Solar Geoengineering Research in India

G. Bala Centre for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

Search for other papers by G. Bala in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Akhilesh Gupta Climate Change Program, Strategic Programs, Large Initiatives and Coordinated Action Enabler (SPLICE) Division, Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India

Search for other papers by Akhilesh Gupta in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This article presents a brief account of scientific research into solar geoengineering in India in the last decade. In recent years, solar geoengineering has been proposed as an option to ameliorate the detrimental impacts of climate change in case the required emissions reductions do not take place rapidly. Hundreds of research papers have been published in the last decade by both natural and social scientists on the feasibility, effectiveness, cost, and risks, and the ethical, legal, social, political, and governance dimensions of geoengineering. Most of this research is conducted in the developed world, and very little research or discussion has taken place in the global South. However, it has been argued in several forums that the developing world should have a central role in solar-geoengineering research, discussion, and evaluation for political and moral reasons. We present here a brief account of the Indian scientific research into solar geoengineering. Climate modeling constitutes the major component of this geoengineering-relevant climate science research. The recent funding initiative by the Department of Science and Technology—the main funding agency for scientific research in India—in support of geoengineering modeling research and its efforts to bring natural, social, and political scientists together for an evaluation of solar geoengineering at meetings are also discussed. Finally, the directions for future scientific research into geoengineering in India are a lso discussed.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: G. Bala, gbala@iisc.ac.in

Abstract

This article presents a brief account of scientific research into solar geoengineering in India in the last decade. In recent years, solar geoengineering has been proposed as an option to ameliorate the detrimental impacts of climate change in case the required emissions reductions do not take place rapidly. Hundreds of research papers have been published in the last decade by both natural and social scientists on the feasibility, effectiveness, cost, and risks, and the ethical, legal, social, political, and governance dimensions of geoengineering. Most of this research is conducted in the developed world, and very little research or discussion has taken place in the global South. However, it has been argued in several forums that the developing world should have a central role in solar-geoengineering research, discussion, and evaluation for political and moral reasons. We present here a brief account of the Indian scientific research into solar geoengineering. Climate modeling constitutes the major component of this geoengineering-relevant climate science research. The recent funding initiative by the Department of Science and Technology—the main funding agency for scientific research in India—in support of geoengineering modeling research and its efforts to bring natural, social, and political scientists together for an evaluation of solar geoengineering at meetings are also discussed. Finally, the directions for future scientific research into geoengineering in India are a lso discussed.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: G. Bala, gbala@iisc.ac.in
Save
  • Bala, G., 2009: Problems with geoengineering schemes to combat climate change. Curr. Sci., 96, 4148.

  • Bala, G., 2014: Should we choose geoengineering to reverse global warming? Curr. Sci., 107, 19391940.

  • Bala, G., and B. Nag, 2012: Albedo enhancement over land to counteract global warming: Impacts on hydrological cycle. Climate Dyn .,39 ,15271542, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1256-1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bala, G., and A. Gupta, 2017: Geoengineering and India. Curr. Sci., 113, 376377.

