Gravity Waves Generated by Sheared Potential Vorticity Anomalies

François Lott Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique du CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France

Search for other papers by François Lott in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Riwal Plougonven Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique du CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France

Search for other papers by Riwal Plougonven in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Jacques Vanneste School of Mathematics, and Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Jacques Vanneste in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The gravity waves (GWs) generated by potential vorticity (PV) anomalies in a rotating stratified shear flow are examined under the assumptions of constant vertical shear, two-dimensionality, and unbounded domain. Near a PV anomaly, the associated perturbation is well modeled by quasigeostrophic theory. This is not the case at large vertical distances, however, and in particular beyond the two inertial layers that appear above and below the anomaly; there, the perturbation consists of vertically propagating gravity waves. This structure is described analytically, using an expansion in the continuous spectrum of the singular modes that results from the presence of critical levels.

Several explicit results are obtained. These include the form of the Eliassen–Palm (EP) flux as a function of the Richardson number N22, where N is the Brunt–Väisälä frequency and Λ the vertical shear. Its nondimensional value is shown to be approximately exp(−πN/Λ)/8 in the far-field GW region, approximately twice that between the two inertial layers. These results, which imply substantial wave–flow interactions in the inertial layers, are valid for Richardson numbers larger than 1 and for a large range of PV distributions. In dimensional form they provide simple relationships between the EP fluxes and the large-scale flow characteristics.

As an illustration, the authors consider a PV disturbance with an amplitude of 1 PVU and a depth of 1 km, and estimate that the associated EP flux ranges between 0.1 and 100 mPa for a Richardson number between 1 and 10. These values of the flux are comparable with those observed in the lower stratosphere, which suggests that the mechanism identified in this paper provides a substantial gravity wave source, one that could be parameterized in GCMs.

Corresponding author address: François Lott, LMD, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 24 rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris, CEDEX 05, France. Email: flott@lmd.ens.fr

Abstract

The gravity waves (GWs) generated by potential vorticity (PV) anomalies in a rotating stratified shear flow are examined under the assumptions of constant vertical shear, two-dimensionality, and unbounded domain. Near a PV anomaly, the associated perturbation is well modeled by quasigeostrophic theory. This is not the case at large vertical distances, however, and in particular beyond the two inertial layers that appear above and below the anomaly; there, the perturbation consists of vertically propagating gravity waves. This structure is described analytically, using an expansion in the continuous spectrum of the singular modes that results from the presence of critical levels.

Several explicit results are obtained. These include the form of the Eliassen–Palm (EP) flux as a function of the Richardson number N22, where N is the Brunt–Väisälä frequency and Λ the vertical shear. Its nondimensional value is shown to be approximately exp(−πN/Λ)/8 in the far-field GW region, approximately twice that between the two inertial layers. These results, which imply substantial wave–flow interactions in the inertial layers, are valid for Richardson numbers larger than 1 and for a large range of PV distributions. In dimensional form they provide simple relationships between the EP fluxes and the large-scale flow characteristics.

As an illustration, the authors consider a PV disturbance with an amplitude of 1 PVU and a depth of 1 km, and estimate that the associated EP flux ranges between 0.1 and 100 mPa for a Richardson number between 1 and 10. These values of the flux are comparable with those observed in the lower stratosphere, which suggests that the mechanism identified in this paper provides a substantial gravity wave source, one that could be parameterized in GCMs.

Corresponding author address: François Lott, LMD, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 24 rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris, CEDEX 05, France. Email: flott@lmd.ens.fr

Save
  • Abramowitz, M., and I. A. Stegun, 1964: Handbook of Mathematical Functions. 9th ed. Dover, 1045 pp.

  • Bakas, N. A., and P. J. Ioannou, 2007: Momentum and energy transport by gravity waves in stochastically driven stratified flows. Part I: Radiation of gravity waves from a shear layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 64 , 15091529.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bishop, C. H., and E. Heifetz, 2000: Apparent absolute instability and the continuous spectrum. J. Atmos. Sci., 57 , 35923608.

  • Blumen, W., 1972: Geostrophic adjustment. Rev. Geophys., 10 , 485528.

