Broken Cloud Field Longwave-Scattering Effects

E. E. Takara Department of Meteorology, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by E. E. Takara in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
R. G. Ellingson Department of Meteorology, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by R. G. Ellingson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Throughout most of the shortwave spectrum, atmospheric gases do not absorb the abundant amount of incoming solar radiation. The shortwave-scattering albedo of clouds is very large. The combination of large amounts of incoming solar radiation, low gaseous absorptivity, and large cloud-scattering albedo enables clouds at one level of the atmosphere to affect the shortwave radiative transfer at all other atmospheric levels. Absorption by atmospheric gases is much stronger in the longwave. This localizes the effects of clouds in the longwave. Since longwave absorption is weakest in the window region (8–12 μm), cloud effects there will have the greatest chance of propagating to other levels of the atmosphere. In partially overcast conditions, individual cloud geometry and optical properties are important factors. Longwave calculations of most GCMs ignore individual cloud geometry. For liquid water clouds, the optical properties of clouds are also ignored.

Previous work in the window region by Takara and Ellingson considered opaque clouds with no absorption or emission by atmospheric gases. Under those conditions, the effect of cloud scattering was comparable to cloud geometry. In this work, the comparison of longwave scattering and geometric effects in the window region is improved by including partially transparent clouds and adding absorption and emission by atmospheric gases. The results show that for optically thick water clouds, it is sufficient to model the geometry; scattering can be neglected. The window region errors are less than 5 W m−2 for fluxes and 0.05 K day−1 for heating rates. The flat-plate approximation worked for ice clouds; the window region flux errors are less than 3 W m−2 with heating rate errors less than 0.05 K day−1.

Corresponding author address: Ezra Takara, Department of Meteorology, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, MD 20742.

Email: ezra@atmos.umd.edu

Abstract

Throughout most of the shortwave spectrum, atmospheric gases do not absorb the abundant amount of incoming solar radiation. The shortwave-scattering albedo of clouds is very large. The combination of large amounts of incoming solar radiation, low gaseous absorptivity, and large cloud-scattering albedo enables clouds at one level of the atmosphere to affect the shortwave radiative transfer at all other atmospheric levels. Absorption by atmospheric gases is much stronger in the longwave. This localizes the effects of clouds in the longwave. Since longwave absorption is weakest in the window region (8–12 μm), cloud effects there will have the greatest chance of propagating to other levels of the atmosphere. In partially overcast conditions, individual cloud geometry and optical properties are important factors. Longwave calculations of most GCMs ignore individual cloud geometry. For liquid water clouds, the optical properties of clouds are also ignored.

Previous work in the window region by Takara and Ellingson considered opaque clouds with no absorption or emission by atmospheric gases. Under those conditions, the effect of cloud scattering was comparable to cloud geometry. In this work, the comparison of longwave scattering and geometric effects in the window region is improved by including partially transparent clouds and adding absorption and emission by atmospheric gases. The results show that for optically thick water clouds, it is sufficient to model the geometry; scattering can be neglected. The window region errors are less than 5 W m−2 for fluxes and 0.05 K day−1 for heating rates. The flat-plate approximation worked for ice clouds; the window region flux errors are less than 3 W m−2 with heating rate errors less than 0.05 K day−1.

Corresponding author address: Ezra Takara, Department of Meteorology, University of Maryland at College Park, College Park, MD 20742.

Email: ezra@atmos.umd.edu

Save
  • Clough, S. A., M. J. Iacono, and J. L. Moncet, 1992: Line-by-line calculations of atmospheric fluxes and cooling rates: Application to water vapor. J. Geophys. Res.,97, 15 761–15 785.

  • Davis, A., A. Marshak, W. Wiscombe, and R. Cahalan, 1994: Multifractal characterizations of nonstationarity and intermittency in geophysical fields: Observed, retrieved, or simulated. J. Geophys. Res.,99, 8055–8071.

  • Ebert, E. E., and J. A. Curry, 1992: A parameterization of ice cloud optical properties for climate models. J. Geophys. Res.,97, 3831–3836.

  • Ellingson, R. G., 1978: An infrared transfer model. Part I: Model description and comparison of observations with calculations. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 523–545.

  • ——, 1982: On the effects of cumulus dimensions on longwave irradiance and heating rates. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 886–896.

  • ——, J. Ellis, and S. Fels, 1991: The intercomparison of radiation codes used in climate models: Long wave results. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 8929–8953.

  • Evans, K. F., 1993: A general solution for stochastic radiative transfer. Geophys. Res. Lett.,20, 2075–2078.

  • Fu, Q., and K. N. Liou, 1993: Parameterization of the radiative properties of cirrus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 2008–2025.

  • Han, D., and R. G. Ellingson, 1996: Validation of cumulus cloud parameterizations for longwave radiation calculations. IRS ’96:Current Problems in Atmospheric Radiation, W. L. Smith and K. Stamnes, Eds., 230–233.

  • Harshvardhan, and J. A. Weinman, 1982: Infrared radiative transfer through a regular array of cuboidal clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 431–439.

  • Howell, J. R., and M. Perlmutter, 1964: Monte Carlo solution of thermal transfer through radiant media between gray wall. J. Heat Transfer,86, 116–122.

  • Hu, Y. X., and K. Stamnes, 1993: An accurate parameterization of the radiative properties of water clouds suitable for use in climate models. J. Climate,6, 728–742.

  • Kiehl, J. T., 1992: Atmospheric circulation models. Climate System Modeling, K. E. Trenbreth, Ed., Cambridge University Press, 344 pp.

  • Killen, R. M., and R. G. Ellingson, 1994: The effect of shape and spatial distribution of cumulus clouds on longwave irradiance. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 2123–2136.

  • Takara, E. E., and R. G. Ellingson, 1996: Scattering effects on longwave fluxes in broken cloud fields. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 1464–1476.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 161 44 2
PDF Downloads 37 21 1