Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

The Influence of Midlevel Shear and Horizontal Rotors on Supercell Updraft Dynamics

Andrew J. Muehr aSchool of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
bCooperative Institute for Severe and High-Impact Weather Research and Operations, Norman, Oklahoma
cNOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Andrew J. Muehr in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3008-7517
,
James H. Ruppert aSchool of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by James H. Ruppert in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Matthew D. Flournoy dNOAA/NWS/NCEP/Storm Prediction Center, Norman, Oklahoma
aSchool of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
cNOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Matthew D. Flournoy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
John M. Peters eDepartment of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Search for other papers by John M. Peters in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Online Publication:
16 Jan 2024
Print Publication:
01 Jan 2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-23-0082.1
Page(s):
153–176
Restricted access

Abstract

Large midlevel (3–6 km AGL) shear is commonly observed in supercell environments. However, any possible influence of midlevel shear on an updraft has been relatively unexplored until now. To investigate, we ran 10 simulations of supercells in a range of environments with varying midlevel shear magnitudes. In most cases, larger midlevel shear results in a storm motion that is faster relative to the low-level hodograph, meaning that larger midlevel shear leads to stronger low-level storm-relative flow. Because they are physically connected, we present an analysis of the effects of both midlevel shear and low-level storm-relative flow on supercell updraft dynamics. Larger midlevel shear does not lead to an increase in cohesive updraft rotation. The tilting of midlevel environmental vorticity does lead to localized areas of larger vertical vorticity on the southern edge of the updraft, but any dynamical influence of this is overshadowed by that of much larger horizontal vorticity in the same area associated with rotor-like circulations. This storm-generated horizontal vorticity is the primary driver behind lower nonlinear dynamic pressure on the southern flank of the midlevel updraft when midlevel shear and low-level storm-relative flow are larger, which leads to a larger nonlinear dynamic pressure acceleration in those cases. Storm-generated horizontal vorticity is responsible for the lowest nonlinear dynamic pressure anywhere in the midlevel updraft, unless the mesocyclone becomes particularly intense. These results clarify the influence of midlevel shear on a supercell thunderstorm, and provide additional insight on the role of low-level storm-relative flow on updraft dynamics.

Significance Statement

Persistent rotation in supercell thunderstorms results from the tilting of horizontal spin into the vertical direction. This initially horizontal spin is the result of shear, which is a change in wind speed and/or direction with height. More shear in the layer 0–3 km above ground level is well understood to lead to stronger rotation within the storm, but the influence of shear in the 3–6-km layer is unclear and is investigated here. We find that horizontal spin originating in the 3–6-km layer has little impact on vertically oriented thunderstorm rotation. Instead, intense regions of horizontal spin that are generated by the storm itself (rather than having originated from the background environment) dominate storm dynamics at midlevels.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Andrew Muehr, andrew.muehr@noaa.gov

Abstract

Large midlevel (3–6 km AGL) shear is commonly observed in supercell environments. However, any possible influence of midlevel shear on an updraft has been relatively unexplored until now. To investigate, we ran 10 simulations of supercells in a range of environments with varying midlevel shear magnitudes. In most cases, larger midlevel shear results in a storm motion that is faster relative to the low-level hodograph, meaning that larger midlevel shear leads to stronger low-level storm-relative flow. Because they are physically connected, we present an analysis of the effects of both midlevel shear and low-level storm-relative flow on supercell updraft dynamics. Larger midlevel shear does not lead to an increase in cohesive updraft rotation. The tilting of midlevel environmental vorticity does lead to localized areas of larger vertical vorticity on the southern edge of the updraft, but any dynamical influence of this is overshadowed by that of much larger horizontal vorticity in the same area associated with rotor-like circulations. This storm-generated horizontal vorticity is the primary driver behind lower nonlinear dynamic pressure on the southern flank of the midlevel updraft when midlevel shear and low-level storm-relative flow are larger, which leads to a larger nonlinear dynamic pressure acceleration in those cases. Storm-generated horizontal vorticity is responsible for the lowest nonlinear dynamic pressure anywhere in the midlevel updraft, unless the mesocyclone becomes particularly intense. These results clarify the influence of midlevel shear on a supercell thunderstorm, and provide additional insight on the role of low-level storm-relative flow on updraft dynamics.

