Coupling Diffuse Sky Radiation and Surface Albedo

Bernard Pinty Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit, IES, EC Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy

Search for other papers by Bernard Pinty in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alessio Lattanzio Makalumedia gmbh, Darmstadt, Germany

Search for other papers by Alessio Lattanzio in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
John V. Martonchik Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

Search for other papers by John V. Martonchik in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michel M. Verstraete Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit, IES, EC Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy

Search for other papers by Michel M. Verstraete in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Nadine Gobron Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit, IES, EC Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy

Search for other papers by Nadine Gobron in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Malcolm Taberner Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit, IES, EC Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy

Search for other papers by Malcolm Taberner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jean-Luc Widlowski Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit, IES, EC Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy

Search for other papers by Jean-Luc Widlowski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Robert E. Dickinson School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia

Search for other papers by Robert E. Dickinson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Yves Govaerts EUMETSAT, Am Kavalleriesand, Darmstadt, Germany

Search for other papers by Yves Govaerts in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

New satellite instruments have been delivering a wealth of information regarding land surface albedo. This basic quantity describes what fraction of solar radiation is reflected from the earth’s surface. However, its concept and measurements have some ambiguity resulting from its dependence on the incidence angles of both the direct and diffuse solar radiation. At any time of day, a surface receives direct radiation in the direction of the sun, and diffuse radiation from the various other directions in which it may have been scattered by air molecules, aerosols, and cloud droplets. This contribution proposes a complete description of the distribution of incident radiation with angles, and the implications in terms of surface albedo are given in a mathematical form, which is suitable for climate models that require evaluating surface albedo many times. The different definitions of observed albedos are explained in terms of the coupling between surface and atmospheric scattering properties. The analytical development in this paper relates the various quantities that are retrieved from orbiting platforms to what is needed by an atmospheric model. It provides a physically simple and practical approach to evaluation of land surface albedo values at any condition of sun illumination irrespective of the current range of surface anisotropic conditions and atmospheric aerosol load. The numerical differences between the various definitions of albedo for a set of typical atmospheric and surface scattering conditions are illustrated through numerical computation.

Corresponding author address: B. Pinty, Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit, IES, EC Joint Research Centre, TP 440, via E. Fermi, I-21020 Ispra (VA), Italy. Email: bernard.pinty@jrc.it

Abstract

New satellite instruments have been delivering a wealth of information regarding land surface albedo. This basic quantity describes what fraction of solar radiation is reflected from the earth’s surface. However, its concept and measurements have some ambiguity resulting from its dependence on the incidence angles of both the direct and diffuse solar radiation. At any time of day, a surface receives direct radiation in the direction of the sun, and diffuse radiation from the various other directions in which it may have been scattered by air molecules, aerosols, and cloud droplets. This contribution proposes a complete description of the distribution of incident radiation with angles, and the implications in terms of surface albedo are given in a mathematical form, which is suitable for climate models that require evaluating surface albedo many times. The different definitions of observed albedos are explained in terms of the coupling between surface and atmospheric scattering properties. The analytical development in this paper relates the various quantities that are retrieved from orbiting platforms to what is needed by an atmospheric model. It provides a physically simple and practical approach to evaluation of land surface albedo values at any condition of sun illumination irrespective of the current range of surface anisotropic conditions and atmospheric aerosol load. The numerical differences between the various definitions of albedo for a set of typical atmospheric and surface scattering conditions are illustrated through numerical computation.

Corresponding author address: B. Pinty, Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit, IES, EC Joint Research Centre, TP 440, via E. Fermi, I-21020 Ispra (VA), Italy. Email: bernard.pinty@jrc.it

Save
  • Chandrasekhar, S., 1960: Radiative Transfer. Dover, 393 pp.

  • Diner, D. J., and Coauthors, 1998: Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer MISR instrument description and overview. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 36 , 10721087.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Henyey, L. G., and T. L. Greenstein, 1941: Diffuse radiation in the galaxy. Astrophys. J., 93 , 7083.

  • Jin, Y., C. B. Schaaf, C. E. Woodcock, F. Gao, X. Li, and A. H. Strahler, 2003: Consistency of MODIS surface bidirectional reflectance distribution function and albedo retrievals. 2. Validation. J. Geophys. Res., 108 .D12105, doi:10.1029/2004JD004552.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knorr, W., K. G. Schnitzler, and Y. Govaerts, 2001: The role of bright desert regions in shaping North African climate. Geophys. Res. Lett., 28 , 34893492.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kondratyev, K., 1972: Radiation Processes in the Atmosphere. World Meteorological Organization, 214 pp.

  • Lenoble, J., 1985: Radiative Transfer in Scattering and Absorbing Atmospheres: Standard Computational Procedures. A. Deepak, 300 pp.

