A Linear Theory of Wind Farm Efficiency and Interaction

Ronald B. Smith aYale University, New Haven, Connecticut

Search for other papers by Ronald B. Smith in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

We investigate the role of gravity waves (GW), farm shape, and wind direction on the efficiency and interaction of wind farms using a two-layer linearized dynamical model with Rayleigh friction. Five integrated diagnostic quantities are used: total wind deficit, the first moment of vorticity, turbine work, disturbance kinetic energy, and vertical energy flux. The work done on the atmosphere by turbine drag is balanced by dissipation of disturbance kinetic energy. A new definition of wind farm efficiency is proposed based on “turbine work.” While GWs do not change the total wind deficit or the vorticity pattern, they alter the spatial pattern of wind deficit and typically make a wind farm less efficient. GWs slow the winds upwind and reduce the wake influence on nearby downstream wind farms. GWs also propagate part of the disturbance energy upward into the upper atmosphere. We applied these ideas to the proposed 45 km × 15 km wind energy areas off the coast of New England. The proximity of these farms allows GWs to play a significant role in farm interaction, especially in winter with northwesterly winds. The governing equations are solved directly and by using fast Fourier transforms (FFT). The computational speed of the linear FFT model suggests its future use in optimizing the design and day-by-day operation of these and other wind farms.

Significance Statement

When a wind farm is generating electricity, the drag of the wind turbines slows the regional winds. As wind farms grow larger and more closely spaced, this wind reduction will limit the efficiency of wind farms and their economic return. In this paper we analyze an idealized mathematical model of the atmospheric response to wind farm drag including nonlocal gravity wave effects. We propose a new definition of farm efficiency based on the atmospheric disturbance that a farm creates. We also propose a fast Fourier transform (FFT) method for carrying out these estimates.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Ronald B. Smith, ronald.smith@yale.edu

Abstract

We investigate the role of gravity waves (GW), farm shape, and wind direction on the efficiency and interaction of wind farms using a two-layer linearized dynamical model with Rayleigh friction. Five integrated diagnostic quantities are used: total wind deficit, the first moment of vorticity, turbine work, disturbance kinetic energy, and vertical energy flux. The work done on the atmosphere by turbine drag is balanced by dissipation of disturbance kinetic energy. A new definition of wind farm efficiency is proposed based on “turbine work.” While GWs do not change the total wind deficit or the vorticity pattern, they alter the spatial pattern of wind deficit and typically make a wind farm less efficient. GWs slow the winds upwind and reduce the wake influence on nearby downstream wind farms. GWs also propagate part of the disturbance energy upward into the upper atmosphere. We applied these ideas to the proposed 45 km × 15 km wind energy areas off the coast of New England. The proximity of these farms allows GWs to play a significant role in farm interaction, especially in winter with northwesterly winds. The governing equations are solved directly and by using fast Fourier transforms (FFT). The computational speed of the linear FFT model suggests its future use in optimizing the design and day-by-day operation of these and other wind farms.

Significance Statement

When a wind farm is generating electricity, the drag of the wind turbines slows the regional winds. As wind farms grow larger and more closely spaced, this wind reduction will limit the efficiency of wind farms and their economic return. In this paper we analyze an idealized mathematical model of the atmospheric response to wind farm drag including nonlocal gravity wave effects. We propose a new definition of farm efficiency based on the atmospheric disturbance that a farm creates. We also propose a fast Fourier transform (FFT) method for carrying out these estimates.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Ronald B. Smith, ronald.smith@yale.edu
Save
  • Allaerts, D., and J. Meyers, 2015: Large eddy simulation of a large wind-turbine array in a conventionally neutral atmospheric boundary layer. Phys. Fluids, 27, 065108, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4922339.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Allaerts, D., and J. Meyers, 2018: Gravity waves and wind-farm efficiency in neutral and stable conditions. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 166, 269299, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-017-0307-5.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Allaerts, D., and J. Meyers, 2019: Sensitivity and feedback of wind-farm-induced gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech., 862, 9901028, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.969.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Archer, C. L., A. Vasel-Be-Hagh, C. Yan, S. Wu, Y. Pan, J. F. Brodie, and A. E. Maguire, 2018: Review and evaluation of wake loss models for wind energy applications. Appl. Energy, 226, 11871207, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.085.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bärfuss, K., and Coauthors, 2019: In-situ airborne measurements of atmospheric and sea surface parameters related to offshore wind parks in the German Bight. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.902845.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Batchelor, G. K., 2012: An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 615 pp., https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800955.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Christiansen, M. B., and C. B. Hasager, 2005: Wake effects of large offshore wind farms identified from satellite SAR. Remote Sens. Environ., 98, 251268, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.07.009.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cortina, G., V. Sharma, and M. Calaf, 2017: Wind farm density and harvested power in very large wind farms: A low-order model. Phys. Rev. Fluids, 2, 074601, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.074601.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eliassen, A., and E. Palm, 1960: On the transfer of energy in stationary mountain waves. Geofys. Publ., 22, 123.

