Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Nonlocal Convective PBL Model Based on New Third- and Fourth-Order Moments

Y. Cheng NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Y. Cheng in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
V. M. Canuto NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, and Department of Applied Physics and Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, New York

Search for other papers by V. M. Canuto in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
A. M. Howard NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York, and Department of Earth, Atmosphere, and Planetary Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by A. M. Howard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jul 2005
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3474.1
Page(s):
2189–2204
Restricted access

Abstract

The standard approach to studying the planetary boundary layer (PBL) via turbulence models begins with the first-moment equations for temperature, moisture, and mean velocity. These equations entail second-order moments that are solutions of dynamic equations, which in turn entail third-order moments, and so on. How and where to terminate (close) the moments equations has not been a generally agreed upon procedure and a variety of models differ precisely in the way they terminate the sequence. This can be viewed as a bottom-up approach. In this paper, a top-down procedure is suggested, worked out, and justified, in which a new closure model is proposed for the fourth-order moments (FOMs). The key reason for this consideration is the availability of new aircraft data that provide for the first time the z profile of several FOMs. The new FOM expressions have nonzero cumulants that the model relates to the z integrals of the third-order moments (TOMs), giving rise to a nonlocal model for the FOMs. The new FOM model is based on an analysis of the TOM equations with the aid of large-eddy simulation (LES) data, and is verified by comparison with the aircraft data. Use of the new FOMs in the equations for the TOMs yields a new TOM model, in which the TOMs are damped more realistically than in previous models. Surprisingly, the new FOMs with nonzero cumulants simplify, rather than complicate, the TOM model as compared with the quasi-normal (QN) approximation, since the resulting analytic expressions for the TOMs are considerably simpler than those of previous models and are free of algebraic singularities. The new TOMs are employed in a second-order moment (SOM) model, a numerical simulation of a convective PBL is run, and the resulting mean potential temperature T, the SOMs, and the TOMs are compared with several LES data. As a final consistency check, T, SOMs, and TOMs are substituted from the PBL run back into the FOMs, which are again compared with the aircraft data.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Y. Cheng, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2880 Broadway, New York, NY 10025. Email: ycheng@giss.nasa.gov

Abstract

The standard approach to studying the planetary boundary layer (PBL) via turbulence models begins with the first-moment equations for temperature, moisture, and mean velocity. These equations entail second-order moments that are solutions of dynamic equations, which in turn entail third-order moments, and so on. How and where to terminate (close) the moments equations has not been a generally agreed upon procedure and a variety of models differ precisely in the way they terminate the sequence. This can be viewed as a bottom-up approach. In this paper, a top-down procedure is suggested, worked out, and justified, in which a new closure model is proposed for the fourth-order moments (FOMs). The key reason for this consideration is the availability of new aircraft data that provide for the first time the z profile of several FOMs. The new FOM expressions have nonzero cumulants that the model relates to the z integrals of the third-order moments (TOMs), giving rise to a nonlocal model for the FOMs. The new FOM model is based on an analysis of the TOM equations with the aid of large-eddy simulation (LES) data, and is verified by comparison with the aircraft data. Use of the new FOMs in the equations for the TOMs yields a new TOM model, in which the TOMs are damped more realistically than in previous models. Surprisingly, the new FOMs with nonzero cumulants simplify, rather than complicate, the TOM model as compared with the quasi-normal (QN) approximation, since the resulting analytic expressions for the TOMs are considerably simpler than those of previous models and are free of algebraic singularities. The new TOMs are employed in a second-order moment (SOM) model, a numerical simulation of a convective PBL is run, and the resulting mean potential temperature T, the SOMs, and the TOMs are compared with several LES data. As a final consistency check, T, SOMs, and TOMs are substituted from the PBL run back into the FOMs, which are again compared with the aircraft data.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Y. Cheng, NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2880 Broadway, New York, NY 10025. Email: ycheng@giss.nasa.gov

Save
Cover Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

  • Alberghi, S., A. Maurizi, and F. Tampieri, 2002: Relationship between the vertical velocity skewness and kurtosis observed during sea-breeze convection. J. Appl. Meteor., 41 , 885–889.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • André, J. C., G. De Moor, P. Lacarrère, and R. du Vachat, 1976: Turbulence approximation for inhomogeneous flows: Part I. The clipping approximation. J. Atmos. Sci., 33 , 476–481.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • André, J. C., G. DeMoor, P. Lacarrére, G. Therry, and R. du Vachat, 1978: Modeling the 24-hour evolution of the mean and turbulent structures of the planetary boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 35 , 1861–1883.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • André, J. C., P. Lacarrére, and K. Traore, 1982: Pressure effects on triple correlations in turbulent convective flows. Turbulent Shear Flows: Selected Papers from the Third International Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, Vol. 3, L. J. S. Bradbury et al., Eds., Springer-Verlag, 243–252.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bougeault, P., 1981: Modeling the trade-wind cumulus boundary layer. Part II: A high order one-dimensional model. J. Atmos. Sci., 38 , 2429–2439.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Canuto, V. M., 1992: Turbulent convection with overshooting: Reynolds stress approach. Astrophys. J., 392 , 218–232.

