Incorporating Hurricane Forecast Uncertainty into a Decision-Support Application for Power Outage Modeling

Steven M. Quiring Department of Geography, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

Search for other papers by Steven M. Quiring in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Andrea B. Schumacher Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by Andrea B. Schumacher in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Seth D. Guikema Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

Search for other papers by Seth D. Guikema in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

A variety of decision-support systems, such as those employed by energy and utility companies, use the National Hurricane Center (NHC) forecasts of track and intensity to inform operational decision making as a hurricane approaches. Track and intensity forecast errors, especially just prior to landfall, can substantially impact the accuracy of these decision-support systems. This study quantifies how forecast errors can influence the results of a power outage model, highlighting the importance of considering uncertainty when using hurricane forecasts in decision-support applications. An ensemble of 1,000 forecast realizations is generated using the Monte Carlo wind speed probability model for Hurricanes Dennis, Ivan, and Katrina. The power outage model was run for each forecast realization to predict the spatial distribution of power outages. Based on observed power outage data from a Gulf Coast utility company, the authors found that in all three cases the ensemble average was a better predictor of power outages than predictions made using the official NHC forecast. The primary advantage of using an ensemble approach is that it provides a means to communicate uncertainty to decision makers. For example, the probability of a given number of outages and the potential range of power outages can be determined. Quantifying the uncertainty associated with the NHC official track and intensity forecasts can improve the real-time decisions made by governmental, public, and private stakeholders.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Steven M. Quiring, Department of Geography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3147, E-mail: squiring@tamu.edu

A variety of decision-support systems, such as those employed by energy and utility companies, use the National Hurricane Center (NHC) forecasts of track and intensity to inform operational decision making as a hurricane approaches. Track and intensity forecast errors, especially just prior to landfall, can substantially impact the accuracy of these decision-support systems. This study quantifies how forecast errors can influence the results of a power outage model, highlighting the importance of considering uncertainty when using hurricane forecasts in decision-support applications. An ensemble of 1,000 forecast realizations is generated using the Monte Carlo wind speed probability model for Hurricanes Dennis, Ivan, and Katrina. The power outage model was run for each forecast realization to predict the spatial distribution of power outages. Based on observed power outage data from a Gulf Coast utility company, the authors found that in all three cases the ensemble average was a better predictor of power outages than predictions made using the official NHC forecast. The primary advantage of using an ensemble approach is that it provides a means to communicate uncertainty to decision makers. For example, the probability of a given number of outages and the potential range of power outages can be determined. Quantifying the uncertainty associated with the NHC official track and intensity forecasts can improve the real-time decisions made by governmental, public, and private stakeholders.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Steven M. Quiring, Department of Geography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3147, E-mail: squiring@tamu.edu
Save
  • Balijepalli, N., S. Venkata, C. Richter Jr., R. Christie, and V. Longo, 2005: Distribution system reliability assessment due to lightning storms. IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, 20, 2153–2159.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brown, R. E., S. Gupta, R. D. Christie, S. S. Venkata, and R. Fletcher, 1997: Distribution system reliability assessment: Momentary interruptions and storms. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 12, 1569–1575.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cerruti, B. J., and S. G. Decker, 2012: A statistical forecast model of weather-related damage to a major electric utility. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 51, 191–204.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clemen, R. T., and T. Reilly, 1999: Making Hard Decisions. Duxbury Press, 733 pp.

  • Davidson, R. A., H. Liu, I. K. Sarpong, P. R. Sparks, and D. V. Rosowsky, 2003: Electric power distribution system performance in Carolina hurricanes. Nat. Hazards Rev., 4, 36–45.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeGaetano, A. T., B. N. Belcher, and P. L. Spier, 2008: Short-term ice accretion forecasts for electric utilities using the Weather Research and Forecasting model and a modified precipitation-type algorithm. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 838–853.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeMaria, M., J. A. Knaff, R. Knabb, C. Lauer, C. R. Sampson, and R. T. DeMaria, 2009: A new method for estimating tropical cyclone wind speed probabilities. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 1573–1591.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DeMaria, M., and Coauthors, 2013: Improvements to the operational tropical cyclone wind speed probability model. Wea. Forecasting, 28, 586–602.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Franklin, J., 2005: 2004 National Hurricane Center forecast verification report. National Hurricane Center Rep., 46 pp. [Available online at www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/pdfs/Verification_2004.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Franklin, J., 2006: 2005 National Hurricane Center forecast verification report. National Hurricane Center Rep.,52 pp. [Available online at www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/pdfs/Verification_2005.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Georgiou, P. N., 1985: Design wind speeds in tropical cyclone-prone regions. Ph.D dissertation, University of Western Ontario, 295 pp.