  • Emeis, S., 2010: A simple analytical wind park model considering atmospheric stability. Wind Energy, 13, 459469, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.367.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eriksson, O., J. Lindvall, S.-P. Breton, and S. Ivanell, 2015: Wake downstream of the Lillgrund wind farm—A comparison between LES using the actuator disc method and a wind farm parametrization in WRF. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 625, 012028, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/625/1/012028.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fischereit, J., R. Brown, X. Larsén, J. Badger, and G. Hawkes, 2021: Review of mesoscale wind farm parametrizations and their applications. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 182, 175224, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-021-00652-y.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fitch, A. C., J. B. Olson, J. K. Lundquist, J. Dudhia, A. Gupta, J. Michalakes, and I. Barstad, 2012: Local and mesoscale impacts of wind farms as parameterized in a mesoscale NWP model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 30173038, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00352.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fitch, A. C., J. B. Olson, and J. K. Lundquist, 2013: Parameterization of wind farms in climate models. J. Climate, 26, 64396458, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00376.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hasager, C. B., L. Rasmussen, A. Peña, L. E. Jensen, and P.-E. Réthoré, 2013: Wind farm wake: The Horns Rev photo case. Energies, 6, 696716, https://doi.org/10.3390/en6020696.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • International Energy Agency, 2021: Net zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy sector. International Energy Agency Special Rep. 01781941, 224 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Jensen, N. O., 1983: A note on wind generator interaction. Risø National Laboratory Tech. Rep. Risoe-M-2411(EN), 16 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Lamb, H., 1945: Hydrodynamics. Dover Publications, 475 pp.

  • Lampert, A., and Coauthors, 2020: In situ airborne measurements of atmospheric and sea surface parameters related to offshore wind parks in the German Bight. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 935946, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-935-2020.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Larsén, X. G., and J. Fischereit, 2021: A case study of wind farm effects using two wake parameterizations in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model (V3.7.1) in the presence of low-level jets. Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 31413158, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-3141-2021.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lee, J. C. Y., and J. K. Lundquist, 2017: Evaluation of the wind farm parameterization in the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (version 3.8.1) with meteorological and turbine power data. Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 42294244, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4229-2017.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lu, H., and F. Porté-Agel, 2011: Large-eddy simulation of a very large wind farm in a stable atmospheric boundary layer. Phys. Fluids, 23, 065101, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3589857.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Musial, W., Z. Parker, J. Fields, G. Scott, D. Elliott, and C. Draxl, 2013: Assessment of offshore wind energy leasing areas for the BOEM Massachusetts wind energy area. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-5000-60942, 60 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Patrick, J. H., P. J. H. Volker, A. N. Hahmann, J. Badger, and H. E. Jørgensen, 2017: Prospects for generating electricity by large onshore and offshore wind farms. Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 034022, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5d86.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Platis, A., and Coauthors, 2018: First in situ evidence of wakes in the far field behind offshore wind farms. Sci. Rep., 8, 2163, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20389-y.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Porté-Agel, F., M. Bastankhah, and S. Shamsoddin, 2020: Wind-turbine and wind-farm flows: A review. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 174, 159, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-019-00473-0.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pryor, S. C., T. J. Shepherd, P. J. H. Volker, A. N. Hahmann, and R. J. Barthelmie, 2020: “Wind theft” from onshore wind turbine arrays: Sensitivity to wind farm parameterization and resolution. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 59, 153174, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-19-0235.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Siedersleben, S. K., and Coauthors, 2020: Turbulent kinetic energy over large offshore wind farms observed and simulated by the mesoscale model WRF (3.8.1). Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 249268, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-249-2020.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, R. B., 1980: Linear theory of stratified hydrostatic flow past an isolated mountain. Tellus, 32, 348364, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v32i4.10590.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, R. B., 2010: Gravity wave effects on wind farm efficiency. Wind Energy, 13, 449458, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.366.

  • Smith, R. B., and V. Grubišić, 1993: Aerial observations of Hawaii’s wake. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 37283750, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<3728:AOOHW>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, R. B., A. Gleason, P. Gluhosky, and V. Grubišić, 1997: The wake of St. Vincent. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 606623, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<0606:TWOSV>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, R. B., B. K. Woods, J. Jensen, W. A. Cooper, J. D. Doyle, Q. Jiang, and V. Grubišić, 2008: Mountain waves entering the stratosphere. J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 25432562, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2598.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, R. B., and Coauthors, 2016: Stratospheric gravity wave fluxes and scales during DEEPWAVE. J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 28512869, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0324.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stevens, R., and C. Meneveau, 2017: Flow structure and turbulence in wind farms. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 49, 311339, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010816-060206.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vanderwende, B. J., B. Kosović, J. K. Lundquist, and J. D. Mirocha, 2016: Simulating effects of a wind-turbine array using LES and RANS. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 8, 13761390, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016MS000652.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vautard, R., F. Thais, I. Tobin, F.-M. Bréon, J.-G. D. De Lavergne, A. Colette, P. Yiou, and P. M. Ruti, 2014: Regional climate model simulations indicate limited climatic impacts by operational and planned European wind farms. Nat. Commun., 5, 3196, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4196.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Volker, P. J. H., A. Hahmann, J. Badger, and H. E. Jørgensen, 2017: Prospects for generating electricity by large onshore and offshore wind farms. Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 034022, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5d86.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • West, C. G., and R. B. Smith, 2021: Global patterns of offshore wind variability. Wind Energy, 24, 14661481, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.2641.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wood, S., J. Purdum, and B. Egan, 2014: Visualization simulations for offshore Massachusetts and Rhode Island wind energy area. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Meteorological Rep. BOEM 2017-037, 134 pp.

  • Wu, K. L., and F. Porté-Agel, 2017: Flow adjustment inside and around large finite-size wind farms. Energies, 10, 2164, https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122164.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 775 141 0
Full Text Views 280 156 17
PDF Downloads 285 133 10