Significance Statement

Persistent rotation in supercell thunderstorms results from the tilting of horizontal spin into the vertical direction. This initially horizontal spin is the result of shear, which is a change in wind speed and/or direction with height. More shear in the layer 0–3 km above ground level is well understood to lead to stronger rotation within the storm, but the influence of shear in the 3–6-km layer is unclear and is investigated here. We find that horizontal spin originating in the 3–6-km layer has little impact on vertically oriented thunderstorm rotation. Instead, intense regions of horizontal spin that are generated by the storm itself (rather than having originated from the background environment) dominate storm dynamics at midlevels.

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Andrew Muehr, andrew.muehr@noaa.gov
Save
Cover Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

  • Adlerman, E. J., K. K. Droegemeier, and R. Davies-Jones, 1999: A numerical simulation of cyclic mesocyclogenesis. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 2045–2069, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<2045:ANSOCM>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bentley, E. S., R. L. Thompson, B. R. Bowers, J. G. Gibbs, and S. E. Nelson, 2021: An analysis of 2016–18 tornadoes and National Weather Service tornado warnings across the contiguous United States. Wea. Forecasting, 36, 1909–1924, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-20-0241.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bluestein, H. B., and C. R. Parks, 1983: A synoptic and photographic climatology of low-precipitation severe thunderstorms in the Southern Plains. Mon. Wea. Rev., 111, 2034–2046, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1983)111<2034:ASAPCO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bluestein, H. B., and G. R. Woodall, 1990: Doppler-radar analysis of a low-precipitation severe storm. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118, 1640–1665, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<1640:DRAOAL>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brandes, E. A., 1984: Relationships between radar-derived thermodynamic variables and tornadogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 112, 1033–1052, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1984)112<1033:RBRDTV>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brooks, H. E., C. A. Doswell III, and R. B. Wilhelmson, 1994: The role of midtropospheric winds in the evolution and maintenance of low-level mesocyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 122, 126–136, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<0126:TROMWI>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brown, M. C., and C. J. Nowotarski, 2019: The influence of lifting condensation level on low-level outflow and rotation in simulated supercell thunderstorms. J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 1349–1372, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0216.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Brown, M. C., C. J. Nowotarski, A. R. Dean, B. T. Smith, R. L. Thompson, and J. M. Peters, 2021: The early evening transition in southeastern U.S. tornado environments. Wea. Forecasting, 36, 1431–1452, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-20-0191.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Browning, K. A., 1964: Airflow and precipitation trajectories within severe local storms which travel to the right of the winds. J. Atmos. Sci., 21, 634–639, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1964)021<0634:AAPTWS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bryan, G. H., and J. M. Fritsch, 2002: A benchmark simulation for moist nonhydrostatic numerical models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2917–2928, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<2917:ABSFMN>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bunkers, M. J., B. A. Klimowski, J. W. Zeitler, R. L. Thompson, and M. L. Weisman, 2000: Predicting supercell motion using a new hodograph technique. Wea. Forecasting, 15, 61–79, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015<0061:PSMUAN>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bunkers, M. J., D. A. Barber, R. L. Thompson, R. Edwards, and J. Garner, 2014: Choosing a universal mean wind for supercell motion prediction. J. Oper. Meteor., 2, 115–129, https://doi.org/10.15191/nwajom.2014.0211.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cai, H., and R. M. Wakimoto, 2001: Retrieved pressure field and its influence on the propagation of a supercell thunderstorm. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2695–2713, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<2695:RPFAII>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Coffer, B. E., and M. D. Parker, 2015: Impacts of increasing low-level shear on supercells during the early evening transition. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 1945–1969, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00328.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Coffer, B. E., and M. D. Parker, 2017: Simulated supercells in nontornadic and tornadic VORTEX2 environments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 149–180, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-16-0226.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Coffer, B. E., M. D. Parker, J. M. L. Dahl, L. J. Wicker, and A. J. Clark, 2017: Volatility of tornadogenesis: An ensemble of simulated nontornadic and tornadic supercells in VORTEX2 environments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 4605–4625, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-17-0152.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, 2019: Cheyenne: HPE/SGI ICE XA System (University Community Computing). National Center for Atmospheric Research, https://doi.org/10.5065/D6RX99HX.

