Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Aerosol–Cloud Interactions in a Mesoscale Model. Part I: Sensitivity to Activation and Collision–Coalescence

Irena T. Ivanova Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Search for other papers by Irena T. Ivanova in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Henry G. Leighton Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Search for other papers by Henry G. Leighton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Feb 2008
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2207.1
Page(s):
289–308
Restricted access

Abstract

High-resolution numerical simulations of the aerosol–cloud feedbacks are performed with a mesoscale model. The multimodal aerosol species, added to the model, and the cloud species were represented by two spectral moments. The aerosol sources include particle activation, solute transfer between drops due to collision and coalescence of drops, and particle regeneration. A summertime case was simulated consisting of a cold frontal cloud system and a postfrontal stratus. Experiments with both simple and mechanistic activation parameterization of aerosol and with one and two aerosol modes were performed. Verification was made of the stratus properties against measurements taken during the Radiation Aerosol and Cloud Experiment (RACE).

The results demonstrate a significant sensitivity of the stratus and of the frontal system to the aerosol and a moderate impact on the particle spectrum of drop collision–coalescence. The stratus simulation with mechanistic activation and unimodal aerosol showed the best agreement of droplet concentration with the observations, and the simulations with mechanistic activation and a bimodal aerosol and with simple activation underestimated the droplet concentration. A similar high sensitivity was found for the frontal precipitation intensity. Drop collision–coalescence in the frontal system was found to have an impact on the particle mean radius whose magnitude amounted to 10% and 15% for one and multiple cloud cycles, respectively. This impact was also found to be highly variable in space. The modified particle spectrum, following activation in clouds, was found to increase droplet concentration.

Corresponding author address: Irena Ivanova, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, 805 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC H3A 2K6, Canada. Email: irena@zephyr.meteo.mcgill.ca

Abstract

High-resolution numerical simulations of the aerosol–cloud feedbacks are performed with a mesoscale model. The multimodal aerosol species, added to the model, and the cloud species were represented by two spectral moments. The aerosol sources include particle activation, solute transfer between drops due to collision and coalescence of drops, and particle regeneration. A summertime case was simulated consisting of a cold frontal cloud system and a postfrontal stratus. Experiments with both simple and mechanistic activation parameterization of aerosol and with one and two aerosol modes were performed. Verification was made of the stratus properties against measurements taken during the Radiation Aerosol and Cloud Experiment (RACE).

The results demonstrate a significant sensitivity of the stratus and of the frontal system to the aerosol and a moderate impact on the particle spectrum of drop collision–coalescence. The stratus simulation with mechanistic activation and unimodal aerosol showed the best agreement of droplet concentration with the observations, and the simulations with mechanistic activation and a bimodal aerosol and with simple activation underestimated the droplet concentration. A similar high sensitivity was found for the frontal precipitation intensity. Drop collision–coalescence in the frontal system was found to have an impact on the particle mean radius whose magnitude amounted to 10% and 15% for one and multiple cloud cycles, respectively. This impact was also found to be highly variable in space. The modified particle spectrum, following activation in clouds, was found to increase droplet concentration.

Corresponding author address: Irena Ivanova, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, 805 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, QC H3A 2K6, Canada. Email: irena@zephyr.meteo.mcgill.ca

Save
Cover Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

  • Abdul-Razzak, H., S. J. Ghan, and C. Rivera-Carpio, 2000: A parameterization of aerosol activation. Part II. Multiple aerosol types. J. Geophys. Res., 105 , 6837–6844.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ackerman, A. S., O. B. Toon, and P. V. Hobbs, 1995: A model for particle microphysics, turbulent mixing, and radiative transfer in the stratocumulus-topped marine boundary layer and comparison with measurements. J. Atmos. Sci., 52 , 1204–1236.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Banic, C. M., and Coauthors, 1996: Measurements of the microphysics of low stratus clouds and the radiation above, in, and below cloud. Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on Clouds and Precipitation, Zurich, Switzerland, International Commission on Clouds and Precipitation and International Association on Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences, Vol. 2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Baumgardner, D., and M. Spowart, 1990: Evaluation of the Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe. Part III: Time response and laser inhomogeneity limitations. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 7 , 666–672.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Baumgardner, D., W. Strapp, and J. E. Dye, 1985: Evaluation of the Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe. Part II: Corrections for coincidence and dead-time losses. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 2 , 626–632.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Benoit, R., J. Cote, and J. Mailhot, 1989: Inclusion of a TKE boundary layer parameterization in the Canadian regional finite-element model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117 , 1726–1750.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Benoit, R., M. Desgagne, P. Pellerin, S. Pellerin, and Y. Chartier, 1997: The Canadian MC2: A semi-Lagrangian, semi-implicit wideband atmospheric model suited for finescale process studies and simulation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125 , 2382–2415.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bluestein, H. B., 1992: Synoptic-Dynamic Meteorology in Midlatitudes. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press, 448 pp.

