Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Bastable, H. G., W. J. Shuttleworth, R. L. G. Dallarosa, G. Fisch, and C. A. Nobre, 1993: Observations of climate, albedo, and surface radiation over cleared and undisturbed Amazonian forest. Int. J. Climatol.,13, 783–796.

  • Charney, J. G., 1975: Dynamics of deserts and drought in the Sahel. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,101, 193–202.

  • Culf, A. D., G. Fisch, and M. G. Hodnett, 1995: The albedo of Amazonian forest and ranchland. J. Climate,8, 1544–1554.

  • ——, J. L. Esteves, A. O. Marques Filho, and H. R. da Rocha, 1996: Radiation, temperature and humidity over forest and pasture in Amazonia. Amazonian Deforestation and Climate, J. H. C. Gash, C. A. Nobre, J. M. Roberts, and R. L. Victoria, Eds., John Wiley, 175–192.

  • Dickinson, R. E., and A. Henderson-Sellers, 1988: Modelling tropical deforestation: A study of GCM land-surface parametrizations. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,114, 439–462.

  • ——, and P. Kennedy, 1992: Impacts on regional climate of Amazon deforestation. Geophys. Res. Lett.,19, 1947–1950.

  • Dirmeyer, P. A., and J. Shukla, 1994: Albedo as a modulator of climate response to tropical deforestation. J. Geophys. Res.,99 (D10), 20 863–20 877.

  • Dolman, A. J., J. H. C. Gash, J. Roberts, and W. J. Shuttleworth, 1991: Stomatal and surface conductance of tropical rainforest. Agric. For. Meteor.,54, 303–318.

  • Eden, M. J., D. F. M. McGregor, and N. A. Q. Vieira, 1990: The Maraca rainforest project: III. Pasture development on cleared forest land in northern Amazonia. Geogr. J.,156, 283–296.

  • Figueroa, S. N., and C. Nobre, 1990: Rainfall distribution over central and western tropical South America. Climanalise,5, 36–45.

  • Gregory, D., and S. Allen, 1991: The effect of convective scale downdraughts upon NWP and climate simulations. Preprints, Ninth Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Denver, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 122–123.

  • Grimaldi, M., M. Sarrazin, A. Chauval, F. Luizao, N. Nunes, M. R. L. Rodriguez, P. Amblard, and D. Tessier, 1993: Effets de la deforestation et des cultures sur la structure des sols argileux d’Amazonie Bresilienne. Cah. Agric.,2, 36–47.

  • Henderson-Sellers, A., R. E. Dickinson, T. B. Durbridge, P. J. Kennedy, K. McGuffie, and A. J. Pitman, 1993: Tropical deforestation: Modelling local to regional-scale climate change. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 7289–7315.

  • Jones, R. J., J. M. Murphy, and M. Noguer, 1995: Simulation of climate change over Europe using a nested regional climate model. Part I: Assessment of control climate including sensitivity to location of lateral boundaries. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,121, 1413–1449.

  • Koster, R. D., and M. J. Suarez, 1995: Relative contributions of land and ocean processes in precipitation variability. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 13 775–13 790.

  • Lean, J., and D. A. Warrilow, 1989: Simulation of the regional impact of Amazon deforestation. Nature,342, 411–413.

  • ——, and P. R. Rowntree, 1993: A GCM simulation of the impact of Amazonian deforestation on climate using an improved canopy representation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,119, 509–530.

  • Legates, D. R., and C. J. Wilmott, 1990: Mean seasonal and spatial variability in gauge-corrected global precipitation. Int. J. Climatol.,10, 111–127.

  • Manzi, A. O., 1993: Introduction d’un schema des transferts sol-vegetation-atmosphere dans un modele de circulation generale et application a la simulation de la deforestation Amazonienne. Ph.D. dissertation, Universite Paul Sabatier, 230 pp. [Available from Meteo-France/CNRM/GMGEC/UDC, 42 Ave. G. Coriolis, 31057 Toulouse, Cedex, France.].

  • Mylne, M. F., and P. R. Rowntree, 1992: Modelling the effects of albedo change associated with tropical deforestation. Climate Change,21, 317–343.

