Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Radar Analysis of Precipitation Initiation in Maritime versus Continental Clouds near the Florida Coast: Inferences Concerning the Role of CCN and Giant Nuclei

Sabine Göke Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois

Search for other papers by Sabine Göke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Harry T. Ochs III Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois

Search for other papers by Harry T. Ochs III in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Robert M. Rauber Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois

Search for other papers by Robert M. Rauber in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Oct 2007
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3961.1
Page(s):
3695–3707
Restricted access

Abstract

A method of analyzing radar data is developed and applied to determine whether the X-band radar reflectivity evolution of clouds observed during summertime on the northeast Florida coast during the Small Cumulus Microphysics Study (SCMS) shows distinct differences in precipitation development that can be associated with the clouds’ maritime or continental characteristics. For this study, the entire National Center for Atmospheric Research CP2 radar dataset from SCMS was examined, and 38 clouds were used. For these clouds the evolution in X-band radar reflectivity, from the clouds’ earliest detection through precipitation, was clearly documented and met specific requirements concerning the clouds’ location relative to the coastline and direction of movement. Since cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and giant and ultragiant nuclei (GN) measurements were not available for the specific clouds used in this study, proxies were used to partition the clouds into four groups based on the cloud location and direction of movement. Specifically, it was assumed that clouds forming over the ocean during onshore flow had maritime characteristics (group 1: low CCN, high GN), clouds forming over land during onshore flow would have modified maritime characteristics (group 2: high CCN, high GN), clouds forming over land during offshore flow would have continental characteristics (group 3: high CCN, low GN), and clouds forming over the ocean during offshore flow would have modified continental characteristics (group 4: high CCN, high GN). These assumptions are based on past measurements presented by Sax and Hudson. Then, these populations were statistically compared using the nonparametric multiresponse permutation procedure developed by Mielke et al. A comparison of groups 1 and 2 provided a test of the role of CCN concentrations in precipitation development in these cloud populations. A comparison of groups 3 and 4 provided a test of the role of GN concentrations in precipitation development in these cloud populations. The two cloud populations that were disjoint at a statistically significant level were groups 1 and 2. For these groups, the analysis showed that the median characteristic total water content of the truly maritime clouds (group 1) was about half that of the modified maritime clouds (group 2) at the time of precipitation formation. The characteristic time to precipitation formation was about 60% smaller for the truly maritime clouds. Thus, the characteristic reflectivity threshold for precipitation development was reached at a much lower altitude above cloud base in a much faster time in the truly maritime clouds. This result supports the conclusions of Hudson and Yum that precipitation development in the SCMS clouds was primarily controlled by CCN concentrations rather than GN concentrations.

* Current affiliation: Department of Physical Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Corresponding author address: Dr. Sabine Göke, Division of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64 (Gustaf Hällstömin katu 2), 00014 Helsinki, Finland. Email: sabine.goeke@helsinki.fi

