Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Estimating Sampling Errors in Large-Scale Temperature Averages

P. D. Jones Climatic Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by P. D. Jones in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
T. J. Osborn Climatic Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by T. J. Osborn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
K. R. Briffa Climatic Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by K. R. Briffa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Oct 1997
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<2548:ESEILS>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
2548–2568
Restricted access

Abstract

A method is developed for estimating the uncertainty (standard error) of observed regional, hemispheric, and global-mean surface temperature series due to incomplete spatial sampling. Standard errors estimated at the grid-box level [SE2 = S2(1 − r̄)/(1 + (n − 1)r̄)] depend upon three parameters: the number of site records (n) within each box, the average interrecord correlation (r̄) between these sites, and the temporal variability (S2) of each grid-box temperature time series. For boxes without data (n = 0), estimates are made using values of S2 interpolated from neighboring grid boxes. Due to spatial correlation, large-scale standard errors in a regional-mean time series are not simply the average of the grid-box standard errors, but depend upon the effective number of independent sites (Neff) over the region.

A number of assumptions must be made in estimating the various parameters, and these are tested with observational data and complementary results from multicentury control integrations of three coupled general circulation models (GCMs). The globally complete GCMs enable some assumptions to be tested in a situation where there are no missing data; comparison of parameters computed from the observed and model datasets are also useful for assessing the performance of GCMs. As most of the parameters are timescale dependent, the resulting errors are likewise timescale dependent and must be calculated for each timescale of interest. The length of the observed record enables uncertainties to be estimated on the interannual and interdecadal timescales, with the longer GCM runs providing inferences about longer timescales. For mean annual observed data on the interannual timescale, the 95% confidence interval for estimates of the global-mean surface temperature since 1951 is ±0.12°C. Prior to 1900, the confidence interval widens to ±0.18°C. Equivalent values on the decadal timescale are smaller: ±0.10°C (1951–95) and ±0.16°C (1851–1900).

Corresponding author address: Dr. Philip D. Jones, Climatic Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.

Abstract

A method is developed for estimating the uncertainty (standard error) of observed regional, hemispheric, and global-mean surface temperature series due to incomplete spatial sampling. Standard errors estimated at the grid-box level [SE2 = S2(1 − r̄)/(1 + (n − 1)r̄)] depend upon three parameters: the number of site records (n) within each box, the average interrecord correlation (r̄) between these sites, and the temporal variability (S2) of each grid-box temperature time series. For boxes without data (n = 0), estimates are made using values of S2 interpolated from neighboring grid boxes. Due to spatial correlation, large-scale standard errors in a regional-mean time series are not simply the average of the grid-box standard errors, but depend upon the effective number of independent sites (Neff) over the region.

A number of assumptions must be made in estimating the various parameters, and these are tested with observational data and complementary results from multicentury control integrations of three coupled general circulation models (GCMs). The globally complete GCMs enable some assumptions to be tested in a situation where there are no missing data; comparison of parameters computed from the observed and model datasets are also useful for assessing the performance of GCMs. As most of the parameters are timescale dependent, the resulting errors are likewise timescale dependent and must be calculated for each timescale of interest. The length of the observed record enables uncertainties to be estimated on the interannual and interdecadal timescales, with the longer GCM runs providing inferences about longer timescales. For mean annual observed data on the interannual timescale, the 95% confidence interval for estimates of the global-mean surface temperature since 1951 is ±0.12°C. Prior to 1900, the confidence interval widens to ±0.18°C. Equivalent values on the decadal timescale are smaller: ±0.10°C (1951–95) and ±0.16°C (1851–1900).

Corresponding author address: Dr. Philip D. Jones, Climatic Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Barnett, T. P., B. D. Santer, P. D. Jones, R. S. Bradley, and K. R. Briffa, 1996: Estimates of low-frequency natural variability in near-surface air temperature. Holocene,6, 255–263.

  • Briffa, K. R., and P. D. Jones, 1990: Basic chronology statistics and assessment. Methods of Dendrochronolgy, E. R. Cook and L. A. Kairiukstis, Eds., Kluwer, 137–152.

  • ——, and ——, 1993: Global surface air temperature variations over the twentieth century, Part 2: Implications for large-scale paleoclimatic studies of the Holocene. Holocene,3, 77–88.

