Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Polar Radiation Budgets of the NCAR CCM3

Bruce P. Briegleb National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Bruce P. Briegleb in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
David H. Bromwich Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

Search for other papers by David H. Bromwich in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jun 1998
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<1246:PRBOTN>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1246–1269
Restricted access

Abstract

Present-day Arctic and Antarctic radiation budgets of the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model version 3 (CCM3) are presented. The CCM3 simulation is from a prescribed and interannually varying sea surface temperature integration from January 1979 through August 1993. Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) data from 1985 through 1989 are used for validation of top-of-atmosphere (TOA) absorbed shortwave radiation (ASR) and outgoing longwave radiation (OLR). Summer ASR in both polar regions is less than the observations by about 20 W m−2. While the annual mean OLR in both polar regions is only 2–3 W m−2 less than the ERBE data, the seasonal amplitude in OLR of 40 W m−2 is smaller than the observed of 55–60 W m−2. The annual polar TOA radiation balance is smaller than observations by 5–10 W m−2. Compared to selected model and observational surface data, downward shortwave (SW) is too small by 50–70 W m−2 and downward longwave (LW) too large by 10–30 W m−2. Surface downward LW in clear atmospheres is too small by 10–20 W m−2. The absence of sea-ice melt ponds results in 10–20 W m−2 too much SW absorption during early summer and from 20 to 40 W m−2 too little during late summer. Summer cloud covers are reasonably well simulated, but winter low cloud cover is too high by 0.5–0.7 compared to surface cloud observations. Comparison with limited satellite and in situ observations indicates cloud water path (CWP) is too high by about a factor of 2. While cloud particle sizes are approximately in the range of observed values, regional variation between maritime and continental droplet sizes is too strong over coastlines. Despite several improvements in CCM3 radiation physics, the accuracy of polar TOA annual radiation balance is degraded against the ERBE data compared to CCM2. Improvement in CCM3 polar radiation budgets will require improved simulation of CWP, clear sky LW, and sea ice albedo.

Corresponding author address: Bruce P. Briegleb, NCAR/CGD, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000.

Abstract

Present-day Arctic and Antarctic radiation budgets of the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model version 3 (CCM3) are presented. The CCM3 simulation is from a prescribed and interannually varying sea surface temperature integration from January 1979 through August 1993. Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) data from 1985 through 1989 are used for validation of top-of-atmosphere (TOA) absorbed shortwave radiation (ASR) and outgoing longwave radiation (OLR). Summer ASR in both polar regions is less than the observations by about 20 W m−2. While the annual mean OLR in both polar regions is only 2–3 W m−2 less than the ERBE data, the seasonal amplitude in OLR of 40 W m−2 is smaller than the observed of 55–60 W m−2. The annual polar TOA radiation balance is smaller than observations by 5–10 W m−2. Compared to selected model and observational surface data, downward shortwave (SW) is too small by 50–70 W m−2 and downward longwave (LW) too large by 10–30 W m−2. Surface downward LW in clear atmospheres is too small by 10–20 W m−2. The absence of sea-ice melt ponds results in 10–20 W m−2 too much SW absorption during early summer and from 20 to 40 W m−2 too little during late summer. Summer cloud covers are reasonably well simulated, but winter low cloud cover is too high by 0.5–0.7 compared to surface cloud observations. Comparison with limited satellite and in situ observations indicates cloud water path (CWP) is too high by about a factor of 2. While cloud particle sizes are approximately in the range of observed values, regional variation between maritime and continental droplet sizes is too strong over coastlines. Despite several improvements in CCM3 radiation physics, the accuracy of polar TOA annual radiation balance is degraded against the ERBE data compared to CCM2. Improvement in CCM3 polar radiation budgets will require improved simulation of CWP, clear sky LW, and sea ice albedo.

Corresponding author address: Bruce P. Briegleb, NCAR/CGD, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000.

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Barkstrom, B. R., and G. L. Smith, 1986: The earth radiation budget experiment: Science and implementation. Rev. Geophys.,24, 379–390.

  • Battisti, D. S., D. L. Williamson, and R. E. Moritz, 1992: Simulation of the Arctic climatology with the NCAR CCM2. Preprints, Third Conf. on Polar Meteorology and Oceanography, Portland, OR, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 130–136.

