Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

CAPE Variations in the Current Climate and in a Climate Change

Bing Ye Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Bing Ye in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Anthony D. Del Genio NASA/Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, New York

Search for other papers by Anthony D. Del Genio in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Kenneth K-W. Lo Science Systems and Applications, Inc., New York, New York

Search for other papers by Kenneth K-W. Lo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Aug 1998
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<1997:CVITHCC>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1997–2015
Restricted access

Abstract

Observed variations of convective available potential energy (CAPE) in the current climate provide one useful test of the performance of cumulus parameterizations used in general circulation models (GCMs). It is found that frequency distributions of tropical Pacific CAPE, as well as the dependence of CAPE on surface wet-bulb potential temperature (Θw) simulated by the Goddard Institute for Space Studies’s GCM, agree well with that observed during the Australian Monsoon Experiment period. CAPE variability in the current climate greatly overestimates climatic changes in basinwide CAPE in the tropical Pacific in response to a 2°C increase in sea surface temperature (SST) in the GCM because of the different physics involved. In the current climate, CAPE variations in space and time are dominated by regional changes in boundary layer temperature and moisture, which in turn are controlled by SST patterns and large-scale motions. Geographical thermodynamic structure variations in the middle and upper troposphere are smaller because of the canceling effects of adiabatic cooling and subsidence warming in the rising and sinking branches of the Walker and Hadley circulations. In a forced equilibrium global climate change, temperature change is fairly well constrained by the change in the moist adiabatic lapse rate and thus the upper troposphere warms to a greater extent than the surface. For this reason, climate change in CAPE is better predicted by assuming that relative humidity remains constant and that the temperature changes according to the moist adiabatic lapse rate change of a parcel with 80% relative humidity lifted from the surface. The moist adiabatic assumption is not symmetrically applicable to a warmer and colder climate: In a warmer regime moist convection determines the tropical temperature structure, but when the climate becomes colder the effect of moist convection diminishes and the large-scale dynamics and radiative processes become relatively important. Although a prediction based on the change in moist adiabat matches the GCM simulation of climate change averaged over the tropical Pacific basin, it does not match the simulation regionally because small changes in the general circulation change the local boundary layer relative humidity by 1%–2%. Thus, the prediction of regional climate change in CAPE is also dependent on subtle changes in the dynamics.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Bing Ye, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, 2880 Broadway, New York, NY 10025.

Abstract

Observed variations of convective available potential energy (CAPE) in the current climate provide one useful test of the performance of cumulus parameterizations used in general circulation models (GCMs). It is found that frequency distributions of tropical Pacific CAPE, as well as the dependence of CAPE on surface wet-bulb potential temperature (Θw) simulated by the Goddard Institute for Space Studies’s GCM, agree well with that observed during the Australian Monsoon Experiment period. CAPE variability in the current climate greatly overestimates climatic changes in basinwide CAPE in the tropical Pacific in response to a 2°C increase in sea surface temperature (SST) in the GCM because of the different physics involved. In the current climate, CAPE variations in space and time are dominated by regional changes in boundary layer temperature and moisture, which in turn are controlled by SST patterns and large-scale motions. Geographical thermodynamic structure variations in the middle and upper troposphere are smaller because of the canceling effects of adiabatic cooling and subsidence warming in the rising and sinking branches of the Walker and Hadley circulations. In a forced equilibrium global climate change, temperature change is fairly well constrained by the change in the moist adiabatic lapse rate and thus the upper troposphere warms to a greater extent than the surface. For this reason, climate change in CAPE is better predicted by assuming that relative humidity remains constant and that the temperature changes according to the moist adiabatic lapse rate change of a parcel with 80% relative humidity lifted from the surface. The moist adiabatic assumption is not symmetrically applicable to a warmer and colder climate: In a warmer regime moist convection determines the tropical temperature structure, but when the climate becomes colder the effect of moist convection diminishes and the large-scale dynamics and radiative processes become relatively important. Although a prediction based on the change in moist adiabat matches the GCM simulation of climate change averaged over the tropical Pacific basin, it does not match the simulation regionally because small changes in the general circulation change the local boundary layer relative humidity by 1%–2%. Thus, the prediction of regional climate change in CAPE is also dependent on subtle changes in the dynamics.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Bing Ye, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, 2880 Broadway, New York, NY 10025.

Save
Cover Journal of Climate
Journal of Climate

  • Arakawa, A., and W. H. Schubert, 1974: Interaction of a cumulus cloud ensemble with the large-scale environment. Part I. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 674–701.

  • Betts, A. K., 1982: Saturation point analysis of moist convective overturning. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 1484–1505.

  • ——, and W. Ridgway, 1989: Climatic equilibrium of the atmospheric convective boundary layer over a tropical ocean. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 2621–2641.

  • Brown, R. G., and C. S. Bretherton, 1997: A test of the strict quasi-equilibrium theory on long time and space scales. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 624–638.

  • Clement, A. C., R. Seager, M. A. Cane, and S. E. Zebiak, 1996: An ocean dynamical thermostat. J. Climate,9, 2190–2196.

  • Del Genio, A. D., 1993: Convective and large-scale cloud processes in GCMs. Energy and Water Cycles in the Climate System, E. Raschke and D. Jacob, Eds., NATO ASI Series, Vol. 15, Springer-Verlag, 95–121.

