Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Weather Noise Forcing of Surface Climate Variability

Edwin K. Schneider George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, and Center for Ocean–Land–Atmosphere Studies, Calverton, Maryland

Search for other papers by Edwin K. Schneider in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Meizhu Fan George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia

Search for other papers by Meizhu Fan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Sep 2007
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS4026.1
Page(s):
3265–3280
Restricted access

Abstract

A model-based method to evaluate the role of weather noise forcing of low-frequency variability of surface properties, including SST, surface currents, land surface temperature, and soil moisture, is presented. In this procedure, an “interactive ensemble” coupled model, in which the ocean and land components are coupled to the mean of an ensemble of atmospheric models, is externally forced by the time-dependent surface fluxes due to the weather noise. The coupling to the ensemble mean atmosphere has the effect of strongly reducing the internally generated atmospheric weather noise so that, for example, observed weather noise forcing can meaningfully be prescribed. The surface flux due to weather noise is determined by removing the ensemble mean surface flux response of an ensemble of atmospheric models to specified surface boundary conditions from the total surface flux. When the system is entirely noise forced and the forcing is specified in this manner, the interactive ensemble model will reproduce the observed evolution of the surface properties. The method is illustrated in the context of two models: 1) a well-known simple coupled model of low-frequency climate variability, which considers the response of a slab thermodynamic surface model coupled to a thermodynamic atmosphere, and 2) a coupled GCM. The simple model is applied to the diagnosis of both observational and model-generated data, while the coupled GCM example illustrates the potential of the method if both model and data are perfect.

Corresponding author address: Edwin Schneider, George Mason University/COLA, 4041 Powder Mill Rd., Suite 302, Calverton, MD 20705-3106. Email: schneide@cola.iges.org

Abstract

A model-based method to evaluate the role of weather noise forcing of low-frequency variability of surface properties, including SST, surface currents, land surface temperature, and soil moisture, is presented. In this procedure, an “interactive ensemble” coupled model, in which the ocean and land components are coupled to the mean of an ensemble of atmospheric models, is externally forced by the time-dependent surface fluxes due to the weather noise. The coupling to the ensemble mean atmosphere has the effect of strongly reducing the internally generated atmospheric weather noise so that, for example, observed weather noise forcing can meaningfully be prescribed. The surface flux due to weather noise is determined by removing the ensemble mean surface flux response of an ensemble of atmospheric models to specified surface boundary conditions from the total surface flux. When the system is entirely noise forced and the forcing is specified in this manner, the interactive ensemble model will reproduce the observed evolution of the surface properties. The method is illustrated in the context of two models: 1) a well-known simple coupled model of low-frequency climate variability, which considers the response of a slab thermodynamic surface model coupled to a thermodynamic atmosphere, and 2) a coupled GCM. The simple model is applied to the diagnosis of both observational and model-generated data, while the coupled GCM example illustrates the potential of the method if both model and data are perfect.

Corresponding author address: Edwin Schneider, George Mason University/COLA, 4041 Powder Mill Rd., Suite 302, Calverton, MD 20705-3106. Email: schneide@cola.iges.org

Save
Cover Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

  • Barsugli, J. J., and D. S. Battisti, 1998: The basic effects of atmosphere–ocean thermal coupling on midlatitude variability. J. Atmos. Sci., 55 , 477–493.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Blanke, B., J. D. Neelin, and D. Gutzler, 1997: Estimating the effect of stochastic wind stress forcing on ENSO irregularity. J. Climate, 10 , 1473–1486.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bretherton, C. S., and D. S. Battisti, 2000: An interpretation of the results from atmospheric general circulation models forced by the time history of the observed sea surface temperature distribution. Geophys. Res. Lett., 27 , 767–770.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Einstein, A., 1905: Investigations on the theory of Brownian movement. Ann. Phys., 17 , 549. [Also available as Investigations on the Theory of the Brownian Movement, by Albert Einstein, edited by R. Fürth and translated by A. D. Cowper, Metheun & Co, 1926. Reprinted by Dover in 1956].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Flügel, M., and P. Chang, 1996: Impact of dynamical and stochastic processes on the predictability of ENSO. Geophys. Res. Lett., 23 , 2089–2092.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Frankignoul, C., 1999: A cautionary note on the use of statistical atmospheric models in the middle latitudes: Comments on “Decadal variability in the North Pacific as simulated by a hybrid coupled model.”. J. Climate, 12 , 1871–1872.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Frankignoul, C., and R. W. Reynolds, 1983: Testing a dynamical model for mid-latitude sea surface temperature anomalies. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 13 , 1131–1145.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Frankignoul, C., A. Czaja, and B. L’Heveder, 1998: Air–sea feedback in the North Atlantic and surface boundary conditions for ocean models. J. Climate, 11 , 2310–2324.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gates, W. L., 1992: AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 73 , 1962–1970.