  • Nobre, C. A., P. J. Sellers, and J. Shukla, 1991: Amazonian deforestation and regional climate change. J. Climate,4, 957–988.

  • Pitman, A. J., T. B. Durbidge, and A. Henderson-Sellers, 1993: Assessing climate model sensitivity to prescribed deforested landscapes. Int. J. Climatol.,13, 879–898.

  • Polcher, J., 1995: Sensitivity of tropical convection to land surface processes. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 3143–3161.

  • ——, and K. Laval, 1994a: The impact of African and Amazonian deforestation on tropical climate. J. Hydrol.,155, 389–405.

  • ——, and ——, 1994b: A statistical study of regional impact of deforestation on climate in the LMD-GCM. Climate Dyn.,10, 205–219.

  • Reategui, K., R. Ruiz, G. Cantera, and C. Lascano, 1990: Persistencia de pasturas asociados con diferentes manejos del pastores en un Ultisol arcilloso de Puerto Bermudez, Peru. Pasturas Tropicales,12, 16–24.

  • Sellers, P. J., Y. Mintz, Y. C. Sud, and A. Dalcher, 1986: A simple biosphere model (SiB) for use within general circulation models. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 505–531.

  • Shukla, J., D. Straus, D. A. Randall, Y. Sud, and L. Marx, 1982: Winter and summer simulations with the GLAS climate model. NASA Tech. Memo. 83866, 282 pp. [Available from NASA, Washington, DC 20546-0001.].

  • Shuttleworth, W. J., 1988: Evaporation from Amazonian rainforest. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B,233, 321–346.

  • Smith, R. N. B., 1993: Subsurface, surface and boundary layer processes. U.K. Meteorological Office Unified Model Documentation Paper 24, 118 pp. [Available from NWP Division, Meteorological Office, London Rd., Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 2SZ, United Kingdom.].

  • Sud, Y. C., J. Shukla, and Y. Mintz, 1988: Influence of land surface roughness on atmospheric circulation and rainfall: A sensitivity study with a general circulation model. J. Appl. Meteor.,27, 1036–1054.

  • Tomasella, J., and M. G. Hodnett, 1996: Soil hydraulic properties and Van Genuchten parameters for an oxisol under pasture in central Amazonia. Amazonian Deforestation and Climate, J. H. C. Gash, C. A. Nobre, J. M. Roberts, and R. L. Victoria, Eds., John Wiley and Sons, 101–124.

  • Uhl, C., R. Buschbacher, and E. A. S. Serrao, 1988: Abandoned pastures in eastern Amazonia: 1. Patterns of succession. J. Ecol.,76, 663–681.

  • Warrilow, D. A., A. B. Sangster, and A. Slingo, 1986: Modelling of land surface processes and their influence on European climate. U.K. Meteorological Office Met O 20 Dynamical Climatology Tech. Note DCTN 38, 92 pp. [Available from Hadley Centre, Meteorological Office, London Rd., Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 2SZ, United Kingdom.].

  • Wright, I. R., J. H. C. Gash, H. R. Da Rocha, W. J. Shuttleworth, C. A. Nobre, G. T. Maitelli, C. A. G. P. Zamparoni, and P. R. A. Carvalho, 1992: Dry season micrometeorology of central Amazonian ranchland. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,118, 1083–1099.

  • ——, A. O. Manzi, and H. R. da Rocha, 1995: Surface conductance of Amazonian pasture: Model application and calibration for canopy climate. Agric. For. Meteor.,75, 51–70.

  • ——, C. A. Nobre, J. Tomasella, H. R. Da Rocha, J. M. Roberts, E. Vertamatti, A. D. Culf, R. C. Alvala, M. G. Hodnett, and V. Ubarana, 1996: Towards a GCM surface parametrization for Amazonia. Amazonian Deforestation and Climate, J. H. C. Gash, C. A. Nobre, J. M. Roberts, and R. L. Victoria, Eds., John Wiley and Sons, 473–504.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 348 154 6
PDF Downloads 96 34 2
Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Understanding the Sensitivity of a GCM Simulation of Amazonian Deforestation to the Specification of Vegetation and Soil Characteristics

