Variability of the Indian Monsoon in the ECHAM3 Model: Sensitivity to Sea Surface Temperature, Soil Moisture, and the Stratospheric Quasi-Biennial Oscillation

K. Arpe Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany

Search for other papers by K. Arpe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
L. Dümenil Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany

Search for other papers by L. Dümenil in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
M. A. Giorgetta Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany

Search for other papers by M. A. Giorgetta in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The variability of the monsoon is investigated using a set of 90-day forecasts [MONEG (Tropical Ocean Global Atmosphere Monsoon Numerical Experimentation Group) experiments] and a set of AMIP-type (Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project) long-term simulations of the atmospheric circulation with the ECHAM3 model. The large-scale aspects of the summer monsoon circulation as represented by differences of dynamical quantities between the two extreme years 1987 and 1988 were reproduced well by the model in both kinds of experiments forced with observed sea surface temperature (SST). At the regional scale the difference of precipitation over India during summer 1987 and 1988 was well reproduced by the model in the 90-day forecasts using interannually varying SSTs; however, similarly good results were achieved in forecasts using climatological SSTs.

The long-term simulations forced with interannually varying SST at the lower boundary of the atmosphere over a period of 14 years, on the other hand, only partly reproduce the observed differences of precipitation over India between 1987 and 1988. For the ensemble mean of five simulations averaged from June to September and for the whole of India an increase from 1987 to 1988 is simulated by the model as observed but with smaller values. The difference in observed precipitation between 1987 and 1988 is of opposite sign for May to that for September. The simulations and observations agree in the manifestation of this sense of opposing variability within a monsoon season for these two years and also for other years. The simulations and observations differ most during July.

The paper concentrates on the question why the interannual variability in the long-term simulations on one hand and the 90-day forecasts and in the observations of precipitation on the other hand differ so strongly during the peak of the monsoon in July. Large-scale dynamics over India are mainly forced by the anomalies of Pacific SST. For the variability of precipitation over India other forcings than the Pacific SST are important as well. Due to enhanced evaporation, warmer SSTs over the northern Indian Ocean lead to increased precipitation over India. Changes in the SST there within the range of uncertainty (0.5 K) can lead to clear impacts.

As a further boundary forcing, the impact of soil moisture is investigated. The use of realistic soil moisture differences between 1987 and 1988 in the MONEG forecasts resulted in improved skill of precipitation forecasts over India. Also the two individual AMIP simulations with realistic precipitation differences over India had more realistic soil moisture differences over east Asia in the beginning of the monsoon season between the two years than those experiments that failed to produce the correct precipitation differences.

The years 1987 and 1988 were quite different with respect to the phase of the stratospheric quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO). As atmospheric circulation models cannot yet reproduce stratospheric QBOs realistically, their impact was tested by nudging observed QBOs into AMIP simulations for July 1987 and 1988. Seven out of eight experiments showed an impact toward a more realistic simulation of precipitation over India; however, during the west phase of the QBO (1987) impacts are very small.

None of these forcings gave a dominant effect. If this finding is confirmed by further experimentation, improvements of practical long-range forecasts may be very difficult as two of these quantities are hardly known with the required accuracy (northern Indian Ocean SSTs and the Eurasian soil moisture) and because models are not yet able to simulate the stratospheric QBO realistically.

This study confirms that El Niño has two direct effects: it reduces the precipitation over India and reduces the surface winds over the Arabian Sea. Due to the latter, the SST of the Arabian Sea can increase as there is less mixing and upwelling in the ocean. Here it is suggested that because of this increased SST there would be more precipitation over India, thus counteracting the expected decrease from the direct El Niño effect.

Sensitivity experiments were carried out with the ECHAM3 model to substantiate this hypothesis. The results may be model-dependent and model deficiencies might influence sensitivities from boundary forcings adversely. Therefore observational data have been investigated as far as possible to seek independent confirmation of the findings obtained through the model simulations.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Klaus Arpe, Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Bundesstr. 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.

Abstract

The variability of the monsoon is investigated using a set of 90-day forecasts [MONEG (Tropical Ocean Global Atmosphere Monsoon Numerical Experimentation Group) experiments] and a set of AMIP-type (Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project) long-term simulations of the atmospheric circulation with the ECHAM3 model. The large-scale aspects of the summer monsoon circulation as represented by differences of dynamical quantities between the two extreme years 1987 and 1988 were reproduced well by the model in both kinds of experiments forced with observed sea surface temperature (SST). At the regional scale the difference of precipitation over India during summer 1987 and 1988 was well reproduced by the model in the 90-day forecasts using interannually varying SSTs; however, similarly good results were achieved in forecasts using climatological SSTs.

