All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 394 217 28
PDF Downloads 243 143 21

Improvement of Microphysical Parameterization through Observational Verification Experiment

Mark T. Stoelinga
Search for other papers by Mark T. Stoelinga in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Peter V. Hobbs
Search for other papers by Peter V. Hobbs in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Clifford F. Mass
Search for other papers by Clifford F. Mass in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
John D. Locatelli
Search for other papers by John D. Locatelli in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Brian A. Colle
Search for other papers by Brian A. Colle in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Robert A. Houze Jr.
Search for other papers by Robert A. Houze Jr. in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Arthur L. Rangno
Search for other papers by Arthur L. Rangno in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Nicholas A. Bond
Search for other papers by Nicholas A. Bond in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Bradley F. Smull
Search for other papers by Bradley F. Smull in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Roy M. Rasmussen
Search for other papers by Roy M. Rasmussen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gregory Thompson
Search for other papers by Gregory Thompson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Bradley R. Colman
Search for other papers by Bradley R. Colman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Despite continual increases in numerical model resolution and significant improvements in the forecasting of many meteorological parameters, progress in quantitative precipitation forecasting (QPF) has been slow. This is attributable in part to deficiencies in the bulk microphysical parameterization (BMP) schemes used in mesoscale models to simulate cloud and precipitation processes. These deficiencies have become more apparent as model resolution has increased. To address these problems requires comprehensive data that can be used to isolate errors in QPF due to BMP schemes from those due to other sources. These same data can then be used to evaluate and improve the microphysical processes and hydrometeor fields simulated by BMP schemes. In response to the need for such data, a group of researchers is collaborating on a study titled the Improvement of Microphysical Parameterization through Observational Verification Experiment (IMPROVE). IMPROVE has included two field campaigns carried out in the Pacific Northwest: an offshore frontal precipitation study off the Washington coast in January–February 2001, and an orographic precipitation study in the Oregon Cascade Mountains in November–December 2001. Twenty-eight intensive observation periods yielded a uniquely comprehensive dataset that includes in situ airborne observations of cloud and precipitation microphysical parameters; remotely sensed reflectivity, dual-Doppler, and polarimetric quantities; upper-air wind, temperature, and humidity data; and a wide variety of surface-based meteorological, precipitation, and microphysical data. These data are being used to test mesoscale model simulations of the observed storm systems and, in particular, to evaluate and improve the BMP schemes used in such models. These studies should lead to improved QPF in operational forecast models.

Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Institute for Terrestrial and Planetary Atmospheres, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York

Department of Atmospheric Sciences, and Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, and NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Research Applications Program, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

National Weather Service, Seattle, Washington

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Prof. Peter V. Hobbs, Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Box 351640, Seattle, W A 98195-1640, E-mail: phobbs@atmos.washington.edu

Despite continual increases in numerical model resolution and significant improvements in the forecasting of many meteorological parameters, progress in quantitative precipitation forecasting (QPF) has been slow. This is attributable in part to deficiencies in the bulk microphysical parameterization (BMP) schemes used in mesoscale models to simulate cloud and precipitation processes. These deficiencies have become more apparent as model resolution has increased. To address these problems requires comprehensive data that can be used to isolate errors in QPF due to BMP schemes from those due to other sources. These same data can then be used to evaluate and improve the microphysical processes and hydrometeor fields simulated by BMP schemes. In response to the need for such data, a group of researchers is collaborating on a study titled the Improvement of Microphysical Parameterization through Observational Verification Experiment (IMPROVE). IMPROVE has included two field campaigns carried out in the Pacific Northwest: an offshore frontal precipitation study off the Washington coast in January–February 2001, and an orographic precipitation study in the Oregon Cascade Mountains in November–December 2001. Twenty-eight intensive observation periods yielded a uniquely comprehensive dataset that includes in situ airborne observations of cloud and precipitation microphysical parameters; remotely sensed reflectivity, dual-Doppler, and polarimetric quantities; upper-air wind, temperature, and humidity data; and a wide variety of surface-based meteorological, precipitation, and microphysical data. These data are being used to test mesoscale model simulations of the observed storm systems and, in particular, to evaluate and improve the BMP schemes used in such models. These studies should lead to improved QPF in operational forecast models.

Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Institute for Terrestrial and Planetary Atmospheres, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York

Department of Atmospheric Sciences, and Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, and NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Research Applications Program, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

National Weather Service, Seattle, Washington

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Prof. Peter V. Hobbs, Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Box 351640, Seattle, W A 98195-1640, E-mail: phobbs@atmos.washington.edu
Save