Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Monitoring the 1996 Drought Using the Standardized Precipitation Index

Michael J. Hayes National Drought Mitigation Center, Lincoln, Nebraska

Search for other papers by Michael J. Hayes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Mark. D. Svoboda National Drought Mitigation Center, Lincoln, Nebraska

Search for other papers by Mark. D. Svoboda in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Donald A. Wiihite National Drought Mitigation Center, Lincoln, Nebraska

Search for other papers by Donald A. Wiihite in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Olga V. Vanyarkho National Drought Mitigation Center, Lincoln, Nebraska

Search for other papers by Olga V. Vanyarkho in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Online Publication:
01 Mar 1999
Print Publication:
01 Mar 1999
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<0429:MTDUTS>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
429–438
Restricted access

Droughts are difficult to detect and monitor. Drought indices, most commonly the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI), have been used with limited success as operational drought monitoring tools and triggers for policy responses. Recently, a new index, the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), was developed to improve drought detection and monitoring capabilities. The SPI has several characteristics that are an improvement over previous indices, including its simplicity and temporal flexibility, that allow its application for water resources on all timescales. In this article, the 1996 drought in the southern plains and southwestern United States is examined using the SPI. A series of maps are used to illustrate how the SPI would have assisted in being able to detect the onset of the drought and monitor its progression. A case study investigating the drought in greater detail for Texas is also given. The SPI demonstrated that it is a tool that should be used operationally as part of a state, regional, or national drought watch system in the United States. During the 1996 drought, the SPI detected the onset of the drought at least 1 month in advance of the PDSI. This timeliness will be invaluable for improving mitigation and response actions of state and federal government to drought-affected regions in the future.

Corresponding author address: Michael J. Hayes, National Drought Mitigation Center, 239 L. W. Chase Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583-0749. E-mail: mhayes@enso.unl.edu

Droughts are difficult to detect and monitor. Drought indices, most commonly the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI), have been used with limited success as operational drought monitoring tools and triggers for policy responses. Recently, a new index, the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), was developed to improve drought detection and monitoring capabilities. The SPI has several characteristics that are an improvement over previous indices, including its simplicity and temporal flexibility, that allow its application for water resources on all timescales. In this article, the 1996 drought in the southern plains and southwestern United States is examined using the SPI. A series of maps are used to illustrate how the SPI would have assisted in being able to detect the onset of the drought and monitor its progression. A case study investigating the drought in greater detail for Texas is also given. The SPI demonstrated that it is a tool that should be used operationally as part of a state, regional, or national drought watch system in the United States. During the 1996 drought, the SPI detected the onset of the drought at least 1 month in advance of the PDSI. This timeliness will be invaluable for improving mitigation and response actions of state and federal government to drought-affected regions in the future.

Corresponding author address: Michael J. Hayes, National Drought Mitigation Center, 239 L. W. Chase Hall, Lincoln, NE 68583-0749. E-mail: mhayes@enso.unl.edu
Save
Cover Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 6975 2056 107
PDF Downloads 4623 866 59