A Formal Analysis of the Feedback Concept in Climate Models. Part I: Exclusive and Inclusive Feedback Analyses

Alain Lahellec Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Paris, France

Search for other papers by Alain Lahellec in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Jean-Louis Dufresne Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Paris, France

Search for other papers by Jean-Louis Dufresne in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

Climate sensitivity and feedback are key concepts if the complex behavior of climate response to perturbation is to be interpreted in a simple way. They have also become an essential tool for comparing global circulation models and assessing the reason for the spread in their results. The authors introduce a formal basic model to analyze the practical methods used to infer climate feedbacks and sensitivity from GCMs. The tangent linear model is used first to critically review the standard methods of feedback analyses that have been used in the GCM community for 40 years now. This leads the authors to distinguish between exclusive feedback analyses as in the partial radiative perturbation approach and inclusive analyses as in the “feedback suppression” methods. This review explains the hypotheses needed to apply these methods with confidence. Attention is paid to the more recent regression technique applied to the abrupt 2×CO2 experiment. A numerical evaluation of it is given, related to the Lyapunov analysis of the dynamical feature of the regression. It is applied to the Planck response, determined in its most strict definition within the GCM. In this approach, the Planck feedback becomes a dynamical feedback among others and, as such, also has a fast response differing from its steady-state profile.

Supplemental information related to this paper is available at the Journals Online website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0218.s1.

Corresponding author address: Alain Lahellec, LMD/IPSL/Université Pierre et Marie Curie, boite 99, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris CEDEX 05, France. E-mail: alain@lmd.jussieu.fr

Abstract

Climate sensitivity and feedback are key concepts if the complex behavior of climate response to perturbation is to be interpreted in a simple way. They have also become an essential tool for comparing global circulation models and assessing the reason for the spread in their results. The authors introduce a formal basic model to analyze the practical methods used to infer climate feedbacks and sensitivity from GCMs. The tangent linear model is used first to critically review the standard methods of feedback analyses that have been used in the GCM community for 40 years now. This leads the authors to distinguish between exclusive feedback analyses as in the partial radiative perturbation approach and inclusive analyses as in the “feedback suppression” methods. This review explains the hypotheses needed to apply these methods with confidence. Attention is paid to the more recent regression technique applied to the abrupt 2×CO2 experiment. A numerical evaluation of it is given, related to the Lyapunov analysis of the dynamical feature of the regression. It is applied to the Planck response, determined in its most strict definition within the GCM. In this approach, the Planck feedback becomes a dynamical feedback among others and, as such, also has a fast response differing from its steady-state profile.

Supplemental information related to this paper is available at the Journals Online website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0218.s1.

Corresponding author address: Alain Lahellec, LMD/IPSL/Université Pierre et Marie Curie, boite 99, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris CEDEX 05, France. E-mail: alain@lmd.jussieu.fr

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 142.14 KB)
Save
  • Arrhénius, S., 1896: On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground. Philos. Mag. J. Sci., 41, 237276.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bode, H., 1945: Network Analysis and Feedback Amplifier Design. Van Nostrand, 551 pp.

  • Bony, S., and et al., 2006: How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes? J. Climate, 19, 34453482.

  • Cai, M., and J. Lu, 2009: A new framework for isolating individual feedback processes in coupled general circulation climate models. Part II: Method demonstrations and comparisons. Climate Dyn., 32, 887–900, doi:10.1007/s00382-008-0424-4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cess, R., and et al., 1989: Interpretation of cloud-climate feedback as produced by 14 atmospheric general circulation models. Science, 245, 513516.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coakley, J., Jr., 1977: Feedbacks in vertical-column energy balance models. J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 465470.

  • Colman, R., 2003: A comparison of climate feedbacks in general circulation models. Climate Dyn., 20 (7–8), 865873.

  • Colman, R., S. Power, and B. McAvaney, 1997: Non-linear climate feedback analysis in an atmospheric general circulation model. Climate Dyn., 13, 717731.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dessler, A. E., 2010: A determination of the cloud feedback from climate variations over the past decade. Science, 330, 15231527.

  • Dufresne, J., and S. Bony, 2008: An assessment of the primary sources of spread of global warming estimates from coupled atmospheric–ocean models. J. Climate, 21, 51355144.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Forster, P., and J. Gregory, 2006: The climate sensitivity and its components diagnosed from Earth Radiation Budget data. J. Climate, 19, 3952.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Forster, P., and K. Taylor, 2006: Climate forcing and climate sensitivities diagnosed from coupled climate model integrations. J. Climate, 19, 61816194.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gregory, J. M., and et al., 2004: A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett.,31, L03205, doi:10.1029/2003GL018747.

