Southern Hemisphere Jet Variability in the IPSL GCM at Varying Resolutions

Ara Arakelian Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, CNRS, Paris, France

Search for other papers by Ara Arakelian in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Francis Codron Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, CNRS, Paris, France

Search for other papers by Francis Codron in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

Fluctuations of the Southern Hemisphere eddy-driven jet are studied in a suite of experiments with the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, version 4 (LMDZ4) atmospheric GCM with varying horizontal resolution, in coupled mode and with imposed SSTs. The focus is on the relationship between changes in the mean state brought by increasing resolution, and the intraseasonal variability and response to increasing CO2 concentration.

In summer, the mean jet latitude moves poleward when the resolution increases in latitude, converging toward the observed one. Most measures of the jet dynamics, such as skewness of the distribution or persistence time scale of jet movements, exhibit a simple dependence on the mean jet latitude and also converge to the observed values. In winter, the improvement of the mean-state biases with resolution is more limited.

In both seasons, the relationship between the dominant mode of variability—the southern annular mode (SAM)—and the mean state remains the same as in observations, except in the most biased winter simulation. The jet fluctuations—latitude shifts or splitting—just occur around a different mean position. Both the model biases and the response to increasing CO2 project strongly onto the SAM structure. No systematic relation between the amplitude of the response and characteristics of the control simulation was found, possibly due to changing dynamics or impacts of the physical parameterizations with different resolutions.

Corresponding author address: A. Arakelian, Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Boite 99, 4 Place Jussieu, F-75252 Paris, France. E-mail: aalmd@lmd.jussieu.fr

Abstract

Fluctuations of the Southern Hemisphere eddy-driven jet are studied in a suite of experiments with the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, version 4 (LMDZ4) atmospheric GCM with varying horizontal resolution, in coupled mode and with imposed SSTs. The focus is on the relationship between changes in the mean state brought by increasing resolution, and the intraseasonal variability and response to increasing CO2 concentration.

In summer, the mean jet latitude moves poleward when the resolution increases in latitude, converging toward the observed one. Most measures of the jet dynamics, such as skewness of the distribution or persistence time scale of jet movements, exhibit a simple dependence on the mean jet latitude and also converge to the observed values. In winter, the improvement of the mean-state biases with resolution is more limited.

In both seasons, the relationship between the dominant mode of variability—the southern annular mode (SAM)—and the mean state remains the same as in observations, except in the most biased winter simulation. The jet fluctuations—latitude shifts or splitting—just occur around a different mean position. Both the model biases and the response to increasing CO2 project strongly onto the SAM structure. No systematic relation between the amplitude of the response and characteristics of the control simulation was found, possibly due to changing dynamics or impacts of the physical parameterizations with different resolutions.

Corresponding author address: A. Arakelian, Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Boite 99, 4 Place Jussieu, F-75252 Paris, France. E-mail: aalmd@lmd.jussieu.fr
Save
  • Barnes, E. A., and D. L. Hartmann, 2010a: Dynamical feedbacks of the southern annular mode in winter and summer. J. Atmos. Sci.,67, 2320–2330.

  • Barnes, E. A., and D. L. Hartmann, 2010b: Testing a theory for the effect of latitude on the persistence of eddy-driven jets using CMIP3 simulations. Geophys. Res. Lett.,37, L15801, doi:10.1029/2010GL044144.

  • Barnes, E. A., D. L. Hartmann, D. M. W. Frierson, and J. Kidston, 2010: Effect of latitude on the persistence of eddy-driven jets. Geophys. Res. Lett.,37, L11804, doi:10.1029/2010GL043199.

  • Chen, G., and R. A. Plumb, 2009: Quantifying the eddy feedback and the persistence of the zonal index in an idealized atmospheric model. J. Atmos. Sci.,66, 3707–3720.

  • Codron, F., 2007: Relations between annular modes and the mean state: Southern Hemisphere winter. J. Atmos. Sci.,64, 3328–3339.

  • Gerber, E. P., and G. K. Vallis, 2007: Eddy–zonal flow interactions and the persistence of the zonal index. J. Atmos. Sci.,64, 3296–3311.

