The Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project

Robert Gall NOAA/NWS, Silver Spring, Maryland

Search for other papers by Robert Gall in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
James Franklin NOAA/NWS/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by James Franklin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Frank Marks NOAA/OAR/AOML/Hurricane Research Division, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Frank Marks in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Edward N. Rappaport NOAA/NWS/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida

Search for other papers by Edward N. Rappaport in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Frederick Toepfer NOAA/NWS, Silver Spring, Maryland

Search for other papers by Frederick Toepfer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Over the decade prior to 2007, the increasing vulnerability of the United States to damage and economic disruption from tropical storms and hurricanes was dramatically demonstrated by the impacts of a number of land-falling storms. In 2008, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) established the Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project (HFIP) to significantly increase the agency's capability to address this vulnerability and begin to mitigate the impacts.

In fiscal year 2009, The White House amended the president's budget and Congress appropriated funding to achieve a 20% reduction in forecast error (track and intensity) in 5 years with 50% reduction in 10 years. Over the past 3 years, HFIP has built computational infrastructure and implemented a focused set of cross-organizational research and development (R&D) activities to develop, demonstrate, and implement enhanced operational modeling capabilities to improve the numerical forecast guidance made available to the National Hurricane Center (NHC). HFIP collaborators, including federal laboratories and academic partners, have demonstrated potential for dramatic improvements in both hurricane track and intensity (up to 40%) prediction through the application of new techniques, including improved data assimilation, higher-resolution models (global and regional), enhanced model physics, better use of existing data sources to initialize regional hurricane models, and new postprocessing techniques.

During each hurricane season, HFIP will run an experimental forecast system on NOAA's R&D high-performance computing to provide experimental improved guidance to NHC forecasters. Prior to each season, NHC will review and select a set of enhanced guidance products to evaluate operationally during the season (mid-July–October).

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Robert Gall, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1325 East–West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, E-mail: robert.gall@noaa.gov

Over the decade prior to 2007, the increasing vulnerability of the United States to damage and economic disruption from tropical storms and hurricanes was dramatically demonstrated by the impacts of a number of land-falling storms. In 2008, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) established the Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project (HFIP) to significantly increase the agency's capability to address this vulnerability and begin to mitigate the impacts.

In fiscal year 2009, The White House amended the president's budget and Congress appropriated funding to achieve a 20% reduction in forecast error (track and intensity) in 5 years with 50% reduction in 10 years. Over the past 3 years, HFIP has built computational infrastructure and implemented a focused set of cross-organizational research and development (R&D) activities to develop, demonstrate, and implement enhanced operational modeling capabilities to improve the numerical forecast guidance made available to the National Hurricane Center (NHC). HFIP collaborators, including federal laboratories and academic partners, have demonstrated potential for dramatic improvements in both hurricane track and intensity (up to 40%) prediction through the application of new techniques, including improved data assimilation, higher-resolution models (global and regional), enhanced model physics, better use of existing data sources to initialize regional hurricane models, and new postprocessing techniques.

During each hurricane season, HFIP will run an experimental forecast system on NOAA's R&D high-performance computing to provide experimental improved guidance to NHC forecasters. Prior to each season, NHC will review and select a set of enhanced guidance products to evaluate operationally during the season (mid-July–October).

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Robert Gall, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1325 East–West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, E-mail: robert.gall@noaa.gov
Save
  • Aksoy, A., S. Lorsolo, T. Vukicevic, K. J. Sellwood, S. D. Aberson, and F. Zhang, 2012: The HWRF Hurricane Ensemble Data Assimilation System (HEDAS) for high-resolution data: The impact of airborne Doppler radar observations in an OSSE. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 18431862.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bao, J.-W., S. Benjamin, R. Bleck, J. Brown, J. Lee, A. MacDonald, J. Middlecoff, and N. Wang, cited 2012: FIM documentation. NOAA, 20 pp. [Available online at http://fim.noaa.gov/fimdocu_rb.pdf.]

  • Benjamin, S., G. Grell, J. Brown, T. Smirnova, and R. Bleck, 2004: Mesoscale weather prediction with the RUC hybrid isentropic-terrain-following coordinate model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 473494.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buizza, R., 1997: Potential forecast skill of ensemble prediction and spread and skill distributions of the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 99119.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Buizza, R., P. L. Houtekamer, G. Pellerin, Z. Toth, Y. Zhu, and M. Wei, 2005: A comparison of the ECMWF, MSC, and NCEP global ensemble prediction systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 10761097.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cangialosi, J. P., and J. L. Franklin, 2011: 2010 National Hurricane Center forecast verification report. NOAA, 77 pp. [Available online at www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/pdfs/Verification_2010.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chang, E. K. M., 1993: Downstream development of baroclinic waves as inferred from regression analysis. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 20382053.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cohn, S. E., and D. F. Parrish, 1991: The behavior of forecast error covariances for a Kalman filter in two dimensions. Mon. Wea. Rev., 119, 17571785.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Daley, R., and E. Barker, 2001: NAVDAS: Formulation and diagnostics. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 869883.

  • DeMaria, M., 2009: A simplified dynamical system for tropical cyclone intensity prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 6882.

