Overview of the Lake Michigan Ozone Study 2017

Charles O. Stanier University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa;

Search for other papers by Charles O. Stanier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. Bradley Pierce Space Science and Engineering Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin;

Search for other papers by R. Bradley Pierce in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Maryam Abdi-Oskouei University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa;

Search for other papers by Maryam Abdi-Oskouei in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Zachariah E. Adelman Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium, Chicago, Illinois;

Search for other papers by Zachariah E. Adelman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jay Al-Saadi NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia;

Search for other papers by Jay Al-Saadi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hariprasad D. Alwe University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota;

Search for other papers by Hariprasad D. Alwe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Timothy H. Bertram University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin;

Search for other papers by Timothy H. Bertram in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gregory R. Carmichael University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa;

Search for other papers by Gregory R. Carmichael in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Megan B. Christiansen University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa;

Search for other papers by Megan B. Christiansen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Patricia A. Cleary University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire, Eau Claire, Wisconsin;

Search for other papers by Patricia A. Cleary in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alan C. Czarnetzki University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa;

Search for other papers by Alan C. Czarnetzki in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Angela F. Dickens Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium, Chicago, Illinois, and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin;

Search for other papers by Angela F. Dickens in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Marta A. Fuoco U.S. EPA Region 5, Chicago, Illinois;

Search for other papers by Marta A. Fuoco in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dagen D. Hughes University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa;

Search for other papers by Dagen D. Hughes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Joseph P. Hupy Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana;

Search for other papers by Joseph P. Hupy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Scott J. Janz NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland;

Search for other papers by Scott J. Janz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Laura M. Judd NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia;

Search for other papers by Laura M. Judd in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Donna Kenski Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium, Chicago, Illinois;

Search for other papers by Donna Kenski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Matthew G. Kowalewski NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland;

Search for other papers by Matthew G. Kowalewski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Russell W. Long Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;

Search for other papers by Russell W. Long in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dylan B. Millet University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Saint Paul, Minnesota;

Search for other papers by Dylan B. Millet in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gordon Novak University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin;

Search for other papers by Gordon Novak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Behrooz Roozitalab University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa;

Search for other papers by Behrooz Roozitalab in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Stephanie L. Shaw Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California

Search for other papers by Stephanie L. Shaw in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Elizabeth A. Stone University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa;

Search for other papers by Elizabeth A. Stone in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
James Szykman Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;

Search for other papers by James Szykman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Lukas Valin Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;

Search for other papers by Lukas Valin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michael Vermeuel University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin;

Search for other papers by Michael Vermeuel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Timothy J. Wagner Space Science and Engineering Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin;

Search for other papers by Timothy J. Wagner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Andrew R. Whitehill Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;

Search for other papers by Andrew R. Whitehill in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
David J. Williams Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;

Search for other papers by David J. Williams in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The Lake Michigan Ozone Study 2017 (LMOS 2017) was a collaborative multiagency field study targeting ozone chemistry, meteorology, and air quality observations in the southern Lake Michigan area. The primary objective of LMOS 2017 was to provide measurements to improve air quality modeling of the complex meteorological and chemical environment in the region. LMOS 2017 science questions included spatiotemporal assessment of nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO + NO2) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) emission sources and their influence on ozone episodes; the role of lake breezes; contribution of new remote sensing tools such as GeoTASO, Pandora, and TEMPO to air quality management; and evaluation of photochemical grid models. The observing strategy included GeoTASO on board the NASA UC-12 aircraft capturing NO2 and formaldehyde columns, an in situ profiling aircraft, two ground-based coastal enhanced monitoring locations, continuous NO2 columns from coastal Pandora instruments, and an instrumented research vessel. Local photochemical ozone production was observed on 2 June, 9–12 June, and 14–16 June, providing insights on the processes relevant to state and federal air quality management. The LMOS 2017 aircraft mapped significant spatial and temporal variation of NO2 emissions as well as polluted layers with rapid ozone formation occurring in a shallow layer near the Lake Michigan surface. Meteorological characteristics of the lake breeze were observed in detail and measurements of ozone, NOx, nitric acid, hydrogen peroxide, VOC, oxygenated VOC (OVOC), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) composition were conducted. This article summarizes the study design, directs readers to the campaign data repository, and presents a summary of findings.

