Predictability of a Stochastically Forced Hybrid Coupled Model of El Niño

Christian Eckert Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany

Search for other papers by Christian Eckert in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Mojib Latif Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany

Search for other papers by Mojib Latif in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phenomenon is modeled as a stochastically driven dynamical system. This was accomplished by adding to a Hybrid Coupled Model (HCM) of the tropical Pacific ocean–atmosphere system a stochastic wind stress anomaly field that was derived from observations. The model exhibits irregular interannual fluctuations, whose space–time characteristics resemble those of the observed interannual climate variability in this region. To investigate the predictability of the model, the authors performed ensemble integrations with different realizations of the stochastic wind stress forcing. The ensembles were initialized at various phases of the model’s ENSO cycle simulated in a 120-yr integration with a particular noise realization. The numerical experiments indicate that the ENSO predictability is severely limited by the stochastic wind stress forcing. Linear stochastic processes were fitted to the restart ensembles in a reduced state space. A predictability measure based on a comparison of the stationary and the time-dependent probability distributions of the fitted linear models reveals an ENSO predictability limit of considerably less than an average cycle length.

Corresponding author address: Christian Eckert, Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Bundesstraße 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.

Abstract

The El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) phenomenon is modeled as a stochastically driven dynamical system. This was accomplished by adding to a Hybrid Coupled Model (HCM) of the tropical Pacific ocean–atmosphere system a stochastic wind stress anomaly field that was derived from observations. The model exhibits irregular interannual fluctuations, whose space–time characteristics resemble those of the observed interannual climate variability in this region. To investigate the predictability of the model, the authors performed ensemble integrations with different realizations of the stochastic wind stress forcing. The ensembles were initialized at various phases of the model’s ENSO cycle simulated in a 120-yr integration with a particular noise realization. The numerical experiments indicate that the ENSO predictability is severely limited by the stochastic wind stress forcing. Linear stochastic processes were fitted to the restart ensembles in a reduced state space. A predictability measure based on a comparison of the stationary and the time-dependent probability distributions of the fitted linear models reveals an ENSO predictability limit of considerably less than an average cycle length.

Corresponding author address: Christian Eckert, Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Bundesstraße 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.

Save
  • Balmaseda, M. A., M. K. Davey, and D. L. T. Anderson, 1995: Decadal and seasonal dependence of ENSO prediction skill. J. Climate,8, 2705–2715.

  • Barnett, T. P., M. Latif, N. Graham, M. Flügel, S. Pazan, and W. White, 1993: ENSO and ENSO-related predictability. Part I: Prediction of equatorial Pacific sea surface temperature with a hybrid coupled ocean–atmosphere model. J. Climate,6, 1545–1566.

  • Barnston, A. G., and Coauthors, 1994: Long-lead seasonal forecasts—Where do we stand? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,75, 2097–2114.

  • Blanke, B., J. D. Neelin, and D. Gutzler, 1997: Estimating the effect of stochastic wind stress forcing on ENSO irregularity. J. Climate,10, 1473–1486.

  • Blumenthal, B., 1991: Predictability of a coupled ocean–atmosphere model. J. Climate,4, 766–784.

  • Cane, M. A., and E. S. Sarachik, 1981: The response of a linear baroclinic equatorial ocean to periodic forcing. J. Mar. Res.,39, 651–693.

  • Chang, P., B. Wang, T. Li, and L. Ji, 1994: Interactions between the seasonal cycle and the Southern Oscillation—Frequency entrainment and chaos in an intermediate coupled ocean–atmosphere model. Geophys. Res. Lett.,21, 2817–2820.

  • Chen, Y.-Q., D. S. Battisti, T. N. Palmer, J. Barsugli, and E. S. Sarachik, 1997: A study of the predictability of tropical Pacific SST in a coupled atmosphere/ocean model using singular vector analysis: The role of the annual cycle and the ENSO cycle. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 831–845.

  • Dettinger, M. D., M. Ghil, C. M. Strong, W. Weibel, and P. Liou, 1995: Software expedites singular spectrum analysis of noisy time series. Eos, Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 76 (2), 12–21.

