Improving Visual Communication of Weather Forecasts with Rhetoric

K. M. Lambrecht Department of English, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada

Search for other papers by K. M. Lambrecht in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
B. J. Hatchett Division of Atmospheric Sciences, and Western Regional Climate Center, Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada

Search for other papers by B. J. Hatchett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
L. C. Walsh Department of English, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada

Search for other papers by L. C. Walsh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. Collins Office of Education, Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada

Search for other papers by M. Collins in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Z. Tolby National Weather Service, Reno, Nevada

Search for other papers by Z. Tolby in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

Communicating weather-related hazards to the public can be a challenge for meteorologists, particularly given the nature of confidence levels in forecasting science. Despite these challenges, communicating high-impact weather remains extremely important because it has implications for the safety, health, and resilience of impacted communities. Because the dynamics of this issue are complex, solutions to weather hazard communication benefit from interdisciplinary solutions and multiple types of expertise. Our work demonstrates how rhetoric, a foundational communication discipline, can be applied to improving weather forecast communication. Applying a rhetorical framework allows the identification of communication strategies that not only invite public involvement but encourage users to act as conduits for weather information distribution. As a result, trust can be developed between the National Weather Service (NWS) and public audiences. The initial results support the hypothesis that effective public communication from NWS messaging can be improved by incorporating the concept of “commonplaces,” which are the expressions of beliefs, values, and norms that construct community attitudes toward weather or natural hazard forecasts, into visual communication techniques such as NWS Weather Stories.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Benjamin J. Hatchett, benjamin.hatchett@gmail.com

Abstract

Communicating weather-related hazards to the public can be a challenge for meteorologists, particularly given the nature of confidence levels in forecasting science. Despite these challenges, communicating high-impact weather remains extremely important because it has implications for the safety, health, and resilience of impacted communities. Because the dynamics of this issue are complex, solutions to weather hazard communication benefit from interdisciplinary solutions and multiple types of expertise. Our work demonstrates how rhetoric, a foundational communication discipline, can be applied to improving weather forecast communication. Applying a rhetorical framework allows the identification of communication strategies that not only invite public involvement but encourage users to act as conduits for weather information distribution. As a result, trust can be developed between the National Weather Service (NWS) and public audiences. The initial results support the hypothesis that effective public communication from NWS messaging can be improved by incorporating the concept of “commonplaces,” which are the expressions of beliefs, values, and norms that construct community attitudes toward weather or natural hazard forecasts, into visual communication techniques such as NWS Weather Stories.

© 2019 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Benjamin J. Hatchett, benjamin.hatchett@gmail.com
Save
  • Abatzoglou, J. T., D. J. McEvoy, and K. T. Redmond, 2017: The West Wide Drought Tracker: Drought monitoring at fine spatial scales. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 98, 18151820, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0193.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • American Meteorological Society, 2018: Atmospheric river. Glossary of Meteorology, http://glossary.ametsoc.org/wiki/atmospheric_river.

  • Ash, K. D., R. L. Schumann, and G. C. Bowser, 2014: Tornado warning trade-offs: Evaluating choices for visually communicating risk. Wea. Climate Soc., 6, 104118, https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00021.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Babrow, A., 2001: Uncertainty, value, communication, and problematic integration. J. Commun., 51, 553573, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02896.x.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brashers, D. E., 2001: Communication and uncertainty management. J. Commun., 51, 477497, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02892.x.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Casteel, M. A., and J. R. Downing, 2013: How individuals process NWS weather warning messages on their cell phones. Wea. Climate Soc., 5, 254265, https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00031.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Earle, T. C., 2010: Trust in risk management: A model-based review of empirical research. Risk Anal., 30 ,541574, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01398.x.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fischhoff, B., 2013: The sciences of science communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110 (Suppl.), 14 03314 039, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213273110.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gelaro, R., and Coauthors, 2017: The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). J. Climate, 30, 54195454, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gigerenzer, G., R. Hertwig, E. Van Den Broek, B. Fasolo, and K. V. Katsikopoulos, 2005: “A 30% chance of rain tomorrow”: How does the public understand probabilistic weather forecasts? Risk Anal., 25 ,623629, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00608.x.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goodnight, G. T., 1982: The personal, technical, and public spheres of argument: A speculative inquiry into the art of public deliberation. J. Amer. Forensic Assoc., 18, 214227.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guan, B., and D. E. Waliser, 2015: Detection of atmospheric rivers: Evaluation and application of an algorithm for global studies. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 120, 12 51412 535, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024257.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Locke, S., 1999: Golem science and the public understanding of science: From deficit to dilemma. Public Understanding Sci., 8 ,7592, https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/8/2/301.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maynard, A., and D. A. Scheufele, 2016: What does research say about how to effectively communicate about science? The Conversation, https://theconversation.com/what-does-research-say-about-how-to-effectively-communicate-about-science-70244.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller, C. R., 1987: Aristotle’s “special topics” in rhetorical practice and pedagogy. Rhetoric Soc. Quart., 17, 6170, https://doi.org/10.1080/02773948709390767.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morss, R. E., J. L. Demuth, and J. K. Lazo, 2008: Communicating uncertainty in weather forecasts: A survey of the U.S. public. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 974991, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008WAF2007088.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2017: Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda. National Academies Press, 152 pp.

  • National Research Council, 2006: Completing the Forecast: Characterizing and Communicating Uncertainty for Better Decisions Using Weather and Climate Forecasts. National Academies Press, 124 pp., https://doi.org/10.17226/11699.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Prelli, L. J., 1990: Rhetorical logic and the integration of rhetoric and science. Commun. Monogr., 57, 315322, https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759009376206.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rutz, J. J., W. J. Steenburgh, and F. M. Ralph, 2015: The inland penetration of atmospheric rivers over western North America: A Lagrangian analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 19241944, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00288.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saldaña, J., 2009: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers .Sage, 240 pp.

  • Sterle, K., B. J. Hatchett, L. Singletary, and G. Pohll, 2019: Hydroclimatic variability in snow-fed river systems: Local water managers’ perspectives on adapting to the “new normal.” Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0031.1, in press.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walsh, L., and K. C. Walker, 2016: Perspectives on uncertainty for technical communication scholars. Tech. Commun. Quart., 25, 7186, https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2016.1150517.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 3757 1773 760
PDF Downloads 1765 322 14