Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Sea Ice and Polar Climate in the NCAR CSM

John W. Weatherly Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by John W. Weatherly in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Bruce P. Briegleb Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Bruce P. Briegleb in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
William G. Large Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by William G. Large in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
James A. Maslanik Division of Cryospheric and Polar Processes, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by James A. Maslanik in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jun 1998
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<1472:SIAPCI>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1472–1486
Restricted access

Abstract

The Climate System Model (CSM) consists of atmosphere, ocean, land, and sea-ice components linked by a flux coupler, which computes fluxes of energy and momentum between components. The sea-ice component consists of a thermodynamic formulation for ice, snow, and leads within the ice pack, and ice dynamics using the cavitating-fluid ice rheology, which allows for the compressive strength of ice but ignores shear viscosity.

The results of a 300-yr climate simulation are presented, with the focus on sea ice and the atmospheric forcing over sea ice in the polar regions. The atmospheric model results are compared to analyses from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts and other observational sources. The sea-ice concentrations and velocities are compared to satellite observational data.

The atmospheric sea level pressure (SLP) in CSM exhibits a high in the central Arctic displaced poleward from the observed Beaufort high. The Southern Hemisphere SLP over sea ice is generally 5 mb lower than observed. Air temperatures over sea ice in both hemispheres exhibit cold biases of 2–4 K. The precipitation-minus-evaporation fields in both hemispheres are greatly improved over those from earlier versions of the atmospheric GCM.

The simulated ice-covered area is close to observations in the Southern Hemisphere but too large in the Northern Hemisphere. The ice concentration fields show that the ice cover is too extensive in the North Pacific and subarctic North Atlantic Oceans. The interannual variability of the ice area is similar to observations in both hemispheres. The ice thickness pattern in the Antarctic is realistic but generally too thin away from the continent. The maximum thickness in the Arctic occurs against the Bering Strait, not against the Canadian Archipelago as observed. The ice velocities are stronger than observed in both hemispheres, with a consistently greater turning angle (to the left) in the Southern Hemisphere. They produce a northward ice transport in the Southern Hemisphere that is 3–4 times the satellite-derived value. Sensitivity tests with the sea-ice component show that both the pattern of wind forcing in CSM and the air-ice drag parameter used contribute to the biases in thickness, drift speeds, and transport. Plans for further development of the ice model to incorporate a viscous-plastic ice rheology are presented.

In spite of the biases of the sea-ice simulation, the 300-yr climate simulation exhibits only a small degree of drift in the surface climate without the use of flux adjustment. This suggests a robust stability in the simulated climate in the presence of significant variability.

Corresponding author address: John W. Weatherly, National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000.

Abstract

The Climate System Model (CSM) consists of atmosphere, ocean, land, and sea-ice components linked by a flux coupler, which computes fluxes of energy and momentum between components. The sea-ice component consists of a thermodynamic formulation for ice, snow, and leads within the ice pack, and ice dynamics using the cavitating-fluid ice rheology, which allows for the compressive strength of ice but ignores shear viscosity.

The results of a 300-yr climate simulation are presented, with the focus on sea ice and the atmospheric forcing over sea ice in the polar regions. The atmospheric model results are compared to analyses from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts and other observational sources. The sea-ice concentrations and velocities are compared to satellite observational data.

The atmospheric sea level pressure (SLP) in CSM exhibits a high in the central Arctic displaced poleward from the observed Beaufort high. The Southern Hemisphere SLP over sea ice is generally 5 mb lower than observed. Air temperatures over sea ice in both hemispheres exhibit cold biases of 2–4 K. The precipitation-minus-evaporation fields in both hemispheres are greatly improved over those from earlier versions of the atmospheric GCM.