  • Booker, J. R., and F. P. Bretherton, 1967: The critical layer for internal gravity waves in a shear flow. J. Fluid Mech., 27 , 513539.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bretherton, C. S., and P. K. Smolarkiewicz, 1989: Gravity waves, compensating subsidence, and detrainment around cumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 46 , 740759.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Charron, M., and E. Manzini, 2002: Gravity waves from fronts: Parameterization and middle atmosphere response in a general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci., 59 , 923941.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Vries, H., and H. Opsteegh, 2007: Resonance in optimal perturbation evolution. Part I: Two-layer Eady model. J. Atmos. Sci., 64 , 673694.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eliassen, A., and E. Palm, 1961: On the transfer of energy in stationary mountain waves. Geophys. Publ., 22 , 123.

  • Farrell, B. F., 1989: Optimal excitation of baroclinic waves. J. Atmos. Sci., 46 , 11931206.

  • Ford, R., M. E. McIntyre, and W. A. Norton, 2000: Balance and the slow quasimanifold: Some explicit results. J. Atmos. Sci., 57 , 12361254.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fritts, D. C., and Z. Luo, 1992: Gravity wave excitation by geostrophic adjustment of the jet stream. Part I: Two-dimensional forcing. J. Atmos. Sci., 49 , 681697.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hertzog, A., G. Boccara, R. A. Vincent, F. Vial, and P. Cocquerez, 2008: Estimation of gravity wave momentum flux and phase speeds from quasi-Lagrangian stratospheric balloon flights. Part II: Results from the Vorcore campaign in Antarctica. J. Atmos. Sci., 65 , 30563070.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Inverarity, G. W., and G. J. Shutts, 2000: A general, linearized vertical structure equation for the vertical velocity: Properties, scalings and special cases. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126 , 27092724.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones, W. L., 1967: Propagation of internal gravity waves in fluids with shear flow and rotation. J. Fluid Mech., 30 , 439448.

  • Lalas, D. P., and F. Einaudi, 1976: On the characteristics of gravity waves generated by atmospheric shear layers. J. Atmos. Sci., 33 , 12481259.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lott, F., 1997: The transient emission of propagating gravity waves by a stably stratified shear layer. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123 , 16031619.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lott, F., 2003: Large-scale flow response to short gravity waves breaking in a rotating shear flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 60 , 16911704.

  • Lott, F., H. Kelder, and H. Teitelbaum, 1992: A transition from Kelvin–Helmholtz instabilities to propagating wave instabilities. Phys. Fluids, 4 , 19901997.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Molemaker, M. J., J. C. McWilliams, and I. Yavneh, 2005: Baroclinic instability and loss of balance. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 35 , 15051517.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Olafsdottir, E. I., A. B. O. Daalhuis, and J. Vanneste, 2008: Inertia–gravity-wave radiation by a sheared vortex. J. Fluid Mech., 596 , 169189.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pedlosky, J., 1979: Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. Springer, 624 pp.

  • Plougonven, R., D. J. Muraki, and C. Snyder, 2005: A baroclinic instability that couples balanced motions and gravity waves. J. Atmos. Sci., 62 , 15451559.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rosenthal, A. J., and R. S. Lindzen, 1983: Instabilities in a stratified fluid having one critical level. Part I: Results. J. Atmos. Sci., 40 , 509520.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rossby, C. G., 1937: On the mutual adjustment of pressure and velocity distributions in certain simple current systems. J. Mar. Res., 21 , 1528.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scavuzzo, C. M., M. A. Lamfri, H. Teitelbaum, and F. Lott, 1998: A study of the low-frequency inertio-gravity waves observed during the Pyrénées Experiment. J. Geophys. Res., 103 , 17471758.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shutts, G. J., and M. E. B. Gray, 1994: A numerical modeling study of the geostrophic adjustment process following deep convection. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 120 , 11451178.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vanneste, J., 2008: Exponential smallness of inertia–gravity wave generation at small Rossby number. J. Atmos. Sci., 65 , 16221637.

  • Vanneste, J., and I. Yavneh, 2004: Exponentially small inertia–gravity waves and the breakdown of quasigeostrophic balance. J. Atmos. Sci., 61 , 211223.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 227 74 5
PDF Downloads 167 54 6