J. Lean1 and P. R. Rowntree1
View More View Less
  • 1 Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Meteorological Office, Bracknell, United Kingdom
Print Publication:
01 Jun 1997
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<1216:UTSOAG>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1216–1235
Restricted access

Abstract

The experiment reported on here presents a realistic portrayal of Amazonian deforestation that uses measurements of vegetation characteristics, taken as part of the Anglo–Brazilian Amazonian Climate Observation Study field campaigns, to define the forest and replacement pasture vegetation in the Hadley Centre GCM. The duration of the main experiment (10 yr) leads to greater confidence in assessing regional changes than in previous shorter experiments.

Complete removal of the Amazonian forest produced area-mean changes that resemble earlier experiments with decreases in evaporation of 0.76 mm day−1 (18%) and rainfall of 0.27 mm day−1 (4%) and a rise in surface temperature of 2.3°C. However, the relative changes in magnitude indicate that increased moisture convergence partly compensates for the reduced evaporation, in contrast to many previous deforestation experiments. Results also showed large regional variations in the change in annual mean rainfall over South America, with widespread decreases over most of the deforested area and increases near the Andes.

A better understanding of the mechanisms responsible for the final deforested climate has been gained by carrying out additional experiments that examine the response to separate changes in roughness and albedo. Increased albedo resulted in widespread significant decreases in rainfall due to less moisture convergence and ascent. The response to reduced roughness is more complex but of comparable importance; in this experiment it was dominated by an increase in low-level wind speeds resulting in decreased moisture convergence and rainfall near the upwind edge of the area and the opposite near the downwind boundary where the increased flow meets the Andes.

In the standard deforestation scenario all vegetation parameters were modified together with one soil parameter—the maximum infiltration rate, which is reduced to represent the observed compaction of soil following deforestation. Results from a further experiment, in which the maximum infiltration rate was left unchanged, showed much smaller reductions in evaporation of 0.3 mm day−1 (7%) and indicated that the predicted regional changes in rainfall and evaporation were very sensitive to this parameter.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Peter R. Rowntree, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Meteorological Office, Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 2SZ, United Kingdom.

Email: prrowntree@meto.gov.uk

Abstract

The experiment reported on here presents a realistic portrayal of Amazonian deforestation that uses measurements of vegetation characteristics, taken as part of the Anglo–Brazilian Amazonian Climate Observation Study field campaigns, to define the forest and replacement pasture vegetation in the Hadley Centre GCM. The duration of the main experiment (10 yr) leads to greater confidence in assessing regional changes than in previous shorter experiments.

Complete removal of the Amazonian forest produced area-mean changes that resemble earlier experiments with decreases in evaporation of 0.76 mm day−1 (18%) and rainfall of 0.27 mm day−1 (4%) and a rise in surface temperature of 2.3°C. However, the relative changes in magnitude indicate that increased moisture convergence partly compensates for the reduced evaporation, in contrast to many previous deforestation experiments. Results also showed large regional variations in the change in annual mean rainfall over South America, with widespread decreases over most of the deforested area and increases near the Andes.

A better understanding of the mechanisms responsible for the final deforested climate has been gained by carrying out additional experiments that examine the response to separate changes in roughness and albedo. Increased albedo resulted in widespread significant decreases in rainfall due to less moisture convergence and ascent. The response to reduced roughness is more complex but of comparable importance; in this experiment it was dominated by an increase in low-level wind speeds resulting in decreased moisture convergence and rainfall near the upwind edge of the area and the opposite near the downwind boundary where the increased flow meets the Andes.

In the standard deforestation scenario all vegetation parameters were modified together with one soil parameter—the maximum infiltration rate, which is reduced to represent the observed compaction of soil following deforestation. Results from a further experiment, in which the maximum infiltration rate was left unchanged, showed much smaller reductions in evaporation of 0.3 mm day−1 (7%) and indicated that the predicted regional changes in rainfall and evaporation were very sensitive to this parameter.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Peter R. Rowntree, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research, Meteorological Office, Bracknell, Berkshire RG12 2SZ, United Kingdom.

Email: prrowntree@meto.gov.uk

Save