  • Coniglio, M. C., and M. D. Parker, 2020: Insights into supercells and their environments from three decades of targeted radiosonde observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 148, 4893–4915, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0105.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Coniglio, M. C., and R. E. Jewell, 2022: SPC mesoscale analysis compared to field-project soundings: Implications for supercell environment studies. Mon. Wea. Rev., 150, 567–588, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-21-0222.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dahl, J. M. L., 2015: Near-ground rotation in simulated supercells: On the robustness of the baroclinic mechanism. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 4929–4942, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0115.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dahl, J. M. L., 2017: Tilting of horizontal shear vorticity and the development of updraft rotation in supercell thunderstorms. J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 2997–3020, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0091.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dahl, J. M. L., M. D. Parker, and L. J. Wicker, 2014: Imported and storm-generated near-ground vertical vorticity in a simulated supercell. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 3027–3051, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0123.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Damiani, R., and G. Vali, 2007: Evidence for tilted toroidal circulations in cumulus. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 2045–2060, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3941.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Davenport, C. E., 2021: Environmental evolution of long-lived supercell thunderstorms in the Great Plains. Wea. Forecasting, 36, 2187–2209, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-21-0042.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Davies-Jones, R., 1984: Streamwise vorticity: The origin of updraft rotation in supercell storms. J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 2991–3006, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041<2991:SVTOOU>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Davies-Jones, R., 2002: Linear and nonlinear propagation of supercell storms. J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 3178–3205, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)059<3178:LANPOS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Davies-Jones, R., 2003: An expression for effective buoyancy in surroundings with horizontal density gradients. J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 2922–2925, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<2922:AEFEBI>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Davies-Jones, R., 2015: A review of supercell and tornado dynamics. Atmos. Res., 158–159, 274–291, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.04.007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Davies-Jones, R., 2021: Invented forces in supercell models. J. Atmos. Sci., 78, 2927–2939, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0082.1.

  • Davies-Jones, R., 2022: Theory of parcel vorticity evolution in supercell-like flows. J. Atmos. Sci., 79, 1253–1270, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0178.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Davies-Jones, R., D. W. Burgess, and M. Foster, 1990: Test of helicity as a forecast parameter. Preprints, 16th Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Kananaskis Provincial Park, AB, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 588–592.