  • Bala, G., P. B. Duffy, and K. E. Taylor, 2008: Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 76647669, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711648105.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bala, G., K. Caldeira, R. Nemani, L. Cao, G. Ban-Weiss, and H. J. Shin, 2011: Albedo enhancement of marine clouds to counteract global warming: Impacts on the hydrological cycle. Climate Dyn., 37 ,915931, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0868-1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Caldeira, K., and G. Bala, 2017: Reflecting on 50 years of geoengineering research. Earth’s Future ,5, 1017, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000454.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Caldeira, K., G. Bala, and L. Cao, 2013: The science of geoengineering. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 41, 231256, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105548.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cao, L., G. Bala, and K. Caldeira, 2012: Climate response on the time scale of days to changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Environ. Res. Lett., 7, 034015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034015.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cao, L., L. Duan, G. Bala, and K. Caldeira, 2016: Simulated long-term climate response to idealized solar geoengineering. Geophys. Res. Lett. ,43, 22092217, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068079.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cao, L., L. Duan, G. Bala, and K. Caldeira, 2017: Simultaneous stabilization of temperature and precipitation through cocktail geoengineering. Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 74297437, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074281.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crutzen, P. J., 2006: Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: A contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Climatic Change, 77, 211220, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9101-y.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ghosh, S., A. Sharma, S. Arora, and G. Desouza, 2016: A geoengineering approach toward tackling tropical cyclones over the Bay of Bengal. Atmos. Sci. Lett. ,17, 208215, https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.644.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kalidindi, S., G. Bala, A. Modak, and K. Caldeira, 2015: Modeling of solar radiation management: A comparison of simulations using reduced solar constant and stratospheric sulfate aerosols. Climate Dyn., 44 ,29092925, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2240-3.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kravitz, B., D. G. MacMartin, M. J. Mills, J. H. Richter, S. Tilmes, J.-F. Lamarque, J. J. Tribbia, and F. Vitt, 2017: First simulations of designing stratospheric sulfate aerosol geoengineering to meet multiple simultaneous climate objectives. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 122, 12 61612 634, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026874.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MacMartin D. B., B. Kravitz, S. Tilmes, J. H. Richter, M. J. Mills, J.-F Lamarque, J. J. Tribbia, and F. Vitt, 2017: The climate response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering can be tailored using multiple injection locations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos ,122, 12 57412 590, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026868.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MacMartin D. B., K. Ricke, and D. W. Keith, 2018: Solar geoengineering as part of an overall strategy for meeting the 1.5°C Paris target. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, 376A, 20160454, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0454.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McCuskar, K. E., K. C. Armour, C. M. Bitz, and D. S. Battisti, 2014: Rapid and extensive warming following cessation of solar radiation management. Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 024005, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/024005.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Modak, A., and G. Bala, 2014: Sensitivity of simulated climate to latitudinal distribution of solar insolation reduction in solar radiation management. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 77697779, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7769-2014.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Modak, A., G. Bala, L. Cao, and K. Caldeira, 2016: Why must a solar forcing be larger than a CO2 forcing to cause the same global mean surface temperature change? Environ. Res. Lett., 11, 044013, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/044013.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moore, J. C., Y. Chen, X. Cui, W. Yuan, W. Dong, Y. Gao, and P. Shi, 2016: Will China be the first to initiate climate engineering? Earth’s Future, 4, 588595, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000402.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morton, O., 2016: The Planet Remade: How Geoengineering Could Change the World. Princeton University Press, 440 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Muthyala, R., G. Bala, and A. Nalam, 2018: Regional scale analysis of climate extremes in an SRM geoengineering simulation, Part 1: Precipitation extremes. Curr. Sci., 114, 10241035, https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i05/1024-1035.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nalam, A., G. Bala, and A. Modak, 2018: Effects of Arctic geoengineering on precipitation in the tropical monsoon regions. Climate Dyn .,50 ,33753395, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3810-y.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Research Council, 2015: Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth. The National Academies Press, 260 pp., https://doi.org/10.17226/18988.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Parker, A., and O. Geden, 2016: No fudging on geoengineering. Nat. Geosci., 9, 859860, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2851.

  • Parker, A., and P. J. Irvine, 2018: The risk of termination from solar geoengineering. Earth’s Future, 6, 456467, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000735.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rahman, A. A., P. Artaxo, A. Asrat, and A. Parker, 2018: Developing countries must lead on Solar geoengineering research. Nature ,556, 2224, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-03917-8.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reynolds, J. L., A. Parker, and P. Irvine, 2016: Five solar geoengineering tropes that have outstayed their welcome. Earth’s Future, 4, 562568, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EF000416.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Robock, A., L. Oman, and G. L. Stenchikov, 2008: Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D16101, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010050.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Swapna, P., and Coauthors, 2015: IITM Earth System Model: Transformation of a seasonal prediction model to a long term climate model. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 13511367, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00276.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tilmes, S., R. R. Garcia, D. E. Kinnison, A. Gettelman, and P. J. Rasch, 2009: Impact of geoengineered aerosols on the troposphere and stratosphere. J. Geophys. Res. ,114, D12305, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011420.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tilmes, S., and Coauthors, 2013: The hydrologic impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. ,118, 11 03611 058, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50868.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tilmes, S., B. M. Sanderson, and B. C. O’Neill, 2016: Climate impacts of geoengineering in a delayed mitigation scenario. Geophys. Res. Lett. ,43, 82228229, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070122.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tilmes, S., J. H. Richter, M. J. Mills, B. Kravitz, D. G. MacMartin, F. Vitt, J. J. Tribbia, and J.-F. Lamarque, 2017: Sensitivity of aerosol distribution and climate response to stratospheric SO2 injection locations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. ,122, 12 59112 615, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026888.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tilmes, S., and Coauthors, 2018a: Effects of different stratospheric SO2 injection altitudes on stratospheric chemistry and dynamics. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. ,123, 46544673, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD028146.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tilmes, S., and Coauthors, 2018b: CESM1(WACCM) Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Large Ensemble (GLENS) Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 99, 23612371, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0267.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yang, H., and Coauthors, 2016: Potential negative consequences of geoengineering on crop production: A study of Indian groundnut. Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 11 78611 795, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071209.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 3930 1686 81
PDF Downloads 1600 284 15