  • DeMaria, M., and J. Kaplan, 1994: A Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme (SHIPS) for the Atlantic basin. Wea. Forecasting, 9, 209220.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DTC, cited 2011a: Community Gridpoint Statistical Interpolation (GSI): Documents and publications. Developmental Testbed Center. [Available online at www.dtcenter.org/com-GSI/users/docs/index.php.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DTC, cited 2011b: WRF for hurricanes: Documents and publications. Developmental Testbed Center. [Available online at www.dtcenter.org/HurrWRF/users/docs/index.php.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Evensen, G., 1994: Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J. Geophys. Res., 99 (C5), 10 14310 162.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goerss, J. S., 2007: Prediction of consensus tropical cyclone track forecast error. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 19851993.

  • Hakim, G. J., 2003: Developing wave packets in the North Pacific storm track. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 28242837.

  • Hamill, T. M., J. S. Whitaker, M. Fiorino, and S. G. Benjamin, 2011: Global ensemble predictions of 2009's tropical cyclones initialized with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 668688.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HFIP, cited 2012: HFIP annual report. Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project. [Available online at www.hfip.org/documents/reports2.php.]

  • Hoskins, B. J., and T. Ambrizzi, 1993: Rossby wave propagation on a realistic longitudinally varying flow. J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 16611671.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Houtekamer, P. L., and H. L. Mitchell, 1998: Data assimilation using an ensemble Kalman filter technique. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 796811.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Keppenne, C. L., 2000: Data assimilation into a primitive-equation model with a parallel ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 19711981.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Langland, R., M. Shapiro, and R. Gelaro, 2002: Initial condition sensitivity and error growth in forecasts of the 25 January 2000 East Coast snowstorm. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 957974.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NCAR, 2011: List of retrospective test cases for 2011 HFIP Stream 1.5 candidate models. Research Applications Laboratory, 2 pp. [Available online at www.ral.ucar.edu/projects/hfip/includes/2011_stream_1.5_test_cases.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NHC, cited 2011: National Hurricane Center forecast models. [Available online at www.nhc.noaa.gov/modelsummary.shtml.]

  • NOAA SAB, cited 2006: Hurricane Intensity Research Working Group majority report. NOAA Science Advisory Board, 66 pp. [Available online at www.sab.noaa.gov/Reports/HIRWG_final73.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NOAA SAB, cited 2007: Response to NOAA Science Advisory Board Hurricane Intensity Research Working Group. [Available online at www.sab.noaa.gov/Reports/hirwg/2010/SAB_Nov07_HFIP_Response_to_HIRWG_FINAL.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NOARL, 1992: The NOGAPS forecast model: A technical description. Naval Oceanographic and Atmospheric Research Laboratory, Final Rep. AD-A247 216, DTIC 92-06202, 223 pp. [Available online at www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA247216&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NRL, cited 2011: COAMPS-TC tropical cyclone prediction and verification. [Available online at www.nrlmry.navy.mil/coamps-web/web/tc?&spg=2.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NSF, 2007: Hurricane warning: The critical need for a national hurricane research initiative. National Science Foundation Rep. NSB-06-115, 36 pp. [Available online at www.nsf.gov/nsb/committees/archive/hurricane/initiative.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OFCM, 2007: Interagency strategic research plan for tropical cyclones—The way ahead. OFCM Rep. FCM-P36-2007, 270 pp. [Available online at www.ofcm.gov/p36-isrtc/fcm-p36.htm.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Palmer, T. N., R. Gelaro, J. Barkmeijer, and R. Buizza, 1998: Singular vectors, metrics, and adaptive observations. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 633653.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Parrish, D. F., and J. C. Derber, 1992: The National Meteorological Center's Spectral Statistical-Interpolation Analysis System. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 17471763.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PSU, cited 2011: PSU WRF/EnKF Real-time Atlantic hurricane forecast. [Available online at http://hfip.psu.edu/realtime/AL2011/forecast_track.html.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Purser, J., W.-S. Wu, D. F. Parrish, and N. M. Roberts, 2003a: Numerical aspects of the application of recursive filters to variational statistical analysis. Part I: Spatially homogeneous and isotropic Gaussian covariances. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 15241535.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Purser, J., W.-S. Wu, D. F. Parrish, and N. M. Roberts, 2003b: Numerical aspects of the application of recursive filters to variational statistical analysis. Part II: Spatially inhomogeneous and anisotropic general covariances. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 15361548.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rabier, F., E. Klinker, P. Courtier, and A. Hollingsworth, 1996: Sensitivity of forecast errors to initial conditions. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 121150.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reynolds, C. A., M. S. Peng, and J.-H. Chen, 2009: Recurving tropical cyclones: Singular vector sensitivity and downstream impacts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 13201337.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Snyder, C., and F. Zhang, 2003: Assimilation of simulated Doppler radar observations with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 16631677.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tippett, M. K., J. L. Anderson, C. H. Bishop, T. M. Hamill, and J. S. Whitaker, 2003: Ensemble square root filters. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 14851490.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weng, Y., and F. Zhang, 2012: Assimilating airborne Doppler radar observations with an ensemble Kalman filter for cloud-resolving hurricane initialization and prediction: Katrina (2005). Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 841859.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WISC, cited 2011: UWNMS model configuration for 2011 HFIP demo. [Available online at http://cup.aos.wisc.edu/will/HFIP/config.html.]

  • Wu, W.-S., J. Purser, and D. F. Parrish, 2002: Threedimensional variational analysis with spatially inhomogeneous covariances. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130, 29052916.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, F., Y. Weng, J. Gamache, and F. Marks, 2011: Performance of convection-permitting hurricane initialization and prediction during 2008–2010 with ensemble data assimilation of inner-core airborne Doppler radar observations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L15810, doi:10.1029/2011GL048469.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2651 826 422
PDF Downloads 1214 163 14