Size Distributions and Dynamical Properties of Shallow Cumulus Clouds from Aircraft Observations and Satellite Data

Stefaan M. A. Rodts Thermal and Fluids Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Stefaan M. A. Rodts in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Peter G. Duynkerke Institute of Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Peter G. Duynkerke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Harm J. J. Jonker Thermal and Fluids Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Harm J. J. Jonker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

In this paper aircraft observations of shallow cumulus over Florida during the Small Cumulus Microphysics Study (SCMS) are analyzed. Size distributions of cloud fraction, mass flux, and in-cloud buoyancy flux are derived. These distributions provide information on the specific contribution of clouds with a certain horizontal size and reveal, for example, which size has the largest effect on cloud fraction or vertical transport. The analysis of four flights shows that the mass flux and buoyancy flux are dominated by intermediate-sized clouds (horizontal dimension of about 1 km). The cloud fraction, on the other hand, is found to be dominated by the smallest clouds observed. These clouds are additionally found to have a negative contribution to the mass flux, yet a positive contribution to the buoyancy flux.

About 200 flight intersections of cumuli with horizontal sizes larger than 500 m are used to obtain average horizontal cross-section profiles of vertical velocity, liquid water content, liquid water potential temperature, and virtual potential temperature. A thin shell of descending air just around the cloud emerges as a conspicuous feature. Evidence is found that the descent is mainly caused by evaporative cooling, which results from lateral mixing at the cloud boundary.

A Landsat satellite image near the flight region is analyzed to compare the cloud size distributions with the aircraft data. The cloud cover in the image appears to be dominated by much larger clouds than the aircraft observations indicated. To account for the different measurement methodology (two-dimensional versus one-dimensional) an equation with which one can predict the cloud size distribution that results from performing line measurements in a prescribed two-dimensional cumulus field is derived. The equation reveals that the aircraft cloud size distributions are always biased toward smaller cloud sizes. This effect is nevertheless not enough to reconcile the aircraft and satellite data, presumably because the analysis neglects the variability of clouds in the vertical direction.

Deceased

Corresponding author address: Dr. Harm J. J. Jonker, Thermal and Fluids Sciences, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Lorentzweg 1, 2628 CJ Delft, Netherlands. Email: h.jonker@ws.tn.tudelft.nl

Abstract

In this paper aircraft observations of shallow cumulus over Florida during the Small Cumulus Microphysics Study (SCMS) are analyzed. Size distributions of cloud fraction, mass flux, and in-cloud buoyancy flux are derived. These distributions provide information on the specific contribution of clouds with a certain horizontal size and reveal, for example, which size has the largest effect on cloud fraction or vertical transport. The analysis of four flights shows that the mass flux and buoyancy flux are dominated by intermediate-sized clouds (horizontal dimension of about 1 km). The cloud fraction, on the other hand, is found to be dominated by the smallest clouds observed. These clouds are additionally found to have a negative contribution to the mass flux, yet a positive contribution to the buoyancy flux.

About 200 flight intersections of cumuli with horizontal sizes larger than 500 m are used to obtain average horizontal cross-section profiles of vertical velocity, liquid water content, liquid water potential temperature, and virtual potential temperature. A thin shell of descending air just around the cloud emerges as a conspicuous feature. Evidence is found that the descent is mainly caused by evaporative cooling, which results from lateral mixing at the cloud boundary.

A Landsat satellite image near the flight region is analyzed to compare the cloud size distributions with the aircraft data. The cloud cover in the image appears to be dominated by much larger clouds than the aircraft observations indicated. To account for the different measurement methodology (two-dimensional versus one-dimensional) an equation with which one can predict the cloud size distribution that results from performing line measurements in a prescribed two-dimensional cumulus field is derived. The equation reveals that the aircraft cloud size distributions are always biased toward smaller cloud sizes. This effect is nevertheless not enough to reconcile the aircraft and satellite data, presumably because the analysis neglects the variability of clouds in the vertical direction.