  • Dennis, E. J., and M. R. Kumjian, 2017: The impact of vertical wind shear on hail growth in simulated supercells. J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 641–663, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0066.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • de Rooy, W. C., and Coauthors, 2013: Entrainment and detrainment in cumulus convection: An overview. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1959.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dowell, D. C., and H. B. Bluestein, 2002: The 8 June 1995 McLean, Texas, storm. Part I: Observations of cyclic tornadogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 2626–2648, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<2626:TJMTSP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Droegemeier, K. K., S. M. Lazarus, and R. Davies-Jones, 1993: The influence of helicity on numerically simulated convective storms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 121, 2005–2029, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1993)121<2005:TIOHON>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Emanuel, K. A., 1991: A scheme for representing cumulus convection in large-scale models. J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 2313–2329, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<2313:ASFRCC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Flournoy, M. D., M. C. Coniglio, E. N. Rasmussen, J. C. Furtado, and B. E. Coffer, 2020: Modes of storm-scale variability and tornado potential in VORTEX2 near- and far-field tornadic environments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 148, 4185–4207, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0147.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Flournoy, M. D., M. C. Coniglio, and E. N. Rasmussen, 2021: Examining relationships between environmental conditions and supercell motion in time. Wea. Forecasting, 36, 737–755, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-20-0192.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Flournoy, M. D., A. W. Lyza, M. A. Satrio, M. R. Diedrichsen, M. C. Coniglio, and S. Waugh, 2022: A climatology of cell mergers with supercells and their association with mesocyclone evolution. Mon. Wea. Rev., 150, 451–461, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-21-0204.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gibbs, J. G., and B. R. Bowers, 2019: Techniques and thresholds of significance for using WSR-88D velocity data to anticipate significant tornadoes. J. Oper. Meteor., 7, 117–137, https://doi.org/10.15191/nwajom.2019.0709.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gilmore, M. S., and L. J. Wicker, 1998: The influence of midtropospheric dryness on supercell morphology and evolution. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 943–958, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<0943:TIOMDO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Goldacker, N. A., and M. D. Parker, 2021: Low-level updraft intensification in response to environmental wind profiles. J. Atmos. Sci., 78, 2763–2781, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0354.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Grant, L. D., and S. C. van den Heever, 2014: Microphysical and dynamical characteristics of low-precipitation and classic supercells. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 2604–2624, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0261.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gray, K., and J. Frame, 2019: Investigating the transition from elevated multicellular convection to surface-based supercells during the tornado outbreak of 24 August 2016 using a WRF Model simulation. Wea. Forecasting, 34, 1051–1079, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-18-0209.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gray, K., and J. Frame, 2021: The impact of midlevel shear orientation on the longevity of and downdraft location and tornado-like vortex formation within simulated supercells. Mon. Wea. Rev., 149, 3739–3759, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-21-0085.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gropp, M. E., and C. E. Davenport, 2018: The impact of the nocturnal transition on the lifetime and evolution of supercell thunderstorms in the Great Plains. Wea. Forecasting, 33, 1045–1061, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-17-0150.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Guarriello, F., C. J. Nowotarski, and C. C. Epifanio, 2018: Effects of the low-level wind profile on outflow position and near-surface vertical vorticity in simulated supercell thunderstorms. J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 731–753, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0174.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hastings, R., and Y. Richardson, 2016: Long-term morphological changes in simulated supercells following mergers with nascent supercells in directionally varying shear. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 471–499, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0193.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hill, M. J. M., 1894: On a spherical vortex. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc., A185, 213–245, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1894.0006.

