A Further Study on Estimating Surface Evaporation Using Monthly Mean Data: Comparison of Bulk Formulations

Guang Jun Zhang Center for Clouds, Chemistry and Climate, and Center for Atmospheric Sciences, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by Guang Jun Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This study further examines the errors in estimating surface evaporation using monthly mean surface atmospheric variables from the moored buoys in the equatorial Pacific. Results from two significantly different bulk aerodynamic formulas are compared. It is shown that for both formulas the errors are within 2–3 W m−2 on average, representing a relative error of less than 3% in the equatorial Pacific. Although small, this error varies systematically across the equatorial Pacific and depends on the bulk formula used. It is also demonstrated that the individual nonlinear contributions associated with the strong dependence of exchange coefficient on surface wind to monthly mean surface evaporation are significant. However, they largely cancel each other, leaving small net effect.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Guang Jun Zhang, California Space Institute, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0221.

Abstract

This study further examines the errors in estimating surface evaporation using monthly mean surface atmospheric variables from the moored buoys in the equatorial Pacific. Results from two significantly different bulk aerodynamic formulas are compared. It is shown that for both formulas the errors are within 2–3 W m−2 on average, representing a relative error of less than 3% in the equatorial Pacific. Although small, this error varies systematically across the equatorial Pacific and depends on the bulk formula used. It is also demonstrated that the individual nonlinear contributions associated with the strong dependence of exchange coefficient on surface wind to monthly mean surface evaporation are significant. However, they largely cancel each other, leaving small net effect.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Guang Jun Zhang, California Space Institute, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0221.

Save
  • Esbensen, S. K., and R. W. Reynolds, 1981: Estimating monthly averaged air-sea transfers of heat and momentum using the bulk aerodynamic method. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,11, 457–465.

  • Fairall, C. W., E. F. Bradley, D. P. Rogers, J. B. Edson, and G. S. Young, 1996: Bulk parameterization of air-sea fluxes for Tropical Ocean-Global Atmosphere Coupled-Ocean Atmosphere Response Experiment. J. Geophys. Res.,101, 3747–3764.

  • Geernaert, G. L., 1987: On the importance of the drag coefficient in air–sea interactions. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans,11, 19–38.

  • Hanawa, K., and Y. Toba, 1987: Critical examination of estimation methods of long-term air–sea heat and momentum transfers. Ocean–Air Interactions,1, 79–93.

  • Liu, W. T., 1988: Moisture and latent heat flux variabilities in the tropical Pacific derived from satellite data. J. Geophys. Res.,93, 6749–6760.

  • ——, K. B. Katsaros, and J. A. Bussinger, 1979: Bulk parameterization of air–sea exchanges of heat and water vapor including the molecular constraints at the interface. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 1722–1735.

  • Price, J. F., R. A. Weller, and R. Pinkel, 1986: Diurnal cycling: Observations and models of the upper ocean response to diurnal heating, cooling and wind mixing. J. Geophys. Res.,91, 8411–8427.

  • Simmonds, I., and M. Dix, 1989: The use of mean atmospheric parameters in the calculation of modeled mean surface heat fluxes over the world’s oceans. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,19, 205–215.

  • Zhang, G. J., 1995: Use of monthly mean data to compute surface turbulent fluxes in the tropical Pacific. J. Climate,8, 3084–3090.

  • ——, and M. J. McPhaden, 1995: The relationship between sea surface temperature and latent heat flux in the equatorial Pacific. J. Climate,8, 589–605.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1614 1227 12
PDF Downloads 261 74 10