Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Bacher, A., J. M. Oberhuber, and E. Roeckner, 1996: ENSO dynamics and seasonal cycle in the tropical Pacific as simulated by the ECHAM4/OPYC3 coupled general circulation model. Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Rep. No. 199, 29 pp. [Available from Max-Planck Institute for Meteorology, Bundesstrasse 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.].

  • Barnett, T. P., 1988: Variations in near-global sea level pressure: Another view. J. Climate,1, 225–230.

  • ——, 1991: The interaction of multiple time scales in the tropical climate system. J. Climate,4, 269–285.

  • ——, E. Kirk, M. Latif, and E. Roeckner, 1991: On ENSO physics. J. Climate,4, 487–515.

  • Horel, J. D., and J. M. Wallace, 1981: Planetary-scale atmospheric phenomena associated with the Southern Oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,109, 813–829.

  • Karoly, D. J., 1989: Southern Hemisphere circulation features associated with El Niño–Southern Oscillation events. J. Climate,2, 1239–1252.

  • Mo, K. C., and G. H. White, 1985: Teleconnections in the Southern Hemisphere. Mon. Wea. Rev.,113, 22–37.

  • Oberhuber, J. M., 1993a: Simulation of the Atlantic circulation with a coupled sea ice–mixed layer–isopycnal general circulation model. Part I: Model description. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,23, 808–829.

  • ——, 1993b: The OPYC ocean general circulation model. Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum GmbH Tech. Rep. 7, 130 pp. [Available from DKRZ, Bundesstrasse 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.].

  • Read, J. F., and R. T. Pollard, 1993: Structure and transport of the Antarctic Circumpolar current and Agulhas return current at 40°E. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 12 281–12 295.

  • Roeckner, E., J. M. Oberhuber, A. Bacher, M. Christoph, and I. Kirchner, 1996: ENSO variability and atmospheric response in a global coupled atmosphere–ocean GCM. Climate Dyn.,12, 737–754.

  • Weare, B. C., and J. S. Nasstrom, 1982: Examples of extended empirical orthogonal function analyses. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 481–485.

  • White, W. B., and R. G. Peterson, 1996: An Antarctic circumpolar wave in the surface pressure, wind, temperature and sea-ice extent. Nature,380, 699–702.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 219 48 5
PDF Downloads 54 22 1
Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

The Antarctic Circumpolar Wave in a Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere GCM

M. Christoph1, T. P. Barnett2, and E. Roeckner3
View More View Less
  • 1 Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
  • | 2 Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
  • | 3 Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Print Publication:
01 Jul 1998
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<1659:TACWIA>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1659–1672
Restricted access

Abstract

A phenomenon called the Antarctic Circumpolar Wave (ACW), suggested earlier from fragmentary observational evidence, has been simulated realistically in an extended integration of a Max Planck Institute coupled general circulation model. The ACW both in the observations and in the model constitutes a mode of the coupled ocean–atmosphere–sea-ice system that inhabits the high latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere. It is characterized by anomalies of such climate variables as sea surface temperature, sea level pressure, meridional wind, and sea ice that exhibit intricate and evolving spatial phase relations to each other.

The simulated ACW signal in the ocean propagates eastward over most of the high-latitude Southern Ocean, mainly advected along in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. On average, it completes a circuit entirely around the Southern Ocean but is strongly dissipated in the South Atlantic and in the southern Indian Ocean, just marginally maintaining statistical significance in these areas until it reaches the South Pacific where it is reenergized. In extreme cases, the complete circumpolar propagation is more clear, requiring about 12–16 yr to complete the circuit. This, coupled with the dominant zonal wavenumber 3 pattern of the ACW, results in the local reappearance of energy peaks about every 4–5 yr.

The oceanic component of the mode is forced by the atmosphere via fluxes of heat. The overlying atmosphere establishes patterns of sea level pressure that mainly consist of a standing wave and are associated with the Pacific–South American (PSA) oscillation described in earlier works. The PSA, like its counterpart in the North Pacific, appears to be a natural mode of the high southern latitudes. There is some ENSO-related signal in the ACW forced by anomalous latent heat release associated with precipitation anomalies in the central and western tropical Pacific. However, ENSO-related forcing explains at most 30% of the ACW variance and, generally, much less.

It is hypothesized that the ACW as an entity represents the net result of moving oceanic climate anomalies interacting with a spatially fixed atmospheric forcing pattern. As the SST moves into and out of phase with the resonant background pattern it is selectively amplified or dissipated, an idea supported by several independent analyses. A simplified ocean heat budget model seems to also support this idea.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Michael Christoph, Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Bundesstraße 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.

Email: christoph@dkrz.de

Abstract

A phenomenon called the Antarctic Circumpolar Wave (ACW), suggested earlier from fragmentary observational evidence, has been simulated realistically in an extended integration of a Max Planck Institute coupled general circulation model. The ACW both in the observations and in the model constitutes a mode of the coupled ocean–atmosphere–sea-ice system that inhabits the high latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere. It is characterized by anomalies of such climate variables as sea surface temperature, sea level pressure, meridional wind, and sea ice that exhibit intricate and evolving spatial phase relations to each other.

The simulated ACW signal in the ocean propagates eastward over most of the high-latitude Southern Ocean, mainly advected along in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. On average, it completes a circuit entirely around the Southern Ocean but is strongly dissipated in the South Atlantic and in the southern Indian Ocean, just marginally maintaining statistical significance in these areas until it reaches the South Pacific where it is reenergized. In extreme cases, the complete circumpolar propagation is more clear, requiring about 12–16 yr to complete the circuit. This, coupled with the dominant zonal wavenumber 3 pattern of the ACW, results in the local reappearance of energy peaks about every 4–5 yr.

The oceanic component of the mode is forced by the atmosphere via fluxes of heat. The overlying atmosphere establishes patterns of sea level pressure that mainly consist of a standing wave and are associated with the Pacific–South American (PSA) oscillation described in earlier works. The PSA, like its counterpart in the North Pacific, appears to be a natural mode of the high southern latitudes. There is some ENSO-related signal in the ACW forced by anomalous latent heat release associated with precipitation anomalies in the central and western tropical Pacific. However, ENSO-related forcing explains at most 30% of the ACW variance and, generally, much less.

It is hypothesized that the ACW as an entity represents the net result of moving oceanic climate anomalies interacting with a spatially fixed atmospheric forcing pattern. As the SST moves into and out of phase with the resonant background pattern it is selectively amplified or dissipated, an idea supported by several independent analyses. A simplified ocean heat budget model seems to also support this idea.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Michael Christoph, Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Bundesstraße 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.

Email: christoph@dkrz.de

Save