  • James, R. P., and P. M. Markowski, 2010: A numerical investigation of the effects of dry air aloft on deep convection. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 140–161, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR3018.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jeevanjee, N., and D. M. Romps, 2016: Effective buoyancy at the surface and aloft. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 142, 811–820, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2683.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jo, E., and S. Lasher-Trapp, 2022: Entrainment in a simulated supercell thunderstorm. Part II: The influence of vertical wind shear and general effects upon precipitation. J. Atmos. Sci., 79, 1429–1443, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0289.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jo, E., and S. Lasher-Trapp, 2023: Entrainment in a simulated supercell thunderstorm. Part III: The influence of decreased environmental humidity and general effects upon precipitation efficiency. J. Atmos. Sci., 80, 1107–1122, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-22-0168.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Katona, B., and P. Markowski, 2021: Assessing the influence of complex terrain on severe convective environments in northeastern Alabama. Wea. Forecasting, 36, 1003–1029, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-20-0136.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kirkpatrick, C., E. W. McCaul Jr., and C. Cohen, 2009: Variability of updraft and downdraft characteristics in a large parameter space study of convective storms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 1550–1561, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2703.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Klemp, J. B., and R. B. Wilhelmson, 1978: The simulation of three-dimensional convective storm dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 1070–1096, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035<1070:TSOTDC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Klemp, J. B., and R. Rotunno, 1983: A study of the tornadic region within a supercell thunderstorm. J. Atmos. Sci., 40, 359–377, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1983)040<0359:ASOTTR>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lasher-Trapp, S., E. Jo, L. R. Allen, B. N. Engelsen, and R. J. Trapp, 2021: Entrainment in a simulated supercell thunderstorm. Part I: The evolution of different entrainment mechanisms and their dilutive effects. J. Atmos. Sci., 78, 2725–2740, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0223.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • LeBel, L. J., and P. M. Markowski, 2023: An analysis of the impact of vertical wind shear on convection initiation using large-eddy simulations: Importance of wake entrainment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 151, 1667–1688, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-22-0176.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lebo, Z. J., and H. Morrison, 2015: Effects of horizontal and vertical grid spacing on mixing in simulated squall lines and implications for convective strength and structure. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 4355–4375, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0154.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lilly, D. K., 1986a: The structure, energetics and propagation of rotating convective storms. Part I: Energy exchange with the mean flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 113–125, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<0113:TSEAPO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lilly, D. K., 1986b: The structure, energetics and propagation of rotating convective storms. Part II: Helicity and storm stabilization. J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 126–140, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<0126:TSEAPO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lin, C., and A. Arakawa, 1997a: The macroscopic entrainment processes of simulated cumulus ensemble. Part I: Entrainment sources. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 1027–1043, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<1027:TMEPOS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lin, C., and A. Arakawa, 1997b: The macroscopic entrainment processes of simulated cumulus ensemble. Part II: Testing the entraining-plume model. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 1044–1053, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<1044:TMEPOS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Lyza, A. W., M. D. Flournoy, and E. N. Rasmussen, 2022: Observed characteristics of the tornadic supercells of 27–28 April 2011 in the southeast United States. Mon. Wea. Rev., 150, 2883–2910, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-21-0274.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Maddox, R. A., 1976: An evaluation of tornado proximity wind and stability data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 104, 133–142, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1976)104<0133:AEOTPW>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Marion, G. R., and R. J. Trapp, 2019: The dynamical coupling of convective updrafts, downdrafts, and cold pools in simulated supercell thunderstorms. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 124, 664–683, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029055.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Markowski, P. M., 2020: What is the intrinsic predictability of tornadic supercell thunderstorms? Mon. Wea. Rev., 148, 3157–3180, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0076.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Markowski, P. M., and Y. Richardson, 2010: Mesoscale Meteorology in Midlatitudes. Wiley-Blackwell, 430 pp.

