Theory of In-Cloud Activation of Aerosols and Microphysical Quasi-Equilibrium in a Deep Updraft

Vaughan T. J. Phillips aDepartment of Physical Geography, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden

Search for other papers by Vaughan T. J. Phillips in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The microphysical quasi-equilibrium in an ascending adiabatic parcel is elucidated by an analytical theory in 0D with drastic simplifications. The theory predicts how in-cloud activation is most likely to be triggered by the onset of precipitation during sufficient ascent, with the ascent only needing to approach almost twice the cloud-base updraft speed aloft. The precipitation and cloud condensate mass fields are coupled in a closed system in a simplified version of the model. The initial state of no precipitation is unstable with respect to a perturbation. In the 2D phase space of both mass fields, there is a neutral line. Unstable growth of precipitation mass drives the system to cross the line into a regime of stability. An attractor is then approached consisting of precipitation mass balanced by accretion of cloud mass and fallout. The cloud-particle number concentration also approaches a stable equilibrium governed by the balance between in-cloud activation aloft from the inexorably increasing supersaturation during vertical acceleration and accretion of cloud droplets by precipitation. Dimensionless numbers characterizing the microphysical equilibria and their stability are derived mathematically, including a condensation–precipitation efficiency and an in-cloud activation efficiency. The theory explains common observations of the orders of magnitude of liquid water content in convective and stratiform clouds. Finally, sensitivity tests of the numerically integrated theoretical equations are documented with respect to variations in cloud condensation nucleus (CCN) aerosols and updraft speed. It is shown that this theory of in-cloud activation, with an increasing supersaturation during ascent, applies to both ice-only and liquid-only cloud.

Significance Statement

The purpose of the study is to create a theory for how equilibria among cloud-microphysical properties are attained during ascent. Continual initiation of fresh cloud droplets far above cloud base in the free troposphere is explained. The theory proposes a balance between creation and depletion of such droplets, in relation to a balance between creation and fallout of precipitation. The transition from positive feedbacks of instability toward negative feedbacks of stability when the equilibria are approached is elucidated. The theory explains why the mass content of cloud liquid in regions of ascent is typically about an order of magnitude lower in layer clouds with weak ascent than in convective clouds with faster ascent. Any future work could extend the theory to treat dilute parcels or coexistence of supercooled liquid and ice.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Vaughan T. J. Phillips, vaughan.phillips@nateko.lu.se

Abstract

The microphysical quasi-equilibrium in an ascending adiabatic parcel is elucidated by an analytical theory in 0D with drastic simplifications. The theory predicts how in-cloud activation is most likely to be triggered by the onset of precipitation during sufficient ascent, with the ascent only needing to approach almost twice the cloud-base updraft speed aloft. The precipitation and cloud condensate mass fields are coupled in a closed system in a simplified version of the model. The initial state of no precipitation is unstable with respect to a perturbation. In the 2D phase space of both mass fields, there is a neutral line. Unstable growth of precipitation mass drives the system to cross the line into a regime of stability. An attractor is then approached consisting of precipitation mass balanced by accretion of cloud mass and fallout. The cloud-particle number concentration also approaches a stable equilibrium governed by the balance between in-cloud activation aloft from the inexorably increasing supersaturation during vertical acceleration and accretion of cloud droplets by precipitation. Dimensionless numbers characterizing the microphysical equilibria and their stability are derived mathematically, including a condensation–precipitation efficiency and an in-cloud activation efficiency. The theory explains common observations of the orders of magnitude of liquid water content in convective and stratiform clouds. Finally, sensitivity tests of the numerically integrated theoretical equations are documented with respect to variations in cloud condensation nucleus (CCN) aerosols and updraft speed. It is shown that this theory of in-cloud activation, with an increasing supersaturation during ascent, applies to both ice-only and liquid-only cloud.

