Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Biases in Shortwave Column Absorption in the Presence of Fractal Clouds

Alexander Marshak Climate and Radiation Branch, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Search for other papers by Alexander Marshak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Anthony Davis Climate and Radiation Branch, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Search for other papers by Anthony Davis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Warren Wiscombe Climate and Radiation Branch, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Search for other papers by Warren Wiscombe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
William Ridgway Climate and Radiation Branch, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Search for other papers by William Ridgway in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Robert Cahalan Climate and Radiation Branch, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Search for other papers by Robert Cahalan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Mar 1998
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<0431:BISCAI>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
431–446
Restricted access

Abstract

In this paper, the effect of cloud structure on column absorption by water vapor is investigated. Radiative fluxes above and below horizontally inhomogeneous liquid water clouds are computed using an efficient Monte Carlo technique, the independent pixel approximation, and plane-parallel theory. Cloud inhomogeneity is simulated by two related fractal models that use bounded cascades for the horizontal distribution of optical depth. The first (“clumpy”) model has constant cloud top and base, hence a constant geometrical thickness but varying extinction; the second (“bumpy”) model has constant extinction and cloud base, hence variable cloud-top and geometrical thickness. The spectral range between 0.9 and 1.0 μm (with strong water vapor absorption and negligible cloud liquid water absorption) is selected for a detailed study, not only of domain-averaged quantities, but also radiation fields. Column-absorption fields are calculated as the difference between the two net fluxes above and below clouds. It is shown that 1) redistribution of cloud liquid water decreases column absorption, that is, plane-parallel absorption is larger than the independent pixel approximation one by 1%–3%; 2) 3D radiative effects enhance column absorption by about 0.6% for the clumpy model and 2% for the bumpy model, that is, Monte Carlo absorption is larger than independent pixel approximation absorption—this effect is most pronounced for the bumpy cloud model at solar zenith angle ≈45°; and 3) plane-parallel absorption is larger than 3D Monte Carlo absorption for high solar elevations and nearly equal to it for low solar elevations. Thus, for extended clouds of thickness 1–2 km or less, in an important water vapor absorption band (0.94 μm), the authors do not find a significant enhancement of cloud absorption due to horizontal inhomogeneity.

* Current affiliation: University of Maryland–Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland.

Current affiliation: Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.

# Current affiliation: Space Application Corporation, Vienna, Virginia.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Alexander Marshak, NASA/GSFC, Code 913, Greenbelt, MD 20771.

Email: marshak@climate.gsfc.nasa.gov

Abstract

In this paper, the effect of cloud structure on column absorption by water vapor is investigated. Radiative fluxes above and below horizontally inhomogeneous liquid water clouds are computed using an efficient Monte Carlo technique, the independent pixel approximation, and plane-parallel theory. Cloud inhomogeneity is simulated by two related fractal models that use bounded cascades for the horizontal distribution of optical depth. The first (“clumpy”) model has constant cloud top and base, hence a constant geometrical thickness but varying extinction; the second (“bumpy”) model has constant extinction and cloud base, hence variable cloud-top and geometrical thickness. The spectral range between 0.9 and 1.0 μm (with strong water vapor absorption and negligible cloud liquid water absorption) is selected for a detailed study, not only of domain-averaged quantities, but also radiation fields. Column-absorption fields are calculated as the difference between the two net fluxes above and below clouds. It is shown that 1) redistribution of cloud liquid water decreases column absorption, that is, plane-parallel absorption is larger than the independent pixel approximation one by 1%–3%; 2) 3D radiative effects enhance column absorption by about 0.6% for the clumpy model and 2% for the bumpy model, that is, Monte Carlo absorption is larger than independent pixel approximation absorption—this effect is most pronounced for the bumpy cloud model at solar zenith angle ≈45°; and 3) plane-parallel absorption is larger than 3D Monte Carlo absorption for high solar elevations and nearly equal to it for low solar elevations. Thus, for extended clouds of thickness 1–2 km or less, in an important water vapor absorption band (0.94 μm), the authors do not find a significant enhancement of cloud absorption due to horizontal inhomogeneity.

* Current affiliation: University of Maryland–Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland.

Current affiliation: Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico.

# Current affiliation: Space Application Corporation, Vienna, Virginia.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Alexander Marshak, NASA/GSFC, Code 913, Greenbelt, MD 20771.