  • ——, ——, F. H. Schweingruber, W. Karlén, and S. Shiyatov, 1996: Tree-ring variables as proxy-climate indicators: Problems with low-frequency signals. Climatic Variations and Forcing Mechanisms of the Last 2000 Years, P. D. Jones, R. S. Bradley, and J. Jouzel, Eds., Springer, 9–41.

  • Christy, J. R., R. W. Spencer, and R. T. McNider, 1995: Reducing noise in the MSU daily lower-tropospheric global temperature dataset. J. Climate,8, 888–896.

  • Cook, E. R., 1995: Temperature histories from tree rings and corals. Climate Dyn.,11, 211–222.

  • Cressie, N. A. C., 1991: Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley, 900 pp.

  • Folland, C. K., and D. E. Parker, 1995: Correction of instrumental biases in historical sea surface temperatures. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,121, 319–367.

  • Gandin, L. S., 1963: Objective Analysis of Meteorological Fields. Israeli Program for Scientific Translations, 242 pp.

  • Gunst, R. F., 1995: Estimating spatial correlations from spatial–temporal meteorological data. J. Climate,8, 2454–2470.

  • Hansen, J. E., and S. Lebedeff, 1987: Global trends of measured surface air temperature. J. Geophys. Res.,92, 13345–13372.

  • Hardin, J. W., and R. B. Upson, 1993: Estimation of the global average temperature with optimally weighted point gauges. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 23275–23282.

  • Hegerl, G. C., H. von Storch, K. Hasselmann, B. D. Santer, U. Cubasch, and P. D. Jones, 1996: Detecting greenhouse gas–induced climate change with an optimal fingerprint method. J. Climate,9, 2281–2306.

  • Jones, P. D., 1994: Hemispheric surface air temperature variations: A reanalysis and an update to 1993. J. Climate,7, 1794–1802.

  • ——, 1995: Land surface temperatures—Is the network good enough? Climate Change,31, 545–558.

  • ——, and K. R. Briffa, 1992: Global surface air temperature variations over the twentieth century, Part 1: Spatial, temporal and seasonal details. Holocene,2, 165–179.

  • ——, and ——, 1996: What can the instrumental record tell us about longer timescale paleoclimatic reconstructions? Climatic Variations and Forcing Mechanisms of the Last 2000 Years, P. D. Jones, R. S. Bradley, and J. Jouzel, Eds., Springer, 625–644.

  • ——, S. C. B. Raper, R. S. Bradley, H. F. Diaz, P. M. Kelly, and T. M. L. Wigley, 1986a: Northern Hemisphere surface air temperature variations: 1851–1984. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,25, 161–179.

  • ——, ——, and T. M. L. Wigley, 1986b: Southern Hemisphere surface air temperature variations: 1851–1984. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,25, 1213–1230.

  • ——, T. M. L. Wigley, and G. Farmer, 1991: Marine and land temperature data sets: A comparison and a look at recent trends. Greenhouse-Gas-Induced Climatic Change: A Critical Appraisal of Simulations and Observations, M. E. Schlesinger, Ed., Elsevier, 153–172.

  • Kagan, R. L., 1966: An Evaluation of the Representativeness of Precipitation Data (in Russian). Gidrometeoizdat, 191 pp.

  • ——, 1979: The Averaging of Meteorological Fields (in Russian). Gidrometeoizdat, 213 pp.

  • Karl, T. R., R. W. Knight, and J. R. Christy, 1994: Global and hemispheric temperature trends: Uncertainties related to inadequate spatial sampling. J. Climate,7, 1144–1163.

  • Kerr, R. A., 1994: Climate modeling’s fudge factor comes under fire. Science,265, 1528.

  • Livezey, R. E., and W. Y. Chen, 1983: Statistical field significance and its determination by Monte Carlo techniques. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 46–59.

  • Madden, R. A., D. J. Shea, G. W. Branstator, J. J. Tribbia, and R. Weber, 1993: The effects of imperfect spatial and temporal sampling on estimates of the global mean temperature: Experiments with model and satellite data. J. Climate,6, 1057–1066.

  • Mann, M. E., and J. Park, 1993: Spatial correlations of interdecadal variations in global surface temperatures. Geophys. Res. Lett.,20, 1055–1058.

