Identifying and Quantifying Benefits of Meteorological Satellites

Molly E. Brown Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Molly E. Brown in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Charles Wooldridge NOAA Satellite and Information Service, Silver Spring, Maryland

Search for other papers by Charles Wooldridge in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites (CGMS) provides an international forum for the exchange of technical information on geostationary and polar-orbiting meteorological satellite systems. In 2013, the CMGS established the Socioeconomic Benefits Tiger Team (SETT) to develop a credible methodology and common terminology for articulating the socioeconomic benefits of satellite observing systems, and to explore the most effective ways to communicate the benefits to decision makers and stakeholders. As part of its first years’ activities, the SETT gathered examples of socioeconomic studies across all member organizations. This article describes key elements of these studies, and identified eight key themes that are presented. We welcome additional collaborations to identify opportunities to incorporate socioeconomic best practices, integrate these into additional or subsequent phases of work on new instruments and satellites, and develop recommendations for the way forward for the broader meteorological community.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Molly Brown, Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, 2181 Samuel J. LeFrak Hall, 7251 Preinkert Drive, College Park, MD 20742, E-mail: mbrown52@umd.edu

Abstract

The Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites (CGMS) provides an international forum for the exchange of technical information on geostationary and polar-orbiting meteorological satellite systems. In 2013, the CMGS established the Socioeconomic Benefits Tiger Team (SETT) to develop a credible methodology and common terminology for articulating the socioeconomic benefits of satellite observing systems, and to explore the most effective ways to communicate the benefits to decision makers and stakeholders. As part of its first years’ activities, the SETT gathered examples of socioeconomic studies across all member organizations. This article describes key elements of these studies, and identified eight key themes that are presented. We welcome additional collaborations to identify opportunities to incorporate socioeconomic best practices, integrate these into additional or subsequent phases of work on new instruments and satellites, and develop recommendations for the way forward for the broader meteorological community.

CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Molly Brown, Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, 2181 Samuel J. LeFrak Hall, 7251 Preinkert Drive, College Park, MD 20742, E-mail: mbrown52@umd.edu
Save
  • Adams, V., and Coauthors, 2013: Measuring socioeconomic impacts of Earth observations. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Rep., 64 pp.

  • Hallegatte, S., J. Eyre, T. McNally, R. Potthast, and R. Husband, 2013: The case for the EUMETSAT Polar System (EPS)/Metop Second-Generation Programme: Cost benefit analysis. Yearbook on Space Policy 2011/2012: Space in Times of Financial Crisis, C. Al-Ekabi et al., Eds., Springer Verlag, 193–213.

  • Laxminarayan, R., and M. K. Macauley, 2012: The Value of Information: Methodological Frontiers and New Applications in Environment and Health. Springer Verlag, 304 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 659 268 24
PDF Downloads 320 64 11