Email: marshak@climate.gsfc.nasa.gov

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Ackerman, S. A., and S. K. Cox, 1981: Aircraft observations of the shortwave fractional absorptance of non-homogeneous clouds. J. Appl. Meteor.,20, 1510–1515.

  • Arking, A., 1996: Absorption of solar energy in the atmosphere: Discrepancy between model and observations. Science,273, 779–782.

  • Barker, H., 1995: A spectral analysis of albedo and bidirectional reflectances for inhomogeneous clouds. Remote Sens. Environ.,54, 113–120.

  • ——, 1996: A parameterization for computing grid-averaged solar fluxes for inhomogeneous marine boundary layer clouds. Part I:Methodology and homogeneous biases. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 2289–2303.

  • ——, and J. A. Davies, 1992: Cumulus cloud radiative properties and the characteristics of satellite radiance wavenumber spectra. Remote Sens. Environ.,42, 51–64.

  • Byrne, R. N., R. C. Somerville, and B. Subasilar, 1996: Broken-cloud enhancement of solar radiation absorption, J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 878–886.

  • Cahalan, R. F., 1994: Bounded cascade clouds: Albedo and effective thickness. Nonlinear Processes Geophys.,1, 156–167.

  • ——, and J. B. Snider, 1989: Marine stratocumulus structure during FIRE. Remote Sens. Environ.,28, 95–107.

  • ——, W. Ridgway, W. J. Wiscombe, T. L. Bell, and J. B. Snider, 1994: The albedo of fractal stratocumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 2434–2455.

  • ——, D. Silberstein, and J. B. Snider, 1995: Liquid water path and plane-parallel albedo bias during ASTEX. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 3002–3012.

  • Cess, R. D., and Coauthors, 1995: Absorption of solar radiation by clouds: Observations versus models. Science,267, 496–499.

  • ——, M. H. Zhang, Y. Zhou, X. Jing, and V. Dvortsov, 1996: Absorption of solar radiation by clouds: Interpretations of satellite, surface, and aircraft measurements. J. Geophys. Res.,101, 23299–23309.

  • Chandrasekhar, S., 1950: Radiative Transfer. Oxford University Press, Reprint, Dover, 1960, 393 pp.

  • Chou, M.-D., A. Arking, J. Otterman, and W. Ridgway, 1995: The effect of clouds on atmospheric absorption of solar radiation. Geophys. Res. Lett.,22, 1885–1888.

  • Crisp, D., 1997: Absorption of sunlight by water wapor in cloudy conditions: A partial explanation for the cloud absorption anomaly. Geophys. Res. Lett.,24, 571–574.

  • Davis, A., S. Lovejoy, and D. Schertzer, 1991: Discrete angle radiative transfer in a multifractal medium. S.P.I.E. Proceedings, V. V. Varadan, Ed., 37–59.

  • ——, A. Marshak, W. Wiscombe, and R. Cahalan, 1994: Multifractal characterizations of non-stationarity and intermittency in geophysical fields, observed, retrieved or simulated. J. Geophys. Res.,99, 8055–8072.

  • ——, ——, ——, and ——, 1996: Multifractal characterizations of intermittency in nonstationary geophysical signals and fields. A model-based perspective on ergodicity issues illustrated with cloud data. Current Topics in Nonstationary Analysis, G. Trevino, J. Hardin, B. Douglas, and E. Andreas, Eds., World-Scientific, 97–158.

  • ——, ——, W. J. Wiscombe, and R. F. Cahalan, 1997: Evidence for net horizontal radiative fluxes in marine stratocumulus. IRS’96:Current Problems in Atmospheric Radiation, W. L. Smith and K. Stamnes, Eds., Deepak, 809–812.

  • Ellingson, R. G., J. Ellis, and S. Fels, 1991: The intercomparison of radiation codes used in climate models: Long wave results. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 8929–8953.

  • Fouquart, Y., J. C. Buriez, and M. Herman, 1990: The influence of clouds on radiation: A climate-modeling perspective. Rev. Geophys.,28, 145–166.

  • ——, B. Bonnel, and V. Ramaswamy, 1991: Intercomparing shortwave radiation codes for climate studies. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 8955–8968.