CURRENT AFFILIATION: University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

© 2021 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Charles O. Stanier, charles-stanier@uiowa.edu

Abstract

The Lake Michigan Ozone Study 2017 (LMOS 2017) was a collaborative multiagency field study targeting ozone chemistry, meteorology, and air quality observations in the southern Lake Michigan area. The primary objective of LMOS 2017 was to provide measurements to improve air quality modeling of the complex meteorological and chemical environment in the region. LMOS 2017 science questions included spatiotemporal assessment of nitrogen oxides (NOx = NO + NO2) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) emission sources and their influence on ozone episodes; the role of lake breezes; contribution of new remote sensing tools such as GeoTASO, Pandora, and TEMPO to air quality management; and evaluation of photochemical grid models. The observing strategy included GeoTASO on board the NASA UC-12 aircraft capturing NO2 and formaldehyde columns, an in situ profiling aircraft, two ground-based coastal enhanced monitoring locations, continuous NO2 columns from coastal Pandora instruments, and an instrumented research vessel. Local photochemical ozone production was observed on 2 June, 9–12 June, and 14–16 June, providing insights on the processes relevant to state and federal air quality management. The LMOS 2017 aircraft mapped significant spatial and temporal variation of NO2 emissions as well as polluted layers with rapid ozone formation occurring in a shallow layer near the Lake Michigan surface. Meteorological characteristics of the lake breeze were observed in detail and measurements of ozone, NOx, nitric acid, hydrogen peroxide, VOC, oxygenated VOC (OVOC), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) composition were conducted. This article summarizes the study design, directs readers to the campaign data repository, and presents a summary of findings.

CURRENT AFFILIATION: University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

© 2021 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Charles O. Stanier, charles-stanier@uiowa.edu

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 633 KB)
Save
  • Abdi-Oskouei, M. , and Coauthors , 2019: Lake Michigan Ozone Study (2017) Preliminary Finding Report. Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium, 104 pp., www.ladco.org/wp-content/uploads/Research/LMOS2017/LMOS_LADCO_report_revision_apr2019_v8.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Abdi-Oskouei, M. , and Coauthors , 2020: Sensitivity of meteorological skill to selection of WRF-Chem physical parameterizations and impact on ozone prediction during the Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS). J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 125, e2019JD031971, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031971.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Adelman, Z. , 2020: LADCO public issues. www.ladco.org/public-issues/.

