Numerical Simulations of Two-Layer Flow past Topography. Part I: The Leeside Hydraulic Jump

Richard Rotunno National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Richard Rotunno in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
George H. Bryan National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by George H. Bryan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Laboratory observations of the leeside hydraulic jump indicate it consists of a statistically stationary turbulent motion in an overturning wave. From the point of view of the shallow-water equations (SWE), the hydraulic jump is a discontinuity in fluid-layer depth and velocity at which kinetic energy is dissipated. To provide a deeper understanding of the leeside hydraulic jump, three-dimensional numerical solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations (NSE) are carried out alongside SWE solutions for nearly identical physical initial-value problems. Starting from a constant-height layer flowing over a two-dimensional obstacle at constant speed, it is demonstrated that the SWE solutions form a leeside discontinuity owing to the collision of upstream-moving characteristic curves launched from the obstacle. Consistent with the SWE solution, the NSE solution indicates the leeside hydraulic jump begins as a steepening of the initially horizontal density interface. Subsequently, the NSE solution indicates overturning of the density interface and a transition to turbulence. Analysis of the initial-value problem in these solutions shows that the tendency to form either the leeside height–velocity discontinuity in the SWE or the overturning density interface in the exact NSE is a feature of the inviscid, nonturbulent fluid dynamics. Dissipative turbulent processes associated with the leeside hydraulic jump are a consequence of the inviscid fluid dynamics that initiate and maintain the locally unstable conditions.

© 2018 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Richard Rotunno, rotunno@ucar.edu

Abstract

Laboratory observations of the leeside hydraulic jump indicate it consists of a statistically stationary turbulent motion in an overturning wave. From the point of view of the shallow-water equations (SWE), the hydraulic jump is a discontinuity in fluid-layer depth and velocity at which kinetic energy is dissipated. To provide a deeper understanding of the leeside hydraulic jump, three-dimensional numerical solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations (NSE) are carried out alongside SWE solutions for nearly identical physical initial-value problems. Starting from a constant-height layer flowing over a two-dimensional obstacle at constant speed, it is demonstrated that the SWE solutions form a leeside discontinuity owing to the collision of upstream-moving characteristic curves launched from the obstacle. Consistent with the SWE solution, the NSE solution indicates the leeside hydraulic jump begins as a steepening of the initially horizontal density interface. Subsequently, the NSE solution indicates overturning of the density interface and a transition to turbulence. Analysis of the initial-value problem in these solutions shows that the tendency to form either the leeside height–velocity discontinuity in the SWE or the overturning density interface in the exact NSE is a feature of the inviscid, nonturbulent fluid dynamics. Dissipative turbulent processes associated with the leeside hydraulic jump are a consequence of the inviscid fluid dynamics that initiate and maintain the locally unstable conditions.

© 2018 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Richard Rotunno, rotunno@ucar.edu
Save
  • Baines, P. G., 1995: Topographic Effects in Stratified Flow. Cambridge University Press, 482 pp.

  • Bryan, G. H., and J. M. Fritsch, 2002: A benchmark simulation for moist nonhydrostatic numerical models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 29172928, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<2917:ABSFMN>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bryan, G. H., and R. Rotunno, 2014: The optimal state for gravity currents in shear. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 448468, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0156.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Epifanio, C. C., 2007: A method for imposing surface stress and heat flux conditions in finite-difference models with steep terrain. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 906917, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3297.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Epifanio, C. C., and T. Qian, 2008: Wave–turbulence interactions in a breaking mountain wave. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 31393158, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2517.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houghton, D. D., and A. Kasahara, 1968: Nonlinear shallow fluid flow over an isolated ridge. Commun. Pure Appl. Math., 21, 123, https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160210103.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klemp, J. B., R. Rotunno, and W. C. Skamarock, 1997: On the propagation of internal bores. J. Fluid Mech., 331, 81106, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112096003710.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Long, R. R., 1954: Some aspects of the flow of stratified fluids. II. Experiments with a two-fluid system. Tellus, 6, 97115, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1954.tb01100.x.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rayleigh, L., 1914: On the theory of long waves and bores. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, 90A, 324328, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1914.0055.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rotunno, R., and P. K. Smolarkiewicz, 1995: Vorticity generation in the shallow-water equations as applied to hydraulic jumps. J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 320330, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<0320:VGITSW>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rotunno, R., V. Grubišić, and P. K. Smolarkiewicz, 1999: Vorticity and potential vorticity in mountain wakes. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 27962810, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<2796:VAPVIM>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schär, C., and R. B. Smith, 1993: Shallow-water flow past topography. Part I: Vorticity production and wake formation. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 13731400, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<1373:SWFPIT>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stoker, J. J., 1957: Water Waves. Interscience, 567 pp.

  • Strauss, L., S. Serafin, and V. Grubišić, 2016: Atmospheric rotors and severe turbulence in a long deep valley. J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 14811506, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0192.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Townsend, A. A., 1976: The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press, 429 pp.

  • Tschantz, B. A., and K. R. Wright, 2011: Hidden dangers and public safety at low-head dams. J. Dam Saf., 9, 817.

  • Whitham, G. B., 1974: Linear and Nonlinear Waves. John Wiley and Sons, 636 pp.

  • Wood, I. R., and J. E. Simpson, 1984: Jumps in layered miscible fluids. J. Fluid Mech., 140, 329342, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112084000628.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 630 166 14
PDF Downloads 555 124 8