  • Mitchell, J. F. B., R. A. Davis, W. J. Ingram, and C. A. Senior, 1995: On surface temperature, greenhouse gases, and aerosols: Models and observations. J. Climate,8, 2364–2386.

  • Nakamura, M., P. H. Stone, and J. Marotzke, 1994: Destabilization of the thermohaline circulation by atmospheric eddy transports. J. Climate,7, 1870–1882.

  • Nicholls, N., G. V. Gruza, J. Jouzel, T. R. Karl, L. A. Ogallo, and D. E. Parker, 1996: Observed climate variability and change. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, J. T. Houghton, L. G. Meira Filho, B. A. Callander, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg, and K. Maskell, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 133–192.

  • Parker, D. E., P. D. Jones, A. Bevan, and C. K. Folland, 1994: Interdecadal changes of surface temperature since the 19th century. J. Geophys. Res.,99, 14373–14399.

  • Preisendorfer, R. W., F. W. Zwiers, and T. P. Barnett, 1981: Foundations of Principal Component Selection Rules. SIO Reference Series, Vol. 81-4, Scripps Institute of Oceanography, 191 pp.

  • Reynolds, R. W., 1988: A real-time global sea surface temperature analysis. J. Climate,1, 75–86.

  • Santer, B. D., K. E. Taylor, T. M. L. Wigley, J. E. Penner, P. D. Jones, and U. Cubasch, 1995: Towards the detection and attribution of an anthropogenic effect on climate. Climate Dyn.,12, 77–100.

  • ——, T. M. L. Wigley, T. P. Barnett, and E. Anyamba, 1996: Detection of climate change and attribution of causes. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, J. T. Houghton, L. G. Meira Filho, B. A. Callander, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg, and K. Maskell, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 408–443.

  • Sausen, R., K. Barthel, and K. Hasselmann, 1988: Coupled ocean atmosphere models with flux corrections. Climate Dyn.,2, 154–163.

  • Shen, S. S. P., G. R. North, and K.-Y. Kim, 1994: Spectral approach to optimal estimation of the global average temperature. J. Climate,7, 1999–2007.

  • Smith, T. M., R. W. Reynolds, and C. F. Ropelewski, 1994: Optimal averaging of seasonal sea surface temperature and associated confidence intervals (1860–1989). J. Climate,7, 949–964.

  • Spencer, R. W., and J. R. Christy, 1992a: Precision and radiosonde validation of satellite grid point temperature anomalies. Part I: MSU channel 2. J. Climate,5, 847–857.

  • ——, and ——, 1992b. Precision and radiosonde validation of satellite gridpoint temperature anomalies. Part II: A tropospheric retrieval and trends during 1979–90. J. Climate,5, 858–866.

  • Stouffer, R. J., S. Manabe, and K. Ya. Vinnikov, 1994: Model assessment of the role of natural variability in recent global warming. Nature,367, 634–636.

  • Tett, S. F. B., T. C. Johns, and J. F. B. Mitchell, 1997: Global and regional variability in a coupled AOGCM. Climate Dyn., in press.

  • Trenberth, K. E., J. R. Christy, and J. W. Hurrell, 1992: Monitoring global monthly mean surface temperatures. J. Climate,5, 1405–1423.

  • Vinnikov, K. Ya., P. Ya. Groisman, and K. M. Lugina, 1990: The empirical data on modern global climate changes (temperature and precipitation). J. Climate,3, 662–677.

  • von Storch, J.-S., 1994: Interdecadal variability in a global coupled model. Tellus,46A, 419–432.

  • Weber, R. O., and R. A. Madden, 1995: Optimal averaging for the determination of global mean temperature: Experiments with model data. J. Climate,8, 418–430.

  • Wigley, T. M. L., K. R. Briffa, and P. D. Jones, 1984: On the average value of correlated time series with applications in dendroclimatology and hydrometeorology. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,23, 201–213.

  • ——, P. Jaumann, B. D. Santer, and K. E. Taylor, 1997: Relative detectability of greenhouse-gas and aerosol climate change signals. Climate Dyn., in press.

  • Yaglom, A. M., 1987: Correlation Theory of Stationary and Related Random Functions I: Basic Results. Springer-Verlag, 526 pp.

  • Yevjevich, V., 1972: Probability and Statistics in Hydrology. Water Resources Publications, 302 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2292 905 44
PDF Downloads 869 189 18