Significance Statement

The purpose of the study is to create a theory for how equilibria among cloud-microphysical properties are attained during ascent. Continual initiation of fresh cloud droplets far above cloud base in the free troposphere is explained. The theory proposes a balance between creation and depletion of such droplets, in relation to a balance between creation and fallout of precipitation. The transition from positive feedbacks of instability toward negative feedbacks of stability when the equilibria are approached is elucidated. The theory explains why the mass content of cloud liquid in regions of ascent is typically about an order of magnitude lower in layer clouds with weak ascent than in convective clouds with faster ascent. Any future work could extend the theory to treat dilute parcels or coexistence of supercooled liquid and ice.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Vaughan T. J. Phillips, vaughan.phillips@nateko.lu.se
Save
  • Battan, L. J., and J. B. Theiss, 1966: Observations of vertical motions and particle sizes in a thunderstorm. J. Atmos. Sci., 23, 7887, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1966)023<0078:OOVMAP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Benmoshe, N., and A. P. Khain, 2014: The effects of turbulence on the microphysics of mixed-phase deep convective clouds investigated with a 2-D cloud model with spectral bin microphysics. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 207221, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020118.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blyth, A. M., and J. Latham, 1997: A multi-thermal model of cumulus glaciation via the Hallett-Mossop process. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123, 11851198, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712354104.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bohm, J., 1992: A general hydrodynamic theory for mixed-phase microphysics. Part II: Collision kernels for coalescence. Atmos. Res., 27, 275290, https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8095(92)90036-A.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Field, P., and Coauthors, 2017: Secondary ice production: Current state of the science and recommendations for the future. Ice Formation and Evolution in Clouds and Precipitation: Measurement and Modeling Challenges, Meteor. Monogr., No. 58, Amer. Meteor. Soc, https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0014.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fridlind, A. M., and Coauthors, 2004: Evidence for the predominance of mid-tropospheric aerosols as subtropical anvil cloud nuclei. Science, 304, 718722, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1094947.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harris-Hobbs, R. L., and W. A. Cooper, 1987: Field evidence supporting quantitative predictions of secondary ice production rates. J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 10711082, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1987)044<1071:FESQPO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hegg, D. A., and P. V. Hobbs, 1992: Nucleation and Atmospheric Aerosols. N. Fukuta and P. E. Wagner, Eds. Hampton, 181 pp.

  • Held, I. M., 2005: The gap between simulation and understanding in climate modeling. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86, 16091614, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-86-11-1609.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heymsfield, A., and Coauthors, 2005: Homogeneous ice nucleation in subtropical and tropical convection and its influence on cirrus anvil microphysics. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 4164, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-3360.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holton, J. R., and G. J. Hakim, 2013: An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology. 5th ed. Academic Press, 553 pp.

  • Khain, A. P., V. T. J. Phillips, A. Pokrovsky, and N. Benmoshe, 2012: The role of small soluble aerosols in the microphysics of deep maritime clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 27872807, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JAS3649.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Khairoutdinov, M., and Y. Kogan, 2000: A new cloud physics parameterization in a large-eddy simulation model of marine stratocumulus. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 229243, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<0229:ANCPPI>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kogan, Y., 2013: A cumulus cloud microphysics parameterization for cloud-resolving models. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 14231436, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0183.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kohler, H., 1936: The nucleus in the growth of hygroscopic droplets. Trans. Faraday Soc., 32, 1151161, https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9363201152.