Deceased

Corresponding author address: Dr. Harm J. J. Jonker, Thermal and Fluids Sciences, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Lorentzweg 1, 2628 CJ Delft, Netherlands. Email: h.jonker@ws.tn.tudelft.nl

Save
  • Arakawa, A., and W. H. Schubert, 1974: Interaction of a cumulus cloud ensemble with the large-scale environment: Part I. J. Atmos. Sci., 31 , 674–701.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Benner, T. C., and J. A. Curry, 1998: Characteristics of small tropical cumulus clouds and their impact on the environment. J. Geophys. Res., 103 , 28753–28767.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brown, A. R., 1999: The sensitivity of large-eddy simulations of shallow cumulus convection to resolution and sub-grid model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125 , 469–482.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cahalan, R. F., and J. H. Joseph, 1989: Fractal statistics of cloud fields. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117 , 261–272.

  • Coakley Jr., J. A., and F. P. Bretherton, 1982: Cloud cover from high-resolution scanner data: Detecting and allowing for partially filled fields of view. J. Geophys. Res., 87 , 4917–4932.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Laat, A. T. J., and P. G. Duynkerke, 1998: Analysis of ASTEX-stratocumulus observational data using a mass-flux approach. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 86 , 63–87.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • French, J. R., G. Vali, and R. D. Kelly, 1999: Evolution of small cumulus clouds in Florida: Observations of pulsating growth. Atmos. Res., 52 , 143–165.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gerber, H., B. G. Arends, and A. S. Ackerman, 1984: New microphysics sensor for aircraft use. Atmos. Res., 31 , 235–252.

  • Grant, A. L. M., and A. R. Brown, 1999: A similarity hypothesis for shallow-cumulus transports. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125 , 1913–1936.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gregory, D., 2001: Estimation of entrainment rate in simple models of convective clouds. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127 , 53–72.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Grinnell, S. A., C. S. Bretherton, D. E. Stevens, and A. M. Frasier, 1996: Vertical mass flux calculations in Hawaiian trade cumulus clouds from dual-Doppler radar. J. Atmos. Sci., 53 , 1870–1886.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hozumi, K., T. Harimaya, and C. Magono, 1982: The size distribution of cumulus clouds as a function of cloud amount. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 60 , 691–699.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jonas, P. R., 1990: Observations of cumulus cloud entrainment. Atmos. Res., 25 , 105–127.

  • Jonker, H. J. J., A. P. Siebesma, and P. G. Duynkerke, 1999: Development of mesoscale fluctuations in cloud-topped boundary layers. Proc. 13th Symp. on Boundary Layers and Turbulence, Dallas, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 197–200.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joseph, J. H., 1986: The study of cloud morphology from LANDSAT. U.S. Air Force Final Rep. AFOSR-83-0239, 137 pp.

  • Joseph, J. H., and R. F. Cahalan, 1990: Nearest neighbor spacing of fair weather cumulus clouds. J. Appl. Meteor., 29 , 793–805.

  • Knight, C. A., and L. J. Miller, 1998: Early radar echoes from small, warm cumulus: Bragg and hydrometeor scattering. J. Atmos. Sci., 55 , 2974–2992.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koren, I., and J. H. Joseph, 2000: The histogram of the brightness distribution of clouds in high-resolution remotely sensed images. J. Geophys. Res., 105 , 29369–29377.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lappen, C-L., and D. A. Randall, 2001: Toward a unified parameterization of the boundary layer moist convection. Part II: Lateral mass exchanges and subplume-scale fluxes. J. Atmos. Sci., 58 , 2037–2051.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lin, C., 1999: Some bulk properties of cumulus ensembles simulated by a cloud-resolving model. Part II: Entrainment profiles. J. Atmos. Sci., 56 , 3736–3748.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lopez, R. E., 1977: The lognormal distribution and cumulus cloud populations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 105 , 865–872.

  • Lovejoy, S., 1982: Area-perimeter relation for rain and cloud areas. Science, 216 , 185–187.