  • Bettge, T. W., J. W. Weatherly, W. M. Washington, D. Pollard, B. P. Briegleb, and W. G. Strand Jr., 1996: The NCAR CSM Sea Ice Model. NCAR/TN-425+STR, 25 pp. [Available from NCAR, Boulder, CO 80307.].

  • Bonan, G. B., 1996: A land surface model (LSM version 1.0) for ecological, hydrological, and atmospheric studies: Technical description of user’s guide. NCAR/TN-417+STR, 150 pp. [Available from NCAR, Boulder, CO 80307.].

  • Boville, B. A., and P. R. Gent, 1998: The NCAR Climate System Model, version one. J. Climate,11, 1115–1130.

  • Briegleb, B. P., 1992: Longwave band model for thermal radiation in climate studies. J. Geophys. Res.,97, 11 475–11 485.

  • ——, and D. H. Bromwich, 1998: Polar climate simulation of the NCAR CCM3. J. Climate,11, 1270–1286.

  • Bromwich, D. H., R.-Y. Tzeng, and T. R. Parish, 1994: Simulation of the modern Arctic climate by the NCAR CCM1. J. Climate,7, 1050–1069.

  • ——, B. Chen, and R.-Y. Tzeng, 1995: Arctic and Antarctic precipitation simulations produced by the NCAR community climate models. Ann. Glaciol.,21, 117–122.

  • Curry, J. A., and E. E. Ebert, 1992: Annual cycle of radiation fluxes over the Arctic Ocean: Sensitivity to cloud optical properties. J. Climate,5, 1267–1280.

  • ——, W. B. Rossow, D. Randall, and J. L. Schramm, 1996: Overview of Arctic cloud and radiation characteristics. J. Climate,9, 1731–1764.

  • Dutton, E. G., R. S. Stone, and J. L. Deluisi, 1989: South Pole surface radiation balance measurements April 1986 to February 1988. NOAA Data Rep. ERL ARL-17, 49 pp.

  • Gates, W. L., 1992: AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,73, 1962–1970.

  • Gloerson, P., W. J. Campbell, D. J. Cavalieri, J. C. Comiso, C. L. Parkinson, and H. J. Zwally, 1992: Arctic and Antarctic Sea Ice, 1978–1987: Satellite Passive-Microwave Observations and Analysis. NASA, 290 pp.

  • Hack, J. J., B. A. Boville, J. T. Kiehl, P. J. Rasch, and D. L. Williamson, 1994: Climate statistics from the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model CCM2. J. Geophys. Res.,99, 20 785–20 813.

  • ——, J. T. Kiehl, and J. W. Hurrell, 1998: The hydrologic and thermodynamic characteristics of the NCAR CCM3. J. Climate,11, 1179–1206.

  • Hahn, C. J., S. G. Warren, J. London, R. L. Jenne, and R. M. Chervin, 1987: Climatological data for clouds over the globe from surface observations. Rep. NDP-026, 57 pp. [Available from Carbon Dioxide Information Center, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6050.].

  • ——, ——, and ——, 1995: The effect of moonlight on observation of cloud cover at night, and application to cloud climatology. J. Climate,8, 1429–1446.

  • Harrison, E. F., P. Minnis, B. R. Barkstrom, V. Ramanathan, R. D. Cess, and G. G. Gibson, 1990: Seasonal variation of cloud radiative forcing derived from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment. J. Geophys. Res.,95, 18 687–18 703.

  • Herman, G. F., and J. A. Curry, 1984: Observational and theoretical studies of solar radiation in Arctic stratus clouds. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,23, 5–24.

  • Hurrell, J. W., J. J. Hack, B. A. Boville, D. L. Williamson, and J. T. Kiehl, 1998: The dynamical simulation of the NCAR Community Climate Model, version 3 (CCM3). J. Climate,11, 1207–1236.

  • Kiehl, J. T., J. J. Hack, and B. P. Briegleb, 1994: The simulated earth radiation budget of the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model CCM2 and comparisons with the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment. J. Geophys. Res.,99, 20 815–20 827.

  • ——, ——, M. H. Zhang, and R. D. Cess, 1995: Sensitivity of a GCM climate to enhanced shortwave cloud absorption. J. Climate,8, 2200–2212.

