Abstract
In their comment, Montgomery and Smith critique the recent study of Heng et al. that revisited the balanced and unbalanced aspects of tropical cyclone (TC) intensification based on diagnostics of a full-physics model simulation using the Sawyer–Eliassen equation. Heng et al. showed that the balanced dynamics reproduced to a large extent the secondary circulation in the full-physics model simulation and concluded that balanced dynamics can well explain TC intensification in their full-physics model simulation. Montgomery and Smith suspect the balanced solution in Heng et al. because the basic-state vortex is not exactly in thermal wind balance in the boundary layer and possibly a too-large diffusivity in the numerical model was used. In this reply, we first indicate that the boundary layer spinup mechanism proposed by Smith et al. is a fast response of the TC boundary layer to surface friction and should not be a major mechanism of TC intensification. We then evaluate the possible effect of imbalance in the basic state in the boundary layer on the balanced solution. The results show that although the removal of the imbalance in the boundary layer leads to about a one-third reduction in the maximum inflow near the surface in the inner-core region, the overall effect on the tangential wind budget is marginal because of other compensations. We also show that both the horizontal and vertical diffusivities in the model used in Heng et al. are reasonable based on previous observational studies. Therefore, we conclude that all results in Heng et al. are valid. Some related issues are also discussed.
© 2018 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).
The original article that was the subject of this comment/reply can be found at http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0046.1.