  • Machado, L. A. T., and W. B. Rossow, 1993: Structural characteristics and radiative properties of tropical cloud clusters. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121 , 3234–3260.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neggers, R. A. J., P. G. Duynkerke, and S. M. A. Rodts, 2002: Shallow cumulus convection: Validation of large-eddy simulation against aircraft and Landsat observations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neggers, R. A. J., H. J. J. Jonker, and A. P. Siebesma, 2003: Size statistics of cumulus cloud populations in large-eddy simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 60 , 1060–1074.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nicholls, S., 1989: The structure of radiatively driven convection in stratocumulus. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 115 , 487–511.

  • Nitta, T., 1975: Observational determination of cloud mass flux distributions. J. Atmos. Sci., 32 , 73–91.

  • Nordeng, T. E., 1994: Extended versions of the convective parametrization scheme at ECMWF and their impact upon the mean and transient activity of the model in Tropics. ECMWF Tech. Memo 206, 41 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Plank, V. G., 1969: The size distribution of cumulus clouds in representive Florida populations. J. Appl. Meteor., 8 , 46–67.

  • Prudnikov, A. P., J. A. Bryckov, and O. I. Maricev, 1992: Integrals and Series, Vol. 1. Gordon and Breach, 768 pp.

  • Raga, G. B., J. B. Jensen, and M. B. Baker, 1990: Characteristics of cumulus band clouds off the coast of Hawaii. J. Atmos. Sci., 47 , 338–355.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Randall, D. A., Q. Shao, and C-H. Moeng, 1992: A second-order bulk boundary-layer model. J. Atmos. Sci., 49 , 1903–1923.

  • Reynolds, D. W., T. B. McKee, and K. S. Danielson, 1978: Effects of cloud size and cloud particles on satellite-observed reflected brightness. J. Atmos. Sci., 35 , 160–164.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Russ, J. C., 1986: Practical Stereology. Plenum Press, 185 pp.

  • Sengupta, S. K., R. M. Welch, M. S. Navar, T. A. Berendes, and D. W. Chen, 1990: Cumulus cloud field morphology and spatial patterns derived from high-resolution Landsat imagery. J. Appl. Meteor., 29 , 1245–1267.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Siebesma, A. P., and J. W. M. Cuijpers, 1995: Evaluation of parametric assumptions for shallow cumulus convection. J. Atmos. Sci., 52 , 650–666.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Siebesma, A. P., and A. A. M. Holtslag, 1996: Model impacts of entrainment and detrainment rates in shallow cumulus convection. J. Atmos. Sci., 53 , 2354–2364.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Siebesma, A. P., and H. J. J. Jonker, 2000: Anomalous scaling of cumulus cloud boundaries. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85 , 214–217.

  • Tiedtke, M., 1987: The Parametrization of Moist Processes, Part 2: The Parametrization of Cumulus Convection. ECMWF Lecture Series, ECMWF, 56 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tiedtke, M., 1989: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117 , 1779–1800.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wen, G., R. F. Cahalan, S. Tsay, and L. Oreopoulos, 2001: Impact of cumulus cloud spacing on Landsat atmospheric correction and aerosol retrieval. J. Geophys. Res., 106 , 12129–12138.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wielicki, B. A., and R. M. Welch, 1986: Cumulus cloud properties derived using Landsat satellite data. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 25 , 261–276.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wielicki, B. A., and L. Parker, 1992: On the determination of cloud cover from satellite sensors: The effect of sensor spatial resolution. J. Geophys. Res., 97 , 12799–12823.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wielicki, B. A., R. D. Cess, M. D. King, D. A. Randall, and E. F. Harrison, 1995: Mission to planet earth: Role of clouds and radiation in climate. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 76 , 2125–2153.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wyngaard, J. C., and C. H. Moeng, 1992: Parameterizing turbulent diffusion through the joint probability density. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 60 , 1–13.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 930 334 88
PDF Downloads 610 196 7