  • Bower, K. N., and Coauthors, 1997: Observations and modeling of the processing of aerosol by a hill cap cloud. Atmos. Environ., 31 , 2527–2543.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brenguier, J. L., 1989: Coincidence and dead-time corrections for particles counters. Part II: High concentration measurements with an FSSP. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 6 , 585–598.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cohard, J-M., and J-P. Pinty, 2000a: A comprehensive two-moment warm microphysical bulk scheme. I: Description and tests. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126 , 1815–1842.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cohard, J-M., J-P. Pinty, and C. Bedos, 1998: Extending Twomey’s analytical estimate of nucleated cloud droplet concentrations from CCN spectra. J. Atmos. Sci., 55 , 3348–3356.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dye, J. E., and D. Baumgardner, 1984: Evaluation of the Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe. Part I: Electronic and optical studies. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 1 , 329–344.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Feingold, G., and S. M. Kreidenweis, 2000: Does cloud processing of aerosol enhance droplet concentrations? J. Geophys. Res., 105 , 24351–24362.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Feingold, G., and S. M. Kreidenweis, 2002: Cloud processing of aerosol as modeled by a large eddy simulation with coupled microphysics and chemistry. J. Geophys. Res., 107 .4687, doi:10.1029/2002JD002054.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Feingold, G., B. Stevens, W. R. Cotton, and A. S. Frisch, 1996a: On the relationships between drop in-cloud residence time and drizzle production in stratocumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 53 , 1108–1122.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Feingold, G., S. M. Kreidenweis, B. Stevens, and W. R. Cotton, 1996b: Numerical simulations of stratocumulus processing of cloud condensation nuclei through collision-coalescence. J. Geophys. Res., 101 , 21391–21402.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Feingold, G., R. Boers, B. Stevens, and W. R. Cotton, 1997: A modeling study of the effect of drizzle on cloud optical depth and susceptibility. J. Geophys. Res., 102 , 13527–13534.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Feingold, G., R. K. Walko, B. Stevens, and W. R. Cotton, 1998: Simulations of marine stratocumulus using a new microphysical parameterization scheme. Atmos. Res., 47–48 , 505–528.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ferrier, B. S., 1994: A double-moment multiple-phase four-class bulk ice scheme. Part I: Description. J. Atmos. Sci., 51 , 249–280.

  • Flossmann, A. I., 1994: A 2-D spectral model simulation of the scavenging of gaseous and particulate sulfate by a warm marine cloud. Atmos. Res., 32 , 233–248.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Flossmann, A. I., W. D. Hall, and H. R. Pruppacher, 1985: A theoretical study of the wet removal of atmospheric pollutants. Part I: The redistribution of aerosol particles captured through nucleation and impaction scavenging by growing cloud drops. J. Atmos. Sci., 42 , 583–606.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Garand, L., and J. Mailhot, 1990: The influence of infrared radiation on numerical weather forecasts. Preprints. Seventh Conf. on Atmospheric Radiation, San Francisco, CA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., J146–J151.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ghan, S. J., L. R. Leung, and R. C. Easter, 1997: Prediction of cloud droplet number in a general circulation model. J. Geophys. Res., 102 , 21777–21794.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Golaz, J-C., V. Larson, and W. Cotton, 2002: A PDF-based model for boundary layer clouds. Part I: Method and model description. J. Atmos. Sci., 59 , 3540–3551.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gong, S. L., and Coauthors, 2003: Canadian Aerosol Module: A size-segregated simulation of atmospheric aerosol processes for climate and air quality models. 1. Module development. J. Geophys. Res., 108 .4007, doi:10.1029/2001JD002002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Guan, H., A. Tremblay, and G. A. Isaac, 2000: Numerical simulation of stratus clouds and their sensitivity to radiation—A RACE case study. J. Appl. Meteor., 39 , 1881–1893.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hudson, J. G., 1993: Cloud condensation nuclei new marine cumulus. J. Geophys. Res., 98 , 2693–2702.

