Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Allan, R., J. Lindesay, and D. Parker, 1996: El Niño Southern Oscillation and Climatic Variability. CSIRO Publishing, 405 pp.

  • Cattell, R. B., 1966: The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar. Behav. Res.,1, 245–276.

  • Fu, C., H. F. Diaz, and J. O. Fletcher, 1986: Characteristics of the response of sea surface temperature in the central Pacific associated with warm episodes of the Southern Oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 1716–1738.

  • Glantz, M. H., R. W. Katz, and N. Nicholls, Eds., 1991: Teleconnections Linking Worldwide Climate Anomalies. Cambridge University Press, 535 pp.

  • Gong, X., and M. B. Richman, 1995: On the application of cluster analysis to growing season precipitation data in North America east of the Rockies. J. Climate,8, 897–931.

  • Gutzler, D. S., 1995: Decadal and interannual variability in the tropical western Pacific. Proc. 20th Annual Climate Diagnostics Workshop, Seattle, WA, Climate Prediction Center/NCEP, 199–202.

  • Hoerling, M. P., A. Kumar, and M. Zhong, 1997: El Niño, La Niña, and the nonlinearity of their teleconnections. J. Climate,10, 1769–1786.

  • Horel, J. D., 1981: A rotated principal component analysis of the interannual variability of the Northern Hemisphere 500 mb height field. Mon. Wea. Rev.,109, 2080–2092.

  • Hsuing, J., and R. E. Newell, 1983: The principal nonseasonal modes of variation of global sea surface temperature. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,13, 1957–1967.

  • Kaiser, H. F., 1958: The Varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika,23, 187–200.

  • Kang, I. N., and N. C. Lau, 1987: Principal modes of atmospheric variability in model atmospheres with and without sea surface temperature forcing in the tropical Pacific. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 2719–2735.

  • Kiladis, G. N., and H. van Loon, 1988: The Southern Oscillation. Part VII: Meteorological anomalies over the Indian and Pacific sectors associated with the extremes of the oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 120–136.

  • ——, and H. F. Diaz, 1989: Global climatic anomalies associated with the Southern Oscillation. J. Climate,2, 1069–1090.

  • Livezey, R. E., and W. Chen, 1983: Statistical field significance and its determination by Monte Carlo techniques. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 46–59.

  • ——, A. Leetmaa, M. Masutani, H. Rui, M. Ji, and A. Kumar, 1997:Teleconnective response of the Pacific–North American region atmosphere to large central equatorial Pacific SST anomalies. J. Climate,10, 1787–1820.

  • Montroy, D. L., 1997: Linear relation of central and eastern North American precipitation to tropical Pacific sea surface temperature anomalies. J. Climate,10, 531–548.

  • North, G. R., T. L. Bell, R. F. Calahan, and F. J. Moeng, 1982: Sampling errors in the estimation of empirical orthogonal functions. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 699–706.

  • Peixoto, J. P., and A. H. Oort, 1992: Physics of Climate. American Institute of Physics, 520 pp.

  • Rasmusson, E. M., and T. H. Carpenter, 1982: Variations in tropical sea surface temperature and surface wind fields associated with the Southern Oscillation/El Niño. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 354–384.

  • Richman, M. B., 1986: Rotation of principal components. J. Climatol.,6, 293–333.

  • ——, 1987: Rotation of principal components: A reply. J. Climatol.,7, 511–520.

  • ——, and P. J. Lamb, 1985: Climatic pattern analysis of three- and seven-day summer rainfall in the central United States: Some methodological considerations and a regionalization. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,24, 1325–1343.

  • ——, and ——, 1987: Pattern analysis of growing season precipitation in southern Canada. Atmos.–Ocean,25, 137–158.

  • ——, ——, A. Zangvil, and J. R. Angel, 1992: Multivariate statistical analysis of precipitation associated with North American storm tracks. Preprints, 12th Conf. on Probability and Statistics in the Atmos. Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 277–283.

  • Ropelewski, C. F., and M. S. Halpert, 1986: North American precipitation and temperature patterns associated with the El Niño–Southern Oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 2352–2362.

  • ——, and ——, 1987: Global and regional scale precipitation patterns associated with the El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 1606–1626.

  • ——, and ——, 1989: Precipitation patterns associated with the high index phase of the Southern Oscillation. J. Climate,2, 268–284.

  • ——, and ——, 1996: Quantifying Southern Oscillation–precipitation relationships. J. Climate,9, 1043–1050.

  • ——, M. Chelliah, T. Smith, and D. Marsico, 1992: What can COADS tell us? Potential and limitations. Proc. Int. COADS Workshop, Boulder, CO, U.S. Department of Commerce, 295–302.

  • Smith, T. M., R. W. Reynolds, R. E. Livezey, and D. C. Stokes, 1996:Reconstruction of historical sea surface temperatures using empirical orthogonal functions. J. Climate,9, 1403–1420.

  • Weare, B. C., A. R. Navato, and R. E. Newell, 1976: Empirical orthogonal analysis of Pacific sea surface temperatures. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,6, 671–678.