  • Markowski, P. M., and Y. Richardson, 2014: The influence of environmental low-level shear and cold pools on tornadogenesis: Insights from idealized simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 243–275, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0159.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Markowski, P. M., and G. H. Bryan, 2016: LES of laminar flow in the PBL: A potential problem for convective storm simulations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 1841–1850, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0439.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Marquis, J., Y. Richardson, P. Markowski, J. Wurman, K. Kosiba, and P. Robinson, 2016: An investigation of the Goshen County, Wyoming, tornadic supercell of 5 June 2009 using EnKF assimilation of mobile mesonet and radar observations collected during VORTEX2. Part II: Mesocyclone-scale processes affecting tornado formation, maintenance, and decay. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 3441–3463, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0411.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McCaul, E. W., Jr., and M. L. Weisman, 1996: Simulations of shallow supercell storms in landfalling hurricane environments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 124, 408–429, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<0408:SOSSSI>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • McCaul, E. W., Jr., and M. L. Weisman, 2001: The sensitivity of simulated supercell structure and intensity to variations in the shapes of environmental buoyancy and shear profiles. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 664–687, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0664:TSOSSS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morrison, H., 2016a: Impacts of updraft size and dimensionality on the perturbation pressure and vertical velocity in cumulus convection. Part I: Simple, generalized analytic solutions. J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 1441–1454, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0040.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morrison, H., 2016b: Impacts of updraft size and dimensionality on the perturbation pressure and vertical velocity in cumulus convection. Part II: Comparison of theoretical and numerical solutions and fully dynamical simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 1455–1480, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0041.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morrison, H., 2017: An analytic description of the structure and evolution of growing deep cumulus updrafts. J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 809–834, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0234.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morrison, H., and J. M. Peters, 2018: Theoretical expressions for the ascent rate of moist deep convective thermals. J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 1699–1719, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0295.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morrison, H., G. Thompson, and V. Tatarskii, 2009: Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: Comparison of one- and two-moment schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 991–1007, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2556.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morrison, H., J. M. Peters, A. C. Varble, W. M. Hannah, and S. E. Giangrande, 2020: Thermal chains and entrainment in cumulus updrafts. Part I: Theoretical description. J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 3637–3660, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0243.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Morrison, H., J. M. Peters, K. K. Chandrakar, and S. C. Sherwood, 2022: Influences of environmental relative humidity and horizontal scale of subcloud ascent on deep convective initiation. J. Atmos. Sci., 79, 337–359, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0056.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mulholland, J. P., J. M. Peters, and H. Morrison, 2021: How does vertical wind shear influence entrainment in squall lines? J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 1931–1946, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0299.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Murdzek, S. S., P. M. Markowski, Y. P. Richardson, and R. L. Tanamachi, 2020: Processes preventing the development of a significant tornado in a Colorado supercell on 26 May 2010. Mon. Wea. Rev., 148, 1753–1778, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0288.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Murdzek, S. S., Y. P. Richardson, P. M. Markowski, and M. R. Kumjian, 2022: How the environmental lifting condensation level affects the sensitivity of simulated convective storm cold pools to the microphysics parameterization. Mon. Wea. Rev., 150, 2527–2552, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-21-0258.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nixon, C. J., and J. T. Allen, 2022: Distinguishing between hodographs of severe hail and tornadoes. Wea. Forecasting, 37, 1761–1782, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-21-0136.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nowotarski, C. J., P. M. Markowski, Y. P. Richardson, and G. H. Bryan, 2014: Properties of a simulated convective boundary layer in an idealized supercell thunderstorm environment. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 3955–3976, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00349.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nowotarski, C. J., J. M. Peters, and J. P. Mulholland, 2020: Evaluating the effective inflow layer of simulated supercell updrafts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 148, 3507–3532, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0013.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Orf, L., R. Wilhelmson, B. Lee, C. Finley, and A. Houston, 2017: Evolution of a long-track violent tornado within a simulated supercell. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 98, 45–68, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00073.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Parker, M. D., 2014: Composite VORTEX2 supercell environments from near-storm soundings. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 508–529, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00167.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Parker, M. D., 2017: How much does “backing aloft” actually impact a supercell? Wea. Forecasting, 32, 1937–1957, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-17-0064.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Parker, M. D., and R. H. Johnson, 2004: Structures and dynamics of quasi-2D mesoscale convective systems. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 545–567, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0545:SADOQM>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Peters, J. M., C. J. Nowotarski, and H. Morrison, 2019: The role of vertical wind shear in modulating maximum supercell updraft velocities. J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 3169–3189, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0096.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Peters, J. M., H. Morrison, A. C. Varble, W. M. Hannah, and S. E. Giangrande, 2020a: Thermal chains and entrainment in cumulus updrafts. Part II: Analysis of idealized simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 3661–3681, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0244.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Peters, J. M., C. J. Nowotarski, J. P. Mulholland, and R. L. Thompson, 2020b: The influences of effective inflow layer streamwise vorticity and storm-relative flow on supercell updraft properties. J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 3033–3057, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0355.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Peters, J. M., C. J. Nowotarski, and G. L. Mullendore, 2020c: Are supercells resistant to entrainment because of their rotation? J. Atmos. Sci., 77, 1475–1495, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-19-0316.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Peters, J. M., J. P. Mulholland, and D. R. Chavas, 2022a: Generalized lapse rate formulas for use in entraining CAPE calculations. J. Atmos. Sci., 79, 815–836, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0118.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Peters, J. M., H. Morrison, T. C. Nelson, J. N. Marquis, J. Mulholland, and C. J. Nowotarski, 2022b: The influence of shear on deep convection initiation. Part I: Theory. J. Atmos. Sci., 79, 1669–1690, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0145.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Peters, J. M., H. Morrison, T. C. Nelson, J. N. Marquis, J. Mulholland, and C. J. Nowotarski, 2022c: The influence of shear on deep convection initiation. Part II: Simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 79, 1691–1711, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-21-0144.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Peters, J. M., B. E. Coffer, M. D. Parker, C. J. Nowotarski, J. P. Mulholland, C. J. Nixon, and J. T. Allen, 2023: Disentangling the influences of storm-relative flow and horizontal streamwise vorticity on low-level mesocyclones in supercells. J. Atmos. Sci., 80, 129–149, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-22-0114.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Pounds, L. E., C. L. Ziegler, R. D. Adams-Selin, and M. I. Biggerstaff, 2024: Analysis of hail production via simulated hailstone trajectories in the 29 May 2012 Kingfisher, Oklahoma, supercell. Mon. Wea. Rev., https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-23-0073.1, in press.