  • Hasselmann, K., 1976: Stochastic climate models. Part I: Theory. Tellus, 28 , 473–485.

  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77 , 437–471.

  • Kiehl, J. T., J. J. Hack, G. B. Bonan, B. A. Boville, D. L. Williamson, and P. J. Rasch, 1998: The National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model: CCM3. J. Climate, 11 , 1131–1149.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kirtman, B. P., and P. S. Schopf, 1998: Decadal variability in ENSO predictability and prediction. J. Climate, 11 , 2804–2822.

  • Kirtman, B. P., and J. Shukla, 2002: Interactive coupled ensemble: A new coupling strategy for CGCMs. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29 .1367, doi:10.1029/2002GL014834.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kirtman, B. P., Y. Fan, and E. K. Schneider, 2002: The COLA global coupled and anomaly coupled ocean–atmosphere GCM. J. Climate, 15 , 2301–2320.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kirtman, B. P., K. Pegion, and S. M. Kinter, 2005: Internal atmospheric dynamics and tropical Indo-Pacific climate variability. J. Atmos. Sci., 62 , 2220–2233.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kirtman, B. P., R. Wu, and S-W. Yeh, 2006: Internal ocean dynamics and climate variability. COLA Tech. Rep. 225, 44 pp.

  • Kleeman, R., and A. M. Moore, 1997: A theory for the limitation of ENSO predictability due to stochastic atmospheric transients. J. Atmos. Sci., 54 , 753–767.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lau, N-C., 1985: Modeling the seasonal dependence of the atmospheric response to observed El Niños in 1962–76. Mon. Wea. Rev., 113 , 1970–1996.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lau, N-C., and M. J. Nath, 1996: The role of the “atmospheric bridge” in linking tropical Pacific ENSO events to extratropical SST anomalies. J. Climate, 9 , 2036–2057.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Navarra, A., and J. Tribbia, 2005: The coupled manifold. J. Atmos. Sci., 62 , 310–330. Corrigendum. 62 , 1660–1661.

  • Pacanowski, R. C., and S. M. Griffies, 1998: MOM 3.0 manual. NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, 668 pp.

  • Saravanan, R., and J. C. McWilliams, 1998: Advective ocean–atmosphere interaction: An analytical stochastic model with implications for decadal variability. J. Climate, 11 , 165–188.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Schneider, E. K., 1997: A note on the annual cycle of sea surface temperature at the equator. COLA Rep. 36, 17 pp. [Available from COLA, 4041 Powder Mill Rd., Suite 302, Calverton, MD 20705.].

  • Schopf, P. S., 1985: Modeling tropical sea-surface temperature: Implications of various atmospheric responses. Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Models, J. C. J. Nihoul, Ed., Elsevier Oceanography Series, Vol. 40, Elsevier, 727–734.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Uppala, S. M., and Coauthors, 2004: ERA-40: ECMWF 45-year reanalysis of the global atmosphere and surface conditions 1957–2002. ECMWF Newsletter, No. 101, ECMWF, Reading, United Kingdom, 2–21.

  • Uppala, S. M., and Coauthors, 2005: The ERA-40 re-analysis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131 , 2961–3012.

  • Wu, Z., E. K. Schneider, and B. P. Kirtman, 2004: Causes of low frequency North Atlantic SST variability in a coupled GCM. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31 .L09210, doi:10.1029/2004GL019548.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Xue, Y., P. J. Sellers, J. L. Kinter, and J. Shukla, 1991: A simplified biosphere model for global climate studies. J. Climate, 4 , 345–364.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zebiak, S. E., 1989: On the 30–60 day oscillation and the prediction of El Niño. J. Climate, 2 , 1381–1387.

  • Zebiak, S. E., and M. A. Cane, 1987: A model El Niño–Southern Oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115 , 2262–2278.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 336 209 12
PDF Downloads 119 26 1