The Effect of Climate Change on the Variability of the Northern Hemisphere Stratospheric Polar Vortex

Daniel M. Mitchell National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Daniel M. Mitchell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Scott M. Osprey National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Scott M. Osprey in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Lesley J. Gray National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Lesley J. Gray in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Neal Butchart Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Neal Butchart in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Steven C. Hardiman Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Steven C. Hardiman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Andrew J. Charlton-Perez Department of Meteorology, Reading University, Reading, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Andrew J. Charlton-Perez in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Peter Watson Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Peter Watson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

With extreme variability of the Arctic polar vortex being a key link for stratosphere–troposphere influences, its evolution into the twenty-first century is important for projections of changing surface climate in response to greenhouse gases. Variability of the stratospheric vortex is examined using a state-of-the-art climate model and a suite of specifically developed vortex diagnostics. The model has a fully coupled ocean and a fully resolved stratosphere. Analysis of the standard stratospheric zonal mean wind diagnostic shows no significant increase over the twenty-first century in the number of major sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) from its historical value of 0.7 events per decade, although the monthly distribution of SSWs does vary, with events becoming more evenly dispersed throughout the winter. However, further analyses using geometric-based vortex diagnostics show that the vortex mean state becomes weaker, and the vortex centroid is climatologically more equatorward by up to 2.5°, especially during early winter. The results using these diagnostics not only characterize the vortex structure and evolution but also emphasize the need for vortex-centric diagnostics over zonally averaged measures. Finally, vortex variability is subdivided into wave-1 (displaced) and -2 (split) components, and it is implied that vortex displacement events increase in frequency under climate change, whereas little change is observed in splitting events.

Corresponding author address: Daniel Mitchell, Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom. E-mail: mitchell@atm.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

With extreme variability of the Arctic polar vortex being a key link for stratosphere–troposphere influences, its evolution into the twenty-first century is important for projections of changing surface climate in response to greenhouse gases. Variability of the stratospheric vortex is examined using a state-of-the-art climate model and a suite of specifically developed vortex diagnostics. The model has a fully coupled ocean and a fully resolved stratosphere. Analysis of the standard stratospheric zonal mean wind diagnostic shows no significant increase over the twenty-first century in the number of major sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) from its historical value of 0.7 events per decade, although the monthly distribution of SSWs does vary, with events becoming more evenly dispersed throughout the winter. However, further analyses using geometric-based vortex diagnostics show that the vortex mean state becomes weaker, and the vortex centroid is climatologically more equatorward by up to 2.5°, especially during early winter. The results using these diagnostics not only characterize the vortex structure and evolution but also emphasize the need for vortex-centric diagnostics over zonally averaged measures. Finally, vortex variability is subdivided into wave-1 (displaced) and -2 (split) components, and it is implied that vortex displacement events increase in frequency under climate change, whereas little change is observed in splitting events.

Corresponding author address: Daniel Mitchell, Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom. E-mail: mitchell@atm.ox.ac.uk
Save
  • Andrews, D., J. Holton, and C. Leovy, 1987: Middle Atmosphere Dynamics. Academic Press, 489 pp.

  • Baldwin, M., and T. Dunkerton, 2001: Stratospheric harbingers of anomalous weather regimes. Science, 294, 581584.