  • Whitaker, L. M., and L. H. Horn, 1984: Northern Hemisphere extratropical cyclone activity for four mid-season months. J. Climatol.,4, 297–310.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 210 39 3
PDF Downloads 50 21 3
Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Observed Nonlinearities of Monthly Teleconnections between Tropical Pacific Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies and Central and Eastern North American Precipitation

David L. Montroy1, Michael B. Richman1, and Peter J. Lamb1
View More View Less
  • 1 School of Meteorology and Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
Print Publication:
01 Jul 1998
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<1812:ONOMTB>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1812–1835
Restricted access

Abstract

Most investigations of relationships between tropical Pacific sea surface temperature anomaly (SSTA) events and regional climate patterns have assumed the teleconnections to be linear, whereby the climate patterns associated with cold SSTA events are considered to be similar in structure and morphology but opposite in sign to those linked to warm SSTA events. In contrast, and motivated by early evidence of nonlinearity in the above regard, this study identifies characteristic (i.e., composite) calendar monthly central and eastern North American precipitation patterns separately for warm and cold SSTA events in different regions of the tropical Pacific (central, eastern, west-central“horseshoe,” far western) identified through principal component analysis. The precipitation anomaly patterns are computed from an approximately 1° lat–long set of monthly station data for 1950–92. Their robustness and nonlinearity are established using local, regional, and field statistical significance tests and a variance analysis.

This combination of unique SSTA analyses, resulting composite selection, and characteristic precipitation anomaly determination from a fine-resolution dataset increases our understanding of tropical Pacific–North American precipitation teleconnections in several respects. First, significant linkages to the two SSTA modes related to traditional warm and cold events (central and eastern tropical Pacific) are identified for all months except September and October, with all exhibiting some nonlinear characteristics. The most important of those nonlinearities involve associations with eastern tropical Pacific SSTAs, which affect precipitation near the southern Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts (dry for cold Novembers), around the Great Lakes and in the Ohio River valley (dry, warm, January–February), in the southeastern United States (dry, warm, July–August), and across the northern Great Plains (dry, warm, November–January). Conversely, the regions confirmed to have essentially linear associations with traditional warm and cold events include the Gulf of Mexico coast (positive relation with eastern tropical Pacific, January–March), Ohio River valley (negative, central tropical Pacific, February), and mid-Atlantic coast (negative, eastern tropical Pacific, July–August). However, only nonlinear precipitation teleconnections are associated with SSTAs in tropical Pacific regions largely unrelated to ENSO. These principally involve anomalously dry conditions in much of the eastern half of the United States during January–March and in the central United States in July–October (warm SSTAs in west-central tropical Pacific horseshoe), and in a strip from Texas to New England in January and along the central gulf coast and lower Mississippi valley in April (warm SSTAs in far western tropical Pacific). The results thus demonstrate the sensitivity of central and eastern North American precipitation teleconnections to the location and extent of tropical Pacific SSTAs. In the appendix, the present results are also compared to the observed climate anomalies during the 1997–98 El Niño event.

Corresponding author address: David L. Montroy, CIMMS, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 100 E. Boyd, Room 1110, Norman, OK 73019-0628.

Email: dmontroy@ou.edu

Abstract

Most investigations of relationships between tropical Pacific sea surface temperature anomaly (SSTA) events and regional climate patterns have assumed the teleconnections to be linear, whereby the climate patterns associated with cold SSTA events are considered to be similar in structure and morphology but opposite in sign to those linked to warm SSTA events. In contrast, and motivated by early evidence of nonlinearity in the above regard, this study identifies characteristic (i.e., composite) calendar monthly central and eastern North American precipitation patterns separately for warm and cold SSTA events in different regions of the tropical Pacific (central, eastern, west-central“horseshoe,” far western) identified through principal component analysis. The precipitation anomaly patterns are computed from an approximately 1° lat–long set of monthly station data for 1950–92. Their robustness and nonlinearity are established using local, regional, and field statistical significance tests and a variance analysis.

This combination of unique SSTA analyses, resulting composite selection, and characteristic precipitation anomaly determination from a fine-resolution dataset increases our understanding of tropical Pacific–North American precipitation teleconnections in several respects. First, significant linkages to the two SSTA modes related to traditional warm and cold events (central and eastern tropical Pacific) are identified for all months except September and October, with all exhibiting some nonlinear characteristics. The most important of those nonlinearities involve associations with eastern tropical Pacific SSTAs, which affect precipitation near the southern Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts (dry for cold Novembers), around the Great Lakes and in the Ohio River valley (dry, warm, January–February), in the southeastern United States (dry, warm, July–August), and across the northern Great Plains (dry, warm, November–January). Conversely, the regions confirmed to have essentially linear associations with traditional warm and cold events include the Gulf of Mexico coast (positive relation with eastern tropical Pacific, January–March), Ohio River valley (negative, central tropical Pacific, February), and mid-Atlantic coast (negative, eastern tropical Pacific, July–August). However, only nonlinear precipitation teleconnections are associated with SSTAs in tropical Pacific regions largely unrelated to ENSO. These principally involve anomalously dry conditions in much of the eastern half of the United States during January–March and in the central United States in July–October (warm SSTAs in west-central tropical Pacific horseshoe), and in a strip from Texas to New England in January and along the central gulf coast and lower Mississippi valley in April (warm SSTAs in far western tropical Pacific). The results thus demonstrate the sensitivity of central and eastern North American precipitation teleconnections to the location and extent of tropical Pacific SSTAs. In the appendix, the present results are also compared to the observed climate anomalies during the 1997–98 El Niño event.

Corresponding author address: David L. Montroy, CIMMS, School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma, 100 E. Boyd, Room 1110, Norman, OK 73019-0628.

Email: dmontroy@ou.edu

Save