Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Is Tropical Cyclone Intensity Guidance Improving?

Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by Mark DeMaria in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Charles R. Sampson Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California

Search for other papers by Charles R. Sampson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
John A. Knaff NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by John A. Knaff in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Kate D. Musgrave Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by Kate D. Musgrave in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Mar 2014
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00240.1
Page(s):
387–398
Restricted access

The mean absolute error of the official tropical cyclone (TC) intensity forecasts from the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) shows limited evidence of improvement over the past two decades. This result has sometimes erroneously been used to conclude that little or no progress has been made in the TC intensity guidance models. This article documents statistically significant improvements in operational TC intensity guidance over the past 24 years (1989–2012) in four tropical cyclone basins (Atlantic, eastern North Pacific, western North Pacific, and Southern Hemisphere). Errors from the best available model have decreased at 1%–2% yr−1 at 24–72 h, with faster improvement rates at 96 and 120 h. Although these rates are only about one-third to one-half of the rates of reduction of the track forecast models, most are statistically significant at the 95% level. These error reductions resulted from improvements in statistical–dynamical intensity models and consensus techniques that combine information from statistical–dynamical and dynamical models. The reason that the official NHC and JTWC intensity forecast errors have decreased slower than the guidance errors is because in the first half of the analyzed period, their subjective forecasts were more accurate than any of the available guidance. It is only in the last decade that the objective intensity guidance has become accurate enough to influence the NHC and JTWC forecast errors.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS and CIRA, CSU, 1375 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80525, E-mail: mark.demaria@noaa.gov

The mean absolute error of the official tropical cyclone (TC) intensity forecasts from the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) shows limited evidence of improvement over the past two decades. This result has sometimes erroneously been used to conclude that little or no progress has been made in the TC intensity guidance models. This article documents statistically significant improvements in operational TC intensity guidance over the past 24 years (1989–2012) in four tropical cyclone basins (Atlantic, eastern North Pacific, western North Pacific, and Southern Hemisphere). Errors from the best available model have decreased at 1%–2% yr−1 at 24–72 h, with faster improvement rates at 96 and 120 h. Although these rates are only about one-third to one-half of the rates of reduction of the track forecast models, most are statistically significant at the 95% level. These error reductions resulted from improvements in statistical–dynamical intensity models and consensus techniques that combine information from statistical–dynamical and dynamical models. The reason that the official NHC and JTWC intensity forecast errors have decreased slower than the guidance errors is because in the first half of the analyzed period, their subjective forecasts were more accurate than any of the available guidance. It is only in the last decade that the objective intensity guidance has become accurate enough to influence the NHC and JTWC forecast errors.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Mark DeMaria, NOAA/NESDIS and CIRA, CSU, 1375 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80525, E-mail: mark.demaria@noaa.gov
Save
Cover Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

  • Bender, M. A., I. Ginis, R. Tuleya, B. Thomas, and T. Marchok, 2007: The operational GFDL coupled hurricane–ocean prediction system and a summary of its performance. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 3965–3989.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cangialosi, J. P., and J. L. Franklin, 2012a: 2011 Atlantic and eastern North Pacific forecast verification. Proc. 66th Interdepartmental Hurricane Conf., Charleston, SC, OFCM. [Available online at www.ofcm.gov/ihc12/Presentations/01b-Session/03-IHC_2012_Verification_(2012)_v2.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cangialosi, J. P., and J. L. Franklin, 2012b: 2011 National Hurricane Center forecast verification report. NOAA/NWS/NHC, 76 pp. [Available online at www.nhc.noaa.gov/verification/pdfs/Verification_2011.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chu, J.-H., 1994: A regression model for the western North Pacific tropical cyclone intensity forecast. NRL Memo. Rep. NRL/MR/7541-94-7215, Naval Research Laboratory, 33 pp. [Available from Naval Research Laboratory, 7 Grace Hopper Avenue, Monterey, CA 93943.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chu, J.-H., C. R. Sampson, A. S. Levine, and E. Fukada, 2002: The Joint Typhoon Warning Center tropical cyclone best-tracks, 1945–2000. NRL Reference NRL/MR/7540-02-16. [Available online at www.usno.navy.mil/NOOC/nmfc-ph/RSS/jtwc/best_tracks/TC_bt_report.html.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • DeMaria, M., 2009: A simplified dynamical system for tropical cyclone intensity prediction. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 68–82.

  • DeMaria, M., 2010: Tropical cyclone intensity predictability estimates using a statistical-dynamical model. Preprints, 29th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Tucson, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 9C.5. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/29Hurricanes/techprogram/paper_167916.htm.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • DeMaria, M., and J. M. Gross, 2003: Evolution of prediction models. Hurricane! Coping with Disaster: Progress and Challenges since Galveston, 1900, R. Simpson et al., Eds., Special Publications Series, Vol. 55, Amer. Geophys. Union, 103–126.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • DeMaria, M., M. Mainelli, L. K. Shay, J. A. Knaff, and J. Kaplan, 2005: Further improvement to the Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme (SHIPS). Wea. Forecasting, 20, 531–543.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • DeMaria, M., J. A. Knaff, and C. R. Sampson, 2007: Evaluation of long-term trend in tropical cyclone intensity forecasts. Meteor. Atmos. Phys., 97, 19–28.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Doyle, J. D., and Coauthors, 2011: Real-time tropical cyclone prediction using COAMPS-TC. Adv. Geosci., 28, 15–28.