  • Jiang, H., G. Feingold, and W. R. Cotton, 2002: Simulations of aerosol-cloud-dynamical feedbacks resulting from entrainment of aerosol into the marine boundary layer during the Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment. J. Geophys. Res., 107 .4813, doi:10.1029/2001JD001502.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kain, J. S., and J. M. Fritsch, 1990: A one-dimensional entraining/detraining plume model and its application in convective parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci., 47 , 2784–2802.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kain, J. S., and J. M. Fritsch, 1993: Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: The Kain–Fritsch scheme. The Representation of Cumulus Convection in Numerical Models, Meteor. Monogr., No. 46, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 165–177.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Klein, S. A., and D. L. Hartmann, 1993: The seasonal cycle of low stratiform clouds. J. Climate, 6 , 1587–1606.

  • Kogan, Y. L., M. P. Khairoutdinov, D. K. Lilly, Z. N. Kogan, and Q. Liu, 1995: Modeling of stratocumulus cloud layers in a large eddy simulation model with explicit microphysics. J. Atmos. Sci., 52 , 2923–2940.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kong, F-Y., and M. K. Yau, 1997: An explicit approach of microphysics in MC2. Atmos.–Ocean, 35 , 257–291.

  • Lohmann, U., 2002: Possible aerosol effects on ice clouds via contact nucleation. J. Atmos. Sci., 59 , 647–656.

  • Lohmann, U., J. Feichter, C. C. Chuang, and J. E. Penner, 1999: Predicting the number of cloud droplets in the ECHAM GCM. J. Geophys. Res., 104 , 9169–9198.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lohmann, U., J. Feichter, J. E. Penner, and R. Leaitch, 2000: Indirect effect of sulfate and carbonaceous aerosols: A mechanistic treatment. J. Geophys. Res., 105 , 12193–12206.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mailhot, J., and Coauthors, 1998: Scientific description of RPN physics library—version 3.6. Tech. Rep., Atmospheric Environment Service, Dorval, QC, Canada, 188 pp.

  • Mechem, D. B., and Y. L. Kogan, 2003: Simulating the transition from drizzling marine stratocumulus to boundary layer cumulus with a mesoscale model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131 , 2342–2360.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Milbrandt, J., and M. K. Yau, 2005a: A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part I: Analysis of the role of the spectral shape parameter. J. Atmos. Sci., 62 , 3051–3064.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Milbrandt, J., and M. K. Yau, 2005b: A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part II: Proposed three-moment closure and scheme description. J. Atmos. Sci., 62 , 3065–3081.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mitra, S. K., J. Brinkmann, and H. T. Pruppacher, 1992: A wind tunnel study on the drop-to-particle conversion. J. Aerosol Sci., 23 , 245–256.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nicholls, S., 1984: The dynamics of stratocumulus. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 110 , 783–820.

  • Noonkester, V. R., 1984: Droplet spectra observed in marine stratus cloud layers. J. Atmos. Sci., 41 , 829–845.

  • Platnick, S., and S. Twomey, 1994: Determining the susceptibility of cloud albedo to changes in droplet concentrations with the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer. J. Appl. Meteor., 33 , 334–347.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ramanathan, V., R. D. Cess, E. F. Harrison, P. Minnis, B. R. Barkstrom, E. Ahmad, and D. Hartmann, 1989: Cloud radiative forcing and climate: Results from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment. Science, 243 , 57–63.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Robert, A., T. L. Yee, and H. Ritchie, 1985: A semi-Lagrangian and semi-implicit numerical integration scheme for multilevel atmospheric models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 113 , 388–394.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Slingo, A., S. Nicholls, and J. Schmetz, 1982: Aircraft observations of marine stratocumulus during JASIN. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 108 , 833–888.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tanguay, M., A. Robert, and R. Laprise, 1990: A semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian fully compressible regional forecast model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118 , 1970–1980.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Twomey, S., 1959: The nuclei of natural cloud formation. Part II: The supersaturation in natural clouds and the variation of cloud droplet concentration. Geofis. Pura Appl., 43 , 243–249.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 146 46 2
PDF Downloads 81 25 0