Boundary Layer Effects on Fronts over Topography

Melinda S. Peng Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California

Search for other papers by Melinda S. Peng in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
John H. Powell Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California

Search for other papers by John H. Powell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. T. Williams Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California

Search for other papers by R. T. Williams in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Bao-Fong Jeng Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California

Search for other papers by Bao-Fong Jeng in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A hydrostatic, primitive equation model with frontogenetical deformation forcing is used to study the effects of surface friction on fronts passing over a two-dimensional ridge. Surface friction is parameterized using a K-theory planetary boundary layer (BL) parameterization with implicitly defined diffusion coefficients, following Keyser and Anthes. Previous studies without surface friction, such as Williams et al., show that a cold front weakens on the upwind slope and intensifies on the lee slope. This is in part due to a superposition effect of mountain flow where colder temperatures exist over the crest and in part due to the divergence pattern caused by the basic flow over the mountain (divergence on the upwind slope and convergence on the lee slope). In Williams et al., the final intensity of a front after passing a symmetric mountain is the same as a front moving over flat land. For no-mountain simulations, the inclusion of the BL results in a more realistic frontal structure and the frontal intensity is weaker than for the frictionless front because weaker temperature gradients are created through vertical mixing. The same type of mixing acts to strengthen a cold front on the upwind slope and weaken it on the downwind slope. The divergence forcing is also frontogenetic on the upwind slope and frontolyic on the lee slope within the BL. The vertical mixing forcing is strongest near the top of BL and weaker within the BL due to weak temperature gradient within the BL. The divergent forcing is strongest within the BL and weak at the top. When BL effects are included, the final intensity of a front passing over a mountain is weaker than the front over flat topography.

The translation of the front is slightly slower with the BL because of the overall reduced cross-frontal speed by surface friction. When moving over a mountain, a front with the BL has a more uniform speed than the frictionless front due to a more uniform flow within the BL.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Melinda S. Peng, Code 7532, Marine Meteorology Division, Naval Research Laboratory, 7 Grace Hopper Ave., Monterey, CA 93943-5502. Email: peng@nrlmry.navy.mil

Abstract

A hydrostatic, primitive equation model with frontogenetical deformation forcing is used to study the effects of surface friction on fronts passing over a two-dimensional ridge. Surface friction is parameterized using a K-theory planetary boundary layer (BL) parameterization with implicitly defined diffusion coefficients, following Keyser and Anthes. Previous studies without surface friction, such as Williams et al., show that a cold front weakens on the upwind slope and intensifies on the lee slope. This is in part due to a superposition effect of mountain flow where colder temperatures exist over the crest and in part due to the divergence pattern caused by the basic flow over the mountain (divergence on the upwind slope and convergence on the lee slope). In Williams et al., the final intensity of a front after passing a symmetric mountain is the same as a front moving over flat land. For no-mountain simulations, the inclusion of the BL results in a more realistic frontal structure and the frontal intensity is weaker than for the frictionless front because weaker temperature gradients are created through vertical mixing. The same type of mixing acts to strengthen a cold front on the upwind slope and weaken it on the downwind slope. The divergence forcing is also frontogenetic on the upwind slope and frontolyic on the lee slope within the BL. The vertical mixing forcing is strongest near the top of BL and weaker within the BL due to weak temperature gradient within the BL. The divergent forcing is strongest within the BL and weak at the top. When BL effects are included, the final intensity of a front passing over a mountain is weaker than the front over flat topography.

The translation of the front is slightly slower with the BL because of the overall reduced cross-frontal speed by surface friction. When moving over a mountain, a front with the BL has a more uniform speed than the frictionless front due to a more uniform flow within the BL.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Melinda S. Peng, Code 7532, Marine Meteorology Division, Naval Research Laboratory, 7 Grace Hopper Ave., Monterey, CA 93943-5502. Email: peng@nrlmry.navy.mil

Save
  • Arakawa, A., and V. R. Lamb, 1977: Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of the UCLA general circulation model. Advances in Research and Applications, J. Chang, Ed., Methods in Computational Physics Series, Vol. 17, Academic Press, 174–264.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bannon, P. R., 1983: Quasi-geostrophic frontogenesis over topography. J. Atmos. Sci, 40 , 2266–2277.

