WHY MONITOR THE CLIMATE?

Richard Goody
Search for other papers by Richard Goody in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
James Anderson
Search for other papers by James Anderson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Thomas Karl
Search for other papers by Thomas Karl in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Roberta Balstad Miller
Search for other papers by Roberta Balstad Miller in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gerald North
Search for other papers by Gerald North in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Joanne Simpson
Search for other papers by Joanne Simpson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Graeme Stephens
Search for other papers by Graeme Stephens in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Warren Washington
Search for other papers by Warren Washington in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

A successful global climate monitoring system must fulfill clear societal objectives. For some aspects of climate monitoring, the societal goals are understood and are clearly stated, but long-term, decadal/centennial climate predictions have, in the past, been judged more in terms of curiosity-led criteria. A curiosity-led climate program is not, however, the effective way to achieve the required societal objective, which is to produce the best possible long-term climate projections. In terms of the universal use of numerical models for climate projections, this leads to the need for monitoring programs that provide data to test model output against reliable observations. This requires an operational climate model (which the United States does not now have), and observations that emphasize accurate and reproducible data designed to provide critical tests of model output. The priorities for specific monitoring programs can be formulated in terms of these requirements, which can also provide metrics of progress. A schematic program that combines monitoring, modeling, and research is described. This program has, as its end point, the provision of demonstrably improved long-term climate projections. Europe appears to be advancing more rapidly along this path than is the United States.

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

NOAA/NCDC, Asheville, North Carolina

Columbia University/CIESIN, New York, New York

Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, Maryland

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

NCAR, Boulder, Colorado

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Richard Goody, 101 Cumloden Drive, Falmouth, MA 02540-1609, E-mail: rgoody@capecod.net

A successful global climate monitoring system must fulfill clear societal objectives. For some aspects of climate monitoring, the societal goals are understood and are clearly stated, but long-term, decadal/centennial climate predictions have, in the past, been judged more in terms of curiosity-led criteria. A curiosity-led climate program is not, however, the effective way to achieve the required societal objective, which is to produce the best possible long-term climate projections. In terms of the universal use of numerical models for climate projections, this leads to the need for monitoring programs that provide data to test model output against reliable observations. This requires an operational climate model (which the United States does not now have), and observations that emphasize accurate and reproducible data designed to provide critical tests of model output. The priorities for specific monitoring programs can be formulated in terms of these requirements, which can also provide metrics of progress. A schematic program that combines monitoring, modeling, and research is described. This program has, as its end point, the provision of demonstrably improved long-term climate projections. Europe appears to be advancing more rapidly along this path than is the United States.

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

NOAA/NCDC, Asheville, North Carolina

Columbia University/CIESIN, New York, New York

Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, Maryland

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

NCAR, Boulder, Colorado

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Richard Goody, 101 Cumloden Drive, Falmouth, MA 02540-1609, E-mail: rgoody@capecod.net
Save