Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Observational Error Structures and the Value of Advanced Assimilation Techniques

K. L. Swanson Department of Geosciences, University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Search for other papers by K. L. Swanson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
T. N. Palmer European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by T. N. Palmer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
R. Vautard Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Paris, France

Search for other papers by R. Vautard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 May 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<1327:OESATV>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1327–1340
Restricted access

Abstract

The ability of four-dimensional variational (4DVAR) assimilation of data to reduce various observational error structures in a quasigeostrophic model is studied. It is found that 4DVAR with assimilation periods on the order of a week is very efficient at reducing error in phase space directions that have not amplified in the past, that is, those phase space directions that do not lie on the unstable manifold of the system. This is particularly true for observational errors that project in rapidly growing singular vector phase space directions.

In general, long period 4DVAR changes the forecast error growth rates to rates similar to the leading Lyapunov exponents for the system. However, error structures that grow significantly faster than the leading Lyapunov vector and are not readily reduced by long period 4DVAR can be constructed by doing a singular vector decomposition in the subspace of growing backward Lyapunov vectors. This procedure is an approximation to calculating the singular vectors using an appropriate analysis error covariance metric for the assimilation technique. 4DVAR acting on observational errors constructed in this manner yields forecast error growth a factor of 5 larger than that of the leading Lyapunov vector over a 4-day forecast period.

The addition of model error places limits on the application of long assimilation period 4DVAR. Model error adds a background level of error to the assimilated solution that cannot be reduced, and also limits how far into the past the assimilation period can be extended. These effects combine to reduce the quality of the optimal assimilated state that can obtained by applying 4DVAR. However, model error does not diminish the ability of long assimilation period 4DVAR to reduce rapidly growing singular vector–type error components. Since long assimilation periods can potentially produce large analysis errors if model error exists, the relative benefit of extending the assimilation period to reduce forecast error growth rates must be weighed in a given situation.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Kyle L. Swanson, Department of Geosciences, University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201.

Email: kswanson@csd.uwm.edu

Abstract

The ability of four-dimensional variational (4DVAR) assimilation of data to reduce various observational error structures in a quasigeostrophic model is studied. It is found that 4DVAR with assimilation periods on the order of a week is very efficient at reducing error in phase space directions that have not amplified in the past, that is, those phase space directions that do not lie on the unstable manifold of the system. This is particularly true for observational errors that project in rapidly growing singular vector phase space directions.

In general, long period 4DVAR changes the forecast error growth rates to rates similar to the leading Lyapunov exponents for the system. However, error structures that grow significantly faster than the leading Lyapunov vector and are not readily reduced by long period 4DVAR can be constructed by doing a singular vector decomposition in the subspace of growing backward Lyapunov vectors. This procedure is an approximation to calculating the singular vectors using an appropriate analysis error covariance metric for the assimilation technique. 4DVAR acting on observational errors constructed in this manner yields forecast error growth a factor of 5 larger than that of the leading Lyapunov vector over a 4-day forecast period.

The addition of model error places limits on the application of long assimilation period 4DVAR. Model error adds a background level of error to the assimilated solution that cannot be reduced, and also limits how far into the past the assimilation period can be extended. These effects combine to reduce the quality of the optimal assimilated state that can obtained by applying 4DVAR. However, model error does not diminish the ability of long assimilation period 4DVAR to reduce rapidly growing singular vector–type error components. Since long assimilation periods can potentially produce large analysis errors if model error exists, the relative benefit of extending the assimilation period to reduce forecast error growth rates must be weighed in a given situation.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Kyle L. Swanson, Department of Geosciences, University of Wisconsin—Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53201.

Email: kswanson@csd.uwm.edu

Save
Cover Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

  • Barkmeijer, J., P. Houtekamer, and X. Wang, 1993: Validation of a skill prediction method. Tellus,45A, 424–434.

  • ——, M. vau Gijzen, and F. Bouttier, 1998: Singular vectors and estimates of the analysis error covariance metric. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,124, 1695–1713.

