Orographic Precipitation and Oregon’s Climate Transition

Ronald B. Smith Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut

Search for other papers by Ronald B. Smith in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Idar Barstad Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut

Search for other papers by Idar Barstad in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Laurent Bonneau Department of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut

Search for other papers by Laurent Bonneau in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Oregon’s sharp east–west climate transition was investigated using a linear model of orographic precipitation and four datasets: (a) interpolated annual rain gauge data, (b) satellite-derived precipitation proxies (vegetation and brightness temperature), (c) streamflow data for a small catchment, and (d) stable isotope analysis of water samples from streams. The success of the linear model against these datasets suggests that the main elements of the model (i.e., airflow dynamics, cloud time delays, condensed water advection, and leeside evaporation) are behaving reasonably, although the high Oregon terrain may push the linear theory beyond its range of applicability.

A key parameter in the linear model is the cloud delay time (τ), encapsulating the action of orographic cloud processes. Each dataset was examined to see if it can constrain the τ values. The statewide precipitation patterns from rain gauge and satellite constrain the τ values only within a broad range from about 500 to 5000 s. A focus on the sharp gradient on the lee slopes of the Cascades suggests that τ values in the range of 1800–2400 s are preferred. The study of the small Alsea watershed constrains τ little, as it receives a mixture of upslope and spillover precipitation. Stable isotope ratios in stream water indicate an atmospheric drying ratio of about 43%, requiring an average cloud physics delay time greater than τ = 600 s.

Corresponding author address: Prof. Ronald B. Smith, Dept. of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, P.O. Box 208109, New Haven, CT 06520-8109. Email: ronald.smith@yale.edu

Abstract

Oregon’s sharp east–west climate transition was investigated using a linear model of orographic precipitation and four datasets: (a) interpolated annual rain gauge data, (b) satellite-derived precipitation proxies (vegetation and brightness temperature), (c) streamflow data for a small catchment, and (d) stable isotope analysis of water samples from streams. The success of the linear model against these datasets suggests that the main elements of the model (i.e., airflow dynamics, cloud time delays, condensed water advection, and leeside evaporation) are behaving reasonably, although the high Oregon terrain may push the linear theory beyond its range of applicability.

A key parameter in the linear model is the cloud delay time (τ), encapsulating the action of orographic cloud processes. Each dataset was examined to see if it can constrain the τ values. The statewide precipitation patterns from rain gauge and satellite constrain the τ values only within a broad range from about 500 to 5000 s. A focus on the sharp gradient on the lee slopes of the Cascades suggests that τ values in the range of 1800–2400 s are preferred. The study of the small Alsea watershed constrains τ little, as it receives a mixture of upslope and spillover precipitation. Stable isotope ratios in stream water indicate an atmospheric drying ratio of about 43%, requiring an average cloud physics delay time greater than τ = 600 s.

Corresponding author address: Prof. Ronald B. Smith, Dept. of Geology and Geophysics, Yale University, P.O. Box 208109, New Haven, CT 06520-8109. Email: ronald.smith@yale.edu

Save
  • Barstad, I., and R. B. Smith, 2005: Evaluation of an orographic precipitation model. J. Hydrometeor., in press.

  • Bastasch, R., 1998: Waters of Oregon. Oregon State University Press, 278 pp.

  • Bond, N. A., and G. A. Vecchi, 2003: The influence of the Madden–Julian oscillation on precipitation in Oregon and Washington. Wea. Forecasting, 18 , 600613.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Browning, K. A., F. F. Hill, and C. W. Pardoe, 1974: Structure and mechanism of precipitation and the effect of orography in a winter time warm sector. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 100 , 309330.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cappa, C. D., M. B. Henricks, D. J. DePaolo, and R. C. Cohen, 2003: Isotope fractionation of water during evaporation. J. Geophys. Res., 108 .4525, doi: 10.1029/2003JD003597.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cortes, A., and R. N. Farvolden, 1989: Isotope studies and ground water in the Sierra de las Cruces, Mexico. J. Hydrol., 107 , 147153.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Daly, C., R. P. Neilson, and D. L. Phillips, 1994: A statistical–topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. J. Appl. Meteor., 33 , 140158.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Daly, C., W. P. Gibson, G. H. Taylor, G. L. Johnson, and P. Pasteris, 2002: A knowledge-based approach to the statistical mapping of climate. Climate Res., 22 , 99113.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dansgaard, W., 1964: Stable isotopes in precipitation. Tellus, 16 , 436468.