  • Blackadar, A. K., 1978: High-resolution models of the planetary boundary layer. Advances in Environmental Science and Engineering, J. R. Pfafflin and E. N. Ziegler, Eds., Vol. 1, Gordon and Breach, 50–85.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blackadar, A. K., and B. D. Gross, 1987: Advection of a passive scalar over a finite-amplitude ridge in a stratified rotating atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci, 44 , 1696–1705.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Braun, S. A., R. Rotunno, and J. B. Klemp, 1999a: Effects of coastal orography on landfalling cold fronts. Part I: Dry, inviscid dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci, 56 , 517–533.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Braun, S. A., R. Rotunno, and J. B. Klemp, 1999b: Effects of coastal orography on landfalling cold fronts. Part II: Effects of surface friction. J. Atmos. Sci, 56 , 3366–3384.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brummer, B., 1988: Structure and circulation in the boundary layer at a strong cold front. Beitr. Phys. Atmos, 61 , 232–243.

  • Djolov, G. D., 1973: Modeling of the interdependent dirunal variation of meteorological elements in the boundary layer. Ph. D. thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dunst, M., and A. Rhodin, 1990: On the influence of frictional effects on surface fronts. Beitr. Phys. Atmos, 63 , 223–242.

  • Gross, B. D., 1994: Frontal interaction with isolated orography. J. Atmos. Sci, 51 , 1480–1496.

  • Hartsough, C. S., and W. Blumen, 1990: Objective cross-sectional analysis of diabatic circulation and vertical motions using ALPEX data. Meteor. Atmos. Phys, 43 , 221–230.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holt, T., and S. Raman, 1988: A review and comparative evaluation of multilevel boundary layer parameterizations for first-order and turbulent kinetic energy closure schemes. Rev. Geophys, 26 , 761–780.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keyser, D., and R. A. Anthes, 1982: The influence of planetary boundary layer physics on frontal structure in the Hoskins–Bretherton horizontal shear model. J. Atmos. Sci, 39 , 1783–1802.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, S-W., M. S. Peng, and R. T. Williams, 1996: A three-dimensional study of the influence of mountains on a front. J. Atmos. Sci, 53 , 2757–2772.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mellor, G. L., and T. Yamada, 1974: A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci, 31 , 1791–1806.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merkine, L-O., 1975: Steady finite-amplitude baroclinic flows over long topography in a rotating stratified atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci, 32 , 1881–1893.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Olafsson, H., and P. Bougeault, 1997: The effect of rotation and surface friction on orographic drag. J. Atmos. Sci, 54 , 193–210.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peng, M. S., and R. T. Williams, 1994: Frontal scale and boundary layer effects. Preprints, Sixth Conf. on Mesoscale Processes, Portland, OR, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 147–150.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Radinovic, D., 1986: Analysis of ALPHEX data, 20, 21 March and 24, 25, 30 April 1982. PSMP Rep. Series 22, WMO/TD No. 154.

  • Richard, E., P. Mascart, and E. C. Nickerson, 1989: The role of surface friction in downslope windstorm. J. Appl. Meteor, 28 , 241–251.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sanders, F., 1995: An investigation of the structure and dynamics of an intense surface frontal zone. J. Meteor, 12 , 542–552.

  • Williams, R. T., 1974: Numerical simulation of steady-state fronts. J. Atmos. Sci, 31 , 1286–1296.

  • Williams, R. T., M. S. Peng, and D. A. Zankofski, 1992: Effects of topography on fronts. J. Atmos. Sci, 49 , 287–305.

  • Zehnder, J. A., and P. R. Bannon, 1988: Frontogenesis over a mountain ridge. J. Atmos. Sci, 45 , 628–644.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 891 606 139
PDF Downloads 107 31 1