The simulated ice-covered area is close to observations in the Southern Hemisphere but too large in the Northern Hemisphere. The ice concentration fields show that the ice cover is too extensive in the North Pacific and subarctic North Atlantic Oceans. The interannual variability of the ice area is similar to observations in both hemispheres. The ice thickness pattern in the Antarctic is realistic but generally too thin away from the continent. The maximum thickness in the Arctic occurs against the Bering Strait, not against the Canadian Archipelago as observed. The ice velocities are stronger than observed in both hemispheres, with a consistently greater turning angle (to the left) in the Southern Hemisphere. They produce a northward ice transport in the Southern Hemisphere that is 3–4 times the satellite-derived value. Sensitivity tests with the sea-ice component show that both the pattern of wind forcing in CSM and the air-ice drag parameter used contribute to the biases in thickness, drift speeds, and transport. Plans for further development of the ice model to incorporate a viscous-plastic ice rheology are presented.

In spite of the biases of the sea-ice simulation, the 300-yr climate simulation exhibits only a small degree of drift in the surface climate without the use of flux adjustment. This suggests a robust stability in the simulated climate in the presence of significant variability.

Corresponding author address: John W. Weatherly, National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000.

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Aagaard, K., and E. C. Carmack, 1989: The role of sea ice and other fresh water in the arctic circulation. J. Geophys. Res.,94, 14 485–14 498.

  • Battisti, D. S., D. L. Williamson, and R. E. Moritz, 1992: Simulation of the Arctic climatology with the NCAR CCM2. Preprints, Third Conf. on Polar Meteorology and Oceanogrography, Portland, OR, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 130–136.

  • ——, C. M. Bitz, and R. E. Moritz, 1997: Do general circulation models underestimate the natural variability in the Arctic climate? J. Climate,10, 1909–1920.

  • Bettge, T. W., J. W. Weatherly, W. M. Washington, D. Pollard, B. P. Briegleb, and W. G. Strand, 1996: The NCAR CSM Sea Ice Model. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-425+STR, 25 pp. [Available from NCAR-CGD, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307.].

  • Bourke, R. H., and R. P. Garrett, 1987: Sea-ice thickness distribution in the Arctic Ocean. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol.,13, 259–280.

  • Boville, B., and P. Gent, 1998: The NCAR Climate System Model, version one. J. Climate,11, 1115–1130.

  • Briegleb, B. P., and D. L. Bromwich, 1998: Polar climate simulation of the NCAR CCM3. J. Climate,11, 1270–1286.

  • Bromwich, D. L., B. Chen, and R. Y. Tzeng, 1995: Arctic and Antarctic precipitation simulations produced by the NCAR community climate models. Ann. Glaciol.,21, 117–122.

  • Bryan, F. O., 1998: Climate drift in a multicentury integration of the NCAR Climate System Model. J. Climate,11, 1455–1471.

  • ——, B. G. Kauffman, W. G. Large, and P. R. Gent, 1996: The NCAR CSM flux coupler. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-425+STR, 48 pp. [Available from NCAR-CGD, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307.].

  • Budyko, M. I., 1977: Climatic Changes. Amer. Geophys. Union, 261 pp.

  • Chapman, W. L., W. L. Welch, K. P. Bowman, J. Sacks, and J. E. Walsh, 1994: Arctic sea-ice variability: Model sensitivities and a multidecadal simulation. J. Geophys. Res.,99, 919–935.

  • Colony, R., and A. S. Thorndike, 1984: An estimate of the mean field of arctic sea-ice motion. J. Geophys. Res.,89 (C6), 10 623–10 629.

  • Danabasoglu, G., 1998: On the wind-driven ocean circulation of the uncoupled and coupled NCAR Climate System Ocean Model. J. Climate,11, 1442–1454.

  • Doney, S. C., W. G. Large, and F. O. Bryan, 1998: Surface ocean fluxes and water-mass transformation rates in the coupled NCAR Climate System Model. J. Climate,11, 1420–1441.

  • Emery, W. J., C. W. Fowler, and J. A. Maslanik, 1998: Satellite-derived maps of Arctic and Antarctic sea-ice motion: 1988–1994. Geophys. Res. Lett.,24, 897–900.

  • Flato, G. M., and W. D. Hibler III, 1992: Modeling pack ice as a cavitating fluid. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,22, 626–651.

  • Gent, P. R., F. O. Bryan, G. Danabasoglu, S. C. Doney, W. R. Holland, W. G. Large, and J. C. McWilliams, 1998: The NCAR Climate System Model global ocean component. J. Climate,11, 1287–1306.