  • Hall, A., 2004: The role of surface albedo feedback in climate. J. Climate, 17, 15501568.

  • Hall, A., and S. Manabe, 1999: The role of water vapor feedback in unperturbed climate variability and global warming. J. Climate, 12, 23272346.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hallegatte, S., A. Lahellec, and J.-Y. Grandpeix, 2006: An elicitation of the dynamic nature of water feedback in climate change using a 1D model. J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 18781894.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hansen, J., D. Lacis, D. Rind, G. Rusell, P. Stone, I. Fung, R. Ruedy, and J. Lerner, 1984: Climate sensitivity: Analysis of feedback mechanisms. Climate Processes and Climate Sensitivity, Geophys. Monogr., Vol. 29, Amer. Geophys. Union, 130–162.

  • Hansen, J., M. Sato, and R. Ruedy, 1997: Radiative forcing and climate response. J. Geophys. Res., 102 (D6), 68316864.

  • Hourdin, F., and et al., 2013: LMDZ5B: The atmospheric component of the IPSL climate model with revisited parameterizations for clouds and convection. Climate Dyn.,40 (9–10), 2193–2222, doi:10.1007/s00382-012-1343-y.

  • Ingram, W. J., C. A. Wilson, and J. F. B. Mitchell, 1989: Modeling climate change: An assessment of sea ice and surface albedo feedbacks. J. Geophys. Res., 94 (D6), 86098622.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knutti, R., S. Krähenmann, D. Frame, and M. R. Allen, 2008: Comment on “Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth’s climate system” by S. E. Schwartz. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15103, doi:10.1029/2007JD009473.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lahellec, A., S. Hallegatte, J.-Y. Grandpeix, P. Dumas, and S. Blanco, 2008: Feedback characteristics of nonlinear dynamical systems. Euro. Phys. Lett., 81, 60016006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LeTreut, H., Z. Li, and M. Forichon, 1994: Sensitivity of the LMD general circulation model to greenhouse forcing associated with two different cloud water parameterizations. J. Climate, 7, 18271841.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lu, J., and M. Cai, 2009: A new framework for isolating individual feedback processes in coupled general circulation climate models. Part I: Formulation. Climate Dyn., 32, 873–885, doi:10.1007/s00382-008-0425-3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Manabe, S., and R. Wetherhald, 1975: The effects of doubling CO2 concentration on the climate of a general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci., 32, 315.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mitchell, J., T. Johns, M. Eagles, W. Ingram, and R. Davis, 1999: Towards the construction of climate change scenarios. Climatic Change, 41 (3–4), 547581.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morcrette, J. J., 1991: Radiation and cloud radiative properties in the ECMRWF forecasting system. J. Geophys. Res., 96 (D5), 91219132.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pedlosky, J., 1982: Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. Springer-Verlag, 624 pp.

  • Peixoto, J. P., and A. H. Oort, Eds., 1992: Physics of Climate. American Institute of Physics, 520 pp.

  • Schlesinger, M., 1986: Equilibrium and transient climatic warming induced by increased atmospheric CO2. Climate Dyn., 1, 3581.

  • Schneider, E., B. Kirtman, and R. Lindzen, 1999: Upper tropospheric water vapor and climate sensitivity. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 16491658.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schwartz, S. E., 2007: Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth’s climate system. J. Geophys. Res.,112, D24S05, doi:10.1029/2007JD008746.

  • Slingo, A., J. Pamment, R. Allan, and P. Wilson, 2000: Water vapor feedbacks in the ECMWF reanalyses and Hadley Centre Climate Model. J. Climate, 13, 30803098.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Soden, B., A. Broccoli, and R. Hemler, 2004: On the use of cloud forcing to estimate cloud feedback. J. Climate, 17, 36613665.

  • Soden, B., I. Held, and R. Colman, 2008: Quantifying climate feedbacks using radiative kernels. J. Climate, 21, 35043520.

  • Spencer, R. W., and W. D. Braswell, 2010: On the diagnosis of radiative feedback in the presence of unknown radiative forcing. J. Geophys. Res., 115, D16109, doi:10.1029/2009JD013371.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stephens, G., 2005: Cloud feedbacks in the climate: A critical review. J. Climate, 18, 237273.

  • Wetherald, R., and S. Manabe, 1988: Cloud feedback processes in a general circulation model. J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 13971416.

  • Zhang, M., J. Hack, J. Kiehl, and R. Cess, 1994: Diagnostic study of climate feedback processes in atmospheric general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res., 99 (D3), 55255537.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 991 577 182
PDF Downloads 426 91 5