  • Falvey, R., 2012: Summary of the 2011 Western Pacific/Indian Ocean tropical cyclone season. Proc. 66th Interdepartmental Hurricane Conf., Charleston, SC, OFCM. [Available online at www.ofcm.gov/ihc12/Presentations/01b-Session/05-JTWC_2012_IHC_Final.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Freedman, A., cited 2012: Storm intensity forecasts lag; Communities more at risk. [Available online at www.climatecentral.org/news/storm-intensity-forecasts-lag-putting-communities-more-at-risk/.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gall, R., J. Franklin, F. Marks, E. N. Rappaport, and F. Toepfer, 2013: The Hurricane Forecast Improvement Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94, 329–343.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Goni, G., and Coauthors, 2009: Applications of satellite-derived ocean measurements to tropical cyclone intensity forecasting. Oceanography, 22, 190–197.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Goodman, S. J., and Coauthors, 2012: The GOES-R proving ground: Accelerating user readiness for the next-generation geostationary environmental satellite system. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 1029–1040.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gopalakrishnan, S. G., Q. Liu, T. Marchok, D. Sheinin, N. Surgi, R. Tuleya, R. Yablonsky, and X. Zhang, 2010: Hurricane Weather and Research and Forecasting (HWRF) model scientific documentation. Development Testbed Center, 75 pp. [Available online at www.dtcenter.org/HurrWRF/users/docs/scientific_documents/HWR_final_2-2_cm.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hamill, T. M., J. S. Whitaker, M. Fiorino, and S. G. Benjamin, 2011: Global ensemble predictions of 2009's tropical cyclones initialized with an ensemble Kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 668–688.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Harnos, D. S., and S. W. Nesbitt, 2011: Convective structure in rapidly intensifying tropical cyclones as depicted by passive microwave measurements. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L07805, doi:10.1029/2011GL047010.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Jarvinen, B. R., and C. J. Neumann, 1979: Statistical forecasts of tropical cyclone intensity for the North Atlantic basin. NOAA Tech. Memo. NWS NHC-10, 22 pp. [Available from National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kaplan, J., M. DeMaria, and J. A. Knaff, 2010: A revised tropical cyclone rapid intensification index for the Atlantic and eastern North Pacific basins. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 220–241.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Knaff, J. A., M. DeMaria, C. R. Sampson, and J. M. Gross, 2003: Statistical, five-day tropical cyclone intensity forecasts derived from climatology and persistence. Wea. Forecasting, 18, 80–92.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Knaff, J. A., C. R. Sampson, and M. DeMaria, 2005: An operational Statistical Typhoon Intensity Prediction Scheme for the western North Pacific. Wea. Forecasting, 20, 688–699.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Landsea, C. W., and J. L. Franklin, 2013: Atlantic hurricane database uncertainty and presentation of a new database format. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 3576–3592.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Landsea, C. W., J. L. Franklin, E. Blake, and R. Tanabe, 2013: The revised northeast and north central Pacific hurricane database (HURDAT2). NOAA, 4 pp. [Available online at www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/hurdat/hurdat2-format-nencpac.pdf.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Marks, F., Jr., and R. Ferek, 2013: Comparison of the 2010 and 2012 snapshots of tropical cyclone research and development. 67th Interdepartmental Hurricane Conf., OFCM. [Available online at www.ofcm.gov/ihc13/67IHC-Linking-File.htm.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Miller, S. D., C. L. Combs, S. Q. Kidder, and T. F. Lee, 2012: Assessing moonlight availability for nighttime environmental applications by low-light visible polar-orbiting satellite sensors. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 29, 538–557.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Musgrave, K. D., B. D. McNoldy, and M. DeMaria, 2012: Creation of a statistical ensemble for tropical cyclone intensity prediction. Preprints, 30th Conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 13A.1. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/30Hurricane/webprogram/Paper204580.html.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rappaport, E. N., J.-G. Jiing, C. W. Landsea, S. T. Murillo, and J. L. Franklin, 2012: The Joint Hurricane Testbed: Its first decade of tropical cyclone research-to-operations activities reviewed. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 371–380.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rennick, M. A., 1999: Performance of the navy's tropical cyclone prediction model in the western North Pacific basin during 1996. Wea. Forecasting, 14, 3–14.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sampson, C. R., and A. J. Schrader, 2000: The automated tropical cyclone forecasting system (version 3.2). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81, 1231–1240.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sampson, C. R., R. J. Miller, R. A. Kreitner, and T. L. Tsui, 1990: Tropical cyclone track objective aids for the microcomputer: PCLM, XTRP, PCHP. Naval Oceanographic and Atmospheric Laboratory Tech. Note 61, 15 pp. [Available from Naval Research Laboratory, 7 Grace Hopper Avenue, Monterey, CA 93943.]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sampson, C. R., J. S. Goerss, and H. C. Weber, 2006: Operational performance of a new barotropic model (WBAR) in the western North Pacific basin. Wea. Forecasting, 21, 656–662.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sampson, C. R., J. L. Franklin, J. A. Knaff, and M. DeMaria, 2008: Experiments with a simple tropical cyclone intensity consensus. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 304–312.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Sampson, C. R., J. Kaplan, J. A. Knaff, M. DeMaria, and C. A. Sisko, 2011: A deterministic rapid intensification aid. Wea. Forecasting, 26, 579–585.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Zhang, F., and D. Tao, 2013: Effects of vertical wind shear on the predictability of tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 975–983.

  • Zhang, F., Y. Weng, J. Gamache, and F. Marks, 2011: Performance of convection-permitting hurricane initialization and prediction during 2008–2010 with ensemble data assimilation of inner-core airborne Doppler radar observations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, doi:10.1029/2011GL048469.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2503 986 108
PDF Downloads 1634 488 54