The long-term simulations forced with interannually varying SST at the lower boundary of the atmosphere over a period of 14 years, on the other hand, only partly reproduce the observed differences of precipitation over India between 1987 and 1988. For the ensemble mean of five simulations averaged from June to September and for the whole of India an increase from 1987 to 1988 is simulated by the model as observed but with smaller values. The difference in observed precipitation between 1987 and 1988 is of opposite sign for May to that for September. The simulations and observations agree in the manifestation of this sense of opposing variability within a monsoon season for these two years and also for other years. The simulations and observations differ most during July.

The paper concentrates on the question why the interannual variability in the long-term simulations on one hand and the 90-day forecasts and in the observations of precipitation on the other hand differ so strongly during the peak of the monsoon in July. Large-scale dynamics over India are mainly forced by the anomalies of Pacific SST. For the variability of precipitation over India other forcings than the Pacific SST are important as well. Due to enhanced evaporation, warmer SSTs over the northern Indian Ocean lead to increased precipitation over India. Changes in the SST there within the range of uncertainty (0.5 K) can lead to clear impacts.

As a further boundary forcing, the impact of soil moisture is investigated. The use of realistic soil moisture differences between 1987 and 1988 in the MONEG forecasts resulted in improved skill of precipitation forecasts over India. Also the two individual AMIP simulations with realistic precipitation differences over India had more realistic soil moisture differences over east Asia in the beginning of the monsoon season between the two years than those experiments that failed to produce the correct precipitation differences.

The years 1987 and 1988 were quite different with respect to the phase of the stratospheric quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO). As atmospheric circulation models cannot yet reproduce stratospheric QBOs realistically, their impact was tested by nudging observed QBOs into AMIP simulations for July 1987 and 1988. Seven out of eight experiments showed an impact toward a more realistic simulation of precipitation over India; however, during the west phase of the QBO (1987) impacts are very small.

None of these forcings gave a dominant effect. If this finding is confirmed by further experimentation, improvements of practical long-range forecasts may be very difficult as two of these quantities are hardly known with the required accuracy (northern Indian Ocean SSTs and the Eurasian soil moisture) and because models are not yet able to simulate the stratospheric QBO realistically.

This study confirms that El Niño has two direct effects: it reduces the precipitation over India and reduces the surface winds over the Arabian Sea. Due to the latter, the SST of the Arabian Sea can increase as there is less mixing and upwelling in the ocean. Here it is suggested that because of this increased SST there would be more precipitation over India, thus counteracting the expected decrease from the direct El Niño effect.

Sensitivity experiments were carried out with the ECHAM3 model to substantiate this hypothesis. The results may be model-dependent and model deficiencies might influence sensitivities from boundary forcings adversely. Therefore observational data have been investigated as far as possible to seek independent confirmation of the findings obtained through the model simulations.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Klaus Arpe, Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Bundesstr. 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.

Save
  • Arpe, K., L. Bengtsson, L. Dümenil, and E. Roeckner, 1994: The hydrological cycle in the ECHAM3 simulations of the atmospheric circulation. Global Precipitations and Climate Change, M. Desbois and F. Desalmand, Eds., NATO ASI Series, Vol. 1, NATO, 361–377.

  • Barnett, T. P., L. Dümenil, U. Schlese, E. Roeckner, and M. Latif, 1989: The effect of Eurasian snow cover on regional and global climate variations. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 661–685.

  • Bengtsson, L., K. Arpe, E. Roeckner, and U. Schulzweida, 1996:Climate predictability experiments with a general circulation model. Climate Dyn., 12, 261–275.

  • Fennessy, M. J., and J. Shukla, 1992: Influence of global SST on GCM simulations of the Northern Hemisphere monsoon circulation of 1987 and 1988, simulation of intra-seasonal monsoon variability. WMO Tech. Document WMO/TD 470, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2.37–2.45.

  • Gates, W. L., 1992: AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,73, 1962–1970.

  • Giorgetta, M. A., 1996: Der Einfluss der quasi-zweijährigen Oszillation auf die allgemeine Zirkulation: Modellsimultionen mit ECHAM4. Examensarbeit Nr. 40, 146 pp. [Available from Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Bundesstr. 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.].

  • Gray, W. M., J. D. Sheaffer, and J. A. Knaff, 1992: Influence of the stratospheric QBO on ENSO variability. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,70, 975–995.

  • Heckley, W. A., and A. E. Gill, 1984: Some simple analytical solutions to the problem of forced equatorial long waves. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,110, 203–217.

  • Hulme, M., 1994: Validation of large-scale precipitation fields in General Circulation Models. Global Precipitations and Climate Change, M. Desbois and F. Desalmand, Eds., NATO ASI Series, Vol. 1, NATO, 387–406.