  • Benjamin, S. G. , and Coauthors , 2016: A North American hourly assimilation and model forecast cycle: The Rapid Refresh. Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 16691694, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0242.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, F. , and J. Dudhia , 2001: Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State–NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 569585, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2001)129<0569:CAALSH>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cleary, P. A. , and Coauthors , 2015: Ozone distributions over southern Lake Michigan: Comparisons between ferry-based observations, shoreline-based DOAS observations and model forecasts. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 51095122, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5109-2015.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doak, A. G. , and Coauthors , 2021: Characterization of ground-based atmospheric pollution and meteorology sampling stations during the Lake Michigan Ozone Study 2017. J. Air Waste Manage., 71, 866889, https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2021.1900000.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dye, T. S. , P. T. Roberts , and M. E. Korc , 1995: Observations of transport processes for ozone and ozone precursors during the 1991 Lake Michigan Ozone Study. J. Appl. Meteor., 34, 18771889, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<1877:OOTPFO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fishman, J. , and Coauthors, 2008: Remote sensing of tropospheric pollution from space. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89, 805822, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2526.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fishman, J. , and Coauthors, 2012: The United States’ next generation of atmospheric composition and coastal ecosystem measurements NASA’s Geostationary Coastal and Air Pollution Events (GEO-CAPE) Mission. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 15471566, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00201.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Foley, T. , E. A. Betterton , P. E. Robert Jacko , and J. Hillery , 2011: Lake Michigan air quality: The 1994–2003 LADCO Aircraft Project (LAP). Atmos. Environ., 45, 31923202, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.033.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Good, G. , 2017: Supplemental information for 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) area designations. 102 pp., https://dnr.wisconsin.gov/sites/default/files/topic/AirQuality/OzoneTSD20170420.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hughes, D. D. , and Coauthors, 2021: PM2.5 chemistry, organosulfates, and secondary organic aerosol during the 2017 Lake Michigan Ozone Study. Atmos. Environ., 244, 117939, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117939.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IGACO, 2004: The changing atmosphere: An integrated global atmospheric chemistry observation: Report of the Integrated Global Atmospheric Chemistry Observation Theme Team. GAW Rep. 159, WMO/TD-1235, 1282 pp., https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=9279.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Judd, L. M. , and Coauthors, 2018: The dawn of geostationary air quality monitoring: Case studies from Seoul and Los Angeles. Front. Environ. Sci., 6, 85, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2018.00085.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Judd, L. M. , and Coauthors, 2019: Evaluating the impact of spatial resolution on tropospheric NO2 column comparisons within urban areas using high-resolution airborne data. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 60916111, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6091-2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knuteson, R. O. , and Coauthors, 2004: Atmospheric emitted radiance interferometer. Part I: Instrument design. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 21, 17631776, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-1662.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kowalewski, M. G. , and S. J. Janz , 2014: Remote sensing capabilities of the GEO-CAPE airborne simulator. Proc. SPIE, 9218, 92181I, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2062058.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laird, N. F. , D. A. R. Kristovich , X. Z. Liang , R. W. Arritt , and K. Labas , 2001: Lake Michigan lake breezes: Climatology, local forcing, and synoptic environment. J. Appl. Meteor., 40, 409424, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<0409:LMLBCL>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leitch, J. W. , and Coauthors, 2014: The GeoTASO airborne spectrometer project. Proc. SPIE, 9218, 92181H, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2063763.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lennartson, G. J. , and M. D. Schwartz , 2002: The lake breeze-ground-level ozone connection in eastern Wisconsin: A climatological perspective. Int. J. Climatol., 22, 13471364, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.802.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Levelt, P. F. , and Coauthors, 2018: The Ozone Monitoring Instrument: Overview of 14 years in space. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 56995745, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5699-2018.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lyons, W. A. , and L. E. Olsson , 1973: Detailed mesometeorological studies of air pollution dispersion in the Chicago lake breeze. Mon. Wea. Rev., 101, 387403, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1973)101<0387:DMSOAP>2.3.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Makar, P. A. , and Coauthors, 2010: Dynamic adjustment of climatological ozone boundary conditions for air-quality forecasts. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 89979015, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8997-2010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mazzuca, G. M. , and Coauthors, 2016: Ozone production and its sensitivity to NOx and VOCs: Results from the DISCOVER-AQ field experiment, Houston 2013. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14 46314 474, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14463-2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McBride, B. A. , J. V. Martins , H. M. J. Barbosa , W. Birmingham , and L. A. Remer , 2020: Spatial distribution of cloud droplet size properties from Airborne Hyper-Angular Rainbow Polarimeter (AirHARP) measurements. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 17771796, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1777-2020.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McNider, R. T. , and Coauthors, 2018: Examination of the physical atmosphere in the Great Lakes Region and its potential impact on air quality—Overwater stability and satellite assimilation. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 57, 27892816, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0355.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mesinger, F. , and Coauthors, 2006: North American Regional Reanalysis. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 87, 343360, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-87-3-343.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller, P. , 2018: Overview of the Long Island Sound Tropospheric Ozone Study (LISTOS). 2018Fall Meeting, San Francisco, CA, Amer. Geophys. Union, Abstract A34B-01.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NOAA/NCEI, 2017a: State of the Climate: Synoptic discussion for May 2017. Accessed 25 May 2021, www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/synoptic/201705.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NOAA/NCEI, 2017b: State of the Climate: Synoptic discussion for June 2017. Accessed 25 May 2021, www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/synoptic/201706.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sullivan, J. T. , and Coauthors, 2019: The ozone water-land environmental transition study: An innovative strategy for understanding Chesapeake Bay pollution events. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 100, 291306, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0025.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • USEPA, 2006: Air quality criteria for ozone and related photochemical oxidants. Final Rep., EPA/600/R-05/004aF-cF, U.S. EPA, 2118 pp., https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/risk/recordisplay.cfm?deid=149923.

  • USEPA, 2013: Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) for ozone and related photochemical oxidants. Final Rep., EPA/600/R-10/076F, 1468 pp., https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/isa/recordisplay.cfm?deid=348522.

  • USEPA, 2015: Regulatory impact analysis of the final revisions to the national ambient air quality standards for ground-level ozone. U.S. EPA, 480 pp., www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-02/documents/20151001ria.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vermeuel, M. P. , and Coauthors, 2019: Sensitivity of ozone production to NOx and VOC along the Lake Michigan coastline. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 124, 10 98911 006, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030842.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wagner, T. J. , P. M. Klein , and D. D. Turner , 2019: A new generation of ground-based mobile platforms for active and passive profiling of the boundary layer. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 100, 137153, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0165.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, J. , M. Ninneman , E. Joseph , M. J. Schwab , B. Shrestha , and J. J. Schwab , 2020: Mobile laboratory measurements of high surface ozone levels and spatial heterogeneity during LISTOS 2018: Evidence for sea breeze influence. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 125, e2019JD031961, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031961.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zoogman, P. , and Coauthors , 2017: Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO). J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 186, 1739, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.05.008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 5 0 0
Full Text Views 3591 772 25
PDF Downloads 2484 380 22