A Topographic Drag Closure Built on an Analytical Base Flux

Stephen T. Garner NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey

Search for other papers by Stephen T. Garner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Topographic drag schemes depend on grid-scale representations of the average height, width, and orientation of the subgrid topography. Until now, these representations have been based on a combination of statistics and dimensional analysis. However, under certain physical assumptions, linear analysis provides the exact amplitude and orientation of the drag for arbitrary topography. The author proposes a computationally practical closure based on this analysis.

Also proposed is a nonlinear correction for nonpropagating base flux. This is patterned after existing schemes but is better constrained to match the linear solution because it assumes a correlation between mountain height and width. When the correction is interpreted as a formula for the transition to saturation in the wave train, it also provides a way of estimating the vertical distribution of the momentum forcing. The explicit subgrid height distribution causes a natural broadening of the layers experiencing the forcing. Linear drag due to simple oscillating flow over topography, which is relevant to ocean tides, has almost the same form as for the stationary atmospheric problem. However, dimensional analysis suggests that the nonpropagating drag in this situation is mostly due to topographic length scales that are small enough to keep the steady-state assumption satisfied.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Stephen T. Garner, NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ 08542. Email: steve.garner@noaa.gov

Abstract

Topographic drag schemes depend on grid-scale representations of the average height, width, and orientation of the subgrid topography. Until now, these representations have been based on a combination of statistics and dimensional analysis. However, under certain physical assumptions, linear analysis provides the exact amplitude and orientation of the drag for arbitrary topography. The author proposes a computationally practical closure based on this analysis.

Also proposed is a nonlinear correction for nonpropagating base flux. This is patterned after existing schemes but is better constrained to match the linear solution because it assumes a correlation between mountain height and width. When the correction is interpreted as a formula for the transition to saturation in the wave train, it also provides a way of estimating the vertical distribution of the momentum forcing. The explicit subgrid height distribution causes a natural broadening of the layers experiencing the forcing. Linear drag due to simple oscillating flow over topography, which is relevant to ocean tides, has almost the same form as for the stationary atmospheric problem. However, dimensional analysis suggests that the nonpropagating drag in this situation is mostly due to topographic length scales that are small enough to keep the steady-state assumption satisfied.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Stephen T. Garner, NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ 08542. Email: steve.garner@noaa.gov

Save
  • Arbic, B K., S T. Garner, R W. Hallberg, and H L. Simmons, 2004: The accuracy of surface elevations in forward global barotropic and baroclinic tide models. Deep-Sea Res., 51B , 3069–3101.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bacmeister, J T., 1993: Mountain-wave drag in the stratosphere and mesosphere inferred from observed winds and a simple mountain-wave parameterization scheme. J. Atmos. Sci., 50 , 377–399.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bacmeister, J T., and M R. Schoeberl, 1989: Breakdown of vertically propagating two-dimensional gravity waves forced by orography. J. Atmos. Sci., 46 , 2109–2134.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baines, P G., and T N. Palmer, 1985: Rationale for a new physically based parametrization of subgridscale orographic effects. Tech. Memo. 169, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 11 pp.

  • Bannon, P R., and J A. Zehnder, 1985: Surface pressure and mountain drag for transient airflow over a mountain ridge. J. Atmos. Sci., 42 , 2454–2462.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bell, T H., 1975: Lee waves in stratified flows with simple harmonic time dependence. J. Fluid Mech., 67-4 , 705–722.

  • Eliassen, A., and E. Palm, 1960: On the transfer of energy in stationary mountain waves. Geofys. Publ., 22 , 1–23.

  • Holton, J R., 1973: An Introduction to Dynamical Meteorology. Academic Press, 361 pp.

  • Kim, Y-J., and A. Arakawa, 1995: Improvement of orographic gravity wave parameterization using a mesoscale gravity wave model. J. Atmos. Sci., 52 , 1875–1902.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lindzen, R S., 1981: Turbulence and stress due to gravity wave and tidal breakdown. J. Geophys. Res., 86 , 9707–9714.

  • Lindzen, R S., 1988: Supersaturation of vertically propagating internal gravity waves. J. Atmos. Sci., 45 , 705–711.

  • Lott, F., and M J. Miller, 1997: A new subgrid-scale orographic drag parametrization: Its formulation and testing. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123 , 101–127.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miranda, M A., and I N. James, 1992: Non-linear three-dimensional effects on gravity-wave drag: Splitting flow and breaking waves. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 118 , 1057–1081.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Olaffson, H., and P. Bougeault, 1996: Nonlinear flow past an elliptic mountain ridge. J. Atmos. Sci., 53 , 2465–2489.

  • Palmer, T N., G J. Shutts, and R. Swinbank, 1986: Alleviation of a systematic westerly bias in general circulation and numerical weather prediction models through an orographic gravity wave drag parameterization. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 112 , 1001–1039.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pierrehumbert, R T., 1987: An essay on the parametrization of orographic gravity wave drag. Proc. Seminar/Workshop on Observations, Theory and Modeling of Orographic Effects, Vol. 1, Shinfield Park, Reading, United Kingdom, ECMWF, 251–282.

  • Pierrehumbert, R T., and B. Wyman, 1985: Upstream effects of mesoscale mountains. J. Atmos. Sci., 42 , 977–1003.

  • Scinocca, J F., and N A. McFarlane, 2000: The parameterization of drag induced by stratified flow over anisotropic orography. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126 , 2353–2393.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shutts, G., 1995: Gravity-wave drag parametrization over complex terrain: The effect of critical-level absorption in directional wind-shear. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 121 , 1005–1021.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, R B., 1977: The steepening of hydrostatic mountain waves. J. Atmos. Sci., 34 , 1634–1654.

  • Stern, W F., and R T. Pierrehumbert, 1988: The impact of an orographic gravity-wave drag parameterization on extended range prediction with a GCM. Preprints, Eight Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Baltimore, MD, Amer. Meteor. Soc. 745–750.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 4295 1533 67
PDF Downloads 430 111 15