Abstract

A method of analyzing radar data is developed and applied to determine whether the X-band radar reflectivity evolution of clouds observed during summertime on the northeast Florida coast during the Small Cumulus Microphysics Study (SCMS) shows distinct differences in precipitation development that can be associated with the clouds’ maritime or continental characteristics. For this study, the entire National Center for Atmospheric Research CP2 radar dataset from SCMS was examined, and 38 clouds were used. For these clouds the evolution in X-band radar reflectivity, from the clouds’ earliest detection through precipitation, was clearly documented and met specific requirements concerning the clouds’ location relative to the coastline and direction of movement. Since cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and giant and ultragiant nuclei (GN) measurements were not available for the specific clouds used in this study, proxies were used to partition the clouds into four groups based on the cloud location and direction of movement. Specifically, it was assumed that clouds forming over the ocean during onshore flow had maritime characteristics (group 1: low CCN, high GN), clouds forming over land during onshore flow would have modified maritime characteristics (group 2: high CCN, high GN), clouds forming over land during offshore flow would have continental characteristics (group 3: high CCN, low GN), and clouds forming over the ocean during offshore flow would have modified continental characteristics (group 4: high CCN, high GN). These assumptions are based on past measurements presented by Sax and Hudson. Then, these populations were statistically compared using the nonparametric multiresponse permutation procedure developed by Mielke et al. A comparison of groups 1 and 2 provided a test of the role of CCN concentrations in precipitation development in these cloud populations. A comparison of groups 3 and 4 provided a test of the role of GN concentrations in precipitation development in these cloud populations. The two cloud populations that were disjoint at a statistically significant level were groups 1 and 2. For these groups, the analysis showed that the median characteristic total water content of the truly maritime clouds (group 1) was about half that of the modified maritime clouds (group 2) at the time of precipitation formation. The characteristic time to precipitation formation was about 60% smaller for the truly maritime clouds. Thus, the characteristic reflectivity threshold for precipitation development was reached at a much lower altitude above cloud base in a much faster time in the truly maritime clouds. This result supports the conclusions of Hudson and Yum that precipitation development in the SCMS clouds was primarily controlled by CCN concentrations rather than GN concentrations.

* Current affiliation: Department of Physical Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Corresponding author address: Dr. Sabine Göke, Division of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64 (Gustaf Hällstömin katu 2), 00014 Helsinki, Finland. Email: sabine.goeke@helsinki.fi

Save
Cover Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

  • Albrecht, B. A., 1989: Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness. Science, 245 , 1227–1230.

  • Battan, L. J., 1953: Observations on the formation and spread of precipitation in convective clouds. J. Meteor., 10 , 311–324.

  • Berry, E. X., and R. L. Reinhardt, 1974: An analysis of cloud drop growth by collection. Part IV: A new parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci., 31 , 2127–2135.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Caylor, I. J., and A. J. Illingworth, 1987: Radar observations and modelling of warm rain initiation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 113 , 1171–1191.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hudson, J. G., 1993: Cloud condensation nuclei. J. Appl. Meteor., 32 , 596–607.

  • Hudson, J. G., and H. Li, 1995: Microphysical contrasts in Atlantic stratus. J. Atmos. Sci., 52 , 3031–3040.

  • Hudson, J. G., and S. S. Yum, 2001: Maritime–continental drizzle contrasts in small cumuli. J. Atmos. Sci., 58 , 915–926.

  • Illingworth, A. J., 1988: The formation of rain in convective clouds. Nature, 336 , 754–756.

  • Illingworth, A. J., J. W. Goddard, and S. M. Cherry, 1987: Polarization radar studies of precipitation development in convective storms. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 113 , 469–489.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Keeler, R. J., P. H. Herzegh, and C. F. Frush, 1984: Measurements of CP-2 co-polar and cross-polar antenna illumination functions at S- and X-band. Preprints, 22d Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Zurich, Switzerland, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 287–291.

  • Knight, C. A., and L. J. Miller, 1998: Early radar echoes from small, warm cumulus: Bragg and hydrometeor scattering. J. Atmos. Sci., 55 , 2974–2992.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Knight, C. A., J. Vivekanandan, and S. G. Lasher-Trapp, 2002: First radar echoes and the early ZDR history of Florida cumulus. J. Atmos. Sci., 59 , 1454–1472.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mielke Jr., P. W., K. J. Berry, and G. W. Brier, 1981: Application of multi-response permutation procedures for examining seasonal changes in monthly mean sea-level pressure patterns. Mon. Wea. Rev., 109 , 120–126.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sax, R. I., and J. G. Hudson, 1981: Continentality of the south Florida summertime CCN aerosol. J. Atmos. Sci., 38 , 1467–1479.

  • Wilson, J. W., T. M. Weckwerth, J. Vivekanandan, R. M. Wakimoto, and R. W. Russell, 1994: Boundary layer clear-air radar echoes: Origin of echoes and accuracy of derived winds. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 11 , 1184–1206.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 990 700 34
PDF Downloads 192 59 5