  • Canuto, V. M., F. Minotti, C. Ronchi, R. M. Ypma, and O. Zeman, 1994: Second-order closure PBL model with new third-order moments: Comparison with LES data. J. Atmos. Sci., 51 , 1605–1618.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Canuto, V. M., Y. Cheng, and A. Howard, 2001: New third-order moments for the convective boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 58 , 1169–1172.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chen, C., and W. R. Cotton, 1983: Numerical experiments with a one-dimensional high order turbulence model: Simulation of the Wangara Day 33 case. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 25 , 375–404.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cheng, Y., and V. M. Canuto, 1994: Stably stratified shear turbulence: A new model for the energy dissipation length scale. J. Atmos. Sci., 51 , 2384–2396.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cheng, Y., V. M. Canuto, and A. M. Howard, 2002: An improved model for the turbulent PBL. J. Atmos. Sci., 59 , 1550–1565.

  • Deardorff, J. W., 1972: Theoretical expression for the countergradient vertical heat flux. J. Geophys. Res., 77 , 5900–5904.

  • Deardorff, J. W., 1976: Clear and cloud-capped mixed layers: Their numerical simulation, structure and growth and parameterization. Seminars on the Treatment of the Boundary Layer in Numerical Weather Prediction, Bracknell, United Kingdom, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 234–284.

  • Deardorff, J. W., 1978: Closure of second- and third-moment rate equations for diffusion in homogeneous turbulence. Phys. Fluids, 21 , 525–530.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gryanik, V. M., and J. Hartmann, 2002: A turbulence closure for the convective boundary layer based on a two-scale mass-flux approach. J. Atmos. Sci., 59 , 2729–2744.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hartmann, J., and Coauthors, 1999: Arctic radiation and turbulence interaction study (ARTIST). Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research Rep. on Polar Research, No. 305, Bremerhaven, Germany, 81 pp.

  • Holtslag, A. A. M., and C-H. Moeng, 1991: Eddy diffusivity and countergradient transport in the convective atmospheric boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 48 , 1690–1700.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Holtslag, A. A. M., and B. A. Boville, 1993: Local versus nonlocal boundary-layer diffusion in a global climate model. J. Climate, 6 , 1825–1842.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Holtslag, A. A. M., E. I. F. De Bruijn, and H-L. Pan, 1990: A high resolution air mass transformation model for short-range weather forecasting. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118 , 1561–1575.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kantha, L. H., and C. A. Clayson, 1994: An improved mixed layer model for geophysical applications. J. Geophys. Res., 99 , 25235–25266.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kupka, F., 1999: Turbulent convection: Comparing the moment equations to numerical simulations. Astrophys. J., 526 , L45–L48.

  • Lenschow, D. H., J. Mann, and L. Kristensen, 1994: How long is long enough when measuring fluxes and other turbulence statistics? J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 11 , 661–673.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lenschow, D. H., V. Wulfmeyer, and C. Senff, 2000: Measuring second- through fourth-order moments in noisy data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 17 , 1330–1347.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mellor, G. L., and T. Yamada, 1974: A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci., 31 , 1791–1806.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mellor, G. L., and T. Yamada, 1982: Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 20 , 851–875.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mironov, D. V., V. M. Gryanik, C-H. Moeng, D. J. Olbers, and T H. Warncke, 2000: Vertical turbulence structure and second-moment budgets in convection with rotation: A large-eddy simulation study. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126 , 477–516.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Moeng, C-H., and D. A. Randall, 1984: Problems in simulating the stratocumulus-topped boundary layer with a third-order closure model. J. Atmos. Sci., 41 , 1588–1600.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Moeng, C. H., and J. C. Wyngaard, 1989: Evaluation of turbulent transport and dissipation closures in second-order modeling. J. Atmos. Sci., 46 , 2311–2330.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Moeng, C-H., and P. P. Sullivan, 1994: A comparison of shear- and buoyancy-driven planetary boundary layer flows. J. Atmos. Sci., 51 , 999–1022.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nakanishi, M., 2001: Improvement of the Mellor-Yamada turbulence closure model based on large-eddy simulation data. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 99 , 349–378.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • O’Brien, E. E., and G. C. Francis, 1962: A consequence of the zero-fourth-cumulant approximation. J. Fluid Mech., 13 , 369–375.

  • Ogura, Y., 1962: Energy transfer in isotropic turbulent flow. J. Geophys. Res., 67 , 3143–3149.

  • Tatsumi, T., 1957: The theory of decay process of incompressible isotropic turbulence. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A239 , 16–45.

  • Troen, I., and L. Mahrt, 1986: A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer: Sensitivity to surface evaporation. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 37 , 129–148.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wyngaard, J. C., and J. C. Weil, 1991: Transport asymmetry in skewed turbulence. Phys. Fluids, A3 , 155–162.

  • Zeman, O., and J. L. Lumley, 1976: Modeling buoyancy driven mixed layers. J. Atmos. Sci., 33 , 1974–1988.

  • Zeman, O., and J. L. Lumley, 1979: Buoyancy effects in entraining turbulent boundary layers: A second-order closure study. Turbulent Shear Flows: Selected Papers from the First International Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, Vol. 1, F. Durst et al., Eds., Springer-Verlag, 295–306.

  • Zilitinkevich, S., V. M. Gryanik, V. N. Lykossov, and D. V. Mironov, 1999: Third-order transport and nonlocal turbulence closures for convective boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci., 56 , 3463–3477.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 334 192 8
PDF Downloads 117 45 2