity fields (implying, incidentally, that they cannot be Hamiltonian). Mean layer depths of 1 and 2 km are tested.

The results show that, in the cases studied, the dynamical information contained in PV distributions is remarkably close to being complete even though R = ∞ at the equator and even though local maximum Froude numbers, Fmax, approach unity in some cases. For example, in a 10-day integration of the balanced model corresponding to one of the most accurate inversion operators, “third-order normal mode inversion,” the mean depth was 1 km, the minimum depth less than 0.5 km, and Fmax ≃ 0.7, hardly small in comparison with unity. At the end of 10 days of integration, the cumulative rms error in the layer depth was less than 15 m, that is, less than 5% of the typical rms spatial variation of 310 m. At the end of the first day of integration the rms error was 5 m, that is, less than 2%. Here “error” refers to a comparison between the results of a balanced integration and those of a corresponding primitive equation integration initialized to have low gravity wave activity on day 0. Contour maps of the PV distributions remained almost indistinguishable by eye over the 10-day period. This remarkable cumulative accuracy, far beyond anything that could have been expected from standard scale analysis, is probably related to the weakness of the spontaneous-adjustment emission or “Lighthill radiation” studied in the companion paper by

* Current affiliation: Department of Atmospheric Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Corresponding author address: Dr. M. E. McIntyre, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, United Kingdom.

Email: mem@damtp.cam.ac.uk

Save
  • Allen, J. S., 1993: Iterated geostrophic intermediate models. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,23, 2447–2461.

  • ——, and D. D. Holm, 1996: Extended-geostrophic Hamiltonian models for rotating shallow water motion. Physica,98D, 229–248.

  • Bolin, B., 1955: Numerical forecasting with the barotropic model. Tellus,7, 27–49.

  • Bühler, O., 1998: A shallow-water model that prevents nonlinear steepening of gravity waves. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 2884–2891.

  • ——, and M. E. McIntyre, 1998: On non-dissipative wave–mean interactions in the atmosphere or oceans. J. Fluid Mech.,354, 301–343.

  • Charney, J. G., 1948: On the scale of atmospheric motions. Geofys. Publ.,17 (2), 3–17.

  • ——, 1955: The use of the primitive equations of motion in numerical prediction. Tellus,7, 22–26.

  • ——, 1962: Integration of the primitive and balance equations. Proc. Int. Symp. on Numerical Weather Prediction Tokyo, Japan, Meteorological Society of Japan, 131–152.

  • ——, 1963: A note on large-scale motions in the Tropics. J. Atmos. Sci.,20, 607–609.

  • Daley, R., 1981: Normal mode initialization. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys.,19, 450–468.

  • Errico, R. M., 1982: Normal mode initialization and the generation of gravity waves by quasi-geostrophic forcing. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 573–586.

  • Ford, R., M. E. McIntyre, and W. A. Norton, 2000: Balance and the slow quasimanifold: Some explicit results. J. Atmos. Sci.,57, 1236–1254.

  • Gent, P. R., and J. C. McWilliams, 1984: Balanced models in isentropic coordinates and the shallow water equations. Tellus,36A, 166–171.

  • Haltiner, G. J., and R. T. Williams, 1980: Numerical Prediction and Dynamic Meteorology. Wiley, 477 pp.

  • Haynes, P. H., and M. E. McIntyre, 1990: On the conservation and impermeability theorems for potential vorticity. J. Atmos. Sci.,47, 2021–2031.

  • Hinkelmann, K. H., 1969: Primitive equations. Lectures in numerical short-range weather prediction. Regional training seminar, Moscow. WMO 297, 706 pp.

  • Hoskins, B. J., 1975: The geostrophic momentum approximation and the semigeostrophic equations. J. Atmos. Sci.,32, 233–242.

  • ——, M. E. McIntyre, and A. W. Robertson, 1985: On the use and significance of isentropic potential-vorticity maps. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,111, 877–946; Corrigendum, 113, 402–404.

  • Lynch, P., 1989: The slow equations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,115, 201–219.

  • Machenhauer, B., 1977: On the dynamics of gravity oscillations in a shallow water equation model with applications to normal mode initialization. Contrib. Atmos. Phys.,50, 253–271.

  • McIntyre, M. E., and W. A. Norton, 1990a: Dissipative wave-mean interactions and the transport of vorticity or potential vorticity. J. Fluid Mech.,212, 403–435; Corrigendum, 220, 693.

  • ——, and ——, 1990b: Nonlinear vorticity or potential vorticity inversion. Topological Fluid Mechanics, H. K. Moffatt and A. Tsinober, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 355–358.

  • ——, and I. Roulstone, 1996: Hamiltonian balanced models: Constraints, slow manifolds and velocity splitting. Forecasting Research Division, Scientific Paper 41, 49 pp. [Available from U.K. Meteorological Office, Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 2SZ, United Kingdom; online at http://www.atmos-dynamics.damtp.cam.ac.uk/people/mem/.].

  • McWilliams, J. C., 1985: A uniformly valid model spanning the regimes of geostrophic and isentropic, stratified turbulence: Balanced turbulence. J. Atmos. Sci.,42, 1773–1774.

  • Mo, R., O. Bühler, and M. E. McIntyre, 1998: Permeability of the stratospheric vortex edge: On the mean mass flux due to thermally dissipating, steady, non-breaking Rossby waves. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,124, 2129–2148.

  • Norton, W. A., 1988: Balance and potential vorticity inversion in atmospheric dynamics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 167 pp. [Available from the Superintendent of Manuscripts, University Library, West Rd., Cambridge CB3 9DR, United Kingdom.].

  • Phillips, N. A., 1973: Principles of large-scale numerical weather prediction. Dynamic Meteorology, P. Morel, Ed., D. Reidel, 3–96.

  • Rossby, C. G., 1936: Dynamics of steady ocean currents in the light of experimental fluid mechanics. Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Papers in Physical Oceanography and Meteorology, Vol. 5, Issue 1, 1–43.

  • Roulstone, I., and M. J. Sewell, 1996: Potential vorticities in semi-geostrophic theory. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,122, 983–992.

  • Salmon, R., 1983: Practical use of Hamilton’s principle. J. Fluid Mech.,132, 431–444.

  • ——, 1985: New equations for nearly geostrophic flow. J. Fluid Mech.,153, 461–477.

  • ——, 1988: Semigeostrophic theory as a Dirac-bracket projection. J. Fluid Mech.,196, 345–358.

  • Shapiro, M., and S. Grønås, 1999: The Life Cycles of Extratropical Cyclones. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 359 pp.

  • Temperton, C., 1988: Implicit normal mode initialization. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 1013–1031.

  • ——, 1989: Implicit normal mode initialization for spectral models. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 436–451.

  • Tribbia, J. J., 1984: A simple scheme for high-order nonlinear normal mode initialization. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 278–284.

  • Vallis, G. K., 1996: Potential vorticity inversion and balanced equations of motion for rotating and stratified flows. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,122, 291–322.

  • Warn, T., 1997: Nonlinear balance and quasigeostrophic sets. Atmos.–Ocean,35, 135–145 (originally written in 1983).

  • ——, O. Bokhove, T. G. Shepherd, and G. K. Vallis, 1995: Rossby number expansions, slaving principles, and balance dynamics. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,121, 723–739.

  • Whitaker, J. S., 1993: A comparison of primitive and balance equation simulations of baroclinic waves. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 1519–1530.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 465 162 3
PDF Downloads 302 105 4