Small-Scale Drop Size Variability: Impact on Estimation of Cloud Optical Properties

Y. Knyazikhin Department of Geography, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Y. Knyazikhin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. B. Myneni Department of Geography, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by R. B. Myneni in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A. Marshak Climate and Radiation Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Search for other papers by A. Marshak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
W. J. Wiscombe Climate and Radiation Branch, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Search for other papers by W. J. Wiscombe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. L. Larsen Department of Physics, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan; Goddard Earth Science and Technology Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland

Search for other papers by M. L. Larsen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
J. V. Martonchik Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

Search for other papers by J. V. Martonchik in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Most cloud radiation models and conventional data processing techniques assume that the mean number of drops of a given radius is proportional to volume. The analysis of microphysical data on liquid water drop sizes shows that, for sufficiently small volumes, this proportionality breaks down; the number of cloud drops of a given radius is instead proportional to the volume raised to a drop size–dependent nonunit power. The coefficient of proportionality, a generalized drop concentration, is a function of the drop size. For abundant small drops the power is unity as assumed in the conventional approach. However, for rarer large drops, it falls increasingly below unity. This empirical fact leads to drop clustering, with the larger drops exhibiting a greater degree of clustering. The generalized drop concentration shows the mean number of drops per cluster, while the power characterizes the occurrence frequency of clusters. With a fixed total number of drops in a cloud, a decrease in frequency of clusters is accompanied by a corresponding increase in the generalized concentration. This initiates a competing process missed in the conventional models: an increase in the number of drops per cluster enhances the impact of rarer large drops on cloud radiation while a decrease in the frequency suppresses it. Because of the nonlinear relationship between the number of clustered drops and the volume, these two opposite tendencies do not necessarily compensate each other. The data analysis suggests that clustered drops likely have a stronger radiative impact compared to their unclustered counterpart; ignoring it results in underestimation of the contribution from large drops to cloud horizontal optical path.

Corresponding author address: Yuri Knyazikhin, Department of Geography, Boston University, 675 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215. Email: jknjazi@crsa.bu.edu

Abstract

Most cloud radiation models and conventional data processing techniques assume that the mean number of drops of a given radius is proportional to volume. The analysis of microphysical data on liquid water drop sizes shows that, for sufficiently small volumes, this proportionality breaks down; the number of cloud drops of a given radius is instead proportional to the volume raised to a drop size–dependent nonunit power. The coefficient of proportionality, a generalized drop concentration, is a function of the drop size. For abundant small drops the power is unity as assumed in the conventional approach. However, for rarer large drops, it falls increasingly below unity. This empirical fact leads to drop clustering, with the larger drops exhibiting a greater degree of clustering. The generalized drop concentration shows the mean number of drops per cluster, while the power characterizes the occurrence frequency of clusters. With a fixed total number of drops in a cloud, a decrease in frequency of clusters is accompanied by a corresponding increase in the generalized concentration. This initiates a competing process missed in the conventional models: an increase in the number of drops per cluster enhances the impact of rarer large drops on cloud radiation while a decrease in the frequency suppresses it. Because of the nonlinear relationship between the number of clustered drops and the volume, these two opposite tendencies do not necessarily compensate each other. The data analysis suggests that clustered drops likely have a stronger radiative impact compared to their unclustered counterpart; ignoring it results in underestimation of the contribution from large drops to cloud horizontal optical path.

Corresponding author address: Yuri Knyazikhin, Department of Geography, Boston University, 675 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215. Email: jknjazi@crsa.bu.edu

Save
  • Albrecht, B A., D A. Randall, and S. Nicholls, 1988: Observations of marine stratocumulus clouds during FIRE. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 69 , 618626.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ash, R., 1965: Information Theory. Dover, 339 pp.

  • Barnsley, M F., 1993: Fractals Everywhere. 2d ed. Academic Press, 531 pp.

  • Brenguier, J L., T. Bourrianne, A. de Araujo Coelho, J. Isbert, R. Peytavi, D. Trevarin, and P. Weschler, 1998: Improvements of droplet size distribution measurements with the Fast-FSSP (Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe). J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 15 , 10771090.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dong, X., P. Minnis, G G. Mace, W L. Smith Jr., M. Poellot, R T. Marchan, and A D. Rapp, 2002: Comparison of stratus cloud properties deduced from surface, GOES, and aircraft data during the March 2000 ARM Cloud IOP. J. Atmos. Sci., 59 , 32653284.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • King, M D., L F. Radke, and P V. Hobbs, 1990: Determination of the spectral absorption of solar radiation by marine stratocumulus clouds from airborne measurements within clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 47 , 894907.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knyazikhin, Y., A. Marshak, W J. Wiscombe, J V. Martonchik, and R B. Myneni, 2002: A missing solution to the transport equation and its effect on estimation of cloud absorptive properties. J. Atmos. Sci., 59 , 35723585.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kolmogorov, A M., 1950: Foundations of the Theory of Probability. Chelsea, 71 pp.

  • Liu, Y., and J. Hallett, 1998: On size distributions of cloud droplets growing by condensation: A new conceptual model. J. Atmos. Sci., 55 , 527536.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, Y., P H. Daum, and J. Hallet, 2002: A generalized systems theory for the effect of varying fluctuations on cloud droplet size distribution. J. Atmos. Sci., 59 , 22792290.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mandelbrot, B B., 1982: The Fractal Geometry of Nature. W. H. Freeman, 460 pp.

  • Marshak, A., Y. Knyazikhin, M. Larsen, and W J. Wiscombe, 2005: Small-scale drop size variability: Empirical models for drop size–dependent clustering in clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 62 , 551558.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pawlowska, H., and J L. Brenguier, 1997: Optimal nonlinear estimation of cloud particle measurements. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 14 , 88104.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Richtmyer, R D., 1978: Principles of Advanced Mathematical Physics. Vol. 1. Springer-Verlag, 422 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 408 222 17
PDF Downloads 76 28 3