  • Fraser, A. B., R. C. Easter, and P. V. Hobbs, 1973: Theoretical study of flow of air and fallout of solid precipitation over mountainous terrain. 1. Air-flow model. J. Atmos. Sci., 30 , 801812.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Friedman, I., 1953: Deuterium content of natural waters and other substances. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 4 , 89103.

  • Friedman, I., A. C. Redfield, B. Schoen, and J. Harris, 1964: The variation of the deuterium content of natural waters in the hydrologic cycle. Rev. Geophys., 2 , 177223.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fritz, P., 1981: River waters. Stable isotope hydrology: Deuterium and oxygen-18 in the water cycle. IAEA Tech. Rep. Series, 210 , 177201.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Garvert, M., B. A. Colle, and C. F. Mass, 2003: Modeling of the 13–14 Dec 2001 IMPROVE 2 case. Preprints,. 10th Conf. on Mesoscale Processes, Portland, OR, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 7.3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Giovinetto, M. B., G. Holdsworth, D. A. Fisher, N. Waters, and H. J. Zwally, 1997: An assessment of the regional distribution of the oxygen–isotope ratio in northeastern Canada. Ann. Glaciol., 25 , 214219.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hobbs, P. V., R. C. Easter, and A. B. Fraser, 1973: Theoretical study of flow of air and fallout of solid precipitation over mountainous terrain. 2. Microphysics. J. Atmos. Sci., 30 , 813823.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jiang, Q. F., and R. B. Smith, 2003: Cloud timescales and orographic precipitation. J. Atmos. Sci., 60 , 15431559.

  • Kendall, C., and T. B. Coplen, 2001: Distribution of oxygen-18 and deuterium in river waters across the United States. Hydrol. Processes, 15 , 13631393.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mather, P. M., 2001: Computer Processing of Remotely-Sensed Images. Wiley, 292 pp.

  • Merlivat, L., and J. Jouzel, 1979: Global climatic interpretation of the deuterium–oxygen 18 relationship for precipitation. J. Geophys. Res., 84 , C8,. 50295033.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, R. B., 1979: The influence of mountains on the atmosphere. Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 21, Academic Press, 87–230.

  • Smith, R. B., 1980: Linear theory of stratified hydrostatic flow past an isolated mountain. Tellus, 32 , 348364.

  • Smith, R. B., 1992: Deuterium in North Atlantic storm tops. J. Atmos. Sci., 49 , 20412057.

  • Smith, R. B., 2003: A linear time-delay model of orographic precipitation. J. Hydrol., 282 , 29.

  • Smith, R. B., and I. Barstad, 2004: A linear theory of orographic precipitation. J. Atmos. Sci., 61 , 13771391.

  • Smith, R. B., Q. Jiang, M. Fearon, P. Tabary, M. Dorninger, J. Doyle, and R. Benoit, 2003: Orographic precipitation and airmass transformation: An Alpine example. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129 , 433454.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stoelinga, M. T., and Coauthors, 2003: Overview of IMPROVE: Verification and improvement of bulk microphysical parameterizations in mesoscale models. Preprints,. 10th Conf. on Mesoscale Processes, Portland, OR, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 7.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taylor, G. H., and C. Hannan, 1999: The Climate of Oregon. Oregon State University Press, 211 pp.

  • USDA-NRCS, 1998: PRISM climate mapping project precipitation. Mean monthly and annual precipitation digital files for the continental U.S. USDA NRCS National Cartography and Geospatial Center, Ft. Worth, TX. [Available online at http://www.ncgc.nrcs.usda.gov/branch/gdb/products/climate/index.html.].

  • Wallace, J. M., and P. V. Hobbs, 1977: Atmospheric Science: An Introductory Survey. Academic Press, 467 pp.

  • Warburton, J. A., and T. P. DeFelice, 1986: Oxygen isotopic composition of central Sierra Nevada precipitation. Part I: Identification of ice-phase water capture regions in winter storms. Atmos. Res., 20 , 1122.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhu, Y., and R. E. Newell, 1998: A proposed algorithm for moisture fluxes from atmospheric rivers. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126 , 725735.

  • Zwally, H. J., M. Giovinetto, M. Craven, V. I. Morgan, and I. D. Goodwin, 1998: Areal distribution of the oxygen–isotope ratio in Antarctica: Comparison of results based on field and remotely sensed data. Ann. Glaciol., 27 , 583590.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 685 262 12
PDF Downloads 395 109 3