  • Janowiak, J. E., and P. A. Arkin, 1991: Rainfall variations in the Tropics during 1986–1989, as estimated from observations of cloud-top temperature. J. Geophys. Res.,96, 3359–3373.

  • Ju, J., and J. Slingo, 1995: The Asian summer monsoon and ENSO. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,121, 1133–1168.

  • Kane, R. P., 1997: Relationship of El Niño–Southern Oscillation and Pacific sea surface temperature with rainfall in various regions of the globe. Mon. Wea. Rev.,125, 1792–1800.

  • Krishnamurti, T. N., H. S. Bedi, and M. Subramaniam, 1990: The summer monsoon of 1988. Meteor. Atmos. Phys.,42, 19–37.

  • Meehl, G. A., 1994: Coupled land-ocean-atmosphere processes and South Asian monsoon variability. Science,266, 263–267.

  • Mintz, Y., and Y. V. Serafini, 1992: A global monthly climatology of soil moisture and water balance. Climate Dyn.,8, 13–27.

  • Mukherjee, B. K., K. Indira, R. S. Reddy, and Bh. V. Ramana Murty, 1985: Quasi-biennial oscillation in stratospheric zonal wind and Indian summer monsoon. Mon. Wea. Rev.,113, 1421–1424.

  • Naujokat, B., 1986: An update of the observed quasi-biennial oscillation of the stratospheric winds over the Tropics. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 1873–1877.

  • Palmer, T. N., and D. L. T. Anderson, 1994: The prospects for seasonal forecasting—A review paper. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,120, 755–793.

  • ——, C. Brankovic, P. Viterbo, and M. J. Miller, 1992: Modelling interannual variations of summer monsoons. J. Climate,5, 399–417.

  • Parthasarathy, B., A. A. Munot, and D. R. Kothawale, 1994: All-India monthly and seasonal rainfall series: 1871–1993. Theor. Appl. Climatol.,49, 217–224.

  • Rayner, N. A., E. B. Horton, D. E. Parker, C. K. Folland, and R. B. Hackett, 1996: Version 2.2 of the global sea-ice and sea surface temperature data set, 1903–1994. Climate Research Tech. Note CRTN74, 35 pp.

  • Reed, R. J., 1965: The present status of the 26-month oscillation. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,46, 374–387.

  • Reynolds, R. W., 1988: A real-time global sea surface temperature analysis. J. Climate,1, 75–86.

  • Roeckner, E., and Coauthors, 1992: Simulation of the present-day climate with the ECHAM model: Impact of model physics and resolution. MPI Rep. 93, 171 pp. [Available from Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Bundesstr. 55, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany.].

  • Ropelewski, C. E., and M. S. Halpert, 1987: Global and regional scale precipitation and temperature patterns associated with the El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 1606–1626.

  • Rudolf, B., H. Hauschild, M. Reiß, and U. Schneider, 1992: The calculation of areal mean precipitation totals on a 2.5 grid by an objective analyses method. Meteor. Z.,1, 32–50.

  • Schemm, J., S. Schubert, J. Terry, and S. Bloom, 1992: Estimates of monthly mean soil moisture for 1979–1989. NASA Tech. Memo. 104571, 262 pp.

  • Shukla, J., 1975: Effect of Arabian sea-surface temperature anomaly on the Indian summer monsoon: A numerical experiment with the GFDL model. J. Atmos. Sci.,32, 503–511.

  • ——, and B. M. Misra, 1977: Relationships between sea surface temperature and wind speed over the central Arabian Sea, and monsoon rainfall over India. Mon. Wea. Rev.,105, 998–1002.

  • Singh, S. V., R. H. Kripalani, and D. R. Sikka, 1992: Interannual variability of the Madden–Julian oscillations in the Indian summer monsoon rainfall. J. Climate,5, 973–978.

  • Spencer, R. W., 1993: Global oceanic precipitation from the MSU during 1979–1991 and comparisons to other climatologies. J. Climate,6, 1301–1326.

  • Sperber, K. R., and T. N. Palmer, 1996: Interannual tropical rainfall variability in general circulation model simulations associated with the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. J. Climate, 9, 2727–2750.

  • Weare, B. C., 1979: A statistical study of the relationships between ocean surface temperatures and the Indian monsoon. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 2279–2291.

  • Webster, P., and S. Yang, 1992: Monsoon and ENSO: Selectively interactive systems. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 118, 877–926.

  • WMO, 1992: Simulation of interannual and intra-seasonal monsoon variability. WRCP 68, WMO/TD No. 470, 208 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 672 279 11
PDF Downloads 141 21 1