Cover Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

  • Dvorak, V. F., 1975: Tropical cyclone intensity analysis and forecasting from satellite imagery. Mon. Wea. Rev., 103, 420–430, doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1975)103<0420:TCIAAF>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hagen, A. B., D. Strahan-Sakoskie, and C. Luckett, 2012: A reanalysis of the 1944–53 Atlantic hurricane seasons—The first decade of aircraft reconnaissance. J. Climate, 25, 4441–4460, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00419.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kossin, J. P., K. R. Knapp, D. J. Vimont, R. J. Murnane, and B. A. Harper, 2007: A globally consistent reanalysis of hurricane variability and trends. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L04815, doi:10.1029/2006GL028836.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kunkel, K. E., and Coauthors, 2013: Monitoring and understanding trends in extreme storms: State of knowledge. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94, 499–514, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00262.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Landsea, C. W., 2005: Hurricanes and global warming. Nature, 438, E11–E12, doi:10.1038/nature04477.

  • Landsea, C. W., and J. L. Franklin, 2013: Atlantic hurricane database uncertainty and presentation of a new database format. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 3576–3592, doi:10.1175/MWR-D-12-00254.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Landsea, C. W., and Coauthors, 2004: The Atlantic hurricane database re-analysis project: Documentation for the 1851–1910 alterations and additions to the HURDAT database. Hurricanes and Typhoons: Past, Present and Future, R. J. Murname and K.-B. Liu, Eds., Columbia University Press, 177–221.

  • Landsea, C. W., and Coauthors, 2008: A reanalysis of the 1911–20 Atlantic hurricane database. J. Climate, 21, 2138–2168, doi:10.1175/2007JCLI1119.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Landsea, C. W., S. Feuer, A. Hagen, D. A. Glenn, J. Sims, R. Perez, M. Chenoweth, and N. Anderson, 2012: A reanalysis of the 1921–30 Atlantic hurricane database. J. Climate, 25, 865–885, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00026.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Landsea, C. W., A. Hagen, W. Bredemeyer, C. Carrasco, D. A. Glenn, A. Santiago, D. Strahan-Sakoskie, and M. Dickinson, 2014: A reanalysis of the 1931 to 1943 Atlantic hurricane database. J. Climate, 27, 6093–6118, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00503.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 7 7 7
PDF Downloads 5 5 5
Editorial Type:
Comment/Reply
Article Type:
Article Commentary

Comments on “Monitoring and Understanding Trends in Extreme Storms: State of Knowledge”

Christopher William Landsea1
View More View Less
  • 1 DOC/NOAA/NWS/NCEP/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida
Print Publication:
01 Jul 2015
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00211.1
Page(s):
1175–1176
A related article is available A related article is available
Restricted access

Kunkel et al. (2013) reviewed the state of the science with regards to long-term changes and trends of various extreme storms that impact the continental United States. In particular, they addressed severe convective storms, precipitation, snowstorms, and—of interest to this comment—hurricanes. All of the analyses presented in Kunkel et al. (2013) (their Figs. 1–7 and Tables 1 and 2) were focused on observations taken over the continental United States, with the notable exception of hurricanes. Instead, their Fig. 5 provided data (updated from Kossin et al. 2007) for the entire North Atlantic and northwestern Pacific

Kunkel et al. (2013) reviewed the state of the science with regards to long-term changes and trends of various extreme storms that impact the continental United States. In particular, they addressed severe convective storms, precipitation, snowstorms, and—of interest to this comment—hurricanes. All of the analyses presented in Kunkel et al. (2013) (their Figs. 1–7 and Tables 1 and 2) were focused on observations taken over the continental United States, with the notable exception of hurricanes. Instead, their Fig. 5 provided data (updated from Kossin et al. 2007) for the entire North Atlantic and northwestern Pacific

The original article that was the subject of this comment/reply can be found at http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00262.1.

Kunkel et al. (2013) reviewed the state of the science with regards to long-term changes and trends of various extreme storms that impact the continental United States. In particular, they addressed severe convective storms, precipitation, snowstorms, and—of interest to this comment—hurricanes. All of the analyses presented in Kunkel et al. (2013) (their Figs. 1–7 and Tables 1 and 2) were focused on observations taken over the continental United States, with the notable exception of hurricanes. Instead, their Fig. 5 provided data (updated from Kossin et al. 2007) for the entire North Atlantic and northwestern Pacific

Kunkel et al. (2013) reviewed the state of the science with regards to long-term changes and trends of various extreme storms that impact the continental United States. In particular, they addressed severe convective storms, precipitation, snowstorms, and—of interest to this comment—hurricanes. All of the analyses presented in Kunkel et al. (2013) (their Figs. 1–7 and Tables 1 and 2) were focused on observations taken over the continental United States, with the notable exception of hurricanes. Instead, their Fig. 5 provided data (updated from Kossin et al. 2007) for the entire North Atlantic and northwestern Pacific

The original article that was the subject of this comment/reply can be found at http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00262.1.

Save