• Ayash, T., S. Gong, and Q. J. Charles, 2008: Implementing the delta-four-stream approximation for solar radiation computations in an atmosphere general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 24482457.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chandrasekhar, S., 1950: Radiative Transfer. Oxford University Press, 393 pp.

  • Chou, M.-D., 1992: A solar radiation model for use in climate studies. J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 762772.

  • Chou, M.-D., and M. J. Suarez, 1999: A solar radiation parameterization for atmospheric studies. NASA Tech. Memo. 104606, 40 pp.

  • Coakley, J. A., R. D. Cess, and F. B. Yurevich, 1983: The effect of tropospheric aerosols on the earth's radiation budget: A parameterization for climate models. J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 116138.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fu, Q., 1991: Parameterization of radiative processes in vertically nonhomogeneous multiple scattering atmospheres. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utah, 259 pp. [Available from University Microfilm, 305 N. Zeeb Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48106.]

  • Fu, Q., and K. N. Liou, 1992: On the correlated k-distribution method for radiative transfer in nonhomogeneous atmospheres. J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 21392156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fu, Q., and K. N. Liou, 1993: Parameterization of the radiative properties of cirrus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 20082025.

  • Fu, Q., K. N. Liou, M. C. Cribb, T. P. Charlock, and A. Grossman, 1997: Multiple scattering parameterization in thermal infrared radiative transfer. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 27992812.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fu, Q., T. J. Thorsen, J. Su, J. Ge, and J. Huang, 2009: Test of Mie-based single-scattering properties of non-spherical dust aerosols in radiative flux calculations. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 110, 16401653.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kay, M. J., M. A. Box, T. Trautmann, and J. Landgraf, 2001: Actinic flux and net flux calculations in radiative transfer—A comparative study of computational efficiency. J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 37523761.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • King, M. D., and Harshvardhan, 1986: Comparative accuracy of selected multiple scattering approximations. J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 784801.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kylling, A., K. Stamnes, and S. C. Tsay, 1995: A reliable and efficient two-stream algorithm for spherical radiative transfer: Documentation of accuracy in realistic layered media. J. Atmos. Chem., 21, 115150.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, J., and V. Ramaswamy, 1996: Four-stream spherical harmonic expansion approximation for solar radiative transfer. J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 11741186.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, J., and S. Dobbie, 1998: Four-stream isosector approximation for solar radiative transfer. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 558567.

  • Li, J., S. Dobbie, P. Raisanen, and Q. Min, 2005: Accounting for unresolved cloud in solar radiation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 16071629.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liou, K. N., 1974: Analytic two-stream and four-stream solutions for radiative transfer. J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 11741186.

  • Liou, K. N., 1992: Radiation and Cloud Processes in the Atmosphere: Theory, Observation, and Modeling. Oxford University, 487 pp.

  • Liou, K. N., 2002: An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation. 3rd ed. Academic Press, 583 pp.

  • Liou, K. N., Q. Fu, and T. P. Ackerman, 1988: A simple formulation of the delta-four-stream approximation for radiative transfer parameterizations. J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 19401947.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lu, P., H. Zhang, and J. Li, 2009: A new complete comparison of two-stream DISORT and Eddington radiative transfer schemes. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 110, 129138.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McClatchey, R., R. Fenn, J. A. Selby, F. Volz, and J. Garing, 1972: Optical properties of the atmosphere. 3rd ed. Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories Rep., 108 pp.

  • Peng, Y., K. von Salzen, and J. Li, 2012: Simulation of mineral dust aerosol with piecewise log-normal approximation (PLA) in CanAM4-PAM. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 68916914.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shibata, K., and A. Uchiyama, 1992: Accuracy of the delta-four-stream approximation in inhomogeneous scattering atmospheres. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 70, 10971110.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stamnes, K., S. C. Tsay, W. J. Wiscombe, and K. Jayaweera, 1988: Numerically stable algorithm for discrete ordinate method radiative transfer in multiple scattering and emitting layered media. Appl. Opt., 27, 25022509.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomas, G. E., and K. Stamnes, 1999: Radiative Transfer in the Atmosphere and Ocean. Cambridge University Press, 517 pp.

  • Tian, Y., R. E. Dickinson, and L. Zhou, 2007: Four-stream isosector approximation for canopy radiative transfer. J. Geophys. Res.,112, D04107, doi:10.1029/2006JD007545.

