Abstract
The climatology of transient wave activity flux defined by Plumb has been calculated for each calendar month, for high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) waves, using the NCAR–NCEP reanalyses for both hemispheres. Wave activity flux of both HF and LF waves shows upward propagation of waves from the lower troposphere into the upper troposphere, then into the lower stratosphere during the summer and at least up to the midstratosphere during other seasons. While the upward flux emanating from the lower troposphere is particularly large in the two storm tracks in the Northern Hemisphere (NH), it is large in most of the extratropics in the Southern Hemisphere (SH). The HF waves radiate equatorward most noticeably in the upper troposphere, whereas the LF waves do not show visible signs of equatorward radiation. The total horizontal flux is generally dominated by the advective flux that represents the eddy enstrophy advection by the mean flow and appears predominantly pseudoeastward. Divergence of the wave activity flux exhibits discernible large-scale characteristics at the lowest level in both hemispheres and in the upper troposphere in the NH. The divergence field indicates acceleration of the pseudoeastward mean flow near the surface in both hemispheres. In the NH, acceleration and deceleration, respectively, of the pseudoeastward mean flow in the storm tracks and downstream of the storm tracks in the upper troposphere are found. Seasonal variations in the wave flux are substantial in the NH but relatively minor in the SH. In the NH, the wave flux fields exhibit generally larger values during the cold months than during warm months. Also, the latitudes at which large wave flux values are seen are higher during warm months, as the jets and storm tracks shift northward from the winter to the summer.
Anomalously large vertical flux of both HF and LF wave activity propagating up from the lower troposphere throughout the troposphere and stratosphere in the northern flank of the North Atlantic storm track is found to precede anomalous deceleration in the NH winter polar vortex, while anomalously small vertical flux in the same area precedes anomalous acceleration of the vortex. The accompanying horizontal flux anomalies tend to counteract the action of the anomalous vertical flux. These cases are found to be dissipation of strong anomalies in the polar vortex. The anomalous flux divergence does not prove the active role of the waves in the anomalous change in the polar vortex, however. No signs of the wave flux originating from specific areas preceding anomalous change in the polar vortex are found for the SH.
* Current affiliation: Science and Engineering, Doshisha University, Kyotanabe, Japan
Corresponding author address: Mototaka Nakamura, JAMSTEC, 3173-25 Showa-machi, Kanazawa-ku Yokohama 236-0001, Japan. Email: moto@jamstec.go.jp