  • Baldwin, M., and D. Thompson, 2009: A critical comparison of stratosphere–troposphere coupling indices. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 16611672.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bell, C., L. Gray, and J. Kettleborough, 2010: Changes in Northern Hemisphere stratospheric variability under increased CO2 concentrations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 11811190.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Butchart, N., and Coauthors, 2011: Multimodel climate and variability of the stratosphere. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D05102, doi:10.1029/2010JD014995.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Charlton, A., and L. Polvani, 2007: A new look at stratospheric sudden warmings. Part I: Climatology and modeling benchmarks. J. Climate, 20, 449469.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Charlton, A., A. O’Neill, W. Lahoz, A. Massacand, and P. Berrisford, 2005: The impact of the stratosphere on the troposphere during the Southern Hemisphere stratospheric sudden warming, September 2002. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 21712188.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Charlton, A., and Coauthors, 2007: A new look at stratospheric sudden warmings. Part II: Evaluation of numerical model simulations. J. Climate, 20, 470488.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Charlton-Perez, A., L. Polvani, J. Austin, and F. Li, 2008: The frequency and dynamics of stratospheric sudden warmings in the 21st century. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D16116, doi:10.1029/2007JD009571.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Charney, J., P. Drazin, and Coauthors, 1961: Propagation of planetary-scale disturbances from the lower into the upper atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res., 66, 83109.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clough, S., and M. Iacono, 1995: Line-by-line calculation of atmospheric fluxes and cooling rates. 2. Application to carbon dioxide, ozone, methane, nitrous oxide and the halocarbons. J. Geophys. Res., 100, 16 51916 535.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Esler, J., L. Polvani, and R. Scott, 2006: The Antarctic stratospheric sudden warming of 2002: A self-tuned resonance? Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L12804, doi:10.1029/2006GL026034.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fels, S., J. Mahlman, M. Schwarzkopf, and R. Sinclair, 1980: Stratospheric sensitivity to perturbations in ozone and carbon dioxide: Radiative and dynamical response. J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 22652297.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hannachi, A., D. Mitchell, L. Gray, and A. Charlton-Perez, 2011: On the use of geometric moments to examine the continuum of sudden stratospheric warmings. J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 657674.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hardiman, S., N. Butchart, T. Hinton, S. Osprey, and L. Gray, 2012: The effect of a well-resolved stratosphere on surface climate: Differences between CMIP5 simulations with high and low top versions of the Met Office climate model. J. Climate, in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones, C., and Coauthors, 2011: The HadGEM2-ES implementation of CMIP5 centennial simulations. Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., 4, 689763.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martin, G., and Coauthors, 2011: The HadGEM2 family of Met Office Unified Model Climate configurations. Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., 4, 765841.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Matthewman, N., J. Esler, A. Charlton-Perez, and L. Polvani, 2009: A new look at stratospheric sudden warmings. Part III: Polar vortex evolution and vertical structure. J. Climate, 22, 15661585.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McLandress, C., and T. Shepherd, 2009: Impact of climate change on stratospheric sudden warmings as simulated by the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model. J. Climate, 22, 54495463.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell, D., A. Charlton-Perez, and L. Gray, 2011a: Characterizing the variability and extremes of the stratospheric polar vortices using 2D moment analysis. J. Atmos. Sci., 68, 11941213.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell, D., L. Gray, and A. Charlton-Perez, 2011b: The structure and evolution of the stratospheric vortex in response to natural forcings. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D15110, doi:10.1029/2011JD015788.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell, D., and Coauthors, 2012b: The nature of arctic polar vortices in chemistry–climate models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., in press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rind, D., D. Shindell, P. Lonergan, and N. Balachandran, 1998: Climate change and the middle atmosphere. Part III: The doubled CO2 climate revisited. J. Climate, 11, 876894.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schoeberl, M., and D. Hartmann, 1991: The dynamics of the stratospheric polar vortex and its relation to springtime ozone depletions. Science, 251, 4652.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Son, S.-W., and Coauthors, 2008: The impact of stratospheric ozone recovery on the Southern Hemisphere westerly jet. Science, 320, 14861489.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Son, S.-W., and Coauthors, 2010: Impact of stratospheric ozone on Southern Hemisphere circulation change: A multimodel assessment. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00M07, doi:10.1029/2010JD014271.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thompson, D., M. Baldwin, and J. Wallace, 2002: Stratospheric connection to Northern Hemisphere wintertime weather: Implications for prediction. J. Climate, 15, 14211428.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Waugh, D., 1997: Elliptical diagnostics of stratospheric polar vortices. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123, 17251748.

  • Waugh, D., and W. Randel, 1999: Climatology of Arctic and Antarctic polar vortices using elliptical diagnostics. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 15941613.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Waugh, D., L. Oman, S. Kawa, R. Stolarski, S. Pawson, A. Douglass, P. Newman, and J. Nielsen, 2009: Impacts of climate change on stratospheric ozone recovery. Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L03805, doi:10.1029/2008GL036223.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Woollings, T., A. Charlton-Perez, S. Ineson, A. Marshall, and G. Masato, 2010: Associations between stratospheric variability and tropospheric blocking. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D06108, doi:10.1029/2009JD012742.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1898 689 40
PDF Downloads 1297 323 24