Using Singular Value Decomposition to Parameterize State-Dependent Model Errors

Christopher M. Danforth Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont

Search for other papers by Christopher M. Danforth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Eugenia Kalnay Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Eugenia Kalnay in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to use a new method of empirical model error correction, developed by Danforth et al. in 2007, based on estimating the systematic component of the nonperiodic errors linearly dependent on the anomalous state. The method uses singular value decomposition (SVD) to generate a basis of model errors and states. It requires only a time series of errors to estimate covariances and uses negligible additional computation during a forecast integration. As a result, it should be suitable for operational use at a relatively small computational expense.

The method is tested with the Lorenz ’96 coupled system as the truth and an uncoupled version of the same system as a model. The authors demonstrate that the SVD method explains a significant component of the effect that the model’s unresolved state has on the resolved state and shows that the results are better than those obtained with Leith’s empirical correction operator. The improvement is attributed to the fact that the SVD truncation effectively reduces sampling errors. Forecast improvements of up to 1000% are seen when compared with the original model. The improvements come at the expense of weakening ensemble spread.

Corresponding author address: Chris Danforth, Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401. Email: chris.danforth@uvm.edu

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to use a new method of empirical model error correction, developed by Danforth et al. in 2007, based on estimating the systematic component of the nonperiodic errors linearly dependent on the anomalous state. The method uses singular value decomposition (SVD) to generate a basis of model errors and states. It requires only a time series of errors to estimate covariances and uses negligible additional computation during a forecast integration. As a result, it should be suitable for operational use at a relatively small computational expense.

The method is tested with the Lorenz ’96 coupled system as the truth and an uncoupled version of the same system as a model. The authors demonstrate that the SVD method explains a significant component of the effect that the model’s unresolved state has on the resolved state and shows that the results are better than those obtained with Leith’s empirical correction operator. The improvement is attributed to the fact that the SVD truncation effectively reduces sampling errors. Forecast improvements of up to 1000% are seen when compared with the original model. The improvements come at the expense of weakening ensemble spread.

Corresponding author address: Chris Danforth, Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05401. Email: chris.danforth@uvm.edu

Save
  • Anderson, J. L., 2001: An ensemble adjustment Kalman filter for data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129 , 28842903.

  • Barnston, A. G., M. H. Glantz, and Y. He, 1999: Predictive skill of statistical and dynamical climate models in SST forecasts during the 1997–98 El Niño episode and the 1998 La Niña onset. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 80 , 217243.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bretherton, C., C. Smith, and J. Wallace, 1992: An intercomparison of methods for finding coupled patterns in climate data. J. Climate, 5 , 541560.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dalcher, A., and E. Kalnay, 1987: Error growth and predictability in operational ECMWF forecasts. Tellus, 39A , 474491.

  • Danforth, C. M., and J. A. Yorke, 2006: Making forecasts for chaotic physical processes. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96 .144102, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.144102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Danforth, C. M., E. Kalnay, and T. Miyoshi, 2007: Estimating and correcting global weather model error. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135 , 281299.

  • DelSole, T., and A. Y. Hou, 1999: Empirical correction of a dynamical model. Part I: Fundamental issues. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127 , 25332545.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Golub, G., and C. F. Van Loan, 1996: Matrix Computations. 3rd ed. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 694 pp.

  • Hamill, T., J. Whitaker, and C. Snyder, 2001: Distance-dependent filtering of background error covariance estimates in an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129 , 27762790.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leith, C. E., 1978: Objective methods for weather prediction. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 10 , 107128.

  • Lorenz, E. N., 1996: Predictability: A problem partly solved. Proc. ECMWF Seminar on Predictability, Reading, United Kingdom, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 1–18.

  • Lorenz, E. N., and K. A. Emanuel, 1998: Optimal sites for supplementary weather observations: Simulation with a small model. J. Atmos. Sci., 55 , 399414.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ott, E., and Coauthors, 2004: A local ensemble Kalman filter for atmospheric data assimilation. Tellus, 56A , 415428.

  • Reynolds, C., P. J. Webster, and E. Kalnay, 1994: Random error growth in NMC’s global forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122 , 12811305.

  • Whitaker, J., and T. Hamill, 2002: Ensemble data assimilation without perturbed observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130 , 19131924.

  • Wilks, D. S., 2005: Effects of stochastic parametrizations in the Lorenz ’96 system. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131 , 389407.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1208 795 53
PDF Downloads 295 64 8