  • Koop, T., B. P. Luo, A. Tsias, and T. Peter, 2000: Water activity as the determinant for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions. Nature, 406, 611614, https://doi.org/10.1038/35020537.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Korolev, A. V., and I. P. Mazin, 2003: Supersaturation of water vapor in clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 29572974, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<2957:SOWVIC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marinescu, P. J., S. C. van den Heever, S. M. Saleeby, S. M. Kreidenweis, and P. J. DeMott, 2017: The microphysical roles of lower-tropospheric versus midtropospheric aerosol particles in mature-stage MCS precipitation. J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 36573678, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0361.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyers, M. P., P. J. DeMott, and W. R. Cotton, 1992: New primary ice-nucleation parametrisations in an explicit cloud model. J. Appl. Meteor., 31, 708720, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1992)031<0708:NPINPI>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ochs, H., 1978: Moment-conserving techniques for warm cloud microphysical computation. Part II. Model testing and results. J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 19591973, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035<1959:MCTFWC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Phillips, V. T. J., A. M. Blyth, T. W. Choularton, P. R. A. Brown, and J. Latham, 2001: The glaciation of a cumulus cloud over New Mexico. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 127, 15131534, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712757503.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Phillips, V. T. J., T. W. Choularton, A. J. Illingworth, R. J. Hogan, and P. R. Field, 2003: Simulations of the glaciation of a frontal mixed-phase cloud with the explicit microphysics model (EMM). Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 13511371, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.100.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Phillips, V. T. J., and Coauthors, 2005: Anvil glaciation in a deep cumulus updraft over Florida simulated with an explicit microphysics model. I: The impact of various nucleation processes. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 20192046, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.85.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Phillips, V. T. J., L. J. Donner, and S. Garner, 2007: Nucleation processes in deep convection simulated by a cloud-system-resolving model with double-moment bulk microphysics. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 738761, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3869.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Phillips, V. T. J., P. J. DeMott, and C. Andronache, 2008: An empirical parameterization of heterogeneous ice nucleation for multiple chemical species of aerosol. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 27572783, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2546.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Phillips, V. T. J., and Coauthors, 2009: Potential impacts from biological aerosols on ensembles of continental clouds simulated numerically. Biogeosciences, 6, 9871014, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-987-2009.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Phillips, V. T. J., and Coauthors, 2020: Multiple environmental influences on the lightning of cold-based continental cumulonimbus clouds. Part I: Description and validation of model. J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 39994024, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0200.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pinsky, M. B., and A. P. Khain, 1998: Some effects of cloud turbulence on water–ice and ice–ice collisions. Atmos. Res., 47–48, 6986, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(98)00041-6.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pinsky, M. B., and A. P. Khain, 2002: Effects of in-cloud nucleation and turbulence on droplet spectrum formation in cumulus clouds. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 501533, https://doi.org/10.1256/003590002321042072.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pinsky, M. B., I. P. Mazin, A. Korolev, and A. Khain, 2013: Supersaturation and diffusional drop growth in liquid clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 27782793, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-077.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pruppacher, H. R., and J. D. Klett, 1997: Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation. Kluwer Academic, 1079 pp.

  • Reuter, G. W., R. De Villiers, and Y. Yavin, 1988: The collection kernel for two falling cloud drops subjected to random perturbations at a turbulent airflow: A stochastic model. J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 765773, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<0765:TCKFTF>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Riemer, N., and A. S. Wexler, 2005: Droplets to drops by turbulent coagulation. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 19621975, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3431.1.

  • Rogers, R. R., and M. K. Yau, 1989: A Short Course in Cloud Physics. Pergamon Press, 308 pp.

  • Squires, P., 1952: The growth of cloud drops by condensation. Aust. J. Sci. Res., 5A, 5986.

  • Squires, P., 1958: The microstructure and colloidal stability of warm clouds. Tellus, 10, 256271, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v10i2.9229.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thompson, G., R. M. Rasmussen, and K. Manning, 2004: Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part I: Description and sensitivity analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 32, 519542, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0519:EFOWPU>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Twomey, S., 1959: The nuclei of natural cloud formation, II. The super-saturation in natural clouds and the variation of cloud droplet concentration. Geofis. Pura Appl., 43, 243249, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01993560.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xue, Y., L.-P. Wang, and W. W. Grabowski, 2008: Growth of cloud droplets by turbulent collision–coalescence. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 331356, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2406.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 285 88 0
Full Text Views 205 128 12
PDF Downloads 211 131 12