  • Courtier, P., J.-N. Thépaut, and A. Hollingsworth, 1994: A strategy for operational implementation of 4DVAR, using an incremental approach. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,120, 1367–1387.

  • Daley, R., 1991: Atmospheric Data Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 457 pp.

  • Eckmann, J.-P., and D. Ruelle, 1985: Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors. Rev. Mod. Phys.,57, 617–656.

  • Farrell, B. F., 1990: Small error dynamics and the predictability of atmospheric flows. J. Atmos. Sci.,47, 2409–2416.

  • Ghil, M., and P. Malanotte-Rizzoli, 1991: Data assimilation in meteorology and oceanography. Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 33, Academic Press, 141–266.

  • Guckenheimer, J., and P. Holmes, 1983: Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Springer-Verlag, 453 pp.

  • Hartmann, D. L., R. Buizza, and T. N. Palmer, 1995: The effect of spatial scale on the linear growth of disturbances. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 3885–3894.

  • Lacarra, J., and O. Talagrand, 1988: Short range evolution of small perturbations is a barotropic model. Tellus,40A, 81–95.

  • Le Dimet, F.-X., and O. Talagrand, 1986: Variational algorithms for analysis and assimilation of meteorological observations: Theoretical aspects. Tellus,38A, 97–110.

  • Legras, B., and R. Vautard, 1995: A guide to Lyapunov vectors. Proc. ECMWF Sem. on Predictability, Vol. 1, Reading, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 143–156.

  • Marshall, J., and F. Molteni, 1993: Toward a dynamical understanding of the planetary-scale flow regimes. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 1792–1818.

  • Ménard, R., and R. Daley, 1996: The application of Kalman smoother theory to the estimation of 4DVAR error statistics. Tellus,48A, 221–237.

  • Molteni, F., and T. N. Palmer, 1993: Predictability and finite time instability of the northern hemisphere winter circulation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,119, 269–298.

  • ——, R. Buizza, T. N. Palmer, and T. Petroliagis, 1996: The ECMWF ensemble prediction system: Methodology and validation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,122, 73–120.

  • Oseledec, V., 1968: A multiplicative ergodic theorem. Lyapunov characteristic numbers for dynamical systems. Trans. Moscow Math. Soc.,19, 197–221.

  • Palmer, T. N., 1995: Predictability of the atmosphere and oceans: From days to decades. Proc. ECMWF Sem. on Predictability, Vol. 1, Reading, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 83–140.

  • Pires, C., R. Vautard, and O. Talagrand, 1996: On extending the limits of variational assimilation in nonlinear chaotic systems. Tellus,48A, 96–121.

  • Rabier, F., E. Klinker, P. Courtier, and A. Hollingsworth, 1996: Sensitivity of forecast errors to initial conditions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,122, 121–150.

  • Simmons, A. J., R. Mureau, and T. Petroliagis, 1995: Error growth and estimates of predictability from the ECMWF forecasting system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,121, 1739–1771.

  • Swanson, K. L., R. Vautard, and C. Pires, 1998: Four-dimensional variational assimilation and predictability in a quasi-geostrophic model. Tellus,50A, 369–390.

  • Thépaut, J.-N., D. Vasilijevic, P. Courtier, and J. Pailleux, 1993: Variational assimilation of conventional observations with a multi-level primitive-equation model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,119, 153–186.

  • Toth, Z., and E. Kalnay, 1997: Ensemble forecasting at NCEP and the breeding method. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 3297–3319.

  • Trevisan, A., and R. Legnani, 1995: Transient error growth and local predictability: A study in the Lorenz system. Tellus,47A, 103–117.

  • ——, and F. Pancotti, 1998: Periodic orbits, Lyapunov vectors, and singular vectors in the Lorenz system. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 390–398.

  • Vannitsen, S., and C. Nicolis, 1997: Lyapunov vectors and error growth patterns in a T21L3 quasigeostrophic model. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 347–361.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 152 27 5
PDF Downloads 31 11 2