  • Harshvardhan, W. Ridgway, V. Ramaswamy, S. M. Freidenreich, and M. Batley, 1996: Solar absorption in cloudy atmosphere. Preprints, Seventh Symp. on Global Change Studies, Atlanta, GA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 127–134.

  • Hayasaka, T., N. Kikushi, and M. Tanaka, 1995: Absorption of solar radiation by stratocumulus clouds: Aircraft measurements and theoretical calculations. J. Appl. Meteor.,34, 1047–1055.

  • Hermann, G., and R. Goody, 1976: Formation and persistence of summertime Arctic stratus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,33, 1537–1553.

  • King, M. D., L. F. Radke, and P. V. Hobbs, 1990: Determination of the spectral absorption of solar radiation by marine stratocumulus clouds from airborne measurements within clouds. J. Atmos Sci.,47, 894–907.

  • Lacis, A. A., and V. Oinas, 1991: A description of the correlated k-distribution method for modeling nongray gaseous absorption,thermal emission, and multiple scattering in vertically inhomogeneous atmospheres. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 9027–9063.

  • Li, Z.-Q., L. Moreau, and A. Arking, 1997: On solar energy disposition: A perspective from observation and modeling. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,78, 53–70.

  • Marchuk, G., G. Mikhailov, M. Nazaraliev, R. Darbinjan, B. Kargin, and B. Elepov, 1980: The Monte Carlo Methods in Atmospheric Optics. Springer-Verlag, 208 pp.

  • Marshak, A., A. Davis, R. Cahalan, and W. Wiscombe, 1994: Bounded cascade models as non-stationary multifractals. Phys. Rev. E.,49, 55–69.

  • ——, ——, and W. Wiscombe, 1995: Radiation smoothing in fractal clouds. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 26247–26261.

  • ——, ——, W. J. Wiscombe, and R. F. Cahalan, 1997a: The effect of horizontal fluxes on cloud absorption estimates based on simulated two-aircraft measurements of fractal clouds. IRS’96: Current Problems in Atmospheric Radiation, W. L. Smith and K. Stamnes, Eds., Deepak, 415–418.

  • ——, ——, ——, and ——, 1997b: Inhomogeneity effects on cloud shortwave absorption measurements: Two-aircraft simulations. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 16619–16637.

  • O’Hirok, W., and C. Gautier, 1998: A three-dimensional radiative transfer model to investigate solar radiation within cloudy atmosphere. Part I: Spatial effects. J. Atmos. Sci., in press.

  • Pilewskie, P., and F. P. Valero, 1995: Direct observations of excess solar absorption by clouds. Science,267, 1626–1629.

  • Pólya, G., and G. Szegö, 1964: Aufgaben und Lehrsätze aus der Analysis. Vol. 2. Springer-Verlag, 391 pp.

  • Ramanathan, V., B. Subasilar, G. J. Zhang, W. Conant, R. D. Cess, J. T. Kiehl, G. Grassl, and L. Shi, 1995: Warm pool heat budget and short-wave cloud forcing: A missing physics? Science,267, 499–503.

  • Ramaswamy, V., and S. M. Friedenreich, 1991: Solar radiative line-by-line determination of water vapor absorption and water extinction in inhomogeneous atmospheres. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 9133–9157.

  • Reynolds, D. W., T. H. Vonder Haar, and S. K. Cox, 1975: The effect of solar radiation absorption in the tropical atmosphere. J. Appl. Meteor.,14, 433–444.

  • Stephens, G. L., 1978a: Radiation profile in extended water clouds. I: Theory. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 2111–2122.

  • ——, 1978b: Radiation profile in extended water clouds. II: Parameterization schemes. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 2123–2132.

  • ——, 1988: Radiative transfer through arbitrarily shaped media. Part II: Group theory and closures. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 1837–1848.

  • ——, and S.-C. Tsay, 1990: On the cloud absorption anomaly. Quart J. Roy Meteor. Soc.,116, 671–704.

  • Tiedke, M., 1996: An extension of cloud-radiation parameterization in the ECMWF model: The representation of subgrid-scale variations in optical depth. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 745–750.

  • Titov, G. A., 1998: Radiative horizontal transport and absorption by stratocumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., in press.

  • van de Hulst, H. C., 1980: Multiple Light Scattering (Tables, Formulas, and Applications). Vol. 2. Academic Press, 739 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 215 38 2
PDF Downloads 83 30 1