  • ——, and M.-S. Yao, 1988: Sensitivity of a global climate model to the specification of convective updraft and downdraft mass fluxes. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 2641–2668.

  • ——, and ——, 1993: Efficient cumulus parameterization for long-term climate studies: The GISS scheme. The Representation of Cumulus Convection in Numerical Models, Meteor. Monogr., No. 46, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 181–184.

  • ——, A. A. Lacis, and R. A. Ruedy, 1991: Simulations of the effect of a warmer climate on atmospheric humidity. Nature,351, 382–385.

  • ——, M.-S. Yao, W. Kovari, and Kenneth K.-W. Lo, 1996: A prognostic cloud water parameterization for global climate models. J. Climate,9, 270–304.

  • Fitzjarrald, D. R., and M. Garstang, 1981: Boundary-layer growth over the tropical ocean. Mon. Wea. Rev.,109, 1762–1772.

  • Fu, R., 1991: Deep convection and its relation to the large-scale circulation in the tropical Pacific. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, 166 pp.

  • ——, A. D. Del Genio, and W. B. Rossow, 1994: Influence of ocean surface conditions on atmospheric vertical thermodynamic structure and deep convection. J. Climate,7, 1092–1108.

  • ——, W. T. Liu, and R. E. Dickinson, 1996: Response of tropical clouds to the interannual variation of sea surface temperature. J. Climate,9, 616–634.

  • Garcia, O., S. J. S. Khalsa, and E. J. Steiner, 1986: Atmospheric characteristics of the equatorial Pacific during the 1982–1983 El Niño, deduced from satellite and aircraft observations. J. Geophys. Res.,91, 13 217–13 231.

  • Gill, A. E., 1980: Some simple solutions for heat-induced tropical circulation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,106, 447–462.

  • Hansen, J., and L. Travis, 1974: Light scattering in planetary atmospheres. Space Sci. Rev.,16, 527–610.

  • ——, G. Russell, D. Rind, P. Stone, A. Lacis, S. Lebedeff, R. Ruedy, and L. Travis, 1983: Efficient three-dimensional global models for climate studies: Models I and II. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 609–662.

  • Knutson, T. R., and S. Manabe, 1995: Time-mean response over the tropical Pacific to increased CO2 in a coupled ocean–atmosphere model. J. Climate,8, 2181–2199.

  • Lindzen, R. S., and S. Nigam, 1987: On the role of sea surface temperature gradients on forcing low level winds and convergence in the Tropics. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 2440–2448.

  • Lucas, C., E. J. Zipser, and M. A. LeMone, 1994a: Vertical velocity in oceanic convection off tropical Australia. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 3183–3193.

  • ——, ——, and ——, 1994b: Convective available potential energy in the environment of oceanic and continental clouds: Correction and comments. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 3829–3830.

  • Manabe, S., J. Smagorinsky, and R. F. Strickler, 1965: Simulated climatology of a general circulation model with a hydrologic cycle. Mon. Wea. Rev.,93, 769–798.

  • Oort, A. H., 1983: Global atmospheric circulation statistics, 1958–1973. NOAA Professional Paper 14, 180 pp.

  • Ramanathan, V., and W. Collins, 1991: Thermodynamic regulation of ocean warming by cirrus clouds deduced from observations of the 1987 El Niño. Nature,351, 27–32.

  • Rind, D., E. W. Chiou, W. Chu, J. Larsen, S. Oltmans, J. Lerner, M. P. McCormick, and L. McMaster, 1991: Positive water vapor feedback in climate models confirmed by satellite data. Nature,349, 500–503.

  • Rossow, W. B., and B. Cairns, 1995: Monitoring changes of clouds. Climate Change,31, 175–217.

  • Solomon, R., and M. Baker, 1994: Electrification of New Mexico thunderstorms. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 1878–1886.

  • Thompson, R. M., Jr., S. W. Payne, E. E. Recker, and R. J. Reed, 1979: Structure and properties of synoptic-scale wave disturbances in the intertropical convergence zone of the eastern Atlantic. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 53–72.

  • Williams, E., 1992: The Schumann resonance: A global tropical thermometer. Science,256, 1184–1187.

  • ——, 1994: Global circuit response to seasonal variations in global surface air temperature. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 1917–1929.

  • ——, and N. Renno, 1993: An analysis of the conditional instability of the tropical atmosphere. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 21–36.

  • Xu, K. M., and K. A. Emanuel, 1989: Is the tropical atmosphere conditionally unstable? Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 1471–1479.

  • Yanai, M., S. Esbensen, and J. Chu, 1973: Determination of bulk properties of tropical cloud clusters from large-scale heat and moisture budget. J. Atmos. Sci.,30, 611–627.

  • Yao, M.-S., and A. D. Del Genio, 1989: Effects of cumulus entrainment and multiple cloud types on a January global climate model simulation. J. Climate,2, 850–863.

  • Zhang, Y.-C., W. B. Rossow, and A. A. Lacis, 1995: Calculation of surface and top-of-atmosphere radiative fluxes from physical quantities based on ISCCP datasets. Part 1: Method and sensitivity to input data uncertainties. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 1149–1165.

  • Zipser, E. J., and K. R. Lutz, 1994: The vertical profile of radar reflectivity of convective cells: A strong indicator of storm intensity and lightning probability? Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 1751–1759.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1518 732 77
PDF Downloads 709 148 37