  • Harder, M., and P. Lemke, 1994: Modeling the extent of sea-ice ridging in the Weddell Sea. The Polar Oceans and Their Role in Shaping the Global Environment, Geophys. Monogr., No. 85, Amer. Geophys. Union, 187–197.

  • Harvey, L. D. D., 1988: Development of a sea-ice model for use in zonally-averaged energy balance climate models. J. Climate,1, 1221–1238.

  • Jones, P. D., S. C. B. Raper, R. S. Bradley, H. F. Diaz, P. M. Kelley, and M. L. Wigley, 1986: Northern Hemisphere surface air temperature variations, 1851–1984. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,25, 161–179.

  • Kiehl, J. T., J. J. Hack, G. B. Bonan, B. A. Boville, B. Briegleb, D. L. Williamson, and P. J. Rasch, 1996: Description of the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM3). NCAR/TN-420+STR, 152 pp. [Available from NCAR-CGD, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307.].

  • Lemke, P., W. D. Hibler III, G. Flato, M. Harder, and M Kreysher, 1998: On the improvement of sea ice models for climate simulations: The sea ice model intercomparison project. Ann Glaciol.,25, 183–187.

  • Manabe, S., and R. Stouffer, 1996: Low-frequency variability of surface air temperature in a 1000-year integration of a coupled atmosphere–ocean–land model. J. Climate,9, 376–393.

  • ——, ——, M. Spelman, and K. Bryan, 1991: Transient responses of a coupled ocean–atmosphere model to gradual changes of atmospheric CO2. J. Climate,4, 785–817.

  • Martin, S., and E. A. Munoz, 1997: Properties of the Arctic 2-m air temperature field for 1979 to the present derived from a new gridded dataset. J. Climate,10, 1428–1440.

  • McBean, G., 1986: The atmospheric boundary layer. The Geophysics of Sea Ice, N. Untersteiner, Ed., Plenum Press, 283–338.

  • NCAR Ocean Section, 1996: The NCAR CSM Ocean Model. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-423+STR., 88 pp. [Available from NCAR-CGD, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307.].

  • Pollard, D., and S. Thompson, 1994: Sea-ice dynamics and CO2 sensitivity in a global climate model. Atmos.–Ocean,32, 449–467.

  • Randall, D., J. and Coauthors, 1998: Status of and outlook for large-scale modeling of atmosphere–ice–ocean interactions in the Arctic. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,79, 197–219.

  • Rind, D., R. Healy, C. Parkinson, and D. Martinson, 1995: The role of sea ice in 2 × CO2 climate model sensitivity. Part I: the total influence of sea-ice thickness and extent. J. Climate,8, 449–463.

  • Semtner, A. J., 1976: A model for the thermodynamic growth of sea ice in numerical investigations of climate. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,6, 379–389.

  • Serreze, M. C., R. G. Barry, M. C. Rehder, and J. E. Walsh, 1995: Variability in atmospheric circulation and moisture flux over the Arctic. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London,352A, 215–225.

  • Trenberth, K. E., 1992: Global analyses from ECMWF. NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-373+STR., 191 pp. [Available from NCAR-CGD, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307.].

  • Tzeng, R. Y., and D. H. Bromwich, 1994: NCAR CCM simulation of present-day Arctic climate. Preprints, Sixth Conf. on Climate Variations, Nashville, TN, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 197–201.

  • Walsh, J. E., and R. G. Crane, 1992: A comparison of GCM simulations of Arctic climate. Geophys. Res. Lett.,19, 29–32.

  • Washington, W. M., and G. A. Meehl, 1996: High-latitude climate change in a global coupled ocean–atmosphere–sea-ice model with increasing atmospheric CO2. J. Geophys. Res.,101, 12 795–12 801.

  • Weatherly, J. W., and J. E. Walsh, 1996: The effects of precipitation and river runoff in a coupled ice-ocean model of the Arctic. Climate Dyn.,12, 785–798.

  • Zhang, J., and W. D. Hibler III, 1997: On an efficient numerical method for modeling sea-ice dynamics. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 8691–8702.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 378 100 11
PDF Downloads 128 28 5