  • Flügel, M., 1994: Untersuchungen zu Mechanismus and Vorhersagbarkeit von ENSO mit einem vereinfachten gekoppelten Ozean–Atmosphäre-Modell. Univ. Hamburg, 67 pp. [Available from Universität Hamburg, Fakultät für Geowissenschaften, Bundesstraße 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.].

  • Giering, R., 1995: The AMC manual. Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie Internal Rep., 21 pp. [Available from Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Bundesstraße 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.].

  • ——, and T. Kaminski, 1996: Recipes for adjoint code construction. Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie Rep. 212, 35 pp. [Available from Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Bundesstraße 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.].

  • Goldenberg, S., and J. O’Brien, 1981: Time and space variability of the tropical Pacific wind stress. Mon. Wea. Rev.,109, 1190–1207.

  • Goswami, B. N., and J. Shukla, 1991: Predictability of a coupled ocean–atmosphere model. J. Climate,4, 3–22.

  • Hasselmann, K., 1976: Stochastic climate models. Part I: Theory. Tellus,28, 289–305.

  • ——, 1988: PIPs and POPs: The reduction of complex dynamical systems using principal interaction and oscillation patterns. J. Geophys. Res.,93, 11 015–11 021.

  • Ji, M., A. Leetma, and J. Derber, 1995: An ocean analysis system for seasonal to interannual climate studies. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 460–481.

  • Jin, F.-F., D. Neelin, and M. Ghil, 1994: El Niño on the Devil’s staircase: Annual subharmonic steps to chaos. Science,246, 70–72.

  • Kendall, M., A. Stuart, and J. K. Ord, 1983: The Advanced Theory of Statistics. 4th ed. Vol. 3, Charles Griffin, 283 pp.

  • Kleeman, R., and S. B. Power, 1994: Limits to predictability in a coupled ocean–atmosphere model due to atmospheric noise. Tellus,46A, 529–540.

  • Latif, M., 1987: Tropical ocean circulation experiments. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,17, 246–263.

  • ——, T. P. Barnett, M. A. Cane, M. Flügel, N. E. Graham, H. von Storch, J.-S. Xu, and S. E. Zebiak, 1994: A review of ENSO prediction studies. Climate Dyn.,9, 167–179.

  • Moore, A., and R. Kleeman, 1996: The dynamics of error growth in a coupled model of ENSO. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,122, 1405–1446.

  • Neelin, J. D., M. Latif, and F.-F. Jin, 1994: Dynamics of coupled ocean–atmosphere models: The tropical problem. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.,26, 617–659.

  • Numerical Algorithms Group, 1991: NAG Fortran Library Manual Mark 15. [Available from NAG, Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford 0X2 8DR, United Kingdom.].

  • Parker, D. E., C. K. Folland, A. Bevan, M. N. Ward, M. Jackson, and K. Maskell, 1994: Marine surface data for analysis of climatic fluctuations on interannual to century time scales. Natural Climate Variability on Decade to Century Time Scales, D. G. Martinson, K. Bryan, M. Ghil, M. M. Hall, T. R. Karl, E. S. Sarachik, S. Soroostian, and L. F. Talley, Eds., National Academy Press, 241–250.

  • Reynolds, R. W., 1988: A real-time global sea surface temperature analysis. J. Climate,1, 75–86.

  • Schopf, P. S., and M. J. Suarez, 1988: Vacillations in a coupled ocean–atmosphere model. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 549–566.

  • Tziperman, E., L. Stone, M. A. Cane, and H. Jarosh, 1994: El Niño chaos: Overlapping of resonances between the seasonal cycle and the Pacific Ocean–atmosphere oscillator. Science,264, 72–74.

  • van Kampen, N. G., 1992: Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. North-Holland, 210 pp.

  • von Storch, H., G. Bürger, R. Schnur, and J.-S. von Storch, 1995: Principal oscillation patterns: A review. J. Climate,3, 377–400.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 346 104 9
PDF Downloads 111 43 8