  • Goerss, J. S., 2007: Prediction of consensus tropical cyclone track forecast error. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 1985–1993.

  • Guikema, S. D., and S. M. Quiring, 2012: Hybrid data mining-regression for infrastructure risk assessment based on zero-inflated data. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 99, 178–182.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guikema, S. D., S. M. Quiring, and S. D. Han, 2010: Prestorm estimation of hurricane damage to electric power distribution systems. Risk Anal., 30, 1744–1752.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Han, S. R., S. D. Guikema, and S. M. Quiring, 2009a: Improving the predictive accuracy of hurricane power outage forecasts using generalized additive models. Risk Anal., 29, 1443–1453.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Han, S. R., S. D. Guikema, S. M. Quiring, K. H. Lee, D. V. Rosowsky, and R. A. Davidson, 2009b: Estimating the spatial distribution of power outages during hurricanes in the Gulf Coast region. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 94, 199–210.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huang, Z., D. V. Rosowsky, and P. R. Sparks, 2001a: Hurricane simulation techniques for the evaluation of wind-speeds and expected insurance losses. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 89, 605–617.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huang, Z., D. V. Rosowsky, and P. R. Sparks, 2001b: Long-term hurricane risk assessment and expected damage to residential structures. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 74, 239–249.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Knabb, R. D., J. R. Rhome, and D. P. Brown, 2005: Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Katrina, 23–30 August 2005. National Hurricane Center Rep., 43 pp. [Available online at www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL122005_Katrina.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li, H., L. A. Treinish, and J. R. M. Hosking, 2010: A statistical model for risk management of electric outage forecasts. IBM J. Res. Dev., 54, 8:1–8:11, doi:10.1147/jrd.2010.2044836.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, H., R. A. Davidson, D. V. Rosowsky, and J. R. Stedinger, 2005: Negative binomial regression of electric power outages in hurricanes. J. Infrastruct. Syst., 11, 258–267.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, H., R. A. Davidson, and T. V. Apanasovich, 2007: Statistical forecasting of electric power restoration times in hurricanes and ice storms. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 22, 2270–2279.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, H., R. A. Davidson, and T. V. Apanasovich, 2008: Spatial generalized linear mixed models of electric power outages due to hurricanes and ice storms. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 93, 875–890.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nateghi, R., S. D. Guikema, and S. M. Quiring, 2011: Comparison and validation of statistical methods for predicting power outage durations in the event of hurricanes. Risk Anal., 31, 1897–1906.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • National Hurricane Center, cited 2010: National Hurricane Center forecast verification. [Available online at www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/.]

  • Rappaport, E. N., and Coauthors, 2009: Advances and challenges at the National Hurricane Center. Wea. Forecasting, 24, 395–419.

  • Reed, D. A., 2008: Electric utility disruption analysis for extreme winds. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 96, 123–140.

  • Reed, D. A., M. D. Powell, and J. Westerman, 2010a: Energy infrastructure damage for Hurricane Rita. Nat. Hazards Rev., 11, 102–109.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reed, D. A., M. D. Powell, and J. Westerman, 2010b: Energy supply system performance for Hurricane Katrina. J. Energy Eng., 136, 95–102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Willoughby, H. E., and M. E. Rahn, 2004: Parametric representation of the primary hurricane vortex. Part I: Observations and evaluation of the Holland (1980) model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 3033–3048.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Willoughby, H. E., R. W. R. Darling, and M. E. Rahn, 2006: Parametric representation of the primary hurricane vortex. Part II: A new family of sectionally continuous profiles. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 1102–1120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Winkler, J., L. Dueñas-Osorio, R. Stein, and D. Subramaniam, 2010: Performance assessment of topologically diverse power systems subjected to hurricane events. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 95, 323–336.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhou, Y., A. Pahwa, and S. Yang, 2006: Modeling weather-related failures of overhead distribution lines. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 21, 1683–1690.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhu, D., D. Cheng, R. P. Broadwater, and C. Scirbona, 2007: Storm modeling for prediction of power distribution system outages. Electr. Power Syst. Res., 77, 973–979.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation