The Influence of the Cloud Shell on Tracer Budget Measurements of LES Cloud Entrainment

Jordan T. Dawe Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Search for other papers by Jordan T. Dawe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Philip H. Austin Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Search for other papers by Philip H. Austin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Direct measurements of rates of entrainment into and detrainment from cumulus cloud cores obtained from LES model cloud fields produce values twice as large as those produced from tracer budget calculations. This difference can be explained by two effects: the presence of a shell of air around the cloud cores that is moister than the mean environment and air at the edge of the cloud core that is drier than the mean core, and the tendency for the mean tracer values of the entrained fluid to be greater than the mean tracer values of the cloud shell. Preferential entrainment of shell air that is moving upward faster than the mean shell creates strong vertical momentum fluxes into the cumulus cloud core, thereby making the assumption that cumulus cloud cores entrain fluid with zero vertical momentum incorrect. Variability in the properties of the moist cloud shell has strong impacts on entrainment values inferred from tracer budget calculations. These results indicate that the dynamics of the cloud shell should be included in parameterization of cumulus clouds used in general circulation models.

Corresponding author address: Jordan T. Dawe, Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of British Columbia, 6339 Stores Road, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. E-mail: jdawe@eos.ubc.ca

Abstract

Direct measurements of rates of entrainment into and detrainment from cumulus cloud cores obtained from LES model cloud fields produce values twice as large as those produced from tracer budget calculations. This difference can be explained by two effects: the presence of a shell of air around the cloud cores that is moister than the mean environment and air at the edge of the cloud core that is drier than the mean core, and the tendency for the mean tracer values of the entrained fluid to be greater than the mean tracer values of the cloud shell. Preferential entrainment of shell air that is moving upward faster than the mean shell creates strong vertical momentum fluxes into the cumulus cloud core, thereby making the assumption that cumulus cloud cores entrain fluid with zero vertical momentum incorrect. Variability in the properties of the moist cloud shell has strong impacts on entrainment values inferred from tracer budget calculations. These results indicate that the dynamics of the cloud shell should be included in parameterization of cumulus clouds used in general circulation models.

Corresponding author address: Jordan T. Dawe, Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of British Columbia, 6339 Stores Road, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. E-mail: jdawe@eos.ubc.ca
Save
  • Bechtold, P., M. Köhler, T. Jung, F. Doblas-Reyes, M. Leutbecher, M. J. Rodwell, F. Vitart, and G. Balsamo, 2008: Advances in simulating atmospheric variability with the ECMWF model: From synoptic to decadal time-scales. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 1337–1351, doi:10.1002/qj.289.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brown, A. R., and Coauthors, 2002: Large-eddy simulation of the diurnal cycle of shallow cumulus convection over land. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 1075–1093.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dawe, J. T., and P. H. Austin, 2011: Interpolation of LES cloud surfaces for use in direct calculations of entrainment and detrainment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 444–456.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Rooy, W. C., and A. P. Siebesma, 2010: Analytical expressions for entrainment and detrainment in cumulus convection. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 1216–1227, doi:10.1002/qj.640.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heus, T., and H. J. J. Jonker, 2008: Subsiding shells around shallow cumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 1003–1018.

  • Heus, T., C. F. J. Pols, H. J. J. Jonker, H. E. A. Van den Akker, and D. H. Lenschow, 2009: Observational validation of the compensating mass flux through the shell around cumulus clouds. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 101–112.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hoppel, W. A., G. M. Frick, J. Fitzgerald, and R. E. Larson, 1994: Marine boundary-layer measurements of new particle formation and the effects nonprecipitating clouds have on aerosol size distribution. J. Geophys. Res., 99, 14 443–14 459.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jonas, P. R., 1990: Observations of cumulus cloud entrainment. Atmos. Res., 25, 105–127.

  • Jonker, H. J. J., T. Heus, and P. P. Sullivan, 2008: A refined view of vertical mass transport by cumulus convection. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L07810, doi:10.1029/2007GL032606.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kain, J. S., and J. M. Fritsch, 1990: A one-dimensional entraining/detraining plume model and its application in convective parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 2784–2802.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Khairoutdinov, M. F., and D. A. Randall, 2003: Cloud resolving modeling of the ARM summer 1997 IOP: Model formulation, results, uncertainties, and sensitivities. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 607–625.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Randall, D., and Coauthors, 2003: Confronting models with data: The GEWEX Cloud Systems Study. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84, 455–469.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rodts, S. M. A., P. G. Duynkerke, and H. J. J. Jonker, 2003: Size distributions and dynamical properties of shallow cumulus clouds from aircraft observations and satellite data. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1895–1912.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Romps, D. M., 2010: A direct measure of entrainment. J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 1908–1927.

  • Rougier, J., D. M. H. Sexton, J. M. Murphy, and D. Stainforth, 2009: Analyzing the climate sensitivity of the HadSM3 climate model using ensembles from different but related experiments. J. Climate, 22, 3540–3557.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Siebesma, A. P., 1998: Shallow cumulus convection. Buoyant Convection in Geophysical Flows, E. J. Plate, Ed., Kluwer Academic, 441–486.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Siebesma, A. P., and J. W. M. Cuijpers, 1995: Evaluation of parametric assumptions for shallow cumulus convection. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 650–666.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Siebesma, A. P., and Coauthors, 2003: A large-eddy simulation intercomparison study of shallow cumulus convection. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1201–1219.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stainforth, D. A., and Coauthors, 2005: Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature, 433, 403–406.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tiedtke, M., 1989: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 1779–1800.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wang, Y., and B. Geerts, 2010: Humidity variations across the edge of trade wind cumuli: Observations and dynamical implications. Atmos. Res., 97, 144–156, doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.03.017.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wu, C.-M., B. Stevens, and A. Arakawa, 2009: What controls the transition from shallow to deep convection? J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 1793–1806.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 609 114 5
PDF Downloads 285 80 4