A Refinement of the Millionshchikov Quasi-Normality Hypothesis for Convective Boundary Layer Turbulence

Vladimir M. Gryanik Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany, and A. M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Search for other papers by Vladimir M. Gryanik in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jörg Hartmann Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany

Search for other papers by Jörg Hartmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Siegfried Raasch University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany

Search for other papers by Siegfried Raasch in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Michael Schröter University of Hannover, Hannover, Germany

Search for other papers by Michael Schröter in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The Millionshchikov hypothesis of quasi-normal distribution of fourth-order moments fails for convective conditions where the probability density functions of temperature and vertical velocity fluctuations are skewed. This is shown for aircraft and large-eddy simulation (LES) data, and new closures for fourth-order moments that take the skewness into account are suggested. These new closures are in very good agreement with the data.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Jörg Hartmann, Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Postfach 12 0161, Bremerhaven 27515, Germany. Email: jhartmann@awi-bremerhaven.de

Abstract

The Millionshchikov hypothesis of quasi-normal distribution of fourth-order moments fails for convective conditions where the probability density functions of temperature and vertical velocity fluctuations are skewed. This is shown for aircraft and large-eddy simulation (LES) data, and new closures for fourth-order moments that take the skewness into account are suggested. These new closures are in very good agreement with the data.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Jörg Hartmann, Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Postfach 12 0161, Bremerhaven 27515, Germany. Email: jhartmann@awi-bremerhaven.de

Save
  • Abdella, K., and N. McFarlane, 1999: Reply. J. Atmos. Sci., 56 , 34823483.

  • Alberghi, S., A. Maurizi, and E. Tampieri, 2002: Reply. J. Appl. Meteor., 41 , 885889.

  • Andre, J. C., G. De Moor, P. Lacarrère, and R. du Vachat, 1976: Turbulence approximation for inhomogeneous flows: Part I. The clipping approximation. J. Atmos. Sci., 33 , 476481.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Canuto, V. M., and M. Dubovikov, 1998: Stellar turbulent convection: Theory. Astrophys. J., 493 , 834847.

  • Canuto, V. M., F. Minotti, C. Ronchi, R. M. Ypma, and O. Zeman, 1994: Second-order closure PBL model with new third-order moments: Comparison with LES data. J. Atmos. Sci., 51 , 16051618.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Canuto, V. M., Y. Cheng, and A. Howard, 2001: New third-order moments for the convective boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 58 , 11691172.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gryanik, V. M., and J. Hartmann, 2002: A turbulence closure for the convective boundary layer based on a two-scale mass-flux approach. J. Atmos. Sci., 59 , 27292744.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hartmann, J., and Coauthors, 1999: Artic Radiation and Turbulence Interaction Study. Berichte zur Polarforschung 305, Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Sciences, 81 pp.

  • Ilyushin, B. B., and A. F. Kurbatskii, 1997: Modeling of turbulent transport in PBL with third-order moments. Proc. 11th Symp. on Turbulent Shear Flows, Vol. 2, Grenoble, France, 2019–2021.

  • Lappen, C. L., and D. A. Randall, 2001: Toward a unified parameterization of the boundary layer and moist convection. Part I: A new type of mass-flux model. J. Atmos. Sci., 58 , 20212036.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Losch, M., 2004: On the validity of the Millionshchikov quasi-normality hypothesis for open-ocean deep convection. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31 .L23301, doi:10.1029/2004GL021412.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Millionshchikov, M. D., 1941: On the theory of homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 32 , 611614.

  • Mironov, D. V., V. M. Gryanik, V. N. Lykossov, and S. S. Zilitinkevich, 1999: Comments on “A new second-order turbulence closure scheme for the planetary boundary layer.”. J. Atmos. Sci., 56 , 34783481.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moeng, C-H., and D. A. Randall, 1984: Problems in simulating the stratocumulus-topped boundary layer with a third-order closure model. J. Atmos. Sci., 41 , 15881600.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Monin, A. S., and A. M. Yaglom, 1971: Statistical Fluid Mechanics. Vol. 1, MIT Press, 769 pp.

  • Raasch, S., and M. Schröter, 2001: PALM—A large-eddy simulation model performing on massively parallel computers. Meteor. Z., 10 , 363372.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zilitinkevich, S., V. M. Gryanik, V. N. Lykossov, and D. V. Mironov, 1999: Third-order transport and nonlocal turbulence closures for convective boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci., 56 , 34633477.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 949 393 10
PDF Downloads 182 45 0