  • Lewis, P., and M. Barnsley, 1994: Influence of the sky radiance distribution on various formulations of the earth surface albedo. Proc. Sixth ISPRS Int. Symp. on Physical Measurements and Signatures in Remote Sensing, Val d’Isère, France Centre National D’etudes Spatiales, 707–715.

  • Liou, K. N., 1980: An Introduction on Atmospheric Radiation. Academic Press, 392 pp.

  • Lyapustin, A., 2002: Radiative transfer code SHARM-3D for radiance simulations over a non-Lambertian nonhomogeneous surface: Intercomparison study. Appl. Opt., 41 , 56075615.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lyapustin, A., and Y. Knyazikhin, 2001: Green’s function method for the radiative transfer problem. I: Homogeneous non-Lambertian surface. Appl. Opt., 40 , 34953501.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martonchik, J. V., D. J. Diner, R. A. Kahn, T. P. Ackerman, M M. Verstraete, B. Pinty, and H. R. Gordon, 1998a: Techniques for the retrieval of aerosol properties over land and ocean using multi-angle imaging. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 36 , 12121227.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martonchik, J. V., D. J. Diner, B. Pinty, M. M. Verstraete, R. B. Myneni, Y. Knyazikhin, and H. R. Gordon, 1998b: Determination of land and ocean reflective, radiative, and biophysical properties using multiangle imaging. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 36 , 12661281.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martonchik, J. V., C. J. Bruegge, and A. H. Strahler, 2000: A review of reflectance nomenclature for remote sensing. Remote Sens. Rev., 19 , 920.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martonchik, J. V., B. Pinty, and M. M. Verstraete, 2002: Note on an improved model of surface BRDF–atmospheric coupled radiation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 40 , 16371639.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Minnaert, M., 1941: The reciprocity principle in lunar photometry. Astrophys. J., 93 , 403410.

  • Nicodemus, F. E., J. C. Richmond, J. J. Hsia, I. W. Ginsberg, and T. Limperis, 1977: Geometrical Considerations and Nomenclature for Reflectance. NBS Monogr., No. 160, National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, 52 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pinty, B., F. Roveda, M. M. Verstraete, N. Gobron, Y. Govaerts, J. Martonchik, D. Diner, and R. Kahn, 2000a: Surface albedo retrieval from METEOSAT. Part 1: Theory. J. Geophys. Res., 105 , 1809918112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pinty, B., F. Roveda, M. M. Verstraete, N. Gobron, Y. Govaerts, J. Martonchik, D. Diner, and R. Kahn, 2000b: Surface albedo retrieval from METEOSAT. Part 2: Application. J. Geophys. Res., 105 , 1811318134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pinty, B., J-L. Widlowski, N. Gobron, M. M. Verstraete, and D. J. Diner, 2002: Uniqueness of multi-angular measurements. Part 1: A subpixel surface heterogeneity indicator from MISR. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 40 , 15601573.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pinty, B., and Coauthors, 2003: Earthquake-related dewatering using MISR/Terra satellite data. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 84 , 3748.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rahman, H., B. Pinty, and M. M. Verstraete, 1993: Coupled surface–atmosphere reflectance (CSAR) model. 2. Semiempirical surface model usable with NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer data. J. Geophys. Res., 98 , 2079120801.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Roesch, A., C. B. Schaaf, and F. Gao, 2004: Use of Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer bidirectional reflectance distribution function products to enhance simulated surface albedos. J. Geophys. Res., 109 .D12105, doi:10.1029/2004JD004552.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schaaf, C. B., and Coauthors, 2002: First operational BRDF, albedo and nadir reflectance products from MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ., 83 , 135148.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vermote, E., D. Tanré, J. L. Deuzé, M. Herman, and J. J. Morcrette, 1997: Second simulation of the satellite signal in the solar spectrum: An overview. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 35–3 , 675686.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Verstraete, M. M., 1989: Land surface processes in climate models: Status and prospects. Climate and the Geosciences: A Challenge for Science and Society in the 21st Century, A. Berger, S. H. Schneider, and J. C. Duplessy, Eds., Kluwer Academic, 321–340.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Widlowski, J-L., B. Pinty, N. Gobron, M. M. Verstraete, D. J. Diner, and A. B. Davis, 2004: Canopy structure parameters derived from multi-angular remote sensing data for terrestrial carbon studies. Climatic Change, 65 , 403415.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhou, L., and Coauthors, 2003: Comparison of seasonal and spatial variations of albedos from moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) and common land model. J. Geophys. Res., 108 .4488, doi:10.1029/2002JD003326.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 3040 1807 43
PDF Downloads 845 177 13