  • Zhang, F., J. Li, H. Zhang, L. Ma, and X. Zhou, 2013a: On the relationship between direct and diffuse radiation. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 115, 6065.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, F., Z. Shen, J. Li, X. Zhou, and L. Ma, 2013b: Analytical delta-four-stream doubling–adding method for radiative transfer parameterizations. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 794–808.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 4 4 4
PDF Downloads 4 4 4

Doubling–Adding Method for Delta-Four-Stream Spherical Harmonic Expansion Approximation in Radiative Transfer Parameterization

View More View Less
  • 1 Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, and Shanghai Typhoon Institute, China Meteorological Administration, Shanghai, China
  • | 2 Canadian Center for Climate Modeling and Analysis, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Restricted access

Abstract

Though the single-layer solutions have been found for the δ-four-stream spherical harmonic expansion method (SHM) in radiative transfer, there is lack of a corresponding doubling–adding method (4SDA), which enables the calculation of radiative transfer through a vertically inhomogeneous atmosphere with multilayers. The doubling–adding method is based on Chandrasekhar's invariance principle, which was originally developed for discrete ordinates approximation. It is shown that the invariance principle can also be applied to SHM and δ-four-stream spherical harmonic expansion doubling–adding method (δ-4SDA) is proposed in this paper. The δ-4SDA method has been systematically compared to the δ-Eddington doubling–adding method (δ-2SDA), the δ-two-stream discrete ordinates doubling–adding method (δ-2DDA), and δ-four-stream discrete ordinates doubling–adding method (δ-4DDA). By applying δ-4SDA to a realistic atmospheric profile with gaseous transmission considered, it is found that the accuracy of δ-4SDA is superior to δ-2SDA or δ-2DDA, especially for the cloudy/aerosol conditions. It is shown that the relative errors of δ-4SDA are generally less than 1% in both heating rate and flux, while the relative errors of both δ-2SDA and δ-2DDA can be over 6%. Though δ-4DDA is slightly more accurate than δ-4SDA in heating rates, both of them are accurate enough to obtain the cloud-top solar heating. Here δ-4SDA is superior to δ-4DDA in computational efficiency. It is found that the error of aerosol radiative forcing can be up to 3 W m−2 by using δ-2SDA at the top of the atmosphere (TOA); such error is substantially reduced by applying δ-4SDA. In view of the overall accuracy and computational efficiency, δ-4SDA is suitable for application in climate models.

Corresponding author address: Feng Zhang, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, 46 Zhong-Guan-Cun South Street, Beijing 100081, China. E-mail: feng_zhang126@126.com

Abstract

Though the single-layer solutions have been found for the δ-four-stream spherical harmonic expansion method (SHM) in radiative transfer, there is lack of a corresponding doubling–adding method (4SDA), which enables the calculation of radiative transfer through a vertically inhomogeneous atmosphere with multilayers. The doubling–adding method is based on Chandrasekhar's invariance principle, which was originally developed for discrete ordinates approximation. It is shown that the invariance principle can also be applied to SHM and δ-four-stream spherical harmonic expansion doubling–adding method (δ-4SDA) is proposed in this paper. The δ-4SDA method has been systematically compared to the δ-Eddington doubling–adding method (δ-2SDA), the δ-two-stream discrete ordinates doubling–adding method (δ-2DDA), and δ-four-stream discrete ordinates doubling–adding method (δ-4DDA). By applying δ-4SDA to a realistic atmospheric profile with gaseous transmission considered, it is found that the accuracy of δ-4SDA is superior to δ-2SDA or δ-2DDA, especially for the cloudy/aerosol conditions. It is shown that the relative errors of δ-4SDA are generally less than 1% in both heating rate and flux, while the relative errors of both δ-2SDA and δ-2DDA can be over 6%. Though δ-4DDA is slightly more accurate than δ-4SDA in heating rates, both of them are accurate enough to obtain the cloud-top solar heating. Here δ-4SDA is superior to δ-4DDA in computational efficiency. It is found that the error of aerosol radiative forcing can be up to 3 W m−2 by using δ-2SDA at the top of the atmosphere (TOA); such error is substantially reduced by applying δ-4SDA. In view of the overall accuracy and computational efficiency, δ-4SDA is suitable for application in climate models.

Corresponding author address: Feng Zhang, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, 46 Zhong-Guan-Cun South Street, Beijing 100081, China. E-mail: feng_zhang126@126.com
Save