  • Gillett, N. P., and D. W. J. Thompson, 2003: Simulation of recent Southern Hemisphere climate change. Science,302, 273 –275, doi:10.1126/science.1087440.

  • Guemas, V., and F. Codron, 2011: Differing impacts of resolution changes in latitude and longitude on the midlatitudes in the LMDZ atmospheric GCM. J. Climate,24, 5831–5849.

  • Held, I. M., and P. J. Phillipps, 1993: Sensitivity of the eddy momentum flux to meridional resolution in atmospheric GCMs. J. Climate,6, 499–507.

  • Held, I. M., and M. J. Suarez, 1994: A proposal for the intercomparison of the dynamical cores of atmospheric general circulation models. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 75, 18251830.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hourdin, F., and Coauthors, 2006: The LMDZ4 general circulation model: Climate performance and sensitivity to parametrized physics with emphasis on tropical convection. Climate Dyn.,27, 787–813, doi:10.1007/s00382-006-0158-0.

  • Hourdin, F., and Coauthors, 2012: Impact of the LMDZ atmospheric grid configuration on the climate and sensitivity of the IPSL-CM5A coupled model. Climate Dyn., doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1411-3, in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hurrell, J. W., J. J. Hack, D. Shea, J. M. Caron, and J. Rosinski, 2008: A new sea surface temperature and sea ice boundary dataset for the Community Atmosphere Model. J. Climate,21, 5145–5153.

  • Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 437–471.

  • Kidston, J., and E. P. Gerber, 2010: Intermodel variability of the poleward shift of the austral jet stream in the CMIP3 integrations linked to biases in 20th century climatology. Geophys. Res. Lett.,37, L09708, doi:10.1029/2010GL042873.

  • Krinner, G., and Coauthors, 2005: A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere-biosphere system. Global Biogeochem. Cycles,19, GB1015, doi:10.1029/2003GB002199.

  • L’Heureux, M. L., and D. W. J. Thompson, 2006: Observed relationships between the El Niño–Southern Oscillation and the extratropical zonal-mean circulation. J. Climate,19, 276–287.

  • Lorenz, D. J., and D. L. Hartmann, 2001: Eddy-zonal flow feedback in the Southern Hemisphere. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 33123327.

  • Marti, O., and Coauthors, 2010: Key features of the IPSL ocean atmosphere model and its sensitivity to atmospheric resolution. Climate Dyn.,34, 1–26, doi:10.1007/s00382-009-0640-6.

  • Perlwitz, J., S. Pawson, R. L. Fogt, J. E. Nielsen, and W. D. Neff, 2008: Impact of stratospheric ozone hole recovery on Antarctic climate. Geophys. Res. Lett.,35, L08714, doi:10.1029/2008GL033317.

  • Ring, M. J., and R. A. Plumb, 2008: The response of a simplified GCM to axisymmetric forcings: Applicability of the fluctuation–dissipation theorem. J. Atmos. Sci.,65, 3880–3898.

  • Robinson, W. A., 2006: On the self-maintenance of midlatitude jets. J. Atmos. Sci.,63, 2109–2122.

  • Sampe, T., H. Nakamura, A. Goto, and W. Ohfuchi, 2010: Significance of a midlatitude SST frontal zone in the formation of a storm track and an eddy-driven westerly jet. J. Climate,23, 1793–1814.

  • Sen Gupta, A., and M. H. England, 2006: Coupled ocean–atmosphere–ice response to variations in the southern annular mode. J. Climate,19, 4457–4486.

  • Son, S.-W., and Coauthors, 2010: Impact of stratospheric ozone on Southern Hemisphere circulation change: A multimodel assessment. J. Geophys. Res.,115, D00M07, doi:10.1029/2010JD014271.

  • Watterson, I. G., 2007: Southern annular modes simulated by a climate model: Patterns, mechanisms, and uses. J. Atmos. Sci.,64, 3113–3131.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 691 435 144
PDF Downloads 163 50 3