Mitigating New York City's Heat Island: Integrating Stakeholder Perspectives and Scientific Evaluation

Cynthia Rosenzweig
Search for other papers by Cynthia Rosenzweig in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
William D. Solecki
Search for other papers by William D. Solecki in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Lily Parshall
Search for other papers by Lily Parshall in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Barry Lynn
Search for other papers by Barry Lynn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jennifer Cox
Search for other papers by Jennifer Cox in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Richard Goldberg
Search for other papers by Richard Goldberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sara Hodges
Search for other papers by Sara Hodges in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Stuart Gaffin
Search for other papers by Stuart Gaffin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ronald B. Slosberg
Search for other papers by Ronald B. Slosberg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Peter Savio
Search for other papers by Peter Savio in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Frank Dunstan
Search for other papers by Frank Dunstan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Mark Watson
Search for other papers by Mark Watson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

This study of New York City, New York's, heat island and its potential mitigation was structured around research questions developed by project stakeholders working with a multidisciplinary team of researchers. Meteorological, remotely-sensed, and spatial data on the urban environment were brought together to understand multiple dimensions of New York City's heat island and the feasibility of mitigation strategies, including urban forestry, green roofs, and high-albedo surfaces. Heat island mitigation was simulated with the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University-NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). Results compare the possible effectiveness of mitigation strategies at reducing urban air temperature in six New York City neighborhoods and for New York City as a whole. Throughout the city, the most effective temperature-reduction strategy is to maximize the amount of vegetation, with a combination of tree planting and green roofs. This lowered simulated citywide surface urban air temperature by 0.4°C on average, and 0.7°C at 1500 Eastern Standard Time (EST), when the greatest temperature reductions tend to occur. Decreases of up to 1.1°C at 1500 EST occurred in some neighborhoods in Manhattan and Brooklyn, where there is more available area for implementing vegetation planting. New York City agencies are using project results to guide ongoing urban greening initiatives, particularly tree-planting programs.

NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York

Geography Department, Hunter College—CUNY, New York, New York

Center for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, New York

L & S Energy Services, Clifton Park, New York

New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, New York

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Cynthia Rosenzweig, Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2880 Broadway, New York, NY 10025, E-mail: crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov

This study of New York City, New York's, heat island and its potential mitigation was structured around research questions developed by project stakeholders working with a multidisciplinary team of researchers. Meteorological, remotely-sensed, and spatial data on the urban environment were brought together to understand multiple dimensions of New York City's heat island and the feasibility of mitigation strategies, including urban forestry, green roofs, and high-albedo surfaces. Heat island mitigation was simulated with the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University-NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). Results compare the possible effectiveness of mitigation strategies at reducing urban air temperature in six New York City neighborhoods and for New York City as a whole. Throughout the city, the most effective temperature-reduction strategy is to maximize the amount of vegetation, with a combination of tree planting and green roofs. This lowered simulated citywide surface urban air temperature by 0.4°C on average, and 0.7°C at 1500 Eastern Standard Time (EST), when the greatest temperature reductions tend to occur. Decreases of up to 1.1°C at 1500 EST occurred in some neighborhoods in Manhattan and Brooklyn, where there is more available area for implementing vegetation planting. New York City agencies are using project results to guide ongoing urban greening initiatives, particularly tree-planting programs.

NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York

Geography Department, Hunter College—CUNY, New York, New York

Center for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, New York

L & S Energy Services, Clifton Park, New York

New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, New York

New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Cynthia Rosenzweig, Goddard Institute for Space Studies, 2880 Broadway, New York, NY 10025, E-mail: crosenzweig@giss.nasa.gov
Save