  • ——, ——, G. B. Bonan, B. A. Boville, B. P. Briegleb, D. L. Williamson, and P. J. Rasch, 1996: Description of the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM3). NCAR/TN-420+STR, 152 pp. [Available from NCAR, Boulder, CO 80307.].

  • ——, ——, ——, ——, D. L. Williamson, and P. J. Rasch, 1998a:The National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model: CCM3. J. Climate,11, 1131–1149.

  • ——, ——, and J. W. Hurrell, 1998b: The energy budget of the NCAR Community Climate Model: CCM3. J. Climate,11, 1151–1178.

  • Li, Z., and H. G. Leighton, 1991: Scene identification and its effect on cloud radiative forcing in the Arctic. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 9175–9188.

  • ——, and ——, 1993: Global climatologies of solar radiation budgets at the surface and in the atmosphere from 5 years of ERBE data. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 4919–4930.

  • ——, ——, K. Masuda, and T. Takashima, 1993a: Estimation of SW flux absorbed at the surface from TOA reflected flux. J. Climate,6, 317–330.

  • ——, ——, and R. D. Cess, 1993b: Surface net solar radiation estimated from satellite measurements: Comparisons with tower observations. J. Climate,6, 1764–1772.

  • Lubin, D., and D. A. Harper, 1996: Cloud radiative properties over the South Pole from AVHRR infrared data. J. Climate,9, 3405–3418.

  • ——, B. Chen, D. H. Bromwich, R. C. J. Somerville, W.-H. Lee, and K. M. Hines, 1998: The impact of Antarctic cloud radiative properties on a GCM climate simulation. J. Climate,11, 447–462.

  • Nemesure, S., R. D. Cess, E. G. Dutton, J. L. Deluisi, Z. Li, and H. G. Leighton, 1994: Impact of clouds on the shortwave radiation budget of the surface-atmosphere system for snow-covered surfaces. J. Climate,7, 579–585.

  • Pinto, J. O., J. A. Curry, and C. W. Fairall, 1997: Radiative characteristics of the Arctic atmosphere during spring as inferred from ground-based measurements. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 6941–6952.

  • Reynolds, R. W., and D. C. Marciso, 1993: An improved real-time global sea surface temperature analysis. J. Climate,6, 114–119.

  • Schweiger, A. J., and J. R. Key, 1994: Arctic ocean radiative fluxes and cloud forcing estimated from the ISCCP C2 cloud dataset, 1983–1990. J. Appl. Meteor.,33, 948–963.

  • Stone, R. S., 1993: Properties of austral winter clouds derived from radiometric profiles at the South Pole. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 12 961–12 971.

  • Tzeng, R.-Y., and D. H. Bromwich, 1994: NCAR CCM2 simulations of present-day Arctic climate. Preprints, Sixth Conf. on Climate Variations, Nashville, TN, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 197–201.

  • ——, ——, and T. R. Parish, 1993: Present-day Antarctic climatology of the NCAR Community Climate Model version 1. J. Climate,6, 205–226.

  • ——, ——, ——, and B. Chen, 1994: NCAR CCM2 simulation of the modern Antarctic climate. J. Geophys. Res.,99, 23 131–23 148.

  • Wild, M., A. Ohmura, H. Gilgen, and E. Roeckner, 1995: Validation of general circulation model radiative fluxes using surface observations. J. Climate,8, 1309–1324.

  • Williamson, D. L., D. H. Bromwich, and R.-Y. Tzeng, 1996: Further discussion on simulation of the modern Arctic climate by the NCAR CCM1. J. Climate,9, 1669–1672.

  • Yamanouchi, T., and T. P. Charlock, 1995: Comparison of radiation budget at the TOA and surface in the Antarctic from ERBE and ground surface measurements. J. Climate,8, 3109–3120.

  • Zender, C. S., B. Bush, S. K. Pope, A. Bucholtz, W. D. Collins, J. T. Kiehl, F. P. J. Valero, and J. Vitko Jr., 1997: Atmospheric absorption during the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Enhanced Shortwave Experiment (ARESE). J. Geophys. Res.,102, 29901–29915.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 488 279 70
PDF Downloads 89 17 1